What does it all mean?

[neworderhorizon]

Hello.
I am just watching John Harris on tv and just wanted to know what "Freeman-on-the-land" means? In what way is he free? What difference is there form not being a "freeman"?
Also his site is down, are there any similar one?
Thanks for any help.
Laters.

Edit.
Can you really use common law in todays system? Do you have to be a "freeman on the land" to use common law? And how does one become a freeman of the land?
Thanks again.
Laters.

[stinker]

Hello.
I am just watching John Harris on tv and just wanted to know what "Freeman-on-the-land" means? In what way is he free? What difference is there form not being a "freeman"?
Also his site is down, are there any similar one?
Thanks for any help.
Laters.

Edit.
Can you really use common law in todays system? Do you have to be a "freeman on the land" to use common law? And how does one become a freeman of the land?
Thanks again.
Laters.

I've been hangng about having a read of this material for a while now, and it seems to me that the entire thing is based on misconception. That and a certain company making a mint out of people's frustration with the legal system.

As for common law, it is valid and one of the sources of law in every day use and applicable to everyone. However, I've seen plenty of posts claiming that a given premise is based on common law when it blatently isn't.

Along with references to flipping Admiralty Law - an issue that I thought had been thoroughly debunked ages ago it all seems mired in basic lack of understanding.

It's a shame as I'd hate to see some of the very live legal issues of the day derailed by all this. But heigh ho, each to their own.....