PDA

View Full Version : Lucy in the sky and without a diamond


tjohn
02-07-2009, 12:02 PM
Preface note:
I have posted this here rather than in Religion, because I do not support religion, at least not in the common usage of that word; which implies faith, doctrines and rules which people blindly follow.

The nearest to my personal concept of God, being based more on logic than on 'faith', is that of Pantheism. My view is that everything that happens in the Universe ("good " or "bad" ) is the embodiment of the essence of a Mind which we should call God but with minds of our own, we do have some choice in what happens to our very tiny sector of the Universe.

Then I do not deny Evolution exists in some forms but I do not put my faith in Darwinism, which because it supposes so much and makes things up and obviously relies on faith, is a religion itself. So if the Mods want to move this to the Religion forum that's OK but I do feel it does not belong there, as I don't want to needlessly encourage people to use these points to support mistaken religious views.
..................................................

Lucy, supposed to be such a 'gem' for Darwinian Evolution, turns out to be a matter of faith or even downright fraud. The following are from Creationist websites but my view is that the universe is creating and is in continual creation.


http://www.omniology.com/LucySkeletons.html

http://www.omniology.com/LUCYSKELETONS1.jpgUsing these comparisons of "lucys" skeletal remains, you can see for yourself how inconsistent and arbitrary the proof for the evolution of man really is, or more accurately, is not. Notice that none of the skull, vertebrae, ribs or arm bone fragments are all exactly the same or the same in number.

You are free to put your "faith" in this metaphysical "patron saint" of human evolution, but that doesn't make it true! The empirical scientific method requires physical and experimental evidence in order to prove or disprove a given theory or hypothesis. This is manufactured, not empirical evidence. Therefore it is not evidence at all! .

http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html



http://www.nwcreation.net/images/evolutionfraud.gif
In an attempt to further their careers and justify the claims that evolution is a legitimate theory, many scientists have fraudulently deceived the world by planting or reconstructing fossils which they would claim to be authentic finds. The most widely published evolution fraud was committed in China (http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html#anchorArchaeoraptor) in 1999, and published in in the National Geographic
http://www.nwcreation.net/images/Australopithecus_thumb.jpgHuman Ancestral Frauds Piltdown man: Found in a gravel pit in Sussex England in 1912, this fossil was considered by some sources to be the second most important fossil proving the evolution of man—until it was found to be a complete forgery 41 years later. The skull was found to be of modern age. The fragments had been chemically stained to give the appearance of age, and the teeth had been filed down!

http://www.nwcreation.net/images/nebraskaman.jpg


Nebraska man: A single tooth, discovered in Nebraska in 1922 grew an entire evolutionary link between man and monkey, until another identical tooth was found which was protruding from the jawbone of a wild pig.

Java man: Initially discovered by Dutchman Eugene Dubois in 1891, all that was found of this claimed originator of humans was a skullcap, three teeth and a femur. The femur was found 50 feet away from the original skullcap a full year later. For almost 30 years Dubois downplayed the Wadjak skulls (two undoubtedly human skulls found very close to his "missing link"). (source: Hank Hanegraaff, The Face That Demonstrates The Farce Of Evolution, [Word Publishing, Nashville, 1998], pp.50-52)

Orce man: Found in the southern Spanish town of Orce in 1982, and hailed as the oldest fossilized human remains ever found in Europe. One year later officials admitted the skull fragment was not human but probably came from a 4 month old donkey. Scientists had said the skull belonged to a 17 year old man who lived 900,000 to 1.6 million years ago, and even had very detail drawings done to represent what he would have looked like. (source: "Skull fragment may not be human", Knoxville News-Sentinel, 1983)

Neanderthal: Still synonymous with brutishness, the first Neanderthal remains were found in France in 1908. Considered to be ignorant, ape-like, stooped and knuckle-dragging, much of the evidence now suggests that Neanderthal was just as human as us, and his stooped appearance was because of arthritis and rickets. Neanderthals are now recognized as skilled hunters, believers in an after-life, and even skilled surgeons, as seen in one skeleton whose withered right arm had been amputated above the elbow. (source: "Upgrading Neanderthal Man", Time Magazine, May 17, 1971, Vol. 97, No. 20)

