Paul McCartney is dead.

[dedesuperman]

Not appropriate for this thread. (But they sure took a long time to get Garrison, and are taking a long time to get Stone.)
http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100menu.html
http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100deaths.html

I know that it is out of topic (or not appropiate according to you) but it is to show the parallel between what would have happened for some witnesses of JFK and what could arrive for those that would dare to speak concerning the death or replacement of the true Paul McCartney including his family and his relatives friends. Maybe you must try to see the big picture on this!

You don't understand before no one had the internet when the true Paul McCartney would have been replaced or would have been killed and it is only toward or around the year 1969 that for the first time we hears about the theory that 'Paul is dead' also the clues that we recovers on the sleeves of the albums of the Beatles were already there before 1969, therefore no one carried attention and these were impossible to verify and compare the pictures of Paul and Faul but today with the technology we can touch up and manipulate the pictures to make see what people must see. And voilà the real Paul McCartney is still alive and is not dead nothing is change! It is child's game and even easy that in general most people believe that Paul is alive and says the conspiracy concerning Paul McCartney is a crap thing.

I have a question to you formosan termite if you don't believe in the conspiracy theory, what are you doing here and join a forum who the main topics concern theses things? Do you believe in something?

One of my friend is very skeptic and he doesn't go and waste his time for futilities of that. He believe that Lee Harvey Oswald is the main suspect of the murder of JFK, he believed the official version of 9/11 nothing about the inside job, he believe that Paul McCartney is still alive and the thing about his replacement is impossible to do in this reality. And his answer for all this, he believed what the mainstream media told nothing more. The problem here it is that nobody is capable to think that otherwise that the mainstream media told I say for most of the people.

And if the theory that Paul died that is unthinkable, why recently does David Letterman ask for this particular question that is considered like stupid as for those are PIA or the common people?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZJxlrjLxZ4

Maybe that is David's initiative to achieve the seriousness of the thing and to wake people concerning this truth up? I have say maybe !!

[magnolia_xx]

PS I also think that if we want to make a decisive comparison it would be necessary to have Sir Paul in flesh & blood, or at least an X-ray of the teeth, or of the skull... many unknown corpses were identified basing of the X-rays made by the dentist... even assuming that the photos were not doctored (but remember that the photos were taken by PID forums), it seems a bit inaccurate to me to compare a photo to another photo and to use these results to publish an upsetting article "screaming" about a serious subject such the replacement (and probable murder) of one of the most famous and talented rock/pop star of XX century... :rolleyes:
But you know, they want to sell their magazine... the same old story!!

[formosan termite]

I have a question to you formosan termite if you don't believe in the conspiracy theory, what are you doing here and join a forum who the main topics concern theses things? Do you believe in something?

One of my friend is very skeptic and he doesn't go and waste his time for futilities of that. He believe that Lee Harvey Oswald is the main suspect of the murder of JFK, he believed the official version of 9/11 nothing about the inside job, he believe that Paul McCartney is still alive and the thing about his replacement is impossible to do in this reality. And his answer for all this, he believed what the mainstream media told nothing more. The problem here it is that nobody is capable to think that otherwise that the mainstream media told I say for most of the people.

And if the theory that Paul died that is unthinkable, why recently does David Letterman ask for this particular question that is considered like stupid as for those are PIA or the common people?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZJxlrjLxZ4

Maybe that is David's initiative to achieve the seriousness of the thing and to wake people concerning this truth up? I have say maybe !!

I did not understand the first part. Sorry. It was not clear. I think it said something about I not understanding that there was no internet back then, and there was no technology to analyze the photographs. Ok. I do understand what it was like back then. I was alive and remember the hubub back in 1969 when the story broke. And there was great photo analysis even back in WWII, so I'm not sure what you are getting at.

Next is a fair enough question. I am a Beatle fan. Have been for decades. I became a member of the 60IF PID forum back in 2003 because I was intrigued by what I saw. I was open minded about it and even relished the idea of being part of the uncovering of such a story. Over time, I looked at the "proof" and the explanations and determined that the PID story being pushed was a hoax. I have since been a member of M4E, then MFH. I joined here because there is a thread about PID of which I have an interest. What brought me here was faulconjob's posts in the comment section of the Wired magazine article. I believe it is wrong to carelessly and falsly accuse people of murder and fraud. Some of the things I have seen at the various PID sites have been outright falsehoods and were libelous. I have seen people of all ages, mostly young though, fall for the biased information being fed to them. My reason for being involved is to provide people with the other side of the story. All sides and points of view should be presented and available.

As far as the mainstream media, I do not share the views and beliefs of about 95% of them. I do not base my beliefs on what they present to me. But it must be pointed out that the mainstream media is made up of news outlets, as well as hollywood and publishers. Wired Magazine is part of the mainstream media. Oliver Stone is part of the mainstream media. So are the publishing companies that have published so much of the conspiracy theory books that are out there. There have also been numerous TV specials that have been produced that come from the mainstream media. The idea that the CT version of major events is somehow being suppressed by the media is laughable.

As far as David Letterman asking the question. He is a comedian, and asked the question, like many other comedians before him, to get a laugh.

[mind1universe]

Still trying to cover the truth.

Money is the god, but for how long. I will be laughing at the end of the day, who will be laughing with me will be a good question to ask.:D

CRANBERRRY SAUCE

[formosan termite]

PS I also think that if we want to make a decisive comparison it would be necessary to have Sir Paul in flesh & blood, or at least an X-ray of the teeth, or of the skull... many unknown corpses were identified basing of the X-rays made by the dentist... even assuming that the photos were not doctored (but remember that the photos were taken by PID forums), it seems a bit inaccurate to me to compare a photo to another photo and to use these results to publish an upsetting article "screaming" about a serious subject such the replacement (and probable murder) of one of the most famous and talented rock/pop star of XX century... :rolleyes:
But you know, they want to sell their magazine... the same old story!!

True. Follow the money. Conspiracy theories make a lot of money. There is no money in saying that things are as they seem, and everything is fine.

[mind1universe]

True. Follow the money. Conspiracy theories make a lot of money. There is no money in saying that things are as they seem, and everything is fine.

lol.... Yeah yeah so do you get paid a lot of money too.

[magnolia_xx]

I did not understand the first part. Sorry. It was not clear. I think it said something about I not understanding that there was no internet back then, and there was no technology to analyze the photographs. Ok. I do understand what it was like back then. I was alive and remember the hubub back in 1969 when the story broke. And there was great photo analysis even back in WWII, so I'm not sure what you are getting at.

Next is a fair enough question. I am a Beatle fan. Have been for decades. I became a member of the 60IF PID forum back in 2003 because I was intrigued by what I saw. I was open minded about it and even relished the idea of being part of the uncovering of such a story. Over time, I looked at the "proof" and the explanations and determined that the PID story being pushed was a hoax. I have since been a member of M4E, then MFH. I joined here because there is a thread about PID of which I have an interest. What brought me here was faulconjob's posts in the comment section of the Wired magazine article. I believe it is wrong to carelessly and falsly accuse people of murder and fraud. Some of the things I have seen at the various PID sites have been outright falsehoods and were libelous. I have seen people of all ages, mostly young though, fall for the biased information being fed to them. My reason for being involved is to provide people with the other side of the story. All sides and points of view should be presented and available.

As far as the mainstream media, I do not share the views and beliefs of about 95% of them. I do not base my beliefs on what they present to me. But it must be pointed out that the mainstream media is made up of news outlets, as well as hollywood and publishers. Wired Magazine is part of the mainstream media. Oliver Stone is part of the mainstream media. So are the publishing companies that have published so much of the conspiracy theory books that are out there. There have also been numerous TV specials that have been produced that come from the mainstream media. The idea that the CT version of major events is somehow being suppressed by the media is laughable.

As far as David Letterman asking the question. He is a comedian, and asked the question, like many other comedians before him, to get a laugh.

This is what I call "common sense".
And there is also the other side, I mean the people who decide to ignore all things about common sense and live indulging in fantasies about plots and mind control and mysterious replacements, like in this case.... we are speaking about a man of 67 who has on his face the very same 3 naevi he had when he was 16, but for most PIDers he was replaced and there is no possibility of reasoning with them... every single thing for them is meant to be a prove of what they want to believe, including the fact that David Letterman, being a comedian leading a show, asked Paul about the hoax of his supposed death... BTW, how he replied and joked about it ("is it... is it him or a very good double?") shows that he is a great man... he must have enough of all this PID foolishness but he kept his good mood in spite of having been asked about it for the millionth time;).
The most funny thing of the Above Top Secret forum is in the main page:

"This forum is dedicated to the all-important highly speculative topics that may not be substantiated by many, if any facts and span the spectrum of topics discussed on ATS. Readers and users should be aware that extreme theories without corroboration are embraced in this forum. Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of conspiracies, scandals, and cover-ups. Members who would seek to refute such theories should be mindful of AboveTopSecret.com's tradition of focusing on conspiracy theory, cover-ups, and scandals."

So: not a rational evaluation of facts, let's focus on conspiracies!!! :D:D:D
I think this explains everything. What a pity that frail people with a great imagination can be catched in this trap.

[formosan termite]

You are speaking of non-senses. Very immature. You don't know what to say and so you prattle with ridiculous accuses to someone you don't even know.
But no use to speak to brats.

Best not to address this person when she name-calls. Better to report it to the mods. We have been warned against name-calling, and specifically about accusing people of being paid disinformation agents.

[magnolia_xx]

Thanks for alerting me.
Maybe you should inform the mods, having been offended and accused by this person?

[formosan termite]

Thanks for alerting me.
Maybe you should inform the mods, having been offended and accused by this person?

Thank you. I shall do so.

[magnolia_xx]

I noticed that you also attend the Maccafunhouse forum.
I read there but I don't write (by now).
Great PIA videos and photos. Real comparisons.
I wonder how is it possible to believe this hoax after seeing them!!! :D

[socrates]

I noticed that you also attend the Maccafunhouse forum.
I read there but I don't write (by now).
Great PIA videos and photos. Real comparisons.
I wonder how is it possible to believe this hoax after seeing them!!! :D

Hi Magnolia,

I think it's because some people lead quite boring lives and the thought that they may be at the centre of uncovering some secret, giant conspiracy gives some excitement and feeling of importance to them.

[mind1universe]

Best not to address this person when she name-calls. Better to report it to the mods. We have been warned against name-calling, and specifically about accusing people of being paid disinformation agents.

I agree it's best to report, I aslo would advise not to falsly accuse people of name calling.


BTW. We are not stupid. Don't insult people's intellegence. We live in a world today where we can now see through the deception. Unless you can prove me wrong. I'm entitled to my opinion as you are yours. But you haven't been able to prove me wrong. So I will stand by my gut feeling. You cannot twist things anymore.

I've watched youon this forum. I've seen how you have played on here. It's good, but your losing grip of it now. Do I make myself clear, I bet I do. ;) I'm well observant of your activity. This meesage should alert others. We are in our right to question your status, since the fact is most people know that Paul was replaced I can see exactly what your doing paid or not.

[mind1universe]

It's a lovely banter you have on "with a new created user magnolia"

It's so lovely that your all talking so sweet.

Give me a break.:D

[triso]

All these well put together videos saying Paul is dead...... now here's a well put together video saying Paul is very much alive.. seriously, it's really good

Watch - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCiX2UfpW-k

[formosan termite]

I noticed that you also attend the Maccafunhouse forum.
I read there but I don't write (by now).
Great PIA videos and photos. Real comparisons.
I wonder how is it possible to believe this hoax after seeing them!!! :D

Yes. I have been a member there since 2005.

We would love to have you as a member there. You are quite welcome.

[formosan termite]

Hi Magnolia,

I think it's because some people lead quite boring lives and the thought that they may be at the centre of uncovering some secret, giant conspiracy gives some excitement and feeling of importance to them.

Here is something I found:

Psychological origins

According to some psychologists, a person who believes in one conspiracy theory tends to believe in others; a person who does not believe in one conspiracy theory tends not to believe another.[24] This may be caused by differences in the information upon which parties rely in formulating their conclusions.

Psychologists believe that the search for meaning is common in conspiracism and the development of conspiracy theories, and may be powerful enough alone to lead to the first formulating of the idea. Once cognized, confirmation bias and avoidance of cognitive dissonance may reinforce the belief. In a context where a conspiracy theory has become popular within a social group, communal reinforcement may equally play a part. Some research carried out at the University of Kent, UK suggests people may be influenced by conspiracy theories without being aware that their attitudes have changed. After reading popular conspiracy theories about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, participants in this study correctly estimated how much their peers' attitudes had changed, but significantly underestimated how much their own attitudes had changed to become more in favour of the conspiracy theories. The authors conclude that conspiracy theories may therefore have a 'hidden power' to influence people's beliefs.[25]

Humanistic psychologists argue that even if the cabal behind the conspiracy is almost always perceived as hostile there is, often, still an element of reassurance in it, for conspiracy theorists, in part because it is more consoling to think that complications and upheavals in human affairs, at least, are created by human beings rather than factors beyond human control. Belief in such a cabal is a device for reassuring oneself that certain occurrences are not random, but ordered by a human intelligence. This renders such occurrences comprehensible and potentially controllable. If a cabal can be implicated in a sequence of events, there is always the hope, however tenuous, of being able to break the cabal's power - or joining it and exercising some of that power oneself. Finally, belief in the power of such a cabal is an implicit assertion of human dignity - an often unconscious but necessary affirmation that man is not totally helpless, but is responsible, at least in some measure, for his own destiny.[26]

For relatively rare individuals, an obsessive compulsion to believe, prove or re-tell a conspiracy theory may indicate one or more of several well-understood psychological conditions, and other hypothetical ones: paranoia, denial, schizophrenia, mean world syndrome

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theories#Psychological_origins

Take a look, Magnolia. It may help.

[socrates]

All these well put together videos saying Paul is dead...... now here's a well put together video saying Paul is very much alive.. seriously, it's really good

Watch - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCiX2UfpW-k

Cool video! :D

The creator can see through the bullshit that is PID.

[triso]

Cool video! :D

The creator can see through the bullshit that is PID.

Very true, some people really get a kick out of prooving nonsense.. why can they just LET IT BE... LET IT BE.....

[socrates]

Here is something I found:

For relatively rare individuals, an obsessive compulsion to believe, prove or re-tell a conspiracy theory may indicate one or more of several well-understood psychological conditions, and other hypothetical ones: paranoia, denial, schizophrenia, mean world syndrome

Hmmmm... Interesting :D

[socrates]

Very true, some people really get a kick out of prooving nonsense.. why can they just LET IT BE... LET IT BE.....

