Cheney warns of new attacks

[dankai]

Hey.....isn't it Obama and Biden's turn to carry the burning flame of fearmongering?

Former Vice President Dick Cheney warned that there is a “high probability” that terrorists will attempt a catastrophic nuclear or biological attack in coming years, and said he fears the Obama administration’s policies will make it more likely the attempt will succeed.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090204/pl_politico/18390

[venividivici2311]

Again....lol

[free_at_last]

What a class A Twat!!!

[gremlin]

oh gould america is on the attack again:eek:

[michael christopher]

Don't forget, it takes TWO parties to scare the shit out of everyone! One party only scares about half the population.

[real6]

Hey.....isn't it Obama and Biden's turn to carry the burning flame of fearmongering?



http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090204/pl_politico/18390


SHit that means the Neo Cons gonna attack us again. O lord!!!

My favorite quote:

Protecting the country’s security is “a tough, mean, dirty, nasty business,” he said. “These are evil people. And we’re not going to win this fight by turning the other cheek.”

[tusme]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wi7xg0WqU8

[gilly]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wi7xg0WqU8

Just too bad this chap's taken in by Obama.

[knightbk]

Hey.....isn't it Obama and Biden's turn to carry the burning flame of fearmongering?



Why is this even being posted here as "news"?

The laws of probability state directly that yes, there WILL be another terrorist attack in the United States at some point in the future, regardless of probability.

There will also be an epidemic, asteroid crashing with earth, earth quake and super volcano at some point in the future. This is just life. You are also guaranteed to die some day.

Why do we keep posting this stuff and calling it "news". It isn't.

[deany]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wi7xg0WqU8


superb speech!

who is this guy? works for MSNBC news does he?

it doesn't matter is he is taken in by Obama (so far) this type of message being aired un the US is a big step in the right direction IMO.

[size_of_light]

superb speech!

who is this guy? works for MSNBC news does he?

it doesn't matter is he is taken in by Obama (so far) this type of message being aired un the US is a big step in the right direction IMO.

Unfortunately he's nothing more than a fake, pseudo-indignant establishment softcock, Democrat bitch and drama queen who fulfilled his role by acting as a pressure-valve during the Bush years with his hollowly righteous and verbose soliloquies.

[deany]

Unfortunately he's nothing more than a fake, pseudo-indignant establishment softcock, Democrat bitch and drama queen who fulfilled his role by acting as a pressure-valve during the Bush years with his hollowly righteous and verbose soliloquies.

I see. more's the pity. first time i have come across this guy.

still if he's putting things like that out over the TV it can't be a bad thing, the trouble is i don't know what else the guys says. half truths he says here might be part of a ploy to sell other things he talks of to the masses, is that about the size of it in your opinion mate?

[tusme]

Unfortunately he's nothing more than a fake, pseudo-indignant establishment softcock, Democrat bitch and drama queen who fulfilled his role by acting as a pressure-valve during the Bush years with his hollowly righteous and verbose soliloquies.
Hi Size_of_light,

Hmm, at least the Truth he speaks is not fake...!! ;) :)

Cheers

[size_of_light]

I see. more's the pity. first time i have come across this guy.

still if he's putting things like that out over the TV it can't be a bad thing, the trouble is i don't know what else the guys says. half truths he says here might be part of a ploy to sell other things he talks of to the masses, is that about the size of it in your opinion mate?

He got stuck into Bush in a good way during the Bush years, but he never went as far as most people would want to go if they had the soapbox he had, and he's an Obama supporter.

Take what he says that you think has value, for sure, but I'd personally be wary of seeing him as some sort of 'voice of truth', or anything.

[size_of_light]

Hi Size_of_light,

Hmm, at least the Truth he speaks is not fake...!! ;) :)

Cheers

I don't get it, but cheers to you too.

[deany]

He got stuck into Bush in a good way during the Bush years, but he never went as far as most people would want to go if they had the soapbox he had, and he's an Obama supporter.

Take what he says that you think has value, for sure, but I'd personally be wary of seeing him as some sort of 'voice of truth', or anything.

I'm certainly not suggesting this guy is a voice of truth, I know nothing about him.

But I did like this response of his to what Cheney has been saying.

it can't be a bad thing to put this out in the main stream, but I will keep an eye out for other broadcasts he does of course, cheers for the info.

[tusme]

I don't get it, but cheers to you too.
Hi Size_of_light,

Truth don't belong the Keith Olbermann, me nor you...whether he's part of Obama admin team or not, doesn't give him control over it...!!

Therefore, if a man/woman speaks Truth, especially about/at Dick Cheney...then, I'm inclined to acknowledge it...!!

Cheers

[deany]

Hi Size_of_light,

Truth don't belong the Keith Olbermann, me nor you...whether he's part of Obama admin team or not, doesn't give him control over it...!!

