PDA

View Full Version : Carbon Dioxide today Vs Ancient geological past


carrotman
22-06-2007, 12:27 AM
Taken from "Freedom From Asthma" Alexander Stalmatski p165

"The human metabolism developed in the ancient geological eras when carbon dioxide in the air and water was represented in tens of percent. It is probably due to this factor that a definite concentration of CO2 (7% approx.) must be an absolutely essential condition of each human cell in order for it to sustain all the normal pathways of the biochemical processes." This is due to oxygen being absorbed best with the optimum CO2 level, CO2 helps release it from the haemoglobin.

"The problem faced by evolving human organism has been the depletion of CO2 in our atmosphere from the tens of percent of ancient eras to the current level (1982) of 0.03%." (This is at least 300 times lower than today)

"Human evolution has dealt with this dilemma by creating an autonomous internal environment with alveolar spaces of the lungs."

This begs the question to me posting this thread, as we evolved during this period where CO2 was in the tens of percent and we are now at 0.03% and the human body operates best at 7% within our bodies (although most people are a lot lower which can be rectified through the Buteyko method) why are we being advised and forced to reduce the CO2 levels still further. Surely in the past with at least 300 times the CO2 level of today we wouldn't have had any dry land on which to evolve if CO2 is as the scientist's say the predominant factor in warming of the planet and rising sea levels?

cruise4
23-06-2007, 03:08 AM
Because CO2 led Global warming is a total scam. Take away computer modelling and I can't find a single piece of evidence to support it. Modelling a system that isn't entirely understood and then basing political decisions on such a model is obvious political and scientific quackery.

However if your aims are to stop people moving about, price them out of the sky, get tracking chips into cars and wheelie Bins, ensure the people's descent into Paupership is based on a seemingly credible reason, increase the profits on Oil still further by limiting supply totally unnecessarily, (they are in Iraq... to 'cap' the flow thus limiting and controlling supply), create a religious fervour amongst environmentalists to further obstruct rational analysis, Use resources while denying others, interfere in the housing market, hide your use of weather modification weapons and tech. etc. etc. etc.

it all makes perfect sense... as long as no-one examines the actual science.

Global warming is caused by Sun Activity period! From what I've seen we will have a bigger problem with Global Cooling than Global warming.

Of all the things people seem to 'believe', Global Warming because of CO2 is the most transparent and easily proven lie of all... well that and the Pentagon Plane... and WTC7... oh and money, and, and , and.

carrotman
29-06-2007, 02:31 AM
A question I have about this is, if scientist's around the world all agree on CO2 global warming and yet most of them do not know about the manipulation as they are not high enough up the pyramid how does this go together. Have they honestly come up with these figures with their consequences rather like people working for the CFR who don't know about the banking scam. How could they if it CO2 Global Warming isn't the case? Any ideas? Do all scientist's working on global warming know about the scam? This must be a lot of people.