LOl. Because it's their life, I guess. :(

[mind1universe]

Here is something I found:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theories#Psychological_origins

Take a look, Magnolia. It may help.


newly created user magnolia here here here never met you before CRANBERRY SAUCE DO I KNOW YOU LIKE CRANBERRY SAUCE



SHHHHHH
You don't know me remember im a newly created user duh.

I mean the dialogue you have here is just amazing.:D

[formosan termite]

All these well put together videos saying Paul is dead...... now here's a well put together video saying Paul is very much alive.. seriously, it's really good

Watch - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCiX2UfpW-k

Great video!

[jackbumbo]

newly created user magnolia here here here never met you before CRANBERRY SAUCE DO I KNOW YOU LIKE CRANBERRY SAUCE



SHHHHHH
You don't know me remember im a newly created user duh.

I mean the dialogue you have here is just amazing.:D

Seriously, what are you talking about? You are seeing things that aren't there, making connections that have absolutley no truth in them. Please, I beg of you, think about what your saying here. You are saying pretty ridiculous things here. I'm not trying to insult you, I'm trying to tell you that what you're saying is pretty... absurd, to say the least.

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's a lovely banter you have on "with a new created user magnolia"

It's so lovely that your all talking so sweet.

Give me a break.:D

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
by H. Michael

4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html

[faulconandsnowjob]

I have a question to you formosan termite if you don't believe in the conspiracy theory, what are you doing here and join a forum who the main topics concern theses things? Do you believe in something?


17 TECHNIQUES FOR TRUTH SUPPRESSION
by David Martin, author of America's Dreyfus Affair

17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, "What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?" ...

http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222

[faulconandsnowjob]

Why, exactly, would a fake Paul McCartney need to use a stand-in for the paternity blood test?


B/c Paul was dead by 1983. Paul didn't send a stand-in. An imposter had taken over Paul's life.

[faulconandsnowjob]

The difference in the width of the mouths can't even be explained by surgery:

..."Compared to the previous picture, that of Sgt Pepper's show clearly that the commessura lip, that is the line formed by the lips of the two, it was suddenly stretched. Which obviously is not possible and that the whiskers can not camouflage. In other words, the phenomenon is all too frequently these days, the lips can be inflated and increased in volume, but the width of the lip commessura can not vary that much. May be slight, but this is not the case for the photos examined: here the difference between the before and after is too strong to have been caused by any surgery...

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db


http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul_hand_faul.jpg

[theenlightenedone]

B/c Paul was dead by 1983. Paul didn't send a stand-in. An imposter had taken over Paul's life.

Ok. If PAUL was the father of the baby, why would FAUL need to send a stand in? He could've taken the bloodtest without problem since you claim he's not Paul.

[phrased eyebrow]

If the bloodtest could happen to prove he wasn't Paul to begin with; that's why. :)

[faulconandsnowjob]

reactions to SFF:
http://www.jojoplace.org/Shoebox/dickclarka.mpg

"They look older"
"They're ugly"
"They look like grandfathers"

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paul_sff_faul.jpg

& Penny Lane:

"Weird"
"They look different than they used to"
"They look entirely different"

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/penny_lane_faul.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

If PAUL was the father of the baby, why would FAUL need to send a stand in?
Faul WAS the stand-in. The blood test showed he wasn't the father of the baby b/c he wasn't Paul.

[magnolia_xx]

Here is something I found:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theories#Psychological_origins

Take a look, Magnolia. It may help.

Thanks for the link, Formosan Termite!
This is very interesting:
"Because of their dramatic potential, conspiracies are a popular theme in thrillers and science fiction. Complex history is recast as a morality play in which bad people cause bad events, and good people identify and defeat them. Fictional conspiracy theories offer neat, intuitive narratives, in which the conspirators' plot fits closely the dramatic needs of the story's plot. As mentioned above, the cui bono? aspect of conspiracy theories resembles one element of mystery stories: the search for a possibly hidden motive."
Many people probably need to think that mysterious facts and plots they see on TV also happen in real life. This adds some thrill to everyday routine...

[magnolia_xx]

newly created user magnolia here here here never met you before CRANBERRY SAUCE DO I KNOW YOU LIKE CRANBERRY SAUCE



SHHHHHH
You don't know me remember im a newly created user duh.

I mean the dialogue you have here is just amazing.:D
Hi Mind1universe, sorry I am not sure to be fully understanding the meaning of your statements... are you saying that I am a fake new member?
Fagnolia?? :D
If so, sorry but you are wrong, I found this forum just a few days ago and after reading here and there I began writing yesterday. I sometimes write on Above Top Secret forum, with the same nickname.
That's all. Sorry, no conspiracies this time... LOL

[magnolia_xx]

17 TECHNIQUES FOR TRUTH SUPPRESSION
by David Martin, author of America's Dreyfus Affair

Hi Faulcon, nice to meet you here.
IMHO there's no wonder that people who are in favour of a theory or another do appreciate all the proves about their theory, which are provided by other members. On ATS forum there are many "stars" given to each single post by the other forum users... usually, PIDers give stars to PID messages and PIAers to PIA messages. I don't think this is strange.
PIDers congratulate to each other like PIAers and you also were congratulated for the fine job you are doing by other people who share your opinions.
If you are saying that we are agents of the Government or something like that, well, I appreciate your sense of humour... :D

[magnolia_xx]

reactions to SFF:
http://www.jojoplace.org/Shoebox/dickclarka.mpg

"They look older"
"They're ugly"
"They look like grandfathers"

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paul_sff_faul.jpg

& Penny Lane:

"Weird"
"They look different than they used to"
"They look entirely different"

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/penny_lane_faul.jpg

Hi Faulcon, as you surely know these comments referring to the Beatles, not only Paul... so what are your conclusions? That all the Beatles were replaced?

[theenlightenedone]

Hi Faulcon, as you surely know these comments referring to the Beatles, not only Paul... so what are your conclusions? That all the Beatles were replaced?

Don't give her any ideas :p :D

[magnolia_xx]

Ooops :D

[darreninnz]

I think i've woken up in a bad mood today because i honestly cant see why there's over 2288 posts about a jumped up twat who can't sing. Who cares if he's dead. If he isn't-- why isn't he ?
Now i've just pissed myself off because i've just added to this post, i should've just left it alone.

[formosan termite]

B/c Paul was dead by 1983. Paul didn't send a stand-in. An imposter had taken over Paul's life.

Ummm. The blood test was meant to prove that Paul McCartney (pre '67)was the real father of the child. If the real Paul was dead, the replacement Paul would not need a stand-in to prove the child was not his.

[formosan termite]

Hi Mind1universe, sorry I am not sure to be fully understanding the meaning of your statements... are you saying that I am a fake new member?
Fagnolia?? :D
If so, sorry but you are wrong, I found this forum just a few days ago and after reading here and there I began writing yesterday. I sometimes write on Above Top Secret forum, with the same nickname.
That's all. Sorry, no conspiracies this time... LOL

Really. If she believes that we are creating duplicate fake members, she should check with the moderators to verify or deny that claim. I encourage her to do so.

[mind1universe]

Hi Mind1universe, sorry I am not sure to be fully understanding the meaning of your statements... are you saying that I am a fake new member?
Fagnolia?? :D
If so, sorry but you are wrong, I found this forum just a few days ago and after reading here and there I began writing yesterday. I sometimes write on Above Top Secret forum, with the same nickname.
That's all. Sorry, no conspiracies this time... LOL

Oh Hi there didn't even notice you, how pleasant are you in this act.

it's sweet to sweet.


Rasberry sauce? Oh yum.

[mind1universe]

Hi Faulcon, as you surely know these comments referring to the Beatles, not only Paul... so what are your conclusions? That all the Beatles were replaced?

Cant get more obvious than those picture. You can see it's william. And the plastic surgery has made him more like him. But the truth is faul is faul. People don't notice the dfferent features. In real life its more obvious, simple photoshopping can do all the work.


If John was alive now, the truth would of been out 10 years ago.

[mind1universe]

I think i've woken up in a bad mood today because i honestly cant see why there's over 2288 posts about a jumped up twat who can't sing. Who cares if he's dead. If he isn't-- why isn't he ?
Now i've just pissed myself off because i've just added to this post, i should've just left it alone.

The people who are covering it up care more.


People with intellegence are not going to be tricked, and for some reason they think they are fooling us. Some people who play the joker needs to come up with new jokes

Hi WILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIAM


I see your thinner nose
I see your lower eyelids
and I your wig
Who are you trying to fool
I see your ears are different
I see your white as a ghost,
And your think we need to learn this in school?
What a dubba long chin you gots going on there

Where the hell is Paul


Cranberrry sauce, wiggles around the room. Cranberry jelly, Wiggles around the room

Who in the hell do you think your fooling, when Paul is in Heaven.



:) To all of you out there, Just don't try and fool me, you will look stupid enough already:D

[formosan termite]

Why do we spend hours refuting the falsehoods of the pidders:

Try this one out for size...

Illuminati sexual predators want Paul as a sort of ultimate prize for some perverse occult ritual involving orgy sex and sacrificial murder (see EYES WIDE SHUT). He is invited to a high society party in London and told through a "friend" that famous artists will be there, cool people young and old, the finest rich birds in London, and the richest people. Paul says no he's not interested. In the next couple of weeks they make sure that a super hot and very highly intelligent girl happens by chance to enter his life and bait him away from Jane and into one of the parties he's already said no to but this time because of the girl, he goes to one of these parties. He finds that it is exactly what he was first told... famous artists, the super elite rich society scene of swinging London, incredible wealth on display and it's actually clean and fun. This convinces him that this particular party scene is not only harmless but he feels he's really made it to the top of society. So a couple weeks later, he accepts another invitation to one of these but this time he's trapped in something very much like the orgy occult party in EYES WIDE SHUT, he's roughed up, date rape drugs forced on him and they do the ritual occult orgy and sacrifice, killing him. So Original Paul is dead and they have his car, his I.D., they raid his flat and get whatever items they could plant on Billy so that when Billy is found in hospital he's got the bona fides.

Then that same night, a crash is staged using Paul's car. Police and ambulance get there very, very quickly (part of the staging) and pull a body (original Paul) out of the wreckage (police photos are taken) and whisk him away in ambulance. The police and their vehicle, the paramedics and ambulance, and the tow truck crew are all MI-6.

Meanwhile on the same night, Billy is admitted to hospital for plastic surgery (with a bogus reason for surgery) and undergoes changes to his face that will make him look more like Original Paul (MI-6 surgeons do the work). Billy comes out of surgery unconscious and Mike McCartney and Brian are called to hospital. They are asked by MI-6 doctors and detective to "keep this quiet for Paul's own good". They are shown pictures (proving to Brian and Mike that Paul was in a car crash) and they are asked by the police detective "what would you like us to do with the car" and so forth. Brian believes it is imperative to keep this whole incident out of the press. As I've theorized above, Mike (or Jane?) and Brian are told by doctors to expect a quick and full recovery.

Brian tells the other Beatles and innermost circle of family and friends what has happened. Says Paul was in a car crash and has had minor plastic surgery but will recover in a few days, but please we must keep this quiet for the good of Paul's fragile state of mind when he recovers.

The switch has been made. "They" put out rumors among the rock musician crowd (perhaps Mick Jagger or Keith, Clapton, Jimmy Page, perhaps others) that Paul was in a car crash and killed and now there's a double. The rumor mill gets back to the Beatles who fiercely deny it.

In the following weeks, John & George H, and George Martin realize they've been had.
They all fear for their own lives, but clues are planted by the three of them. They all play along with Faul. Brian is told the truth by Lennon and George Martin which at first he thinks is preposterous, then he too comes around to realize he's been had. Brian eventually confronts Faul and a deal is worked in which Brian and the others are given hush money. At some point, Brian is found to have spilled the beans to a homosexual partner or two. Brian is then murdered and the others in the innermost Beatles circle take Brian's murder as a warning that this can happen to them too if they don't play along.

Faul is fed brilliant musical ideas from the best and brightest MI-6 musicologists from behind-the-scenes and mixed with actual song fragments left over from Original Paul, John, George Martin, and George H develop the songs with Faul just as they had before with Paul only now they all know it isn't Original Paul however they have no choice but to make the best of the situation. John, George H and George Martin work very hard to embed clues throughout song lyrics, song titles and album art and at first, Faul isn't aware but when it becomes obvious they all know the real truth, Faul contributes to the clues with gusto. As theorized in earlier posts, the Illuminati love to sort of advertise what sinister thing they've done.

The albums and years roll by with John, George H and George Martin becoming more and more depressed about what happened and at the same time Faul becomes more and more the egomaniac because he convinces himself that he's better than the Original. Ringo has been neutral during the whole thing and prefers to just play along as if nothing ever happened.

When The Beatles break up, George Martin is paid off very well to keep quiet.
John and George are eventually killed by them so that they will never come out to the press with the true story. But by this time, the only evidence would be forensics testing like fingerprints and DNA which Faul will never submit to. Linda was aware of the rumors but never believed them. She thought her Paul was the real Paul.

Faulcon finds the above "plausible."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread195888/pg75

Imagine if young people in their first exposure to Paul, The Beatles, or PID only had such fiction as the basis of their research.

Since I got involved in this in 2003, I have seen the following put forth by the pidders as the true story of Paul McCartney.


Paul McCartney died of explosive diarrhea from IBS
Paul's dead body was launched into space by NASA and is in orbit now.
Yoko is a government agent and actually murdered John.
"Faul" was involved in John's murder and he and Yoko toasted John's death the day after.
"Faul" is a pedophile who molested his own children.
John, George and Ringo were complicit in the cover up so that they could make more money.
Don Knotts replaced Brian Epstein.
Charlie Brill (of Star Trek fame) replaced John Lennon and was the one actually murdered by Yoko.
"Faul" is actually the clone of a female WWII spy who was actually the "real" Paul's mother.
Other more outlandish theories


I along with others are big Beatle fans who respect them. We saw these stories listed above being promoted as the "truth" about Paul McCartney. We also saw some young, and not so young, gullible people reading and starting to believe this stuff. I am sorry, but I along with the other PIAers are not going to sit back and see people we like and respect smeared with nothing offered to refute it. We take time to offer another side of the story; another point-of-view, so that people researching Paul, The Beatles, and PID have the ability to see the fallacy of the PID theories.

Another big reason that drove me to continue came when I was at 60IF. I had the audacity to question one of the brilliant theories listed above. I didn't buy one of the crazier things and said so. For that I was immediately jumped on and accused of being a government agent working as part of the cover up. I knew that they were completely wrong, and it showed me how easy it was for them to make baseless, reckless accusations. It destroyed any crediblility they had about PID.