Therefore, if a man/woman speaks Truth, especially about/at Dick Cheney...then, I'm inclined to acknowledge it...!!

Cheers

yeah I agree providing it's not done in a such a way that it will give him cred to promote future untruths on people who see him as a voice or truth.

that said from what i have seen of him here it's so far so good

[size_of_light]

Hi Size_of_light,

Truth don't belong the Keith Olbermann, me nor you...whether he's part of Obama admin team or not, doesn't give him control over it...!!

Therefore, if a man/woman speaks Truth, especially about/at Dick Cheney...then, I'm inclined to acknowledge it...!!

Cheers

Me too.

Let's see how he handles Obama to get a bit of perspective on him though.

[tusme]

Me too.

Let's see how he handles Obama to get a bit of perspective on him though.
Hmm...;) :)

[tusme]

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=217694&title=why-are-you-such-a-dick-audio

[deany]

I love the emphasis he put on the word "Dick" :-)

[jimmi]

It was on msnbc,msm., so every word pre-planned and pre-approved.

[deany]

interesting. how popular is this new channel compared to say fox or CNN?

[bowtiedaddy]

Just too bad this chap's taken in by Obama.

not as much as some people thought. I've seen him dig Obama a few times. I'm thinking that he may start in on him if things get obvious enough. He's a little misguided, but I kind of like the guy. He's got some balls. He's gotten fired over and over and over from various networks for doing exactly what he does-say it like he sees it. I hope he wakes up.

[kappy0405]

It was on msnbc,msm., so every word pre-planned and pre-approvedinteresting. how popular is this new channel compared to say fox or CNN?

I'm not sure if this is what you're asking, but...

NBC (MSNBC) was accessible to over a 1/4 of Americas population last time I heard... Not as big as Fox/CNN but still HUGE, with its rightful place in the top 3.

The network is owned by General Electric & MicroSoft, and yes, run by Zionists. =)

[drhemp]

Says he who was behind the attacks of Sept 11 in 2001.

[the nine]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wi7xg0WqU8

top vid, nice post tus :)

i wonder how many released prisoners from guantanamo will be manchurian candidates? i also wonder what their 'triggers' will be?

it musy be buried deep down in their psyche..wilhelm reich style..inserted through an electronically induced state of constant orgam, which aligns both the concience and subconcience for 'total' manipulation with out memory.

I think cheyney is gearing up for a told you so 'speach'.

look at the power and respect alex jones has received and what 'bill' cooper had, up until his murder, for bringing out the truth with warnings prior to the event. this generates trust, something neither bush presidents or thier administration have had.
its only us who look again who know the difference, the majority are still under the media and/or education spell (we the pigeon holed 'foil hat brigade').
we have been insulated from the masses but the wakening up is begining

[tyler]

Olberman sounds good but he is one of them, after all. He wouldn't keep that top paid job if he didn't follow orders. he will go so far and stop. A bit like George Galloway.

[white knight]

Hey.....isn't it Obama and Biden's turn to carry the burning flame of fearmongering?



http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090204/pl_politico/18390

Nothing's going to happen...it's called fear-mongering and not unlike Dick, it's a term that's starting to show it's age!

[deany]

I'm not sure if this is what you're asking, but...

NBC (MSNBC) was accessible to over a 1/4 of Americas population last time I heard... Not as big as Fox/CNN but still HUGE, with its rightful place in the top 3.

The network is owned by General Electric & MicroSoft, and yes, run by Zionists. =)


cheers for the info mate

[tusme]

I think cheyney is gearing up for a told you so 'speach'.
Hi The Nine,

Hmm, it's in his nature...unfortunately!! One can only hope, GOD forbid there is a next time, he pushes the proverbial boat out too far...only so he can be nicked...for good!! ;)

Cheers

[tusme]

Olberman sounds good but he is one of them, after all. He wouldn't keep that top paid job if he didn't follow orders. he will go so far and stop. A bit like George Galloway.
Hi Tyler,

I hear what you're saying, however, if Truth is our means to overcome the NWO and all these evil forces operating within our dimension, then imho, it would be wise to heed Truth provoking talk, regardless of where it comes from...

Truth don't belong to me, you, Keith Olbermann and most certainly not to George Galloway...!! Truth chooses whomever it likes to express itself...!!

I apppreciate and respect the way you feel towards George Galloway or anyone whom you've considered to be "one of them"...:D ...but the reality is, we're only doing "the us" a disservice when we're not able to use the Truth people like Keith Olbermann & George Gallways speaks sometimes...!!

Truth is my purpose and imho opinion, without it, we will never overcome these evil people...!!

Thus, if Truth is our focus, then every bit of Truth gathered along the way to our (Truth) destiny, should be welcomed...admittedly, with some caution...!! :)

Truth, as I know it, can look after itself...without or without us, it's been doing so ever since the beginning, if ever the was a beginning...

