View Full Version : Freemasons: The silent destroyers
meksar
20-09-2009, 09:44 AM
"The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation. None is better than the three lower degrees of Free Masonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it. Next to this, the form of a learned or literary society is best suited to our purpose, and had Free Masonry not existed, this cover would have been employed; and it may be much more than a cover, it may be a powerful engine in our hands. By establishing reading societies, and subscription libraries, and taking these under our direction, and supplying them through our labours, we may turn the public mind which way we will." - Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati.
http://www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm
keystone
20-09-2009, 10:49 AM
I do not see the point in quoting Tony Gosling's site when he is a rabid anti-mason anyway. But there we go.
Cheers
meksar
20-09-2009, 01:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RcN_XFbbR4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXFY3Li5V3g&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3AHTb8FG6c&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb1jqA7ZSGk&feature=related
free thinker
20-09-2009, 05:06 PM
I sat on the fence for a long time over whether freemasonry is corrupt to its core, however, i have come to the conclusion freemasonry itself is not the offender, Freemasons who are in it for personal gain are.
The section process may well be strict, the initiation may be symbolic, but 'bad apples' can be inherent, i also believe that the masons dislike having to defend these maggots that can (and do) make some peoples lives a misery with their misplaced trust.
keystone
20-09-2009, 05:34 PM
I sat on the fence for a long time over whether freemasonry is corrupt to its core, however, i have come to the conclusion freemasonry itself is not the offender,I would agree with you 100%.
Freemasons who are in it for personal gain are. The section process may well be strict, the initiation may be symbolic, but 'bad apples' can be inherent,Yes - unfortunately you get bad apples in every barrel. We do a pretty good job of rooting 'em out but some get missed.
I also believe that the masons dislike having to defend these maggots that can (and do) make some peoples lives a misery with their misplaced trust.Dislike is a serious understatement.
Cheers
hirschfelder
20-09-2009, 05:42 PM
I do not see the point in quoting Tony Gosling's site when he is a rabid anti-mason anyway. But there we go.
Cheers
But the quote's from Adam Weishaupt
keystone
20-09-2009, 05:47 PM
But the quote's from Adam WeishauptI know that - did the OP? ;) Just my warped SOH I guess.
Cheers
hirschfelder
20-09-2009, 05:51 PM
I know that - did the OP? ;)
Well he or she posted the quote and the name of the person to whom it's attributed, so I guess so
keystone
20-09-2009, 05:54 PM
Well he or she posted the quote and the name of the person to whom it's attributed, so I guess soOh yes you are right - I only read the first line and recognised the piece so skipped to the url at the bottom which I also know only too well. My bad! Apols to meksar.
Cheers
PS Is your avatar from Kes? - Great film.
nihil
20-09-2009, 06:41 PM
Weishaupt himself states it's a masonic cover-up.
keystone
20-09-2009, 06:42 PM
Weishaupt himself states it's a masonic cover-up.What's a masonic cover-up? Be more specific please.
Cheers
mike martin
21-09-2009, 10:43 AM
Very interesting timing as I actually finished reading Proofs of a Conspiracy by John Robison last week and am going to write a paper about it.
The funniest (ironic) thing is that those of you who quote him would never do so if you actuallty read the whole book. He often defends the honour of British Freemasonry and clearly states that the only Freemasonry that was a problem was that in Europe which had been corrupted from the British version.
OK, now to this:
Weishaupt himself states it's a masonic cover-up.
Actually Weishaupt very clearly states that it is of benefit for the Illuminati to pretend to be Freemasonry.
Here are some of the clues from the pen of Robison himself in "Proofs of a Conspiracy" quoting Weishaupt (Spartacus) and Baron Knigge (Philo):
Page 111 "We must allow the underlings to imagine (but without telling them the truth) that we direct all the Free Mason Lodges, and even all other Orders, and that the greatest monarchs are under our guidance, which indeed is here and there the case."
Page 112 "The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation. None is fitter than the three lower degrees of Free Masonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it. Next to this, the form of a learned or literary society is best suited to our purpose, and had Free Masonry not existed, this cover would have been employed; and it may be much more than a cover, it may be a powerful engine in our hands. By establishing reading societies, and subscription libraries, and taking these under our direction, and supplying them through our labours, we may turn the public mind which way we will."
Page 124 Philo says, "I have been at unwearied pains to remove the fears of some who imagine that our Superiors want to abolish Christianity; but by and by their prejudices will wear off, and they will be more at their ease. Were I to let them know that our General holds all Religion to be a lie, and uses even Deism, only to lead men by the nose.--Were I to connect myself again with the Free Masons, and tell them our designs to ruin their Fraternity by this circular letter (a letter to the Lodge in Courland)--Were I but to give the least hint to any of the Princes of Greece (Bavaria)--
Anyone interested in reading this fascinating book can find it here: http://www.sacred-texts.com/sro/pc/pc00.htm
Mike
nihil
21-09-2009, 05:26 PM
...
Common Masons pretend to be (part of) the Illuminati.
It is the Illuminati Wannabeeism.
Cover-up as in the Franklin Cover-up.
Or as in the X Dossier coverup - the Belgian satanic pedophile ring.
...
nihil
21-09-2009, 05:33 PM
John Robison, as masonry as usual, deals with both truth and lies. He gives all the accusations to continental brothers, while omitting the UK masonry responsibilities, as the Druidic groups that had the opium smoker Winston Churchill into their affiliated brothers. Divide et Impera. Throw the stone and hide the hand.
keystone
21-09-2009, 10:56 PM
...
Common Masons pretend to be (part of) the Illuminati.
It is the Illuminati Wannabeeism.Balls - what nonsense. Your premise only applies if your name happens to be Zagami. :D
Cheers
nihil
21-09-2009, 11:57 PM
Wannabeeism - a form of crypto-jewish rituals, mixed with homoerotic egyptian-style onanism and springled with the worship of the Great Smurf:
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/4660/papasmurf.jpg
keystone
22-09-2009, 12:34 AM
Wannabeeism - a form of crypto-jewish rituals, mixed with homoerotic egyptian-style onanism and springled with the worship of the Great Smurf:
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/4660/papasmurf.jpgBlime! Thats a gob full!
Theres a feed for you. Dig out! :D
Cheers