[formosan termite]

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/1-1.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/2.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/3-1.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/4.gif

Same guy.

h/t PIAbolo1

[magnolia_xx]

:) To all of you out there, Just don't try and fool me, you will look stupid enough already:D
Are calling names? That seems to be the only thing PIDers can do when they don't know how to answer.

[magnolia_xx]

I was immediately jumped on and accused of being a government agent working as part of the cover up. I knew that they were completely wrong, and it showed me how easy it was for them to make baseless, reckless accusations. It destroyed any crediblility they had about PID.

It seems that I am being accused to have a fake identity and being an government agent too. I wonder what government... USA? UK? Italy? LOL

[formosan termite]

Faul WAS the stand-in. The blood test showed he wasn't the father of the baby b/c he wasn't Paul.

Most likely is that Paul was not the father.

But, most important, this woman, who knew Paul McCartney intimately and up close, believes that in 1983, and now, the real Paul McCartney is still alive and well. If she, who knew Paul intimately and up close, believed that Paul had been replaced, she would never have pushed for a paternity test.

[lookfar]

Guys can you please keep personal accusations about other members out of this thread & keep on topic. Thanks:)

[formosan termite]

If the bloodtest could happen to prove he wasn't Paul to begin with; that's why. :)

So what good would it be to have a stand-in? The blood from the stand-in would not be Paul's either. In any case, using a stand-in would serve no purpose. Let us go through options if Paul was trying to prove he was not the father:

Option - Conclusion
Paul McCartney is alive, but not the father. - Paul would not need a stand-in.
Paul was replaced in 1966, and Paul was the father - "Faul" would not need a stand-in.
Paul was replaced in 1966, and Paul not the father - "Faul" would not need a stand-in.
Paul is alive, and is the father - Paul would need a stand-in.

The only way Paul would need a stand in is if he is the real Paul McCartney.

So, let us say that they are going to take blood from "Faul" and he is afraid because the blood will show he is not the real Paul McCartney. So, he gets a friend to be a stand-in. They do the test on the blood from the stand-in and find out that it does not belong to Paul McCartney. So what good did using the blood of a stand-in do?

I believe that faulcon's point is that Faul did not use a stand-in, and because the test came back showing Paul not to be the father, that it proves that Paul was replaced. That is only the case if Paul is the father of the child. If Paul did not father the child, then this test proves nothing about PID, or PIA for that matter.

[fireman]

Why do we spend hours refuting the falsehoods of the pidders:



Faulcon finds the above "plausible."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread195888/pg75

Imagine if young people in their first exposure to Paul, The Beatles, or PID only had such fiction as the basis of their research.

Since I got involved in this in 2003, I have seen the following put forth by the pidders as the true story of Paul McCartney.


Paul McCartney died of explosive diarrhea from IBS
Paul's dead body was launched into space by NASA and is in orbit now.
Yoko is a government agent and actually murdered John.
"Faul" was involved in John's murder and he and Yoko toasted John's death the day after.
"Faul" is a pedophile who molested his own children.
John, George and Ringo were complicit in the cover up so that they could make more money.
Don Knotts replaced Brian Epstein.
Charlie Brill (of Star Trek fame) replaced John Lennon and was the one actually murdered by Yoko.
"Faul" is actually the clone of a female WWII spy who was actually the "real" Paul's mother.
Other more outlandish theories


I along with others are big Beatle fans who respect them. We saw these stories listed above being promoted as the "truth" about Paul McCartney. We also saw some young, and not so young, gullible people reading and starting to believe this stuff. I am sorry, but I along with the other PIAers are not going to sit back and see people we like and respect smeared with nothing offered to refute it. We take time to offer another side of the story; another point-of-view, so that people researching Paul, The Beatles, and PID have the ability to see the fallacy of the PID theories.

Another big reason that drove me to continue came when I was at 60IF. I had the audacity to question one of the brilliant theories listed above. I didn't buy one of the crazier things and said so. For that I was immediately jumped on and accused of being a government agent working as part of the cover up. I knew that they were completely wrong, and it showed me how easy it was for them to make baseless, reckless accusations. It destroyed any crediblility they had about PID.

GREAT POST, how can anyone still believe in PID after that?

@Magnolia_xx: i read your posts at the ATS forum. :) I posted there under the name Diabolo1. Please join the maccafunhouse, you are very welcome there!!

good to have some people with common sense around here!:cool:

[theenlightenedone]

Guys can you please keep personal accusations about other members out of this thread & keep on topic. Thanks:)

That would be nice, but mind1universe keeps on calling us stupid, ignorant and paid dis-info agents. If we could keep that out this would be much easier to discuss :)

[magnolia_xx]

Hey Fireman/Diabolo, thank you for your invitation, I am going to reach you all there also :)

[theenlightenedone]

Don't worry, it is not us that the Mod is speaking about :D

Well we have also called the PIDers names, like stupid. Both sides need to stop with that.

[formosan termite]

Hey Fireman/Diabolo, thank you for your invitation, I am going to reach you all there also :)

What about my invitatation? :confused::D

[magnolia_xx]

Just done! :) Thanks!

[magnolia_xx]

Why do we spend hours refuting the falsehoods of the pidders:



Faulcon finds the above "plausible."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread195888/pg75

Imagine if young people in their first exposure to Paul, The Beatles, or PID only had such fiction as the basis of their research.

Since I got involved in this in 2003, I have seen the following put forth by the pidders as the true story of Paul McCartney.


Paul McCartney died of explosive diarrhea from IBS
Paul's dead body was launched into space by NASA and is in orbit now.
Yoko is a government agent and actually murdered John.
"Faul" was involved in John's murder and he and Yoko toasted John's death the day after.
"Faul" is a pedophile who molested his own children.
John, George and Ringo were complicit in the cover up so that they could make more money.
Don Knotts replaced Brian Epstein.
Charlie Brill (of Star Trek fame) replaced John Lennon and was the one actually murdered by Yoko.
"Faul" is actually the clone of a female WWII spy who was actually the "real" Paul's mother.
Other more outlandish theories


I along with others are big Beatle fans who respect them. We saw these stories listed above being promoted as the "truth" about Paul McCartney. We also saw some young, and not so young, gullible people reading and starting to believe this stuff. I am sorry, but I along with the other PIAers are not going to sit back and see people we like and respect smeared with nothing offered to refute it. We take time to offer another side of the story; another point-of-view, so that people researching Paul, The Beatles, and PID have the ability to see the fallacy of the PID theories.

Another big reason that drove me to continue came when I was at 60IF. I had the audacity to question one of the brilliant theories listed above. I didn't buy one of the crazier things and said so. For that I was immediately jumped on and accused of being a government agent working as part of the cover up. I knew that they were completely wrong, and it showed me how easy it was for them to make baseless, reckless accusations. It destroyed any crediblility they had about PID.

I also think that some people should not have the nerve to accuse Paul McCartney to be a pedophile! How do you dare? He was a husband to Linda Eastman for nearly 30 years, he adopted her daughter and had other 3 children from her and in all the years of their marriage nobody could ever say anything bad about him as a husband and father (compare his behaviour to most of other celebrities... )!!!!
These are very serious accuses and nobody can accuse someone without having proofs. And it seems he is much loved from his son and daughters, just see how they defended him during the divorce from Heather Mills.
I suppose he does not care at all of PID ridiculous theories and would not spend his time reading these boards, otherwise I think he would have all the good reasons to bring an action against who accuses him to be a pedophile.

[socrates]

So what good would it be to have a stand-in? The blood from the stand-in would not be Paul's either. In any case, using a stand-in would serve no purpose. Let us go through options if Paul was trying to prove he was not the father:

Option - Conclusion
Paul McCartney is alive, but not the father. - Paul would not need a stand-in.
Paul was replaced in 1966, and Paul was the father - "Faul" would not need a stand-in.
Paul was replaced in 1966, and Paul not the father - "Faul" would not need a stand-in.
Paul is alive, and is the father - Paul would need a stand-in.

The only way Paul would need a stand in is if he is the real Paul McCartney.

So, let us say that they are going to take blood from "Faul" and he is afraid because the blood will show he is not the real Paul McCartney. So, he gets a friend to be a stand-in. They do the test on the blood from the stand-in and find out that it does not belong to Paul McCartney. So what good did using the blood of a stand-in do?

I believe that faulcon's point is that Faul did not use a stand-in, and because the test came back showing Paul not to be the father, that it proves that Paul was replaced. That is only the case if Paul is the father of the child. If Paul did not father the child, then this test proves nothing about PID, or PIA for that matter.

Exactly! :rolleyes:

[formosan termite]

I also think that some people should not have the nerve to accuse Paul McCartney to be a pedophile! How do you dare? He was a husband to Linda Eastman for nearly 30 years, he adopted her daughter and had other 3 children from her and in all the years of their marriage nobody could ever say anything bad about him as a husband and father (compare his behaviour to most of other celebrities... )!!!!
These are very serious accuses and nobody can accuse someone without having proofs. And it seems he is much loved from his son and daughters, just see how they defended him during the divorce from Heather Mills.
I suppose he does not care at all of PID ridiculous theories and would not spend his time reading these boards, otherwise I think he would have all the good reasons to bring an action against who accuses him to be a pedophile.

You are correct. There are things that have been put forth about Paul, Yoko and others that are quite mean and hateful.

That is why it is completely wrong when some people say that the ONLY reason anyone would spend time posting things counter to PID is for money. Any decent person reading some of the theories put forth would gladly take time to refute such things. I will gladly do so when anyone I like and respect is falsely accused of something.

[mind1universe]

It seems that I am being accused to have a fake identity and being an government agent too. I wonder what government... USA? UK? Italy? LOL

Lol..

I think your doing what your required.

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/PoorPAUL.jpg

[formosan termite]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/PoorPAUL.jpg

Yep. No doubt. John was replaced.

[formosan termite]

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/2-1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/1-2.gif

Same shape. Same jaw line. Same eyes. Same guy.

[magnolia_xx]

Lol..

I think your doing what your required.

Pardon? Please can you explain what you are saying?

[faulconandsnowjob]

Looks like the same nose on Faul

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ed_sull_comp-1.jpg
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g134/antiKitano/PDVD_005.jpg

[dream9]

Good comp faulcon.


....

[mind1universe]

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/2-1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/1-2.gif

Same shape. Same jaw line. Same eyes. Same guy.

Lol.

You keep trying:D

[mind1universe]

Pardon? Please can you explain what you are saying?

Shouldn't you:D

[theenlightenedone]

Looks like the same nose on Faul

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ed_sull_comp-1.jpg
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g134/antiKitano/PDVD_005.jpg

Faulcon, as you get older, the nose droops. So does the earlobes.

[formosan termite]

Same nose. Same shape. Same guy.

A properly executed comp (by FP) using photos from the same angle and similar expressions.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/newfade67.gif

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/fih-ti.jpg



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/67pfanimation.gif

Same expression. Same nose. Same guy.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade1.gif

[formosan termite]

Just to note. A nose is made up of cartilage and soft tissue. One can change the look of it by changing expressions. You can flare your nostrils, you can scrunch it up, you can stretch it and make it look thinner. Therefore, it should be easy to find two pictures where the noses can look a little different. That is why a comp needs to use photos from the same relative angle and photos with the same facial expressions.

Also, as many people age, the end of the nose begins to droop a bit because of the cartilage. That needs to be taken into account.

[magnolia_xx]

Shouldn't you:D

Sorry, it seems that I am still not able to understand.
You know, PIA is a virus. My brain was replaced and my mind dowloaded.:D
Please be more clear in your insinuation.
I am very curious.

[magnolia_xx]

Just to note. A nose is made up of cartilage and soft tissue. One can change the look of it by changing expressions. You can flare your nostrils, you can scrunch it up, you can stretch it and make it look thinner. Therefore, it should be easy to find two pictures where the noses can look a little different. That is why a comp needs to use photos from the same relative angle and photos with the same facial expressions.

Also, as many people age, the end of the nose begins to droop a bit because of the cartilage. That needs to be taken into account.
You know Termite, I think that maybe we are wasting time. On ATS Faulcon replied to me that the nose shape does not change with expression.
When someone denies a fact, there's nothing left to say!!

[formosan termite]

You know Termite, I think that maybe we are wasting time. On ATS Faulcon replied to me that the nose shape does not change with expression.
When someone denies a fact, there's nothing left to say!!

I hope your are kidding. That is demonstrably not true. Anyone can look in a mirror and try it. Where does she think the phrase "flaring the nostrils" comes from? Does someone's nose look the same when yawning as it does with a stoic expression?

Same nose:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paul02.gif

Look at these comps. Just look at the pre 67 Paul. Can anyone say that the shape of the nose is the same in both pictures?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ed_sull_comp-1.jpg
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade1.gif

[formosan termite]

Just for fun, here is a page dealing with animation of the nose. The person talks about how difficult the nose is due to deformation with differing expressions.

http://www.silo3d.com/Tutorials/User_Tutorials/tony_jung/HTML_files/tjnyc_4.htm

In other words, people with a great attention to detail for such things know that the nose changes shape with different expressions.

See this article about drawing the nose:

I believe this one was wearing a large hat that might have shaded the front of his nose, or it would have been more highlighted at the exact front. The sketch cuts off like the brim of a hat crosses the man's head but hasn't been drawn yet. In the full sketch, the man's lips are curled up and he's shouting in rage, it's very emotional. So look at what the other muscles of the face do to the line under and around the nose, to the shadows around the nose. Emotion and expression can even change the shape of the nose itself -- have you seen someone flare his nostrils?


http://www.ehow.com/how_2109051_draw-a-nose.html?ref=fuel&utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=ssp&utm_campaign=yssp_art

I hope this helps, Magnolia.

[magnolia_xx]

Just for fun, here is a page dealing with animation of the nose. The person talks about how difficult the nose is due to deformation with differing expressions.

http://www.silo3d.com/Tutorials/User_Tutorials/tony_jung/HTML_files/tjnyc_4.htm

In other words, people with a great attention to detail for such things know that the nose changes shape with different expressions.

See this article about drawing the nose:



http://www.ehow.com/how_2109051_draw-a-nose.html?ref=fuel&utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=ssp&utm_campaign=yssp_art



I hope this helps, Magnolia.

Hi Termite, look here:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread195888/pg81
I think Faulcon should have a look to your links... :rolleyes:

[magnolia_xx]

I hope your are kidding. That is demonstrably not true. Anyone can look in a mirror and try it. Where does she think the phrase "flaring the nostrils" comes from? Does someone's nose look the same when yawning as it does with a stoic expression?