Otherwise, being selective with the Truth we utilize in our objectives, overcoming the NWO and all the evil forces operating in the World right now, may mean that we could possibly never get beyond them...know what I mean...?

Anyway, just thought I'd add my 2pee's worth... :D

Cheers

[tusme]

Screw Cheney he is one of them!
One of them...!? :confused:

Cheney's them's prized idiot...!!

Programmed to perfection...!! :eek:

[oiram]

Screw Cheney he is one of them!

Here are two options approved by truth & Gods will!
You criminals take your pick!

http://i467.photobucket.com/albums/rr40/413200/11/jail.jpg OR http://i467.photobucket.com/albums/rr40/413200/arrowL1.gif http://i467.photobucket.com/albums/rr40/413200/11/guillotintwo.gif

All these freaking criminals of Humanity involved directly or by association need to go to Jail or make there own choice for the second option!
Two Prisons one for women one for man; no good to create more bad blood or continue on with bad sick bloodlines! "Right?"






Cheney Warns Of
Another Mass Terror Attack
Joel Skousen
World Affairs Brief
2-7-9
In an interview with Politico.com the former Vice President was rattling the sabers of terror again. CBS summarized the interview as follows: "Cheney warned that there is a 'high probability' that terrorists will attempt a catastrophic nuclear or biological attack in coming years, and said he fears the Obama administration's policies will make it more likely the attempt will succeed... Cheney unyieldingly defended the Bush administration's support for the Guantanamo Bay prison and coercive interrogation of terrorism suspects. And he asserted that President Obama will either backtrack on his stated intentions to end those policies or put the county at risk in ways more severe than most Americans - and, he charged, many members of Obama's own team - understand."

This is a telling reminder that Cheney, as a real insider knows that the CFR transition team made sure that all of Obama's appointments were on board the same globalist agenda that ruled the Bush regime. Only the rhetoric will be different. Cheney's remarks are all the more significant because he is the only person in the Bush administration upon whom we have hard evidence that he knowingly allowed one of the hijacked airliners to crash into the Pentagon when he had the power to stop it. Cheney was in charge of the White House situation room and kept putting off a young Air Force officer's concern about how close one of the hijacked airliners was approaching the Pentagon. The officer was frantic because Cheney had issued orders NOT to engage the target.

This dramatic scene, charged with evidence of government conspiracy in the 9/11 attacks, was not witnessed by some conspiracy theorist but a member of president Bush's own cabinet, Norman Mineta. To this day, it is one of the best pieces of evidence of government involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Aaron Dykes of the Jones Report tells the story:

"Former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta answered questions from members of 9/11 Truth Seattle.org about his testimony before the 9/11 Commission report. Mineta says Vice President Cheney was 'absolutely' already there when he arrived at approximately 9:25 a.m. in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) bunker on the morning of 9/11. Mineta seemed shocked to learn that the 9/11 Commission Report claimed Cheney had not arrived there until 9:58-- after the Pentagon had been hit, a report that Mineta definitively contradicted. Norman Mineta revealed that Lynn Cheney was also in the PEOC bunker already at the time of his arrival, along with a number of other staff.

"Mineta is on video testifying before the 9/11 Commission, though it was omitted in their final report. He told Lee Hamilton: 'During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President...the plane is 50 miles out...the plane is 30 miles out....and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president 'do the orders still stand?' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said 'Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!?'

"Mineta confirmed his statements with reporters, saying 'When I overheard something about 'the orders still stand' and so, what I thought of was that they had already made the decision to shoot something down.' Norman Mineta made it clear to reporters-- who verified his quotes in written text alongside him-- that Mineta was indeed talking about a stand down order NOT to shoot down hijacked aircraft headed for the Pentagon."

The fact that the 9/11 Commission did not investigate Mineta's testimony to the commission and made active attempts to falsely document Cheney's arrival in the situation room after the Pentagon crash is also evidence of conspiracy to obstruct the truth. The 9/11 Commission also refused to publish thousands of witness testimony and had the records of those testimonies sealed in the National Archives for 50 years--just like the JFK assassination files and the FBI surveillance records on Martin Luther King. --All done to cover-up truth that would expose official government claims as false.

I bring all of this out because when a very highly placed co-conspirator in a provocation attack on America goes out of his way to publicly promote another attack, it should put us on high alert--not because the attack would be by real terrorists, but because it is likely to be another false flag attack for the purpose of manipulating public perception of the threat. The public has generally become skeptical of the constant rhetoric on the "war on terror" that has driven the political and military agenda for the last 7 years. It is very possible that the Powers That Be (PTB) intend to pull off another act to reconstitute the perception of threat and drive the American public to accept an even greater diminution of their liberties.

