David Posting Here Questions

[phoenix1]

It's come to my attention that you don't intent to post here at all.

At the other forum...a lot of folk grew on there, and are still doing so, outweighing you in many areas, obviously you cannot cover all angles, granted.

But THIS FORUM IS YOUR BABY, SOMETHING YOU CREATED,

Therfore I personally think you should give it a little devotion too.

I know your world is all over the place at the moment, but that is relative.

When or will you post ??

Whats the point in creating a BABY...and handing it over to thousands of "Fosterparents" ??

Maybe you should at least have something to say occasionally here..or not ??

Respect


Phoenix1

[Ruler of the Universe]

When this place gets going, we need to start a poll asking how many people think David Icke should post here.

[oceanwave]

surely...

...the man has spoken, through various media, and made his views known,

whether you agree with him or not is irrelevant...

what *is* relevant, is this...

...why does anyone *need*, or indeed even *want*, to speak to david?...

[clint eastwood]

David's out, trying to make a living, while every other lazy sonofabitch posts in here. :D

[phoenix1]

David's out, trying to make a living, while every other lazy sonofabitch posts in here. :D

Every one needs a crust or two to live , sure, personaly, i'm no lazy sonofabitch.
Like David..we all got something to do.

I make smart money online.(but that's a another subject)

It would be nice though if he does drop in here . Maybe to discuss one topic, of his choosing,,,occasionally, in which we could give him our angles on the topic he may wish to discuss.

Not to distract him or bog him down, but to get more of a feel for him, on a personal basis, if ya see where i'm comin' from Clint.:)

Phoenix1

[phoenix1]

When this place gets going, we need to start a poll asking how many people think David Icke should post here.

Maybe a good idea...

Phoenix1:)

[phoenix1]

surely...

...the man has spoken, through various media, and made his views known,

whether you agree with him or not is irrelevant...

what *is* relevant, is this...

...why does anyone *need*, or indeed even *want*, to speak to david?...

I want to speak to anyone, so did David when he started his crusade..sometimes to an audience of four or five...in a tent.

Thing is , it don't really matter where David was then...BUT in sure he will agree, it is a wise thing, to KNOW where you are NOW, BUT NOT forget where you have been.

In other words...where you have evolved to from what you where.
David (for me) Has been a great eye opener, so have many others too.

I was reading heavy stuff when he was still playing footy.

I bet he was too, so yeah, i'd like to see him drop in occasionally.

[phoenix1]

Do you think David Icke ought to drop in now and again, bearing in mind he's a very busy Guy, but some pepes would like to see him post the odd topic of his choosing ?

[phoenix1]

I voted yes by the way.

[thirdwave]

I agree it would be cool to be able to communicate with him a little...

but like allot of things, a few spoil it for the rest, when you look at some of the petty things that get brought up on the old forum... How can you converse with people like that... why would he want to covers with idiots like King of the Mole Hill?, its not possible as we know, and there would be so much of it I can kind of understand why he has said he wont post...

that being said, there is no reason why he cant monitor it and through the moderator, communicate with the people here in relation to popular subjects that pop up, it would certainly make the forum a busier place!

[sweet cheeks]

Let's http://www.davidickeforum.com/forum/images/smiles/pray2.gif that David posts!

[the king of the mountain]

I do not want David Icke to post here. He'll only clog up this beautiful place with retarded nonsense. At the moment - give or take a few threads - it's all shiney and quite serene. :D

[funky rusty sherrif star]

David's out, trying to make a living, while every other lazy sonofabitch posts in here. :D

i was spectin better from you lad

fo shame :confused:

[Anders Lindman]

I would like to have David posting here. But it's a pain in the neck for any person to have some kind of explicit or implicit obligation to post and to read other posts. That would be a miserable burden. And a public person like mista Icke must be careful about what he writes. That too is pretty burdensome.