Same nose:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paul02.gif

Look at these comps. Just look at the pre 67 Paul. Can anyone say that the shape of the nose is the same in both pictures?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ed_sull_comp-1.jpg
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade1.gif
The comparisons you posted show that Paul & Faul's features perfectly match. So, no Faul at all :D

[magnolia_xx]

PS in Faulcon's pics about the nose we can see that the 2 left ears perfectly match.
Thank you Faulcon! :p

[faulconandsnowjob]

Different foreheads

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/Solidbass.jpghttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/LennonMcCartney1965LennonSheppard19.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

PS in Faulcon's pics about the nose we can see that the 2 left ears perfectly match.
Thank you Faulcon! :p

Forensics have proven the ears don't match :rolleyes:

[formosan termite]

Different foreheads

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/Solidbass.jpghttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/LennonMcCartney1965LennonSheppard19.jpg

LOL! Look at this comp. One huge picture compared to a much smaller one that is all fuzzy and blurry. And the one on the right looks kind of squeezed and stretched. With all the thousands of pictures that can be used, why would a person pick that?

Same sized forehead.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/faul_spies_george.gif

[socrates]

Forensics have proven the ears don't match :rolleyes:

Your lies just prove how desperate you are. Kinda sad really.

The forensics proved nothing. That's a FACT. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

[magnolia_xx]

Forensics have proven the ears don't match :rolleyes:

That is great news, Faulcon, but please can you look at the ears in the two photos you posted? (you posted them so you will agree that they cannot be doctored by us, mean PIAers :D)
I am sure you have eyes.
Do you really think they are different?

[formosan termite]

Forensics have proven the ears don't match :rolleyes:


Magnolia, you are Italian and have read the article. The writers did not once claim to have proven that the pictures were of two different people. If they don't claim it is proof, why should anyone else?

[magnolia_xx]

Yes of course this is what the 2 scientists said, but it seems that PIDers understand just what they want to understand.
Anybody who has well-working eyes can see that the ears are identical.
Why can't people think with their own brain?

[magnolia_xx]

With all the thousands of pictures that can be used, why would a person pick that?

Because picking up photos suitable for a real comparison (same light, same expression, same shooting angle et cetera) would lead to prove that "Faul" is a mere invention and that the guy known as Paul McCartney, musician for over 50 years, and still performing, is the very same guy who met John Lennon in 1957, well alive and in good health.
This would cause the collapse of all the silly PID theories and they know.
So, they go on this way.

[supertzar]

His features in the comps with similar angles match like 99.99999999% I think this is a psyop to discredit the board and "Conspiracy Theorists" in general. How many people in this whole world could look at two pictures of a face that perfectly matches when overlaid and still insist it does not look the same?

[magnolia_xx]

How many people in this whole world could look at two pictures of a face that perfectly matches when overlaid and still insist it does not look the same?

It seems quite a lot. PIDers do.:D

[formosan termite]

His features in the comps with similar angles match like 99.99999999% I think this is a psyop to discredit the board and "Conspiracy Theorists" in general.

Do you think so? I never even considered that, but it is possible.

[mind1universe]

Yep. No doubt. John was replaced.

Ya no douibt faul needs a Chin replacement.

I mean do you think people are a bunch of knobs or what?

You CAN CLEARLY see there are two different people where ONE is trying to look like him. Fair enough looks like him, big swing.


But its not him.


INSULT EDITED OUT


You know what I think.;) Seriously I even know what your going to say next. Give it up. The world is not yours and the world can't be hidden from the truth no more.

So my words to you is

You have a choice what your going to do. Worship the system are breakaway from the system. Mark these words.


The choice is now yours. I already know which your going to take. As for Magnolia she will understand too.;)

[mind1universe]

His features in the comps with similar angles match like 99.99999999% I think this is a psyop to discredit the board and "Conspiracy Theorists" in general. How many people in this whole world could look at two pictures of a face that perfectly matches when overlaid and still insist it does not look the same?

Cus they are not the same


And they are not 99.9999999 percent alike.

[socrates]

Magnolia, you are Italian and have read the article. The writers did not once claim to have proven that the pictures were of two different people. If they don't claim it is proof, why should anyone else?

Because they are so desperate and biased in favour of PID that FACT and TRUTH don't matter.

They will twist anything and lie about it to suit their agenda.

Just shows how desperate their position is if they have to resort to those sort of tactics.

[socrates]

Yes of course this is what the 2 scientists said, but it seems that PIDers understand just what they want to understand.
Anybody who has well-working eyes can see that the ears are identical.
Why can't people think with their own brain?

Because they are so desperate to believe in PID that objectivety goes flying out of the window.

[phrased eyebrow]

That's why it's nice to remain objective to possibilities. :)

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Private_View1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/EyebrowFillers.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Ex-Beatle McCartney recalls 1960s death rumours
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE57P4W220090826

Former Beatle Paul McCartney has described rumours that he had died, which surfaced more than 40 years ago, as "ridiculous"
Well, of course, "he" didn't die. We're saying the original mop-top Paul died, not the one who imposter-replaced him. All the LIFE magazine article did was prove post 1966 "Paul" was "still with us."

an "occupational hazard" for a member of one of the world's biggest bands.
Are there a lot of rumors of other musicians being dead & replaced - at least, on this scale? If so, then I'm not aware of them.

The conspiracy theory began in October 1969
It actually started in 1967 when rumors of a "car crash" went around England.

when a Detroit-based DJ claimed that the three other Beatles -- Ringo Starr, John Lennon and George Harrison -- had recruited a lookalike replacement for McCartney after he died in 1966.
Russ Gibb didn't claim that. Someone calling himself "Tom" called into his radio show & said Paul was dead, & that Gibb should play Revolution 9 backward.

He argued that because the man "posing" as McCartney on the cover of the Beatles' 1969 album "Abbey Road" had bare feet meant it represented a corpse, and that the number plate on a car in the photograph was LMW 28IF -- denoting McCartney's age, if he had lived.
Russ Gibb didn't "argue" that. Fred Labour heard the radio broadcast, & started looking into it. I believe he wrote about the bare feet & the 28IF clues. BTW, Faul's explanation for having bare feet that day is less than satisfactory, IMO.

"It was funny, really," McCartney, 67
Faul is probably about 72. He said he was 30 in MMT, which was 1967.

"But ridiculous. It's an occupational hazard: people make up a story and then you find yourself having to deal with this fictitious stuff.
Except there's the problem of all the facts that don't add up: the photos, the videos, the forensics, etc.

"I think the worst thing that happened was that I could see people sort of looking at me more closely: 'Were his ears always like that?'"
No, they were not. Forensics have proven that.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Wired_Ear_Crop.jpg

You can see the different conformation of piercing A (billobato before the 1966) the different performance of ellce and the different amplezza of antelice and of the valley. Do not coincide even the proportions between the various points Litania-from antelice and incisura pretagica (or the depression between Piercing and antitrago).

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db


Plus, Paul didn't have weird, plastic ear inserts:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sff_comp2.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/FaulEarZoom.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

I think this could explain the non-matching freckle patterns that Focrates keeps posting.

Wallace, Robert and H. Keith Melton. Spycraft. USA: Dutton, 2008 at 387:

... As necessary, more elaborate disguises using full or partial facial masks could perform an ethnic or sex change to alter a person's racial or gender appearance. among the options are padded clothing to alter body type and weight distribution, sculpted appliances that alter eye color, mouth lines, and affect speech tone, makeup and hair coloring, hand and arm "gloves" to match facial coloring, shoe lifts to add height, and torso devices to create a stooped posture. Individually and in combination, the disguise techniques can affect dramatic appearance change.

For officers in need of a disguise subject to close attention and durable for hours or days, OTS specialists would spend several hours performing the transformations. These labor-intensive disguises were typically applied on individuals in high-risk situations, such as illegal border crossings. Given time, the disguise specialists would alter hair color, apply facial hair, modify jaw lines, improvise dental work, create wrinkles, change complexion, or add glasses and warts to match any photographic documents and thus avoid chance recognition at a border crossing or airport checkpoint...

If they could add warts, they could add freckles.

Book info:
http://www.amazon.com/Spycraft-History-Spytechs-Communism-al-Qaeda/dp/B001LF4AOA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1251357906&sr=8-1

[faulconandsnowjob]

The eyes & eyebrows don't match up at all. They're clearly from 2 different faces.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/beardhalf.gif

[fireman]

lol. it's funny how in faulcons world, we are all paid agents!
:D

but really, her comps are pathetic and very slobby and nobody is buying that fantasy-stuff anyway.

It should be clear that this is the same guy:


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/classic_comp1.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/classic_fade1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/classic_comp_cut1.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/2-1.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/newfade1.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/b777.jpg

[socrates]

I think this could explain the non-matching freckle patterns that Focrates keeps posting.

Wallace, Robert and H. Keith Melton. Spycraft. USA: Dutton, 2008 at 387:

If they could add warts, they could add freckles.

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Earlier, someone posted some comps showing non-matching freckle patterns.

Well of course you'd say they are "non matching". However, I'll let others decide if they are the same freckles or not:


http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/1566/faulpaul4.pnghttp://img196.imageshack.us/img196/7830/cheezeymoustache3.jpg

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/5506/screenhunter49.jpg

If they could add wrinkles & warts, they could add freckles & scars.

Ok, let's get this straight. You are now suggesting that the illuminati went to the trouble of adding freckles to 'Faul' - yet they completely messed this up and couldn't even put them in the right places?

And at the same time as the illuminati doctors were muddling about putting freckles in the wrong places they didn't bother with something so obvious as his ears and so had him wandering around with fake ears stuck to the side of his face which were so badly made that they kept coming unstuck?

Okaaaaaaay..... :rolleyes::rolleyes:

And you have previously stated that:

"Faul had freckles. Paul did not."

Now you are saying Paul did?

Your claims are not very consistent, are they? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Of course, photo-doctoring could also be involved.

Ah, the old PID fall back! If in trouble, blame doctored photos. Funny you never provide the UN doctored photos to support your claim! :rolleyes:

What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

He posted these pics to support his theory that they are the same person, but those are not the same noses or eyes.

Mere speculation and biased opinion.

[mind1universe]

Magazine cover was photoshopped....


NEXT DESPARATE ATTEMTPT TO FOOL US.:D


They are not the same, god bless fauls chin, cus Paul didnt have THAT.:D:D:D

[magnolia_xx]

Magazine cover was photoshopped....


NEXT DESPARATE ATTEMTPT TO FOOL US.:D


They are not the same, god bless fauls chin, cus Paul didnt have THAT.:D:D:D

Please, can you pick up some comparable photos of Paul and Faul (same expression, same light, same shooting angle and so on) and explain us where are the differences? I will let this to you, otherwise you would go on accusing us to manipulate the photos. Please choose the photos and compare them for us.
Thanks.

[supertzar]

There was a comp that hagbard celine posted that appeared to show "Faul" with a very weak chin indeed - until I looked at it closer and saw that in the "Faul" pic he had his mouth wide open, making his lower lip appear to be his chin.

[formosan termite]

Yes, the deep contradiction is amazing.

The illuminati are all powerful and pay attention to every detail on the one hand. Their surgeons placed wrinkles, feckles and warts on Faul. They even were able to operate on the iris of Faul's eye to give it the same quirk as was in Paul's.

But, at the same time, she says that these detail oriented illuminati got the hair wrong, the ears wrong, the eye color wrong, the height wrong, the nose wrong, the teeth wrong and put the freckles in the wrong spots.

You can't have it both ways.

Also, let us review.

We were told flatly that Paul had brown eyes. We have shown with a quote from Paul McCartney himself in 1965 that he did not have brown eyes.

We were told flatly that Paul did not have freckles. Now we are told the illuminati placed freckles on Faul to try to match Paul. She debunked her own statement.

We are told flatly that forensics has proven that the ears don't match. But we have an Italian member who read the article and found that the "scientists" themselves do not claim that there is proof that the photos show two different men. If they don't claim proof, then how can someone here claim proof?

There are many statements being made in support of PID that are totally erroneous.

[magnolia_xx]

Yes, the deep contradiction is amazing.

The illuminati are all powerful and pay attention to every detail on the one hand. Their surgeons placed wrinkles, feckles and warts on Faul. They even were able to operate on the iris of Faul's eye to give it the same quirk as was in Paul's.

But, at the same time, she says that these detail oriented illuminati got the hair wrong, the ears wrong, the eye color wrong, the height wrong, the nose wrong, the teeth wrong and put the freckles in the wrong spots.

You can't have it both ways.

Also, let us review.

We were told flatly that Paul had brown eyes. We have shown with a quote from Paul McCartney himself in 1965 that he did not have brown eyes.

We were told flatly that Paul did not have freckles. Now we are told the illuminati placed freckles on Faul to try to match Paul. She debunked her own statement.

We are told flatly that forensics has proven that the ears don't match. But we have an Italian member who read the article and found that the "scientists" themselves do not claim that there is proof that the photos show two different men. If they don't claim proof, then how can someone here claim proof?

There are many statements being made in support of PID that are totally erroneous.

Yet, it is incredible that they actually seem unable to accept reality.

[formosan termite]

The eyes & eyebrows don't match up at all. They're clearly from 2 different faces.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/beardhalf.gif

The picture matches very well to pictures of Paul. But of course the two sides won't match up, because they are two different sides of the face.

This has to do with Facial Symmetry:

Facial Symmetry - - Which Side of Your Face is Your Good Side?
http://hubpages.com/hub/Which-Side-of-Your-Face-is-Your-Good-Side

Many times on TV and the movies, you will see some star or famous person saying "photograph my good side." That is because a person's face is not exactly the same on both sides. Each side is different.

So, the fact that one side of Paul's face does not exactly match up to the other is not a surprise, it is to be expected.

[mind1universe]

one post and I have 3 reactions.


And who de we think is smart.:D

[mind1universe]

The picture matches very well to pictures of Paul. But of course the two sides won't match up, because they are two different sides of the face.

This has to do with Facial Symmetry:

Facial Symmetry - - Which Side of Your Face is Your Good Side?
http://hubpages.com/hub/Which-Side-of-Your-Face-is-Your-Good-Side

Many times on TV and the movies, you will see some star or famous person saying "photograph my good side." That is because a person's face is not exactly the same on both sides. Each side is different.

So, the fact that one side of Paul's face does not exactly match up to the other is not a surprise, it is to be expected.


Still can't take your attention off the CHIN and EYES.


