angelthecat
21-08-2009, 04:18 PM
Just recieved a pre-completed form from the council I have stuck through the names and enclosed this notice for the return delivery. I would value any imput from the non-troll (this usually atracts them to show themeselves but we know who and what they are) members of this forum before it goes into the post on monday
Notice
First I would like to thank you for the offer of contract, but I have no option but to decline your offer as the consideration on my part is much too high Nuda pactio obligationem non parit.
. I of course will Do anything that I a lawfully required to do on proof that I am lawfully required to do it. On proof that I, my wife and kin, are PERSONS [blacks law definition: Legal fictions] Omnis persona est homo, sed non vicissim.
It is for this reason I insist that you remove mine and my wife’s given names from your register as we have unalienable right to privacy which cannot be taken away by man, and certainly not by legal fictions, I acknowledge the fact by pursuing this contract or failing to rebut allows a right of agreement by acquiescence. So this notice serves as a rebuttal and removes any right of agreement by acquiescence you may feel you have a right to claim and in so doing dismisses you from any position of authority you feel that you claim over me, my wife and my kin.
There are a few points I require answers to
1) It states [in a box and not on the document (four cornered rule assumed, by me, to apply even if the corners have been rounded) ] “You are required by law to give the information asked for in this form”, I would warn you that the failure to differentiate between Law and legislated acts is deceit which is equal to fraud. If as I suspect this is by act of parliament it is given the power of law by the CONSENT of the governed therefore I do not consent and it is not a law to me. Ejus est nolle,qui potest velle.
2) By filling in or returning this application [blacks law definition: begging letter] for registration I would be handing over our unalienable human right of sovereignty to a foreign jurisdiction, this is by agreeing, to elect, and allow elected officials to govern our lives for me us again by acquiescence. Qui vult decipi,decipiatur
3) The use of BLOCK CAPITAL letters Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) - The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.
These are of course points raised and not questions posed, as this is a Lawful (not legal) notice should you wish to rebut it I require that you do so in the form of a lawful affidavit and with unlimited private liability , and I as a matter of course retain the right to convene a proper court de jure to deliberate on any act of perjury you may or may not have committed either wittingly or unwittingly, any and all responses should be in writing and answer all the points raised(not just the easy ones) and no telephone conversations will be entered into as I wish to retain all information you transmit without invading you own unalienable human rights by using recording devices which are at my disposal, I grant you permission to refer to me in your correspondence as Xxxxx-Xxxxx of the family Xxxxx
Without Prejudice (reserving all unalienable, human, common law and UCC207/308 rights)
By: ___________________________(SIGNED IN RED INK)
:D
Notice
First I would like to thank you for the offer of contract, but I have no option but to decline your offer as the consideration on my part is much too high Nuda pactio obligationem non parit.
. I of course will Do anything that I a lawfully required to do on proof that I am lawfully required to do it. On proof that I, my wife and kin, are PERSONS [blacks law definition: Legal fictions] Omnis persona est homo, sed non vicissim.
It is for this reason I insist that you remove mine and my wife’s given names from your register as we have unalienable right to privacy which cannot be taken away by man, and certainly not by legal fictions, I acknowledge the fact by pursuing this contract or failing to rebut allows a right of agreement by acquiescence. So this notice serves as a rebuttal and removes any right of agreement by acquiescence you may feel you have a right to claim and in so doing dismisses you from any position of authority you feel that you claim over me, my wife and my kin.
There are a few points I require answers to
1) It states [in a box and not on the document (four cornered rule assumed, by me, to apply even if the corners have been rounded) ] “You are required by law to give the information asked for in this form”, I would warn you that the failure to differentiate between Law and legislated acts is deceit which is equal to fraud. If as I suspect this is by act of parliament it is given the power of law by the CONSENT of the governed therefore I do not consent and it is not a law to me. Ejus est nolle,qui potest velle.
2) By filling in or returning this application [blacks law definition: begging letter] for registration I would be handing over our unalienable human right of sovereignty to a foreign jurisdiction, this is by agreeing, to elect, and allow elected officials to govern our lives for me us again by acquiescence. Qui vult decipi,decipiatur
3) The use of BLOCK CAPITAL letters Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) - The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.
These are of course points raised and not questions posed, as this is a Lawful (not legal) notice should you wish to rebut it I require that you do so in the form of a lawful affidavit and with unlimited private liability , and I as a matter of course retain the right to convene a proper court de jure to deliberate on any act of perjury you may or may not have committed either wittingly or unwittingly, any and all responses should be in writing and answer all the points raised(not just the easy ones) and no telephone conversations will be entered into as I wish to retain all information you transmit without invading you own unalienable human rights by using recording devices which are at my disposal, I grant you permission to refer to me in your correspondence as Xxxxx-Xxxxx of the family Xxxxx
Without Prejudice (reserving all unalienable, human, common law and UCC207/308 rights)
By: ___________________________(SIGNED IN RED INK)
:D