There is a wave of backlash building against torture and domestic surveillance that can easily be turned around by another terrorist attack. That backlash is what is driving CIA Director-nominee Leon Panetta to go out of his way to assure the world that the US has rejected waterboarding, terror and secret prisons. Even if that were true, which it is not, these are secret programs because they are illegal and the dark side of government does what it wants regardless of what the public thinks. The president only knows what they tell him. He would not know if his Executive Orders were being obeyed or not.

I have long argued that the government's case against terror is completely bogus--although I will admit that the longer the US continues to meddle in the Middle East, and provoke hatred against America, the more real terrorists they will generate. Eventually it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

However, it is crucial to understand that rarely, if ever, does any significant terrorist attack occur by lone terrorists or suicide bombers even if they do hate our government. They all are relatively powerless withou organized help, and if you trace that help back far enough you always run into some black ops supply and training operations run by Russia, or the US--or by one of their surrogates like North Korea, Iran, and Syria (for the Russians) and Israel, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and others, for the US and Britain. Some like the Palestinians and Libyans have worked for both sides. Considering we still have wide-open borders, why do we not have a rash of small normal acts of terrorism--that don't take large sums of money or organization?

The only other major commentator that has agreed with me on the terrorist threat being bogus is former Asst. Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts. Recently he said, "According to US government propaganda, terrorist cells are spread throughout America, making it necessary for the government to spy on all Americans and violate most other constitutional protections. Among President Bush's last words as he left office was the warning that America would soon be struck again by Muslim terrorists. If America were infected with terrorists, we would not need the government to tell us. We would know it from events. As there are no events, the US government substitutes warnings in order to keep alive the fear that causes the public to accept pointless wars, the infringement of civil liberty, national ID cards, and inconveniences and harassments when they fly."

Almost every prosecution of Muslims for acts of terrorism reveals, at trial, the involvement of one or more government agents in their midst. Typically these agents are not just informing, but instructing them on arms and telling them how to procure explosives--which is also damning of government participation. Roberts concludes, "The 'war on terror' is a hoax that fronts for American control of oil pipelines, the profits of the military-security complex, the assault on civil liberty by fomenters of a police state, and Israel's territorial expansion." He fails to see the broader motive of creating war and conflict to further a New World Order.

As to the specifics of this new verbal threat, it may not be imminent, but it does give a strong hint that the powers behind government are planning to perpetrate another terror attack. The dramatic circumstances would naturally force President Obama to once again apologize for changing course and begin to champion anew the same aggressive tactics on terror that the preceding administration did. That is the intent, I believe, of Cheney's threatening stance.

If you are in a major metro area, you need to be prepared for the social unrest that will follow such an attack. As I have said before, your greatest threat is NOT the actual attack, which is always fairly localized, but the social and economic effects of a draconian federal reaction to the crisis. This could be anything from shutting down all transportation, to local martial law. In any case, expect to be heavily impacted by traffic jams, panic buying at stores and panic exits from the area of the attack. If it is a small localized attack (95% probability) your best tactic is to get home and stay home till it clears. Only in very massive social panic situations should you risk trying to leave the area, and only then early on before gridlock occurs (by taking one of your preplanned local street routes out of town) or after the initial crush and panic subsides--by staying at home and relying on your stockpile of food and household goods. Don't delay in getting those in order. My booklet 10 Packs for Survival has complete lists.
http://www.joelskousen.com/Secure/reports.html

I think the easiest attack to pull off, and still make it appear as if it "couldn't have been foreseen or prevented" is an attack from a ship or boat slipping into a major US harbor and exploding a dirty nuclear or biological/chemical bomb. The actual blast effects will be limited to a few blocks, but one must be very careful to always note which way the wind is blowing when one of these bombs goes off. You only need to worry about getting out of the downwind path. Even that will dissipate within 1-10 miles depending on the strength of the wind and how high the material is blown upward. Of course, everyone will be in panic, so if you are anywhere in the vicinity you will be impacted by the instant traffic jam, and then by the government created traffic jam as it closes off freeways and major roads for "first responders" --making the situation worse.

I always recommend people carry a small can of extra fuel in their car and one or two gas masks or paint respirators in their trunk so that, if stuck downwind, they won't run out of fuel in a traffic jam. If one has to park and wait it out, it can be done without panic, inside the car breathing filtered air through the respirator. It's even more important to have a mask if you have to exit the vehicle. If your home or apartment is downwind of the attack, stay inside and do duct tape your windows and doors to stop all air infiltration. This does work--but only if you have a supply of tape available beforehand. The trapped air supply will last at least 2-3 days.


World Affairs Brief - Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.

Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted.

Cite source as Joel Skousen's World Affairs Brief http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com

World Affairs Brief, 290 West 580 South, Orem, Ut 84058, USA

http://www.rense.com/general85/chen.htm