Pity we couldn't see the ears here.:p

Passes cranberry smoothies around the room;)


I huff, I huff, I puff I blow your house down. Give me a strawberry milkshake you spilited the last one in the car. You'd swear there were 19 people ploughing into old folks over 66 years of age. Jeesh. You know strawberry smoothies are not as healthy as cranberry ones. More vitamin C in it. Good for headaches.


Anyway. John was murdered. Paul didn't seem to surprised. I wonder why.;) Must had a cranberry shake before the death plot.



Oh oh oh oh and I almost forgot Faul is a great actor. But not good enough for me:D:D:D:D

[mind1universe]

Fauls eyes are lighter
Fauls Hair is lighter
Fauls skin is fairer
Fauls chin is longer
Fauls ears are different


But its funny how all these people are either fooled or playing this very dangerous ball game on this thread.;)

We all know Faul had work done to make him look more like him. We all know months of work was involved in 1967 to make him look more alike. Thats is why the mop of hair and facial hair was there to mask it. Hehe.



I enjoy this thread, Cus I love too see how far they are going to go with this before I make this reallly embarressing for them. if you catch my drift


Remember I said.....














This,




Keep gonig with it. I will see how far you will go. I will sit back and watch. ANd wait for it.






Go ahead, see if you can fool me. You know you can't. Try fool others now. See if people are going to fall for it now.

[mind1universe]

Please, can you pick up some comparable photos of Paul and Faul (same expression, same light, same shooting angle and so on) and explain us where are the differences? I will let this to you, otherwise you would go on accusing us to manipulate the photos. Please choose the photos and compare them for us.
Thanks.

Now now,. We don't want to talk to much do we.

[magnolia_xx]

one post and I have 3 reactions.


And who de we think is smart.:D

Just trying to help you :D

[formosan termite]

Just trying to help you :D

You are very nice.:D Besides, I did not see three.

I hope you see that what I said before has been substantiated. You can see how easy it is for some to make the baseless charge that Paul was involved in killing John. That is why we post. Any person of conscience can not sit back and let things like that go by without doing something to refute it.

At least it was admitted that it was Paul, and not "Faul." So there is now an admission that Paul is Alive.:)

[socrates]

The picture matches very well to pictures of Paul. But of course the two sides won't match up, because they are two different sides of the face.

This has to do with Facial Symmetry:

Facial Symmetry - - Which Side of Your Face is Your Good Side?
http://hubpages.com/hub/Which-Side-of-Your-Face-is-Your-Good-Side

Many times on TV and the movies, you will see some star or famous person saying "photograph my good side." That is because a person's face is not exactly the same on both sides. Each side is different.

So, the fact that one side of Paul's face does not exactly match up to the other is not a surprise, it is to be expected.

Excellent summation.

PIDDERS believe that each side of the face should be identical. :eek:

Just shows you how ignorance of physiology can lead to ridiculous contentions. :rolleyes:

[socrates]

There was a comp that hagbard celine posted that appeared to show "Faul" with a very weak chin indeed - until I looked at it closer and saw that in the "Faul" pic he had his mouth wide open, making his lower lip appear to be his chin.

Yes, photos can be misleading.

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paull_Faul_nose.jpg

[formosan termite]

Of course, the nose is made up of cartilage and soft tissue. It can change shape depending on the expressions. But don't take my word for it.

Here is a page dealing with animation of the nose. The person talks about how difficult it is to animate the nose is due to deformation with differing expressions.

http://www.silo3d.com/Tutorials/User_Tutorials/tony_jung/HTML_files/tjnyc_4.htm

In other words, people with a great attention to detail for such things know that the nose changes shape with different expressions.

See this article about drawing the nose:

I believe this one was wearing a large hat that might have shaded the front of his nose, or it would have been more highlighted at the exact front. The sketch cuts off like the brim of a hat crosses the man's head but hasn't been drawn yet. In the full sketch, the man's lips are curled up and he's shouting in rage, it's very emotional. So look at what the other muscles of the face do to the line under and around the nose, to the shadows around the nose. Emotion and expression can even change the shape of the nose itself -- have you seen someone flare his nostrils?

http://www.ehow.com/how_2109051_draw-a-nose.html?ref=fuel&utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=ssp&utm_campaign=yssp_art

So, artists, who have great attention to detail, know that the nose can change shape with different expressions. So it is important to find photos of similar expressions.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paul02.gif

Same nose

Look at these comps. Just look at the pre 67 Paul. Can anyone say that the shape of the nose is the same in both pictures?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ed_sull_comp-1.jpg
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade1.gif

This shows that even comparing two photos of pre' 67 Paul, the shape of the nose can change.

[mind1universe]

Excellent summation.

PIDDERS believe that each side of the face should be identical. :eek:

Just shows you how ignorance of physiology can lead to ridiculous contentions. :rolleyes:

No don't put words in peoples mouth.

But since Pauls face is not so anti symettrical

It would be FAR MORE ANTI SYMETRICAL WHEN PUT TO FAULS:D


Hence the chin......:p And heavy drooping of fauls eyes. Can't miss it so you can't

[mind1universe]

Of course, the nose is made up of cartilage and soft tissue. It can change shape depending on the expressions. But don't take my word for it.

Here is a page dealing with animation of the nose. The person talks about how difficult it is to animate the nose is due to deformation with differing expressions.

http://www.silo3d.com/Tutorials/User_Tutorials/tony_jung/HTML_files/tjnyc_4.htm

In other words, people with a great attention to detail for such things know that the nose changes shape with different expressions.

See this article about drawing the nose:



http://www.ehow.com/how_2109051_draw-a-nose.html?ref=fuel&utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=ssp&utm_campaign=yssp_art

So, artists, who have great attention to detail, know that the nose can change shape with different expressions. So it is important to find photos of similar expressions.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paul02.gif

Same nose

Look at these comps. Just look at the pre 67 Paul. Can anyone say that the shape of the nose is the same in both pictures?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ed_sull_comp-1.jpg
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade1.gif

This shows that even comparing two photos of pre' 67 Paul, the shape of the nose can change.

Great that you posted these pictures


EARS ARE VERY DIFFERENT. TADAAAAAAA


CHIN IS SO BLOODY OBVIOUS. Thank you for those pictures


Now I'm enjoying this. It would be better if I got paid for this:D I do love the photoshopping that is done in these picture you show. I just love how you can fool the viewers of this forum with those pictures. We all know that fauls Chin is different but in the pics above where you morphed two pictures shows the chin to be the same yet its obviously different in the ones you just posted



HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMM. :D


I wonder if I'm gonna be fooled :P

[mind1universe]

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paull_Faul_nose.jpg

God its makes this whole Paul replacement to obvious when they did all that moustache thing on faul:D

Oh better do this to him to make people distracted of his other features. Like a bald man covering his bald spot with a hat. Like give me a break.

But the shape of the head is even different for christ sake.

Fauls HEAD IS MORE OVAL, PAUL is more square.

[mind1universe]

Just trying to help you :D



You will be helping yourself soon enough ;)

[formosan termite]

Same nose. Same shape. Same guy.

A properly executed comp (by FP) using photos from the same angle and similar expressions.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/newfade67.gif

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/fih-ti.jpg



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/67pfanimation.gif

Same expression. Same nose. Same guy.

[formosan termite]

Same shape.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paul02.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/faul_spies_george.gif

NOT a different shape.

[phrased eyebrow]

Those are funny. You can control what YOU want to believe, but you're not going to persuade me.

If "Paul" wasn't a Beatle, would the PIA crew be such rabid fans? Well from 66/67 onward, Faul WAS a Beatle. So you don't have to carry water for him anymore. Different Guy, but still the Beatle heritage, right? So keep cheering for the impostor at his concert$ and purchasing his crap music standard of late. He can sing Beatles hits too if you get tired of the new stuff. We can all be happy. :p

[socrates]

Same nose. Same shape. Same guy.

A properly executed comp (by FP) using photos from the same angle and similar expressions.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/newfade67.gif

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/fih-ti.jpg



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/67pfanimation.gif

Same expression. Same nose. Same guy.

MASTERPIECE!

:D :D :D

How anyone can think those are two different people is incredible. :eek:

[mind1universe]

Clever photoshopping.


But not clever me.

Makes sense. good.;) I have the violin out now. I just love how you imagine to fool me. Post more pictures I'm singing humpty dumpty sat on the wall.

The eggman song.

Let's rattle this room.;) I can clearly see one of the photos were photoshopped. I'm interested to know where do you get this equipment. I would love if you could email me this so I can do this to photos I have at home of the family. I like how you can transfer hair and different features to one face.

[mind1universe]

The two pics you posted maybe different times and different places. But the eyes and muscle fixtation in both pictures are the exact replica and copied into each photo. The eye movement and pupil dilation is 100 percent the same. This is impossible to have in any pic to have the exact same stare. The only way to have 100percent measurement is to literally copy the photo. So there is obvious photoshopping. Any attentive person can see this, if you showed these photos to a photographer she would slap you. I'm serious. Your foooling NOBODY.



Now we are seeing really dodgy photoshopping. A professional photographer could even photoshop better than this. Will Faul hire one?. I think somebody should ask him. We need someone to try fool us seriously. Because I'm sitting here eating toast laughing at you. It's becoming even more fun especially to the readers :D. I'm glad your doing this work. I see the end already. Now keep going ;) I want you too, you know i DO.


i see someone digging a really really big hole as time goes on. Keep it up ;)


It's funny how his chin changes shape in photos. I'm the eggman, you gonna shoot me. wiggles around the room.

[faulconandsnowjob]

I love how the cat is out of the bag on this PID thing. There's no way the PIA crew is going to keep everyone from seeing Faul is an imposter who could never fill Paul's Beatle boots.

[faulconandsnowjob]

A little something on how they may have created the illusion that Paul was "still with us"

FAKE CELL PHONE CALLS (Flight 93)

..These voices were the result of the technological wonder called voice morphing in which the sound of anybody's voice can be duplicated in real time. If the full range of the subject's voice has been recorded, which usually can happen in a 10 minute phone conversation, and then fed into the computer software, anybody speaking the subject's language can very convincingly sound like the subject person on the phone to his or her family, friends, coworkers, etc. etc...

http://www.911lies.org/cell_calls_911_faked_voice_morphing.html

[formosan termite]

The animated pic in this image is the '66 face with only the hair and mustache changing . The two on the left are unaltered.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/67pfanimation.gif

That is the only change made. It shows that when you change the hair and mustache, '66 Paul looks like '67 Paul. Simple.

[formosan termite]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/fade020709.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/mpf020709.jpg

Here, the third picture on the right is the post '66 Paul in the first picture, with the hair of the '66 Paul.

I am happy to post properly done comps using correctly sized photos showing similar expressions.

[faulconandsnowjob]

A little timeline:

July 1, 1966 - Tokyo

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1966_July1Concert_03.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1966_July1Concert_02.jpg

July 4 or 5, 1966

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1966_ManillaReturn_05.jpg

Aug 19, 1966 - Memphis

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/memphisbeatles1966b.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paul_66_last_interview.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/memphis_66_paul.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Aug 22, 1966 - NY

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1966_August22_01.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/warwick_paul.jpg

Aug 28, 1966 - LA

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/la_paul_66.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/la_paul_4-1.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/la_paul_4.jpg

Aug 29 - San Francisco
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/InsiderBill2.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/John_Paul_candlestick.jpg

Aug 19 v Aug 29, 1966
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/comp_memphis_la.jpg

Nov 1966 - Kenya trip

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Bill_Sheppard_Mal_Evans_1966_03-1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Bill_Sheppard_Mal_Evans_1966_05.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Dec 18, 1966

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FamilyWay.jpg

Dec 20, 1966 - EMI studios

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Dec66_09.jpg

Winter 1966 - is that supposed to be Paul?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1966Winter.jpg

[dedesuperman]

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paull_Faul_nose.jpg

Thank you faulconandsnowjob not being accustomed with photobucked you knew how to put it as I wanted it! ;)

As you notice it the rear of Paul's nose is different from the one of Faul, I don't see big difference of expression to make that the one of Paul in the shape of beak (indicated by the arrow) while the one of Faul he doesn't have the same shape (indicated also by the arrow) Also the eyebrows is different more arched for Faul.

I agree with mind1universe to say that Fauls head is more oval while the one of Paul is more square in that picture. Usually I say round!

[faulconandsnowjob]

Thank you faulconandsnowjob not being accustomed with photobucked you knew how to put it as I wanted it! ;)

Any time :)

I agree with mind1universe to say that Fauls head is more oval while the one of Paul is more square in that picture. Usually I say round!

Paul definitely had a rounder face & head than Faul. The right-most pic is a blend of the 2 that appeared on Sgt. Pepper.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sgt_pepper_blend.jpg

[magnolia_xx]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/fade020709.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/mpf020709.jpg

Here, the third picture on the right is the post '66 Paul in the first picture, with the hair of the '66 Paul.

I am happy to post properly done comps using correctly sized photos showing similar expressions.

It is evident that he is the same person.
Those who say that the photos don't match/are doctored/and so on, simply lie. Or maybe they really don't want to see.
Oh, the only difference between the 1st and 2nd photo is the scar on Paul's lip, due to the moped accident that took place in December 1966.

[magnolia_xx]

You will be helping yourself soon enough ;)


Now are you threatening me?
LOL, after insults, even menaces. :D
You are a noteworthy PIDer.

[mind1universe]

The animated pic in this image is the '66 face with only the hair and mustache changing . The two on the left are unaltered.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v197/Member27/PID/67pfanimation.gif

That is the only change made. It shows that when you change the hair and mustache, '66 Paul looks like '67 Paul. Simple.

You keep digging and crossing a very dangerous threashold.


Look at the pictures you photoshopped and wonder why people are accusing you of being a dis info agent.


I'm going to give you one chance now.;)

I've already explained obviously how you manipulated these photos.

[mind1universe]

It is evident that he is the same person.
Those who say that the photos don't match/are doctored/and so on, simply lie. Or maybe they really don't want to see.
Oh, the only difference between the 1st and 2nd photo is the scar on Paul's lip, due to the moped accident that took place in December 1966.
:D


Passes the one a shovel.

[mind1universe]

Now are you threatening me?
LOL, after insults, even menaces. :D
You are a noteworthy PIDer.

I haven't insulted

You claimed I need help. Orginally.


I'm not a PIDer. I'm a human being who is worthy.


Funny that you accuse other people of insulting but you dished out an insult in the one line as well.

[mind1universe]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/fade020709.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/mpf020709.jpg

Here, the third picture on the right is the post '66 Paul in the first picture, with the hair of the '66 Paul.