Human Ancestor Fraud - Creationist Links


A Human Ancestor Fraud (http://www.webmecca.com/creation/articles/article01.htm)
Deceptive Fossil Interpretations of Evolutionists (http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter8.php)from the Muslim online book Evolution Deceit
Features of Piltdown Skull "Deliberate Fakes" (http://www.clarku.edu/%7Epiltdown/map_expose/featur_piltskull_delibfake.html)
Human Evolution - Frauds and Mistakes (http://www.human--evolution.com/)
Lucy's Fraudulent Fame (http://www.omniology.com/LucySkeletons.html)
Orce man hominid fraud (http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/orce.html)
Piltdown man fraud (http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/piltdown.html)
The Ape-men fallacy (http://www.mbowden.surf3.net/ape.htm) by Malcolm Bowden (Review of book - Ape-men: Fact or Fallacy? (http://www.mbowden.surf3.net/bkape.htm))
The Face that Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution (http://www.2christ.org/face.htm) The following is a transcript of The Apemen Frauds portion of the audio tape.
The Piltdown Man Fraud (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/1124piltdown.asp) by Monty White
The Story of the Piltdown Man (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/13anc08.htm) by the Creation-Evolution Encyclopedia
The Yale DNA Hybridization Scandal (http://digilander.libero.it/avifauna/classificazione/sequence6.htm) - A UC Berkely professor reports on the intentional alteration of hybridization data which was used to support the theory that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees.


http://www.nwcreation.net/images/Australopithecus_thumb.jpgOntogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny? Haekel’s faked embryonic drawings

http://www.nwcreation.net/images/haeckel.jpg

The theory of embryonic recapitulation asserts that the human fetus goes through various stages of its evolutionary history as it develops. Ernst Haeckel proposed this theory in the late 1860’s, promoting Darwin’s theory of evolution in Germany. He made detailed drawings of the embryonic development of eight different embryos in three stages of development, to bolster his claim. His work was hailed as a great development in the understanding of human evolution. A few years later his drawings were shown to have been fabricated, and the data manufactured. He blamed the artist for the discrepancies, without admitting that he was the artist. (source: Russell Grigg, "Fraud Rediscovered", Creation, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.49-51)
Haeckel’ Forgeries Creationary Links


Another Evolution Fraud Exposed (http://www.creationism.org/caesar/haeckel.htm)
Evolution Fraud in Current Biology Textbooks (http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details.asp?8360) – Haeckel’s Ontongeny
Haeckel's distortions did not help Darwin (http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m1134/2_109/60026710/print.jhtml) by Stephen Jay Gould
Haeckel's Fake Drawings (http://www.cornerstonechurchonline.com/biblestudies/haeckel.htm) - Pictures
Please Urge Publishers to Fix Textbooks (http://strengthsandweaknesses.org/news.10.01.2003.htm) by Texans for Better Science Education




http://www.nwcreation.net/images/archaeoraptor.jpg

Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis: Fake Dinosaur-bird ancestor The most recent and perhaps the most infamous evolution frauds was committed in China and published in 1999 in the journal National Geographic 196:98-107, November 1999. Dinosaur bones were put together with the bones of a newer species of bird and they tried to pass it off as a very important new evolutionary intermediate.
"Feathers For T-Rex?", Christopher P. Sloan, National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 196, No. 5, November, 1999, pp.99,100,105

Interesting Quote - "National Geographic has reached an all-time low for engaging in sensationalistic, unsubstantiated, tabloid journalism" Storrs L. Olson, Smithsonian Institution
Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis Creationary Links


