PDA

View Full Version : Verichip have NOT been approved by the FDA


feather
06-02-2007, 12:54 PM
hahaha - Applied Digital Solutions have been telling porkies, they never had approval to market the Verichip as a medical device - despite this the determined little buggers are at it again - with any luck, if they carry on like this the FDA will stomp all over them and they'll just die a commercial death. (i can dream, can't i? )

http://techdirt.com/articles/20070205/015059.shtml

Implantable RFID Chip Company Tries Again To IPO; Despite No Clear Plans To Make Money
from the you-know,-the-important-stuff dept

A little over a year ago, we wrote that Applied Digital Solutions, parent company to implantable RFID chip company, VeriChip, was planning to go public. Apparently, that never happened, as the NY Times has reported that the company is about to file to go public again this week. That article notes much of the criticism the company has faced over the years concerning its products, and also some of the questionable financial situation the company is in, with tremendous losses, not much in the way of demand and no clear plans for profitability. It also mentions the odd structure of the company where it's been kept alive by a series of loans from a subsidiary to the company (which makes implantable RFIDs for pets -- which are common and are quite popular). The article leaves out, however, some of the more questionable behavior from the company in the past, including lying about FDA approval and then ignoring some of the limitations the FDA gave them. Then, of course, any potential investor in the company might also want to read up the time that the company sued IBM after IBM tried to collect on collateral from unpaid loans by Applied Digital (yes, apparently, Applied Digital defaulted on its loans, and when IBM went to collect, Applied Digital sued them). It's hard to believe the company is still in business, let alone has enough people willing to invest money to take it public.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20021008/0926257.shtml

Confusion Over Chipping - Is It Regulated?
from the oops dept

Back in February there was the press flurry around the publicity stunt family in Florida that wanted to get chips implanted in their arms for various reasons (not very sensible reasons, but reasons, nonetheless). In April, I was pretty surprised to find out that the FDA said they wouldn't regulate the devices which allowed the family to actually go and get chipped. However, it turns out that the "FDA approval" was a farce. The FDA says they gave no such statement. What, in fact, happened was that the company, Applied Digital Solutions, asked the FDA not to regulate the VeriChip because (they said) it wasn't a medical device. The FDA wrote back and asked for more information about the chip. Somehow, ADS interpreted the request for more information into an official statement from the FDA that the device was not to be regulated, and put out a press release, which everyone ate right up. There were, clearly, some confusing statements out of the FDA, but never an approval for the device. After the family got chipped the FDA announced they were "investigating" the company - so they're not allowed to chip anyone else for a while. I wonder why anyone would trust a company that lies about FDA approval to then stick a chunk of silicon into their bodies?

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20021119/1114201_F.shtml
FDA Warns Applied Digital on Chip Implant Marketing
from the on-again,-off-again,-on-again,-off-again dept

The makers of the implantible "VeriChip" sure are gutsy. Back in April, they announced that the FDA had approved their chips to be implanted in humans. Of course, there was one major problem: the FDA had not approved the chip, in reality. They had just asked for more information, and ADS put out a press release saying it was approved. Of course, a few weeks later, it was approved, but specifically not if advertised as a medical device. Of course, ADS put out another press release and marketing blitz about the product - including calling it a medical device. So, the FDA is pissed off again, and are warning ADS to cut it out. ADS seems to like putting out marketing material that have no basis in reality. Would you trust this company to stick a hunk of silicon inside your skin?

more linkies at the above URL's

bumble
06-02-2007, 03:12 PM
with any luck, if they carry on like this the FDA will stomp all over them and they'll just die a commercial death. (i can dream, can't i? )

Yeh right! Just like the FDA did with Aspartame

21_12_2012
06-02-2007, 06:26 PM
with any luck, if they carry on like this the FDA will stomp all over them and they'll just die a commercial death. (i can dream, can't i? )

Never know...there are MILLIONS of people against this....christians being the main ones, not forgetting the families and friends of christians who are probably being warned about "accepting the mark of the beast"
This was not the case with aspartame or stuff like MSG etc...whereas this has had a big impact on people, and they probably feel more strongly against the chip than anything else that has ever been presented to us.
If enough people refuse/complain/spread the word, i think the chip could be wiped out of existance.

kerravon
06-02-2007, 09:51 PM
However, if you did a survey 10 years ago and asked people if they wanted a chip, there would be a lot less than if the same question is asked today, and to be given the chip to help in the fight against so-called "terrorism". This is how they work, they do survey's and alter their tactics based on response. Nobody ever wanted an ID card in the UK, and now they are on the verge of getting it. The public is pursueded over time by manipulation.