I am happy to post properly done comps using correctly sized photos showing similar expressions.


Why was two totally different pictures made so alike and why the hell was the exact same pose was made to the T.


Because sillly goons over the years who like to think they are fooling people spending all their times taking pictures of the new faul to make the poses look like the old Paul. Editing and photoshopping pcitures with so much obliviousness. Then you come along and post the pictures


"Here here ere ha ha hHA look ah ha ha "

I'm almost singing.


It is getting so obvious at this rate.


I can see people are beginning to think less and less of your credentials Formosan. You know how I feel:)

[mind1universe]

Any time :)



Paul definitely had a rounder face & head than Faul. The right-most pic is a blend of the 2 that appeared on Sgt. Pepper.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sgt_pepper_blend.jpg

It's very very obvious they are alike and not the same person. the facial structure and jawline are completely different. It's now official we have people on here trying to convince us that it's all lies.
I would still notice that even if Faul had a chin op. You can still clearly see the heads are diferent and Fauls face is by far much longer than Pauls.

The question is how long can they do it.

[magnolia_xx]

I haven't insulted

You claimed I need help. Orginally.


I'm not a PIDer. I'm a human being who is worthy.


Funny that you accuse other people of insulting but you dished out an insult in the one line as well.

Yes, you insulted me insinuating that I would be a paid agent.
This is what some human beings believing in PID (I hope this time it is OK for you) do to dismiss PIAers' claims.
I am not an agent from any secret society or government or whatever else.
I am a Paul McCartney's fan and after considering PID for a short while I then came to my own conclusions.
Therefore I cannot just read pro-PID messages without trying to confute what I believe to be a hoax.
It is obvious that both parts firmly believe in their theories.
This is why PIAers go on asserting that PID is a hoax and why you and Faulcon and other people go on with PID claims.
That's all.
It may be that I misunderstood the sense of your message about the help I would have needed soon. It sounded like a menace to me but English is not my first language so it could be that I was wrong, at least I hope so.
I also hope that we can go on discussing PID (hoax or not) in a civil way.
Thanks.

[formosan termite]

It is evident that he is the same person.
Those who say that the photos don't match/are doctored/and so on, simply lie. Or maybe they really don't want to see.
Oh, the only difference between the 1st and 2nd photo is the scar on Paul's lip, due to the moped accident that took place in December 1966.

Thank you, Magnolia.

There is some foolishness posted that these photos were perposley posed to make the "Faul" look like Paul. This of course is baloney.

As I have said there are hundreds of thousands of pictures of Paul taken over decades. Some are going to show similar expressions and looks. If you just look at film which is 24 frames per second, a 90 minute film would have 129,600 pictures in it. Out of all of those pictures, it certainly is possible to find pictures with similar angles and facial expressions. To properly do comps, it takes effort to find such photos.

Here are the full shots that the comp photos were taken from.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/24-beatles-082207.jpg

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paulierings.jpg

[mind1universe]

Yes, you insulted me insinuating that I would be a paid agent.
This is what some human beings believing in PID (I hope this time it is OK for you) do to dismiss PIAers' claims.
I am not an agent from any secret society or government or whatever else.
I am a Paul McCartney's fan and after considering PID for a short while I then came to my own conclusions.
Therefore I cannot just read pro-PID messages without trying to confute what I believe to be a hoax.
It is obvious that both parts firmly believe in their theories.
This is why PIAers go on asserting that PID is a hoax and why you and Faulcon and other people go on with PID claims.
That's all.
It may be that I misunderstood the sense of your message about the help I would have needed soon. It sounded like a menace to me but English is not my first language so it could be that I was wrong, at least I hope so.
I also hope that we can go on discussing PID (hoax or not) in a civil way.
Thanks.


Well we will find out what your purpose is, just don't question what I think of you, because your going to get the truth.


Let's just say for argument sake I was right, would I be wrongfully accused of insult.

Carry on Magnolia. I lead you the way.:D I don't need to judge you any further than you already have.


i hope you can talk more civil and stop calling people unworthy which is a personal insult. Practice what you preach and we carry this thread to the truth hope you are with me on the truth. :)

[mind1universe]

Thank you, Magnolia.

There is some foolishness posted that these photos were perposley posed to make the "Faul" look like Paul. This of course is baloney.

As I have said there are hundreds of thousands of pictures of Paul taken over decades. Some are going to show similar expressions and looks. If you just look at film which is 24 frames per second, a 90 minute film would have 129,600 pictures in it. Out of all of those pictures, it certainly is possible to find pictures with similar angles and facial expressions. To properly do comps, it takes effort to find such photos.

Here are the full shots that the comp photos were taken from.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/24-beatles-082207.jpg

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paulierings.jpg



The photoshopping is good here.

I mean he happened to have the exact same eye stare the exact same mouth stare and the exact same direction of the eyes in two different pictures.


Passes you a shovel.:p

[fireman]

haha, "Photoshopping" yeah right!

Go find the "undoctored" original then! Please!

:rolleyes:

It's just the same guy...


PAUL in 1966 and PAUL in 1967: exact match!
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif

[magnolia_xx]

The photoshopping is good here.

I mean he happened to have the exact same eye stare the exact same mouth stare and the exact same direction of the eyes in two different pictures.


Passes you a shovel.:p

Termite's pics are great, not blurry and uncomparable like most of the photos posted by pro-PID members.
Please provide proofs of the photoshopping.
Otherwise your claim is unfounded :D:D:D

[formosan termite]

Paul definitely had a rounder face & head than Faul. The right-most pic is a blend of the 2 that appeared on Sgt. Pepper.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sgt_pepper_blend.jpg

Oy. This is the old Sun King stuff that was debunked 5 years ago.

The picture in the middle is the infamous Sgt Pepper pic from the CD released in 1987. It has been so badly stretched vertically that his features won't line up with any other photo from that same session.

The picture on the far right is from the original gatefold in the 1967 record album cover. Here is the gatefold from 1967.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v477/devilsadv/sgtfeffer1.gif

So the one on the far right came first in 1967. The one in the middle came later in 1987. So the one on the far right is not a combo of the first and second.

And talk about photoshop, that middle photo was stretched and cropped. It is such a sloppy job, the hair looks like the picture was cut out by a 6 year old with safety scissors.

Let us look how the artwork was stretched for all of the Beatles.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v477/devilsadv/RedYellowPepperAnimation.gif

http://www.tlcgraphic.com/paul2.html

[magnolia_xx]

haha, "Photoshopping" yeah right!

Go find the "undoctored" original then! Please!

:rolleyes:

It's just the same guy...


PAUL in 1966 and PAUL in 1967: exact match!
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif

Great job Fireman.
BTW, undoctored pics can be found everywhere in the web. No need to photoshop anything to have obviously perfect matches, proving that Paul McCartney was never replaced.

[formosan termite]

An accusation has been made that I photoshopped.

Some how it is not possible to some that out of hundreds of thousands of pictures taken of the same man, that two can't be found where he has the same facial expression.

Hint. The reason that the facial features look the same is because IT IS THE SAME PERSON. Not because of any photoshopping.

But, since the accusation has been made, please, anyone at all, go find the original undoctored photos and present them here. Prove that the ones I posted were photoshopped.

[formosan termite]

Same shape, same features, same guy.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v477/devilsadv/PaulFadeAn.gif

[magnolia_xx]

i hope you can talk more civil and stop calling people unworthy which is a personal insult.

Please provide the proofs that I called someone "unworthy" here.:rolleyes:
Oh.... you can't, because I did not.
But it does not matter to me.
The only thing I can do is confuting PID claims showing that they are based on comparisons between uncomparable photos and mere opinions, not facts.
BTW I think you are discrediting PID hoax with your own behaviour, with your "Here here ere ha ha hHA look ah ha ha " and so on :rolleyes:

[magnolia_xx]

An accusation has been made that I photoshopped.

Some how it is not possible to some that out of hundreds of thousands of pictures taken of the same man, that two can't be found where he has the same facial expression.

Hint. The reason that the facial features look the same is because IT IS THE SAME PERSON. Not because of any photoshopping.

But, since the accusation has been made, please, anyone at all, go find the original undoctored photos and present them here. Prove that the ones I posted were photoshopped.

They cannot of course, because anyone could take the same photos from the web.

[ivgg]

The photoshopping is good here.

I mean he happened to have the exact same eye stare the exact same mouth stare and the exact same direction of the eyes in two different pictures.


Passes you a shovel.:p


The quality of tampering was very low in the sixties. So it's not doctored.

And by the way, if it's tampered, too many people should have known about Paul's "death".

[formosan termite]

Just a logic question for the pidders.

If the detail oriented illuminati worked so hard and spent so much to cover up Paul's death, why did they stretch Paul's picture on the 1987 CD Sgt. Pepper cover? Stretching it would make him look less like Paul. They seemed to get the shape right on the 1967 cover. Why blow it all by stretching the 1987 cover?

[fireman]

Just a logic question for the pidders.

If the detail oriented illuminati worked so hard and spent so much to cover up Paul's death, why did they stretch Paul's picture on the 1987 CD Sgt. Pepper cover? Stretching it would make him look less like Paul. They seemed to get the shape right on the 1967 cover. Why blow it all by stretching the 1987 cover?

They just want you to believe that! Actually they replaced height and width a long time ago! :D

[mind1universe]

Termite's pics are great, not blurry and uncomparable like most of the photos posted by pro-PID members.
Please provide proofs of the photoshopping.
Otherwise your claim is unfounded :D:D:D


Chinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn :D:D:D


Fauls chin cannot be found.

[formosan termite]

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/fade020709.gif http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v477/devilsadv/PaulFadeAn.gif

Oh by gosh by golly. Chin is the sam in all six photos. (3 comps of 2 photos each = 6 photos)

[socrates]

I love how the cat is out of the bag on this PID thing.

Where exactly? I don't see any newspaper reports of an impostor? :D

Nothing on TV..... :D

Nothing on the radio. :D

All I see are more of your PID fantasies. :(

There's no way the PIA crew is going to keep everyone from seeing Faul is an imposter who could never fill Paul's Beatle boots.

43 years and counting........ :D:D:D:D:D

[socrates]

haha, "Photoshopping" yeah right!

Go find the "undoctored" original then! Please!

:rolleyes:

It's just the same guy...


PAUL in 1966 and PAUL in 1967: exact match!
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif

That's one of the best fades I've ever seen. :D

Brilliant Fireman.

So, where's Faulcon's "longer face"?

Where's his different shaped head?

His different chin?

Nose?

Mouth?

Forehead?

Incredible that some people have such poor observational skills that they will insist that that fade shows two different people.

There again, some people had never even noticed that Paul had freckles until a PIAer pointed it out to them.....

Right, Faulcon? :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

[mind1universe]

It's always the same when merge photos into one. I can clearly see the mixing.


Fauls chin is fauls chin your putting Pauls chin in there and don't deny it;)


The fact is Paul is not the same as Paul. But nice clever work that you do. The technology is there to fool people.


But remember I love just how I waste your time.

[formosan termite]

Again. If anyone thinks we are doctoring photos, like putting one chin over another, then produce the original undoctored photos and prove us wrong.

Simple.

And providing the truth is never a waste of time.:D

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's easy to fake pics to make Paul look like Faul & vice versa:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FakingBilly.gif

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/beatlespaul.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/JPMFakedmag.jpg

[ivgg]

It's easy to fake pics to make Paul look like Faul & vice versa:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FakingBilly.gif

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/beatlespaul.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/JPMFakedmag.jpg


And they tampered with John too?

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/4343/02am7.jpg

[ivgg]

It's easy to fake pics to make Paul look like Faul & vice versa:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FakingBilly.gif

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/beatlespaul.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/JPMFakedmag.jpg

The first one is not tampered, that's just a very good PIA-comp.

In the second one, they just painted a moustache. But they did the same thing with John.

Nice try, no price.

[formosan termite]

It's easy to fake pics to make Paul look like Faul & vice versa:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FakingBilly.gif

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/beatlespaul.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/JPMFakedmag.jpg

No pictures were "faked." It is merely changing the hair style on the photo. Nobody is fooling with the underlying features, just the hair style. They look the same because it is the same guy.

[mind1universe]

No pictures were "faked." It is merely changing the hair style on the photo. Nobody is fooling with the underlying features, just the hair style. They look the same because it is the same guy.

lol.......






yeah yeah. stares...

[socrates]

The fact is Paul is not the same as Paul.

Er..... okaaaaaay..... :rolleyes:

http://images.zaazu.com/img/daze-male-cross-eye-dizzy-smiley-emoticon-000296-large.gif

[socrates]

Again. If anyone thinks we are doctoring photos, like putting one chin over another, then produce the original undoctored photos and prove us wrong.

Funny that Faulcon and Co have NEVER been able to do it. :D:D:D

So much for their "doctoring" claims, eh? :)

[formosan termite]

If anyone think that the photos we used for the comps were doctored, please produce the original undoctored photos and prove us wrong.

Simple.

[formosan termite]

Er..... okaaaaaay..... :rolleyes:


A new mathematical property: a does not equal a

Upon such logic, PID is based.

[socrates]

A new mathematical property: a does not equal a

Upon such logic, PID is based.

http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_194.gif

[mind1universe]

good


We going to continue this?

Or are we going to be more self honest. Now make sure you read this message. Are we going to be more self honest NOW, or are we going to go against the flow.


I will make this a point right now. You either get with this line or you fall off it.:)

If you win and forever keep the truth, you can kill me, if you don't we will kill you meaning this old manipulative reality will be discarded and you will have no purpose. I love talking like this because masons will know exactly what Im talking about.:D

[mind1universe]

If anyone think that the photos we used for the comps were doctored, please produce the original undoctored photos and prove us wrong.

Simple.

No you post up proper pictures not fake ones


Give me a break LMFAOOOOOOO


I am beginning to think your digging your grave.:D

[formosan termite]

Funny that Faulcon and Co have NEVER been able to do it. :D:D:D

So much for their "doctoring" claims, eh? :)

Yeah. They just say, "you post fake ones," but never back it up with any proof. They never, ever show the "undoctored" versions of our photos, because the CAN'T. Just the same story. Baseless accusations not backed up by any proof.

[socrates]

masons will know exactly what Im talking about.

I'm glad somebody does.

http://images.zaazu.com/img/daze-male-cross-eye-dizzy-smiley-emoticon-000296-large.gif

[socrates]

Yeah. They just say, "you post fake ones," but never back it up with any proof. They never, ever show the "undoctored" versions of our photos, because the CAN'T. Just the same story. Baseless accusations not backed up by any proof.

