Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > UFOs / ETs / Anunnaki / Orbs / Crop Circles / Solar System / Space
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Do you believe that men walked on the Moon in 1969
Yes i believe NASA has told us the truth 78 30.12%
No i dont believe men walked on the Moon in 1969 181 69.88%
Voters: 259. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 26-04-2012, 10:27 AM   #2801
truegroup
Temporarily suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Best not light this one when it escapes.....
Posts: 8,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude111 View Post
Yes the first one in 1969 I am questioning wheather that really happend.... (The pics from that supposed mission DO NOT SHOW what they would (in my opinion) had they really been there!)
Luckily we have verified lunar samples, laser reflectors, matching weather patterns with video and photography, tracked craft by the Soviets and Jodrell Bank, independent radio ham reception, terrain exactly matching as it should be, LROC pictures etc. Anybody is entitled to an opinion, even when it is 100% wrong.

As for the pictures, here is just one of them showing astonishing accuracy to where celestial bodies should be...

truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 10:33 AM   #2802
oooooooooo
Senior Member
 
oooooooooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: in the cover of a smoke grenade.
Posts: 835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
That wasn't the point, they were privvy to all the interactions which also included numerous instances where they spoke about current daily events with the astronauts(seemlessly) within hours long transmissions and received responses. Makes the pre-recorded contention a pile of shite.

Go back to sleep man.
the "news" station was "privvy to all the interactions which also included numerous instances where they spoke about current daily events with the astronauts(seemlessly) within hours long transmissions and received responses".

so a trusted news anchor spoke to someone numerous times.

"Go back to sleep man"

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
__________________
“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it” - A.Huxley
oooooooooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 10:56 AM   #2803
bertl
Senior Member
 
bertl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,263
Default

What a non-response to truegroup's point.
bertl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 01:12 PM   #2804
oooooooooo
Senior Member
 
oooooooooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: in the cover of a smoke grenade.
Posts: 835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bertl View Post
What a non-response to truegroup's point.
i had already responded to TGs response.
maybe you missed it.
let me remind you-
"if it was on telly it must be true"

The news anchor "spoke" directly to an astronaut ?
directly ?
or relayed ?

But hey, it was on the telly.

TG will be telling us that daleks are real next.
__________________
“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it” - A.Huxley
oooooooooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 01:14 PM   #2805
jamesc
Senior Member
 
jamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,361
Default

While by now everyone will have percived my belief that the Apollo moon landings happened and man did indeed set foot on the moon i have just came across this image from the LROC lunar space craft.Now it shows a shiny object on the surface of the moon , possibly in some lunar crator,is it a "PROCESSING ERROR" or some kind of "light reflection" of some rock/rocks,strange indeed.

This was taken by Lunar orbiter 5;


Source for above LCRO 5 image, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lu...nt/5151_h1.jpg

Bright object is in the bottom right quarter of the picture.
__________________
"What if the alien encounter phenomenon were subtle in the sense that it may manifest in the physical world but derives from a source which by its very nature could not provide the kind of hard evidence that would satisfy skeptics for whom reality is limited to the material? What if we were to acknowledge that the phenomenon is beyond our present framework of knowledge?"- Dr John Mack.

Last edited by jamesc; 26-04-2012 at 01:15 PM.
jamesc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 03:12 PM   #2806
truegroup
Temporarily suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Best not light this one when it escapes.....
Posts: 8,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oooooooooo View Post
The news anchor "spoke" directly to an astronaut ?
directly ?
or relayed ?
WTF? Who said anything about the news anchor talking to astronauts? Houston's interaction with the astronauts on the Moon included numerous daily references to World events, sports stuff, random stuff. The ABC team were on site and were privy to this all the time.

The point, whoosh straight over your head, this occurred during hours long EVAs with dialog relevant to what was happening. One hell of an edit job to put that in live! Every single thing you people come up with to make this massive series of events hoaxed is just pure unadulterated crap.