[the king of the mountain]

Old Ickey will be in here on a regular basis, just observing the carry on. Think: If you had a forum dedicated to your ramblings, would you not be here lapping it up as often as you could? ;)

[oceanwave]

I want to speak to anyone, so did David when he started his crusade..sometimes to an audience of four or five...in a tent.

Thing is , it don't really matter where David was then...BUT in sure he will agree, it is a wise thing, to KNOW where you are NOW, BUT NOT forget where you have been.

If you want to know your past, look into your present conditions.
If you want to know your future, look into your present actions.
--Buddhist Saying

The past is a guidepost, not a hitching post.
--L. Thomas Holdcroft

:)

In other words...where you have evolved to from what you where.
David (for me) Has been a great eye opener, so have many others too.

I was reading heavy stuff when he was still playing footy.

I bet he was too, so yeah, i'd like to see him drop in occasionally.

as would i...

...but not if the people demand it, but rather because he *wants* to

but, somehow i don't think he will and tbh i wouldn't blame him

[oceanwave]

...nice avatar king...

[phoenix1]

I would like to have David posting here. But it's a pain in the neck for any person to have some kind of explicit or implicit obligation to post and to read other posts. That would be a miserable burden. And a public person like mista Icke must be careful about what he writes. That too is pretty burdensome.


Maybe..but I still think he ought to adress his "Audience occasionally"

We ALL have burdens.Me included..I shoulder them well enough. And I do have a little time for folk.

I aint bieng prejudgemental...its not my job .

I'd like to discuss stuff with him, or anyoe else Anders. Is all.:)

[sweet cheeks]

Please..:)

[phoenix1]

Old Ickey will be in here on a regular basis, just observing the carry on. Think: If you had a forum dedicated to your ramblings, would you not be here lapping it up as often as you could? ;)

Well ramblings they may be to you KOTM, but it stands..that even you have gleaned a little knowledge from what David may have drawn to your attention, his material or not.

You have still thought about what he says, that you cannot deny.Hence you would hold no oppinion whatsoever of him would you ?? SO I corner you there.Not a challenge...so don't feel challenged.

Merely a point of view is all.

I would personally join in on my own forum,especially if my public image was as big as his is getting. To talk to folk and discuss concepts from time to time.
It would be interesting ..if nothing else on our part and his, to see who holds what truths for who.

Remember one persons truth is another persons lie. You cannot deny that either right ??

As for lapping it up, no I wouldn't be lapping it up. I dont have a BIG EGO issue, and I aint nobodys dog to lap up nothing.

I take what I like, and pick up what's meant for me. For me..it's the way it should be.

I am the way I am ....don't make it the right way..but it's my way.

I cant hold an oppinion that that is inflexible ...like my way or the highway attitude.

That tree..bears no good friut.

You may say David Icke has a my way or the highway attitude. And maybe you are right...but there is allways the possibility you may have missed a flashing gem, and the possibility that it may be right to say, a lot of what resonates with him, also resonates with you.

There is an old Indian saying "NEVER judge a man until you have walked a mile in his moccassins"

[clint eastwood]

i was spectin better from you lad

fo shame :confused:

Time to shoot you in the face, f'sure. :D

[Anders Lindman]

Maybe..but I still think he ought to adress his "Audience occasionally"

We ALL have burdens.Me included..I shoulder them well enough. And I do have a little time for folk.

I aint bieng prejudgemental...its not my job .

I'd like to discuss stuff with him, or anyoe else Anders. Is all.:)

But the risk is that David would receive a lot of questions, and then it would look impolite to ignore many of them even though that would be the most practical thing to do in order to not be overwhelmed by them. :D

[phoenix1]

But the risk is that David would receive a lot of questions, and then it would look impolite to ignore many of them even though that would be the most practical thing to do in order to not be overwhelmed by them. :D

Yeah Anders I see that problem. If david were to post. Maybe a time limit or something as someone suggested would be good ??

Like (customise the site) to include a session for discussion, on a particular topic of his choice....his chance to question us as well. At a particular time, even for a short time...??