I hear you, brother.... I hear you.

PID is dead.

[formosan termite]

I hear you, brother.... I hear you.

PID is dead.

Until they can produce the "undoctored" versions of the ones they say we faked, their charges are worthless; full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

[themime]

Yeah another Schicksalstag thread.

I'd avoided it until I Googled the story behind it, may have to skip through it now.:D:D

[mind1universe]

:D

[faulconandsnowjob]

Yeah another Schicksalstag thread.



Sexy Sadie, you'll get yours yet :D

[formosan termite]

:D

Hey. Your 900th post.:D

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/0001.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/GreenEyes.jpg

[phrased eyebrow]

http://c.shores.home.mindspring.com/Unknown.gif

Same knows.

[faulconandsnowjob]

The PIA crew is desperately trying to keep the lid on PID, but it's too late. People are catching on. I love it! :p

[fireman]

The PIA crew is desperately trying to keep the lid on PID, but it's too late. People are catching on. I love it! :p

:confused:

Faulcon seems to forget a few things:

- it's her who is desperatly spamming those stories about Paul

- everyone of her far-fetched claims has been debunked over and over again (which she ignores)

- millions and billions of people of all over the world who do not post here, are what you call PIAers!

- people are catching on? Yeah right, even at Icke or ATS where reptile-conspiracies are discussed, most people don't buy your theories about Paul.

:o

[faulconandsnowjob]

"Spamming"? Wow, you're really desperate, aren't you? It's not "spamming" when you post exactly on what the thread is about. lol

You just hate that people are seeing Paul was replaced. :p

[faulconandsnowjob]

Paul had an interview just the other day about PID. I bet he thought he'd gotten away w/ it, but now the heat is back on. You know the old adage, you can fool some of the people some of the time, etc. Well, some of us aren't falling for it :p

[fireman]

ok , that convinced me.

i now believe that the CIA and the illuminati and MI6 all together replaced Paul Mccartney who died in a car crash...

or did "they" kill him themselves and then replace him?

Anyway, not important!

Luckily they had a guy who exactly matches Paul, who had the same face, the same wrinkles, the same freckles.

A guy who was a perfect actor and voice imitator, and a great singer, too! A guy who could play bass and guitar and piano, just like Paul!

A guy who wrote, sung and played some of the greatest songs in rock history! And eventually became the leading Beatle! Lucky illuminati to find that guy!

Although that guy was filmed, photographed, interviewed only weeks after Pauls death and started recording songs like "when i'm 64", "strawberry fields" and "penny lane" in december 1966 NOBODY IN THE WHOLE WORLD saw the difference! Wow, what a cool guy!

Oh wait, how is it that all Beatles looked so weird, ugly and not-cute-anymore from 1967 on??

Thanks to Faulcon we know the answer: they ALL got replaced with ugly mustached lookalikes!! :eek:

Isn't that right Faulcon? Isn't that your theory that you are posting at the PID MISS HIM board?

But, i was still sceptical how "Faul" could know so much intimate details about Pauls live...

Thanks to Faulcon we now that "they" (MI6, reptiles, CIA, illuminati) dowloaded Pauls mind into Fauls brain!!

I am a believer now! Thanks Faulcon for your enlightenment!!



But wait a minute!


If Faul looks soooo different from Paul, like Faulcon claims, how is it that nobody (ecxept a handful enlightend ones) can see the difference?


Easy: Faulcon tells us "they are stupid, brainwashed sheeple"!



AHH, that's why!







Ok, but what about all that pictures that clearly show the same guy? Like these:


:confused:



http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/uppermost.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/another-comp1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/new2.jpg

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/b777.jpg

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfectcomp.gif


:rolleyes:


That's an easy one: they are ALL DOCTORED by illuminati-reptile-photoshop artists!!


Thanks again Faulcon!

[toty1994]

Although this thread has long since passed it's sell-by date, I think most casual observers would agree that it remains highly entertaining and often hilarious.

It is clear the fundamentalist PiD believers will never display an iota of doubt, but I say long may the fun continue. I'd miss this thread if it 'died'...


...cue someone chiming in to say 'you wan't it to die 'cos you're a paid disinfo agent hahahahahahaha'...or something like that.

Love it!

[humito]

Although this thread has long since passed it's sell-by date, I think most casual observers would agree that it remains highly entertaining and often hilarious.

It is clear the fundamentalist PiD believers will never display an iota of doubt, but I say long may the fun continue. I'd miss this thread if it 'died'...


...cue someone chiming in to say 'you wan't it to die 'cos you're a paid disinfo agent hahahahahahaha'...or something like that.

Love it!

yes it is a laugh toty.......the theory and "proofs" have been torn to pieces time and again...........I cant wait for Paul to actually die!! will this carry on ?

what will we have instead .....the Faul is alive thread ?

[mind1universe]

ok , that convinced me.

i now believe that the CIA and the illuminati and MI6 all together replaced Paul Mccartney who died in a car crash...

or did "they" kill him themselves and then replace him?

Anyway, not important!

Luckily they had a guy who exactly matches Paul, who had the same face, the same wrinkles, the same freckles.

A guy who was a perfect actor and voice imitator, and a great singer, too! A guy who could play bass and guitar and piano, just like Paul!

A guy who wrote, sung and played some of the greatest songs in rock history! And eventually became the leading Beatle! Lucky illuminati to find that guy!

Although that guy was filmed, photographed, interviewed only weeks after Pauls death and started recording songs like "when i'm 64", "strawberry fields" and "penny lane" in december 1966 NOBODY IN THE WHOLE WORLD saw the difference! Wow, what a cool guy!

Oh wait, how is it that all Beatles looked so weird, ugly and not-cute-anymore from 1967 on??

Thanks to Faulcon we know the answer: they ALL got replaced with ugly mustached lookalikes!!

Isn't that right Faulcon? Isn't that your theory that you are posting at the PID MISS HIM board?

But, i was still sceptical how "Faul" could know so much intimate details about Pauls live...

Thanks to Faulcon we now that "they" (MI6, reptiles, CIA, illuminati) dowloaded Pauls mind into Fauls brain!!

I am a believer now! Thanks Faulcon for your enlightenment!!



But wait a minute!


If Faul looks soooo different from Paul, like Faulcon claims, how is it that nobody (ecxept a handful enlightend ones) can see the difference?

Because 95% of the world are moronic, brainwashed and simply not aware of anything around them on subtle level.

It's so incredibly easy to manipulate people when your on the level im on. Thankfully I am here to do the greater good with the awareness I have. The luciferan and illuminists that control the reality you now live in do it so they can survive and live the existence they want.


Because over the years more and more work was done to make him look more like him. Plastic sugary can do wonders.

Easy: Faulcon tells us "they are stupid, brainwashed sheeple"!



AHH, that's why! You said it.:D







Ok, but what about all that pictures that clearly show the same guy? Like these:


:confused:

So easily done. But the thing you missed here, they don't clearly show its the same guy

Unless of course, wait nevermind:D



http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/uppermost.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade1.gif





http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/b777.jpg

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfectcomp.gif


:rolleyes:
:D

That's an easy one: they are ALL DOCTORED by illuminati-reptile-photoshop artists!!


Thanks again Faulcon!



Faul is an artist like Paul, he can act.

Paul is dead so its an easy sport to play when you look like the man and played the man for 40 years.


But it sure is not easy now. Faul is aging rapidly, because of the stress i'm partially creating as is Faulcon.

[ivgg]

[B]Because 95% of the world are moronic, brainwashed and simply not aware of anything around them on subtle level.



And his family and friends didn't notice he was different either.

Talking about brainwashing... PID'ers are brainwashed!!!

[ivgg]

http://c.shores.home.mindspring.com/Unknown.gif

Same knows.


Nice try, but for us it's very obvious that Socrates and Paul are not the same man.

It's very obvious Paul is alive.

[socrates]

The PIA crew is desperately trying to keep the lid on PID, but it's too late. People are catching on. I love it! :p

A handful of people on some conspiracy forums?

LOL!

You're always good for a laugh.

http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_194.gif

[fireman]

http://www.philzimmermann.com/images/TinFoilHatArea.jpg

[socrates]

This made me laugh.

Faucon's post to a PIAER on AboveTopSecret (her latest hangout now she knows she's fighting a losing battle on here):

You make a lot of assumptions.

http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_40.gif

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread195888/pg94

Irony is obviously lost on Faulcon!

[phrased eyebrow]

ok , that convinced me.

But, i was still sceptical how "Faul" could know so much intimate details about Pauls live...



Without going out of your door
You can know all things of earth
With out looking out of your window
You could know the ways of heaven

The farther one travels
The less one knows
The less one really knows

Arrive without travelling
See all without looking
Do all without doing

E'en so, he's bound to slip up now and then. Singing "Yesterday" on the Ed Sullivan show? Isn't that what he said on Letterman?

[fireman]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAtfy6T4M6I

:rolleyes:

[magnolia_xx]

Because 95% of the world are moronic, brainwashed and simply not aware of anything around them on subtle level.

It's so incredibly easy to manipulate people when your on the level im on. Thankfully I am here to do the greater good with the awareness I have. The luciferan and illuminists that control the reality you now live in do it so they can survive and live the existence they want.


Because over the years more and more work was done to make him look more like him. Plastic sugary can do wonders.
You said it.:D







So easily done. But the thing you missed here, they don't clearly show its the same guy

Unless of course, wait nevermind:D


:D




Faul is an artist like Paul, he can act.

Paul is dead so its an easy sport to play when you look like the man and played the man for 40 years.


But it sure is not easy now. Faul is aging rapidly, because of the stress i'm partially creating as is Faulcon.

Thank you Mind1universe, you provided a few seconds of great fun to all the readers. The luciferan what?? Oh my, oh my. LOL
BTW... so you are thinking to be causing distress to Paul McCartney?
Is this your mission? My God. You have such a great sense of humour. :D:D:D
People coming here for the first time should be easily convinced of how farcical are PID theories, they just need to read your messages.

[magnolia_xx]

Paul had an interview just the other day about PID. I bet he thought he'd gotten away w/ it, but now the heat is back on. You know the old adage, you can fool some of the people some of the time, etc. Well, some of us aren't falling for it :p

Pardon, Faulcon??? What did you write?? Paul had an interview???
GREAT FREUDIAN SLIP!!
I thought you were convinced that Paul was murdered in 1966...
:p:D:rolleyes:

[dream9]

I think faulcon knows quite well that the person claiming to be Paul isn't the real Paul.



....

[humito]

I have asked the PID crowd umpteen times to enlighten us as to what " they "would gain by inserting an imposter into the beatles and allowing "faul" a solo career.........pesumably it was to lead us all down the path of the satanic occult and to control us and our morals/behaviour in some way???

if this is the case then can a PID supporter point out what songs by the beatles or paul are responsible for this? there are a few weird novelty songs,but mainly they are about celebrating ,peace/love.protest and aspects of life in general..........none of it mind blowingly evil compared with some of the metal bands of today.

I suppose satanic hexes and spells could be performed over the master tapes so certain energies are released on the listener when the album is played.............but this can be done without the involvement/knowledge of the band so no one would have to be killed over non compliance.........


again what is it in the beatles and pauls output that is brainwashing the masses?? name one song that supports an evil agenda.......

and dont say lsd........we know the cia involvement with the drug....they found out it set people too free and that it could not be used to contol the masses............if they were so into everyone tripping then why make it illegal and send people to prison for possession?

the beatles had enough of being controlled and ripped off, thats why they started their own label......i would think at the time the beatles were the illuminati 's worst enemy.............they had to make lsd seem dangerous (which it can be) to the masses, thats what Manson and the connection they gave him to the beatles was all about IMO. bursting the peace and love bubble........

[socrates]

e'en so, he's bound to slip up now and then. Singing "yesterday" on the ed sullivan show? Isn't that what he said on letterman?

""Slip up"???? He DID sing it - as Fireman proved.

More PID nonsense.

Will it ever end?

[socrates]

I think faulcon knows quite well that the person claiming to be Paul isn't the real Paul.

I think you'll find that faulcon 'knows' a lot of things which aren't in fact true.

Like she 'knew' Paul didn't have freckles:


Add this one to the list of differences: Faul's freckles. This is where they're located on his face:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FaulConstellation.jpg

Paul didn't have those freckles.

Faul had freckles. Paul did not.

So much for faulcon 'knowing' Paul didn't have freckles:

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1566/faulpaul4.png

Why do you have so much faith in faulcon's alleged 'knowledge'???

It's been debunked over and over as nothing more than wishful thinking and blind fantasy.

[formosan termite]

It is really great.

Just let them keep talking. They do more to destroy PID than anything we can do. It is just enjoyable to be able to point out the faulicies in everything they post.



And if y'all can, just give a little thought and prayer for the people still struggling after what happened 4 years ago today.

[formosan termite]

I think you'll find that faulcon 'knows' a lot of things which aren't in fact true.

Like she 'knew' Paul didn't have freckles:





So much for faulcon 'knowing' Paul didn't have freckles:


Why do you have so much faith in faulcon's alleged 'knowledge'???

It's been debunked over and over as nothing more than wishful thinking and blind fantasy.

And don't forget that she also declared flatly that Paul had brown eyes, and kept saying it even after it was shown that Paul said himself in 1965 that his eyes were hazel. And then she said that hazel eyes could not look green, even though we posted several sources that proved that hazel eyes do indeed look green depending on the surroundings. Then she said that pre '67 Paul NEVER showed green looking eyes and said we could not find one picture of Paul with green eyes. Then we posted several pictures of Paul with green eyes.

Amazing.

[socrates]

And don't forget that she also declared flatly that Paul had brown eyes, and kept saying it even after it was shown that Paul said himself in 1965 that his eyes were hazel. And then she said that hazel eyes could not look green, even though we posted several sources that proved that hazel eyes do indeed look green depending on the surroundings. Then she said that pre '67 Paul NEVER showed green looking eyes and said we could not find one picture of Paul with green eyes. Then we posted several pictures of Paul with green eyes.

Amazing.

True. How anybody can believe in faulcon's 'knowledge' when it is continually shown to be false, is, well, just plain gullible.

Paul had brown eyes.

http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/9052/2paulbook1vu6.jpg

http://images.zaazu.com/img/daze-male-cross-eye-dizzy-smiley-emoticon-000296-large.gif

[mind1universe]

Thank you Mind1universe, you provided a few seconds of great fun to all the readers. The luciferan what?? Oh my, oh my. LOL
BTW... so you are thinking to be causing distress to Paul McCartney?
Is this your mission? My God. You have such a great sense of humour. :D:D:D
People coming here for the first time should be easily convinced of how farcical are PID theories, they just need to read your messages.