Adventist Scientist Comments on Retraction of Evolutionary "Missing Link" Claim (http://www.tagnet.org/adventist.fm/ark/an33.htm)
And now: Feathered Dinosaur Link (http://www.prca.org/standard_bearer/2000apr01.html#FeatheredDinosaurLink)
Another Evolution Fraud (http://www.webmecca.com/creation/articles/article37.htm) By Tim Friend, USA TODAY
Another Fossil Flub (http://www.christiancourier.com/penpoints/fossilFlub.htm)
Another Hoax (http://www.doesgodexist.org/MarApr01/AnotherHoax.html) by Owen D. Olbricht
Another ‘Missing Link’ Takes Flight (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4392news10-16-2000.asp)
Another "OOOPS" For Science (http://www.pochristian.org/preachers_corner/moment_ooops.html)
Archaeoraptor Flight Aborted (http://www.icr.org/pubs/president/prz-0003.htm) by John Morris
Archaeopteryx, Archaeoraptor, and the "Dinosaurs-To-Birds" Theory ... (http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/rr2001/r%26r0104a.htm)
Archaeoraptor: Feathered Dinosaur from National Geographic Doesn’t Fly ... IMPACT No. 321 by Steven A. Austin, Ph.D (http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-321.htm)
Archaeoraptor Hoax Update — National Geographic Recants! (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4229news3-2-2000.asp)
Archaeoraptor: National Geographic's Biggest Embarassment (http://informationcentre.tripod.com/arap.html) by Craig McClarren
Archaeoraptor: Phony ‘feathered’ fossil (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4208news2-3-2000.asp) by Jonathan Sarfati
Archaeoraptor: Some interesting points about this particular hoax (http://home.earthlink.net/%7Etandjtrainor/evolution_oopsies/Archaeoraptor/archaeoraptor.html)
Crying Fowl: Tale of 'Missing Link' Embarrasses Scientists (http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/2000/mar00/missing-link.html)
'Dragon' fossils seized (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2702.asp)
EVOLUTION COVER-UP (http://www.crbiblechapel.org/CreationEvolution.htm)
Evolution Hoax (http://fellowshipinhislove.com/index36.html) The Archaeoraptor Fraud
Evolution: The Fraud That Shapes The Worldview of Our Kids (http://www.csfpittsburgh.org/mar00.html) By Bob Harsh and Chuck Colson. Origins Insights March 2000 Newsletter by the Creation Science Fellowship
"Feathered Dinosaur" Claim Apparently a Fake (http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a388487fe0e8c.htm)
National Geographic backs down – sort of! (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4273news4-11-2000.asp) By Carl Wieland
National Geographic Gets a Black Eye (http://www.ridgenet.net/%7Edo_while/sage/v4i5n.htm)
National Geographic Eats Crow (http://www.rome4christ.com/youngpeo/whyb03.html)
National Geographic retracts boast of dinosaur-to-bird 'missing link' (http://worthynews.com/news-features/national-geographic-missing-link.html)
Smithsonian criticizes National Geographic’s Dino-to-Bird Claims (http://www.trueorigin.org/birdevoletter.htm) revealing the lack of consensus on the matter among scientists, despite National Geographic’s sensationalistic “propagandizing”.
Smithsonian critiques National Geographic in open letter (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4159.asp) archaeoraptor
The Missing Link That Wasn’t ... (http://www.arn.org/docs/pearcey/np_hespotlight0300.htm) National Geographic’s Bird Dinosaur Flew Again the Facts by Nancy Pearcey,. Access Research Network
The Archaeoraptor Fraud – by (http://www.cornerstonechurchonline.com/biblestudies/archaeoraptor.htm) Charles Colson
The Archaeoraptor Fraud: National Geographic (http://www.bible.ca/tracks/archaeoraptor-fraud-piltdown-bird.htm)
The Latest Fraud! (http://www.fellowshipinhislove.com/index36.html)
The Missing Link that Wasn't: National Geographic's 'Bird Dinosaur' Flew Against the Facts (http://www.arn.org/docs/pearcey/np_hespotlight0300.htm)
The Piltdown Chicken (http://www.omniology.com/PiltdownChicken.html)
Well, Folks…It Happened Again! (http://www.highschoolscience.com/nodinbrd.htm)


http://www.nwcreation.net/images/news0b.gif News Articles Published on The Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis Discovery


