Ancient Underwater City Discovered ? [Archive] - David Icke's Official Forums

View Full Version : Ancient Underwater City Discovered ?

chattanova

06-09-2007, 11:54 AM

chattanova

06-09-2007, 12:02 PM

http://img28.picoodle.com/img/img28/9/9/6/f_Japan01m_be3a435.jpg

http://img28.picoodle.com/img/img28/9/9/6/f_Japan01am_d614fa3.jpg

http://img39.picoodle.com/img/img39/9/9/6/f_Japan02m_bc25314.jpg

http://img30.picoodle.com/img/img30/9/9/6/f_Japan04m_8b68ddc.jpg

http://img39.picoodle.com/img/img39/9/9/6/f_Japan09smalm_d69b270.jpg

http://img29.picoodle.com/img/img29/9/9/6/f_Japan11smalm_214847e.jpg

http://www.timstouse.com/EarthHistory/Lemuria/japanpyramids.htm

tinmenace

06-09-2007, 12:19 PM

I have never seen a natural formation that looks like this:

http://img30.picoodle.com/img/img30/9/9/6/f_Japan04m_8b68ddc.jpg

kblood

06-09-2007, 01:13 PM

Looks exciting :) Makes me want to go scuba diving again :)

tinmenace

06-09-2007, 03:45 PM

Looks exciting :) Makes me want to go scuba diving again :)

You lil adventurer, you! :)

soglad

06-09-2007, 03:50 PM

Y'know what? I remember seeing a program on this and there were people ACTUALLY saying this was a natural formation!

I'M SERIOUS!!

FUCKING HELL!

Natural right angles???

Sure....

tinmenace

06-09-2007, 03:57 PM

Y'know what? I remember seeing a program on this and there were people ACTUALLY saying this was a natural formation!

I'M SERIOUS!!

FUCKING HELL!

Natural right angles???

Sure....

And you know what the sad thing is? Some people will actually believe that.

soglad

06-09-2007, 07:48 PM

tinmenace

06-09-2007, 08:19 PM

Right, and their "research" is limited to avenues that "bolster" THEIR points of view. They don't even want to go outside of that bubble, as you said.

David wrote a very good newsletter on this subject several months ago.

THE NO-CONSPIRACY THEORISTS ... WITH CONCRETE ON THEIR MINDS
"...French told me they had found that those who believed in 'conspiracy theories' were more likely to be 'delusional' than those who didn't believe them. The psychiatric definition of 'delusional' is: 'A false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence, especially as a symptom of mental illness: delusions of persecution'.

So how come no-conspiracy theorists are not considered 'delusional' when they believed there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq just because those in authority told them this was the case? Ah, but, you see, not to believe in conspiracies is more credible to academia because it supports the establishment version of events. It is like believing in extraterrestrial life. The idea that life as we know it has only evolved on this tiny little planet and nowhere else is considered credible because that's the establishment's view that people like Chris French are there to serve. Therefore, to believe that given the perceived vastness of space there has to be other life 'out there' is considered 'delusional' - 'He believes in little green men', and all that crap.

There is no better example of this phenomenon that I call 'reverse-credibility', than the Islamic hijackers theory about 9/11. It is credible to believe that nineteen hijackers who struggled to fly one-engined Cessnas at puddle-jumping flying schools could suddenly manifest the ability to fly jumbo jets with the most extraordinary skill. But, to say that this is clearly nonsense is a 'conspiracy theory' that attracts dismissal from people like French. He was trying to defend the official 9/11 story during our chat, including the hijacker-pilots-who-couldn't-fly theory.

I asked him for his definition of delusional with regard to his survey and he said it was those who answered 'yes' to questions like: Do you think that everyone is being tracked by their mobile phone?

Once again, whether they are or not is never addressed by French and company. Only his interpretation of the answer matters. The fact is that everyone can be tracked by their cell phone and many are when they are being particularly targeted. I don't believe that everyone is, because most people are no problem to authority and so there is no point.

But to believe that it might be happening when surveillance is increasing by the day is now considered 'delusional'. French doesn't know if the statement is true or false, but he believes it to be false and so anyone who thinks it might be going on must be delusional because he can't be wrong.

French told me there was no evidence for what I was saying in my books about a global conspiracy to impose an Orwellian state. I asked him the obvious question: Have you read any of them? His answer ... 'No'.

This is absolutely typical of his breed and I have met so many of these academic clones who parrot their song sheet 'science' and song sheet 'psychology'. They are not interested in evidence, only their own theories. Indeed, they are no-conspiracy theorists who never bother to check out the validity of what is being claimed by actually researching the evidence.