I did and it just get's better:D

[socrates]

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/5876/screenhunter22.jpg

:D

[ar20]

Well I'm back (wading in as Socrates would probably put it).

What have I missed?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1966_ManillaReturn_05.jpg

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/pauliehair.jpg

People are still convinced this is the same guy?

It's 2009 people, for the love of holy god wake the hell up. It's still alright for there to be shapeshifting interdimensional lizards to be running the planet, or child-kidnapping rings, ritual sacrifice, mind-control, chemtrails and terraforming, HARRP TECH.... but replacing a Beatle is a BIG stretch? :rolleyes:

Someone pointed out earlier what's the benefit of replacing a Beatle.

Well, what's the benefit of co-opting a Government? Power by insertion, isn't it? If you hijack the biggest band in the world and have FAUL peddle LSD on the media, getting the kids hooked and listening to the albums... then it's all money and mind-control in the end. Not to mention the Crowley influence is strong post-66 (view the SGT. Peppers cover).

We don't know what went on... perhaps it was a sacrifice. The whole thing stinks of being above "normal consciousness" bordering into the esoteric anyway. There's no doubt it is something spiritual -- this is the trap I think most of the PIA'ers fall into, I'll bet you can't get your heads around that it isn't as 3-Dimensional as you'd like.

Is it any wonder that most of the post-66 songs reversed have allusions to death or Paul being dead? Is it JUST COINCIDENCE, that the SGT.PEPPERS drum still reads:

1ONE1X HE^DIE

I could go on repeating myself forever with this. If you just plain refuse to see it based on old ignorant traits then I still can't do anything to convince you -- in the meantime, shut the hell up about people who have seen it being crazy, we just had two scientists in Wired magazine notice it -- maybe you squares will cotton on soon enough.

[socrates]

http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4436/358f09ee94ba11dea502d7b.jpg

:D

[ivgg]

Well I'm back (wading in as Socrates would probably put it).

What have I missed?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1966_ManillaReturn_05.jpg

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/pauliehair.jpg

People are still convinced this is the same guy?

It's 2009 people, for the love of holy god wake the hell up. It's still alright for there to be shapeshifting interdimensional lizards to be running the planet, or child-kidnapping rings, ritual sacrifice, mind-control, chemtrails and terraforming, HARRP TECH.... but replacing a Beatle is a BIG stretch? :rolleyes:

Someone pointed out earlier what's the benefit of replacing a Beatle.

Well, what's the benefit of co-opting a Government? Power by insertion, isn't it? If you hijack the biggest band in the world and have FAUL peddle LSD on the media, getting the kids hooked and listening to the albums... then it's all money and mind-control in the end. Not to mention the Crowley influence is strong post-66 (view the SGT. Peppers cover).

We don't know what went on... perhaps it was a sacrifice. The whole thing stinks of being above "normal consciousness" bordering into the esoteric anyway. There's no doubt it is something spiritual -- this is the trap I think most of the PIA'ers fall into, I'll bet you can't get your heads around that it isn't as 3-Dimensional as you'd like.

Is it any wonder that most of the post-66 songs reversed have allusions to death or Paul being dead? Is it JUST COINCIDENCE, that the SGT.PEPPERS drum still reads:

1ONE1X HE^DIE

I could go on repeating myself forever with this. If you just plain refuse to see it based on old ignorant traits then I still can't do anything to convince you -- in the meantime, shut the hell up about people who have seen it being crazy, we just had two scientists in Wired magazine notice it -- maybe you squares will cotton on soon enough.


You didn't need to come back. We didn't miss you.

Calling other people ignorant isn't very nice.

[ar20]

Public forum, need I remind? I can show up when I like thanks. Calling people ignorant is like calling a spade a spade at this point. Aren't you lot still calling Faulcon crazy and stupid?

Pot kettle black.

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/5939/reptilefaul.jpg

[fireman]

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/5876/screenhunter22.jpg

:d

:-)

[socrates]

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/8725/screenhunter23.jpg

[socrates]

The PIA crew is desperately trying to keep the lid on PID, but it's too late.

OMG!! This just in....

http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/5531/e2f10bfa94ba11de94f849b.jpg

[mind1universe]

Looks whos getting desperate now


Let's turn the tables more. NOW.

[socrates]

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/1369/d753279294bf11de9c9e3fb.jpg

[formosan termite]

Oh my goodness. Someone else to call us paid agents and call us blind and ignorant.

But Paul is alive.

Same walk. Same run. Same mannerisms. Same guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNhTU6iBzDk&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmaccafunhouse%2Eproboards%2Ecom% 2Findex%2Ecgi%3Fboard%3Dpid%26action%3Ddisplay%26t hread%3D3849&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNjpxr2_sGg&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmaccafunhouse%2Eproboards%2Ecom% 2Findex%2Ecgi%3Fboard%3Dpid%26action%3Ddisplay%26t hread%3D3849&feature=player_embedded

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's so obvious what you are, Focrates :p I just think it's funny more than anything how you're desperately trying to keep people from seeing that Paul was imposter replaced. :p

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a389/Genie_Dalek/browneyes3.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/card2.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/uno2.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Billy_Shears_Says_Faul_Is_Here.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Some people are really buying that this is the same guy? :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/uno4.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Pen02.jpg

[magnolia_xx]

Some people are really buying that this is the same guy? :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/uno4.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Pen02.jpg

Faulcon, did a steamroller press Paul's face in the first photo? :p

[magnolia_xx]

Public forum, need I remind? I can show up when I like thanks. Calling people ignorant is like calling a spade a spade at this point. Aren't you lot still calling Faulcon crazy and stupid?

Pot kettle black.

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/5939/reptilefaul.jpg
Hahahaha, what is this?? do you think that Paul McCartney is a reptile? Or maybe a cat? Yeah, that's what you need to make your theory even more absurd.

[fireman]

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/scan0011.jpg

:rolleyes:

[ivgg]

Some people are really buying that this is the same guy? :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/uno4.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Pen02.jpg


You still believe that this comp makes sense?:p

Different angle, face expression, quality, etc.

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/jpmfinalrecord.jpg

Notice on the card how it says "brown" eyes?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/card2.jpg

Whether Paul's eyes were brown or hazel, that still isn't green.

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6675/green1gc6.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/faul_green_eye.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Ears

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul-faul.gif

[fireman]

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/scan0011.jpg

:rolleyes:


notice how this and the one socrates posted say HAZEL?

[fireman]

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6675/green1gc6.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/faul_green_eye.jpg

mmh..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKZHwf5q22g

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/eyes1.gif

[mind1universe]

im the eggman hes the warlus:p

[mind1universe]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yNcE8c3j2M

[rapunzel]

:-)

As for Paul saying he used to think his eyes were hazel until someone told him they were green the same thing happened to me. I described my eye colour as hazel on my passport but on looking closer they are green with light brown streaks. So how should I describe my eye colour? Looking at me from a few feet away you can't see the green in my eyes unless I am wearing something green, otherwise they look dark.

[mind1universe]

The agents and Faul

boo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1diTosC8G-4


Oh thank you john for putting this line in the song. Check at .0.54. That is faul with the long face. WHOOOOOOOPS.......................


oh shit.

Oh shit.


Ooops.

Oh well. can't shoot me. wiggles and wiggles around the room.

COO COO CHOO COO COO CHOOO.

[formosan termite]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/jpmfinalrecord.jpg

Notice on the card how it says "brown" eyes?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/card2.jpg

Whether Paul's eyes were brown or hazel, that still isn't green.

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6675/green1gc6.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/faul_green_eye.jpg

Give us a break!

Hazel eyes can look green.

Hazel eyes can look green. We have posted many sources to say so.

So are we supposed to believe some stupid card, or Paul McCartney himself? Paul stated in 1965 that his eyes are hazel.

And, for the millionth time:

Hazel
This iris shows a mixture of brown, green, and amber colors.

Hazel eyes are due to a combination of Rayleigh scattering and a moderate amount of melanin in the iris' anterior border layer.[7][25] Hazel eyes often appear to shift in color from a light brown to a dark golden-green. A number of studies using three-point scales have assigned hazel to be the medium-color between the lightest shade of blue and darkest shade of brown. Hazel mostly consists of Brown and Green. The dominant color in the eye can either be green or light brown/gold.[46][47][48][49][50][51][52] This can sometimes produce a multicolored iris, i.e., an eye that is light brown near the pupil and charcoal or amber/dark green on the outer part of the iris (and vice versa) when observed in sunlight.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_color#Hazel

And makeup companies even give advice as to how to change the color of hazel eyes:

If you are one of those lucky people that have hazel eyes, you can change the look of them as fast as you can apply new makeup. All of the colors that are contained in your peepers can be brought out, one by one, with a few makeup tips for changing your hazel eyes.

http://www.essortment.com/all/makeuphazeleye_tuyd.htm

No matter how many times you say hazel can't look green, it doesn't change the fact that hazel eyes can and many times do look green.

But any readers here, don't take my word for it, research it for yourselves. See how Harrison Ford's hazel eyes often appear different colors.

Also, hazel eyes, like blue eyes and all light eyes, reflect colors around them, as a pool reflects the sky.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/aprilholladay/2007-03-19-hazel-eye-memory_N.htm

Look it up. There are hundreds of sources backing this up.

[mind1universe]

See how they snied.................. 4.34.

I'm crying, I'm crying....


John was a very smart guy, to smart even. Get what I mean agents.;)

Right you know. John can spell can't he. Funny that he made a spelling error and still sang the word snied. John you did it the right way. What a man he was.



Let's put it togetther shall we. John isn't here to tell you, so I will spell it out.



See how they lied, I'm crying, I'm crying;)



Now. we know who really is enjoying this game. smiles.

[humito]

I have asked the PID crowd umpteen times to enlighten us as to what " they "would gain by inserting an imposter into the beatles and allowing "faul" a solo career.........pesumably it was to lead us all down the path of the satanic occult and to control us and our morals/behaviour in some way???

if this is the case then can a PID supporter point out what songs by the beatles or paul are responsible for this? there are a few weird novelty songs,but mainly they are about celebrating ,peace/love.protest and aspects of life in general..........none of it mind blowingly evil compared with some of the metal bands of today.

I suppose satanic hexes and spells could be performed over the master tapes so certain energies are released on the listener when the album is played.............but this can be done without the involvement/knowledge of the band so no one would have to be killed over non compliance.........


again what is it in the beatles and pauls output that is brainwashing the masses?? name one song that supports an evil agenda.......

and dont say lsd........we know the cia involvement with the drug....they found out it set people too free and that it could not be used to contol the masses............if they were so into everyone tripping then why make it illegal and send people to prison for possession?

the beatles had enough of being controlled and ripped off, thats why they started their own label......i would think at the time the beatles were the illuminati 's worst enemy.............they had to make lsd seem dangerous (which it can be) to the masses, thats what Manson and the connection they gave him to the beatles was all about IMO. bursting the peace and love bubble........

I am quoting my own post as it has been ignored by the PID supporters....................can I have the relevent info?

FAULCON...........again can I please be shown the photographs that you said you have of "fauls" extensive surgery scars ...you must have found them by now...........:)


as usual I see the same old posts and arguements ,the same old comparisons being churned out..........what a futile farce.........

so again can I have a list of songs by the beatles and out of pauls solo work that are illuminati vehicles for brainwashing us into behaving and thinking the way they want us too ??

[mind1universe]

we can see

you and me we are all together.



See how they run
like pigs from a gun


we are flying.
They are crying.

[formosan termite]

Ears

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul-faul.gif

Whooo. Bad comp.

Try these:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/faul_spies_george.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paul02.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/6723962_b4865592c5-1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/10fe5y0.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade2009.gif

[humito]

See how they snied.................. 4.34.

I'm crying, I'm crying....


John was a very smart guy, to smart even. Get what I mean agents.;)

Right you know. John can spell can't he. Funny that he made a spelling error and still sang the word snied. John you did it the right way. What a man he was.



Let's put it togetther shall we. John isn't here to tell you, so I will spell it out.



See how they lied, I'm crying, I'm crying;)



Now. we know who really is enjoying this game. smiles.

yes this is a game............a morbid one at that.

[humito]

Whooo. Bad comp.

Try these:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/faul_spies_george.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paul02.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/6723962_b4865592c5-1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/10fe5y0.gif

its no secret that paul has had minor cosmetic surgery..........i.e ears pinned back a bit and more recently botox etc.............a vain public figure is all.

[mind1universe]

I am quoting my own post as it has been ignored by the PID supporters....................can I have the relevent info?

FAULCON...........again can I please be shown the photographs that you said you have of "fauls" extensive surgery scars ...you must have found them by now...........:)


as usual I see the same old posts and arguements ,the same old comparisons being churned out..........what a futile farce.........

so again can I have a list of songs by the beatles and out of pauls solo work that are illuminati vehicles for brainwashing us into behaving and thinking the way they want us too ??



I'm glad you quoted.

It show's how easy it is to fool you.

[fireman]

faulcons version
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/faul_green_eye.jpg

original?
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/eyes1.gif

[mind1universe]

The agents and Faul

boo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1diTosC8G-4


Oh thank you john for putting this line in the song. Check at .0.54. That is faul with the long face. WHOOOOOOOPS.......................


oh shit.

Oh shit.


Ooops.

Oh well. can't shoot me. wiggles and wiggles around the room.

COO COO CHOO COO COO CHOOO.


(This was quietly ignored) Grins

[humito]

I'm glad you quoted.

It show's how easy it is to fool you.

its easy to be ignored when there is no answer lol:)

[humito]

The agents and Faul

boo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1diTosC8G-4


Oh thank you john for putting this line in the song. Check at .0.54. That is faul with the long face. WHOOOOOOOPS.......................


oh shit.

Oh shit.


Ooops.

Oh well. can't shoot me. wiggles and wiggles around the room.

COO COO CHOO COO COO CHOOO.


(This was quietly ignored) Grins

??????? is this a childs post?

[mind1universe]

ee how they snied.................. 4.34.

I'm crying, I'm crying....


John was a very smart guy, to smart even. Get what I mean agents.

Right you know. John can spell can't he. Funny that he made a spelling error and still sang the word snied. John you did it the right way. What a man he was.



Let's put it togetther shall we. John isn't here to tell you, so I will spell it out.



See how they lied, I'm crying, I'm crying



Now. we know who really is enjoying this game. smiles.

[mind1universe]

its easy to be ignored when there is no answer lol:)

I have the answers

It doesn't look to pretty to the police men sitting pretty in a row.