Second Piece of Fossil Forgery Identified (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=000D8732-EA5D-1DDB-A838809EC588F2D7) Scientific American 11/21/02
Comparing Modern Birds with The Missing Link Fossils (http://www.gladwyne.org/students/missinglink.htm)
FEATHERED CREATURES FROM CHINA BOOST DINOSAUR-BIRD CONNECTION (http://www.nationalgeographic.com/events/releases/pr980623.html)
Flying dinosaur was mean, graceless: Fiercesome bird may have been first flying feathered animal to evolve (http://www.caller.com/1999/october/15/today/national/1577.html)
Fossils from China Link Birds With Dinosaurs (http://www.nationalgeographic.com/events/98/dinosaurs/)
MISSING LINK BETWEEN DINOSAURS AND BIRDS FOUND IN CHINA: Dino Land Has the Full Story of Dinosaur-Bird Evolution and the Latest Exciting Development! (http://www.geocities.com/stegob/dinobird.html)
'Missing Link' Dino Actually Two Animals (http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/dino_mistake000407.html) ABCNEWS.com
New Birdlike Dinosaurs from China Are True Missing Links (http://www.nationalgeographic.com/events/99/feather/index.html)
NEW BIRDLIKE DINOSAURS ON VIEW: COULD T. REX HAVE HAD FEATHERS (http://www.nationalgeographic.com/events/releases/pr991015.html) / T. Rex mit Federn (http://www.nationalgeographic.de/php/magazin/topstories/1999/11/topstory3.htm)
Researchers find fossils of primitive flying dinosaur (http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/101599/new_1015990005.shtml)
Think of it as a 120 million-year-old turkey: (http://www.morningsun.net/stories/101599/usw_1015990023.shtml) Archaeoraptor liaoningensis may be missing link between ground-based dinosaurs and birds


http://www.nwcreation.net/images/Australopithecus_thumb.jpgMiscellaneous Fakes and Frauds Brontosaurus: One of the best known dinosaurs in books and museums for the past hundred years, brontosaurus never really existed. The dinosaur’s skeleton was found with the head missing. To complete it, a skull found three or four miles away was added. No one knew this for years. The body actually belonged to a species of Diplodocus and the head was from an Apatosaurus. (source: Paul S. Taylor, The Great Dinosaur Mystery and the Bible, [Chariot Victor Publishing, 1989], pp.12-13)
General Evolution Fraud Links


10 Notorious Darwinist Fabrications (http://www.darwinism-watch.com/10.html)
Anatomy of a Hoax (http://www.projectcreation.org/CStation/v9n2-meek1.htm) by Sean Meek
Dinosaur webcam picture (http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/dinocam.html)s -- fake, hoax photos and pics
Evolution Fraud in School Scienfic Textbooks (http://www.bible.ca/tracks/textbook-fraud.htm)
Evolution fraud in current biology textbooks (http://www.restoringamerica.org/archive/evolution/evolution_fraud.html) Worldnet Magazine 2001 Exposed as fakes decades ago, major publishers still include them
Evolution Forgeries (http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php) from the Muslim online book Evolution Deceit
Gaps in the Textbooks' Coverage of the Fossil Record (http://strengthsandweaknesses.org/news.10.02.2003.htm) by Texans for Better Science Education
Forensic geochemistry solves fossil riddles ..Geological Society News (http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/template.cfm?name=FossilForensics) - New forensic tools developed to spot fossil fakes.
Scientists behaving badly - Journal editors reveal researchers' wicked ways (http://www.nature.com/nsu/040301/040301-9.html) Nature 3/4/2004
Survival of The Fakest Part I (http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/SurvivaloftheFakestpt1.html) or Survival of The Fakest Part II (http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/SurvivaloftheFakestpt2.html) by Jonathan Wells (PDF download (http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/survivalOfTheFakest.pdf))
Textbook Fraud (http://www.bible.ca/tracks/textbook-fraud-scopes-trial-inherit-wind.htm): Inherit The Wind is intellectual pornography!: Full of Lies, deception and very anti-Christian.
Textbook Fraud (http://www.bible.ca/tracks/textbook-fraud-dawn-horse-eohippus.htm): The Horse Series; Hyracotherium "dawn horse" eohippus, mesohippus, ...
Text book Fraud! Video (http://www.bible.ca/tracks/patton-textbook-fraud-embryology.ram) -& Documentation (http://www.bible.ca/tracks/textbook-fraud-embryology-earnst-haeckel-biogenetic-law.htm) by Don Patton
THE CASE OF ARCHAEOPTERYX (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/20hist09.htm) The evidence strongly indicates it is a fake

Archaeopteryx (unlike Archaeoraptor) is NOT a hoax — it is a true bird, not a ‘missing link’ (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4254news3-24-2000.asp) by Jonathan Sarfati


The Rise of the Evolution Fraud (http://www.mbowden.surf3.net/bkfraud.htm) Review of book by Malcolm Bowden