When I challenged French about dismissing evidence that he hadn't even bothered to read, he said he knew what I was saying from articles he had read in the media. Given that we are talking about one of the most miss-represented people of recent times, I had to laugh at the idea that anyone could find out what I was really saying, and on what evidence, from the news media. But, then, from the moment I began talking with the guy, I knew I was in Fairyland.

He told me that my work was based on a document called The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which he claimed was a 'proven fake'. I asked him how he knew that my books were based on that. He had seen it in the papers. The fact that this was provable nonsense, as a read of my books would immediately confirm, was once again irrelevant to him.

Sign Up to read full article (http://www.davidicke.com/amember/signup.php)

http://www.feebleminds-gifs.com/peeing-man.gif http://www.open2.net/truthwillout/ET/images/french.jpg = http://www.globalfailure.com/images/emotes/3D_emoticon_148.gif

Complete robot!

emerald

06-09-2007, 10:09 PM

The continent of Mu? It looks very structural...
It seems some scientists think it is all a natural formation.
Take a look VIDEO: [/B]http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=49750&cl=3915690&ch=1105621&src=news

I read James Churchward's book, "Mu, the lost continent" and it fascinated me. Like them (him and his friend and collaborator, William Niven), I mostly tend to believe that the cradle of humanity was this continent, Pacifida or the land of Mu.

pumma

06-09-2007, 10:22 PM

This is an aincent city,and it's not down there because of some narure like desastre (earthquake). But beacuse of the "big flood - heavy rain" taking place long long time ago...

hagbard_celine

08-09-2007, 12:42 PM

The continent of Mu? It looks very structural...
It seems some scientists think it is all a natural formation.
Take a look VIDEO: [/B]http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=49750&cl=3915690&ch=1105621&src=news

One day someone is going to discover a stone tablet on the seabed with the words: "Welcome to Atlantis- Please Drive Carefully" inscribed on it, and some skeptics will still claim that it is just a natural formation that coincidentally resembles an inscribed tablet. :rolleyes:

lostinstrangeworld

08-09-2007, 11:47 PM

Wow. This is amazing. I'm definitely coming back to this thread to find out more. Meanwhile, must get some sleep. I sometimes wish I didn't have to eat or sleep! :)

tickles

09-09-2007, 04:49 AM

Is this the same place as in Grahame Hancocks Ancient Civillisation videos that are on google?. If so, watch the videos. Theres 3 of them. Amazing stuff. Highly recommend it to anyone interested.

shodan

10-09-2007, 03:54 AM

Is this the same place as in Grahame Hancocks Ancient Civillisation videos that are on google?. If so, watch the videos. Theres 3 of them. Amazing stuff. Highly recommend it to anyone interested

Yep, and also check out 'Underworld' by Hancock, it covers this and many other underwater sites that exist. As far as orthodox archaeology goes, they've never (publicy) been examined as far as is known.

hagbard_celine

10-09-2007, 03:27 PM

Yep, and also check out 'Underworld' by Hancock, it covers this and many other underwater sites that exist. As far as orthodox archaeology goes, they've never (publicy) been examined as far as is known.

That's a brilliant book! Yes, this is the Yonaguni structure. It definitely looks man-made to me!

frank1974

16-09-2007, 04:43 PM

This is a documentary on this structure. Yonaguni, Japan.
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7717364105182583322

celtic isis

16-09-2007, 05:03 PM

I have never seen a natural formation that looks like this:

http://img30.picoodle.com/img/img30/9/9/6/f_Japan04m_8b68ddc.jpg

exactly :)

thanks chatt, i remember seeing this before on this site, some interesting stories there:

http://www.crystalinks.com/lemuria.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/bythesea.html

(quite a strange new interpretation of the all seeing eye there too?)

celtic isis

16-09-2007, 05:06 PM

Y'know what? I'm all for rational thinking, but these self-named "Skeptics" are fuckin' pathetic! They renounce anything out of their bubble, no matter what! And their arguments are just so ignorant, is if the world has to revolve around them!

Sad really...

i hear you soggy! :D

isn't that nick's pet name for you? lol

btw loving the new pic! you had another like that before with a big smile :D

how can anyone believe that that's a natural formation lol omg people will believe anything! And not even use their own rational common sense in the process!

ok people, rocks don't do that on their own ok! perfect right angles? they're steps god damn it!

maybe it's a mermaid freemasonic temple !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!