The hoops needed to believe this don't add up, frequently contradict each other and sometimes there are no hoops that could ever work, such as the rocks, gravity, matching weather etc.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 03:18 PM   #2807
truegroup
Temporarily suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Best not light this one when it escapes.....
Posts: 8,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesc View Post
This was taken by Lunar orbiter 5;


Source for above LCRO 5 image, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lu...nt/5151_h1.jpg

Bright object is in the bottom right quarter of the picture.
James, I just cropped that object about 2cm either side and kept zooming in, there is a definitive square that pixelates more than the surrounding area. Now I'm not a photogrammetry experet, but that does look like a processing anomaly.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 04:03 PM   #2808
jamesc
Senior Member
 
jamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
James, I just cropped that object about 2cm either side and kept zooming in, there is a definitive square that pixelates more than the surrounding area. Now I'm not a photogrammetry experet, but that does look like a processing anomaly.
Cheers TG , thought as much it would be a processing anomaly, cheers for your time and input appreciated.
__________________
"What if the alien encounter phenomenon were subtle in the sense that it may manifest in the physical world but derives from a source which by its very nature could not provide the kind of hard evidence that would satisfy skeptics for whom reality is limited to the material? What if we were to acknowledge that the phenomenon is beyond our present framework of knowledge?"- Dr John Mack.
jamesc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 06:52 PM   #2809
moving finger
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Down in the basement, working for the government
Posts: 3,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesc View Post
While by now everyone will have percived my belief that the Apollo moon landings happened and man did indeed set foot on the moon i have just came across this image from the LROC lunar space craft.Now it shows a shiny object on the surface of the moon , possibly in some lunar crator,is it a "PROCESSING ERROR" or some kind of "light reflection" of some rock/rocks,strange indeed.

This was taken by Lunar orbiter 5;


Source for above LCRO 5 image, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lu...nt/5151_h1.jpg

Bright object is in the bottom right quarter of the picture.
Lunar orbiter 5 was launched in 1967, and looking at the big image there are all kinds of issues with it that seem much more like problems caused by scanning an original print out with blemishes on it. I don;t think it's so much a processing error as a 'printer paper got damaged' error!

Do you know where the image is from?

You might also like this:

http://pub.lmmp.nasa.gov/LMMPUI/LMMP_CLIENT/LMMP.html

It takes a while to load, but once it has click 'browse' to see the surface. I can recommend connecting a laptop via HDMI to a good quality big TV to really enjoy the images!
moving finger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 08:17 PM   #2810
jamesc
Senior Member
 
jamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moving finger View Post
Lunar orbiter 5 was launched in 1967, and looking at the big image there are all kinds of issues with it that seem much more like problems caused by scanning an original print out with blemishes on it. I don;t think it's so much a processing error as a 'printer paper got damaged' error!

Do you know where the image is from?

You might also like this:

http://pub.lmmp.nasa.gov/LMMPUI/LMMP_CLIENT/LMMP.html

It takes a while to load, but once it has click 'browse' to see the surface. I can recommend connecting a laptop via HDMI to a good quality big TV to really enjoy the images!




Hi MF, cheers for the link, will give this a view, yes it is an old image below are some coordinates ect from this image below.


Mission: Lunar Orbiter 5
Spacecraft Position:
Altitude: 103.15 km
Latitude: 9.52°
Longitude: -20.70°
Principal Point:
Latitude: 9.49°
Longitude: -20.39°
Illumination:
Sun Azimuth: 91.58°
Incident Angle: 72.06°
Emission Angle: 5.49°
Phase Angle: 77.53°
Alpha: -5.47°


Here is the source of this image; Source = www.lpi.usra.edu...

link for image; http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lu...nt/5155_h1.jpg


Here is the a rendered down version of the location of this bright object from the original lager image taken by Lunar Orbiter 5.





here is a zoomed in image of bright something that apears on the LO 5 image.




But then we have this information below that indicates some sort of processing error or imperfections traceable to methods of film development.



link for info below;
www.lpi.usra.edu... http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lu...oduction.shtml

"Upon completion of a photographic sequence, a processor dryer, on command, processed the film from the storage looper at a rate of 6.09 cm (2.4 in.) per minute. ... "

"Certain imperfections may be observed in some of the photographs. These imperfections are directly traceable to the method of film development, the readout system, the video data, or the GRE system."


Seems its better to dig deeper than shout ET space ship ect prematurely.lol.
__________________
"What if the alien encounter phenomenon were subtle in the sense that it may manifest in the physical world but derives from a source which by its very nature could not provide the kind of hard evidence that would satisfy skeptics for whom reality is limited to the material? What if we were to acknowledge that the phenomenon is beyond our present framework of knowledge?"- Dr John Mack.

Last edited by jamesc; 26-04-2012 at 08:19 PM.
jamesc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2012, 04:07 PM   #2811
phrased eyebrow
Senior Member
 
phrased eyebrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paul was replaced, more than once. Look into it and see for yourself.
Posts: 1,269
Default buried in bullshit

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesc View Post
"Upon completion of a photographic sequence, a processor dryer, on command, processed the film from the storage looper at a rate of 6.09 cm (2.4 in.) per minute. ... "

"Certain imperfections may be observed in some of the photographs. These imperfections are directly traceable to the method of film development, the readout system, the video data, or the GRE system."