Maybe once a month, to those who subscribe, and to those who do not.

Like the man says Problem-Reaction-Solution right??

Maybe he will see this post , as no doubt he will and talk to the Webmasters about it .

Dunno...if he'll post though...l I wouldnt want him to appear rude or ignorant either.


May be the first 20 or so pepes in ,to discuss, then close the topic.

That way everyone would get their chance to speak...and even pick the topic.

Like a first come thing ??

Phoenix1

[Anders Lindman]

Yeah Anders I see that problem. If david were to post. Maybe a time limit or something as someone suggested would be good ??

Like (customise the site) to include a session for discussion, on a particular topic of his choice....his chance to question us as well. At a particular time, even for a short time...??

Maybe once a month, to those who subscribe, and to those who do not.

Like the man says Problem-Reaction-Solution right??

Maybe he will see this post , as no doubt he will and talk to the Webmasters about it .

Dunno...if he'll post though...l I wouldnt want him to appear rude or ignorant either.


May be the first 20 or so pepes in ,to discuss, then close the topic.

That way everyone would get their chance to speak...and even pick the topic.

Like a first come thing ??

Phoenix1

If David would post here it would probably be as a part of his job. This means that he must be able to monetize his participation, or at least profit financially from it indirectly.

Money is social energy. The banking system is like a global reptile brain, but that doesn't automatically mean that money itself is evil, even though the way money is managed by the elite often probably is a bit dubious, or to put it more nicely: the banking system has not yet evolved into a global "mammal brain".

[phoenix1]

If you want to know your past, look into your present conditions.
If you want to know your future, look into your present actions.
--Buddhist Saying

The past is a guidepost, not a hitching post.
--L. Thomas Holdcroft

:)



as would i...

...but not if the people demand it, but rather because he *wants* to

but, somehow i don't think he will and tbh i wouldn't blame him

Good quote Oceanwave...nice.

I wasn't demanding him like, I just thought it would be kinda nice if he felt moved to someday is all :)

[the king of the mountain]

Well ramblings they may be to you KOTM, but it stands..that even you have gleaned a little knowledge from what David may have drawn to your attention, his material or not.

You have still thought about what he says, that you cannot deny.Hence you would hold no oppinion whatsoever of him would you ?? SO I corner you there.Not a challenge...so don't feel challenged.

Merely a point of view is all.

I would personally join in on my own forum,especially if my public image was as big as his is getting. To talk to folk and discuss concepts from time to time.
It would be interesting ..if nothing else on our part and his, to see who holds what truths for who.

Remember one persons truth is another persons lie. You cannot deny that either right ??

As for lapping it up, no I wouldn't be lapping it up. I dont have a BIG EGO issue, and I aint nobodys dog to lap up nothing.

I take what I like, and pick up what's meant for me. For me..it's the way it should be.

I am the way I am ....don't make it the right way..but it's my way.

I cant hold an oppinion that that is inflexible ...like my way or the highway attitude.

That tree..bears no good friut.

You may say David Icke has a my way or the highway attitude. And maybe you are right...but there is allways the possibility you may have missed a flashing gem, and the possibility that it may be right to say, a lot of what resonates with him, also resonates with you.

There is an old Indian saying "NEVER judge a man until you have walked a mile in his moccassins"

There is an old Tibetan saying: "Don't con money out of people for a stated purpose and then use it to buy your weekly shopping, it's not very nice." ;)

[phoenix1]

There is an old Tibetan saying: "Don't con money out of people for a stated purpose and then use it to buy your weekly shopping, it's not very nice." ;)


Yeah KOTM...I'm on two minds about what you say there...I still dunno for sure whether David is in it fot the Dosh or not.

What I would like to know is who is the "Other Guy" in the court case.
The one the Mod poined you to here.

If thats a Tibetan saying ...I like it:cool:

[sean]

Thread Closed. Please read the announcement at the top of every forum.