Seems its (sic) better to dig deeper than shout ET space ship ect (sic) prematurely.lol.
It's always BEST to hedge your bets and cover your ass.
__________________
"The Apollo missions were effectively "task complete" when Armstrong and Aldrin stepped foot on the USS Hornet." apollo_gnomon
"The Saturn V was perfectly capable of launching to Earth orbit. That was all it was required to do." moving finger
Quote:
Originally Posted by apollo_gnomon View Post
I won't be posting in moon hoax threads much for a while. You guys are retards.
There are more important things in the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
the pictures were in existence in 1969. They weren't offered as proof of the mission
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2012, 07:30 PM   #2812
ytch
Senior Member
 
ytch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lala- Land
Posts: 1,430
Default

And now to something completely different...


Just to break the tension
__________________
REBEL WITHOUT APPLAUSE

too old to grow up....

Wake Up and Smell The Fish!
ytch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2012, 07:38 PM   #2813
truegroup
Temporarily suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Best not light this one when it escapes.....
Posts: 8,669
Default

If we are talking about tension breaking, try this one. Youtuber Awe130 who accidentally on purpose deleted his account with embarrassment after getting a pissy 94 signatures on his Whitehouse petition. now has a website up asking for "donations" etc. whilst flogging public domain documentaries and NASA footage

truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2012, 10:37 PM   #2814
ianw
Senior Member
 
ianw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,331
Default

Rare Armstrong recording released, proves nothing that anyone went to the moon. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17873153.
ianw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2012, 10:51 PM   #2815
truegroup
Temporarily suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Best not light this one when it escapes.....
Posts: 8,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianw View Post
Rare Armstrong recording released, proves nothing that anyone went to the moon. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17873153.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2012, 10:55 PM   #2816
apollo_gnomon
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6,396
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianw View Post
Rare Armstrong recording released, proves nothing that anyone went to the moon. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17873153.
Off topic, but thanks. I love Louis Armstrong. I'll have to figure out how to download those onto my "jukebox" computer.
apollo_gnomon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2012, 01:27 AM   #2817
phrased eyebrow
Senior Member
 
phrased eyebrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paul was replaced, more than once. Look into it and see for yourself.
Posts: 1,269
Default What is the whisper

What the pig said at the end

To YOU. more trolling, trite gripes.
__________________
"The Apollo missions were effectively "task complete" when Armstrong and Aldrin stepped foot on the USS Hornet." apollo_gnomon
"The Saturn V was perfectly capable of launching to Earth orbit. That was all it was required to do." moving finger
Quote:
Originally Posted by apollo_gnomon View Post
I won't be posting in moon hoax threads much for a while. You guys are retards.
There are more important things in the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
the pictures were in existence in 1969. They weren't offered as proof of the mission
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2012, 07:20 AM   #2818
moving finger
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Down in the basement, working for the government
Posts: 3,721
Default

And there we have the hoax argument in a nutshell.

Take one fragment of information (a pink animal), make an assumption (pigs are pink) and make an observation that fails to match up to reality (the animal in the video is a pig) .

Fail.

Last edited by moving finger; 28-04-2012 at 07:21 AM.
moving finger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2012, 11:19 PM   #2819
phrased eyebrow
Senior Member
 
phrased eyebrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paul was replaced, more than once. Look into it and see for yourself.
Posts: 1,269
Default

Good one, Buddha. Here's another. We went to the moon.
__________________
"The Apollo missions were effectively "task complete" when Armstrong and Aldrin stepped foot on the USS Hornet." apollo_gnomon
"The Saturn V was perfectly capable of launching to Earth orbit. That was all it was required to do." moving finger
Quote:
Originally Posted by apollo_gnomon View Post
I won't be posting in moon hoax threads much for a while. You guys are retards.
There are more important things in the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
the pictures were in existence in 1969. They weren't offered as proof of the mission
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2012, 11:52 PM   #2820
truegroup
Temporarily suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Best not light this one when it escapes.....
Posts: 8,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phrased eyebrow View Post
Good one, Buddha.
God, even when he's making with the incessant trolling he still fails. The avatar is Shiva

Quote:
Here's another. We went to the moon.
Even a stopped clock is correct twice a day
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
apollo hoax, moon landing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 AM.