It's not approved by the FDA? so? You can guarantee that the FDA was created by the illuminati, as was IBM, the funding corporation behind Applied Digital. The same people who put flouride in the water and aspartame in thousand's of products.

21_12_2012
07-02-2007, 02:23 AM
However, if you did a survey 10 years ago and asked people if they wanted a chip, there would be a lot less than if the same question is asked today, and to be given the chip to help in the fight against so-called "terrorism". This is how they work, they do survey's and alter their tactics based on response. Nobody ever wanted an ID card in the UK, and now they are on the verge of getting it. The public is pursueded over time by manipulation.

It's not approved by the FDA? so? You can guarantee that the FDA was created by the illuminati, as was IBM, the funding corporation behind Applied Digital. The same people who put flouride in the water and aspartame in thousand's of products.

I know what you're saying there mate. And i am aware of the surveys and the 'alteration of tactics'...but...at the end of the day...it's an infringement....the BIGGEST infrigement on human liberty to ever come out in history, and...well......everyone i have asked about this has told me under no circumstances would they ever have anything implanted in their body, law or no law....they would rather die first or 'hide'....and i don't think even the worst 'set- up terror' in the world will change people's feelings about it.
It's going to split the world in 2 when it comes out, in my opinion anyway. One half refusing under all circumstances, and the other half sleeping and accepting it (believing the fake terror, and living in fear)
Let's hope it never gets to that stage, and lets hope enough people find out about the chip early enough to spread the word and refuse it no matter what.

exmicrochipmafia
07-02-2007, 02:49 AM
To be quite honest, I'd settle for an id card but will go to my grave without a microchip under my skin.
At least you can leave the bloody id card at home if you REALLY want to.

21_12_2012
07-02-2007, 03:31 AM
To be quite honest, I'd settle for an id card but will go to my grave without a microchip under my skin.
At least you can leave the bloody id card at home if you REALLY want to.

That's true, but what if there is a chip in the card which basically does the same 'harm' to a persons energy/dna/personality as the chip does?
And if it becomes a law to carry ID cards 24/7, then that chip would be with you all the time (or most of the time). However, i do not know whether there is a chip which can 'self-power' itself (like in an id card) and to act as a transmitter/receiver and all the rest of it, but the implantable one gets it's energy from your body (i think it's either heat or movement in the body im not sure which now)

kerravon
07-02-2007, 04:04 AM
Don't forget these people are clever, very clever, they would not got through all this for something you could leave at home. They tend to aim where it hurts, like introducing RFID's into license plates (coming very soon in USA), RFID's in passports (They started this year), 'chip and pin' credit cards in the UK, and into things we need to function and have with us.

I also would die before taking a chip, but the problem is that the chips are getting so small (Microsoft just announced 45nm technology), if there was a Problem-Reaction-Solution scenario such as a bird-flu epidemic, could they sneak it into everyone as a vacination. They sure could, and they sure would.

21_12_2012
07-02-2007, 04:13 AM
if there was a Problem-Reaction-Solution scenario such as a bird-flu epidemic, could they sneak it into everyone as a vacination. They sure could, and they sure would.

They sure could...and they sure would...and I would be off like a shot....no needles or chips in me...

harpalchemist
07-02-2007, 06:51 PM
The first thing to know is that these chips are two way.They receive signals as well as transmit.The FDA are the ones who imprisoned Wilhelm reich,maybe murdered too,burned his books and put back scientific knowledge 50 years.Not to mention monosodiumglutamate, the whole aspartame man,rumsfeld,having his way with it.If our society has so many contaminants in the enviroment,deliberately introduced,then surely it is logical that the regulatory body is responsible.Double speak.They are using the FDA to oppose chips,when in fact that is the exact opposite of the plan.Come on,problem,reaction,solution.Next subject,please.

ho1ogram
13-02-2007, 02:21 PM
Verichip have now gone veripublic. Their prospectus was submitted on the 9th Feb. to the US Securities and Exchange Commision. In it they say they have FDA approval for the first implantable microchip.

View prospectus here: (it is very long but a lot of interesting info about their plans in the early paragraphs after the diagram)
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1347022/000119312507024937/ds1a.htm

I have started a thread specifically to discuss the prospectus here:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=816

We can stop it, anything is possible. If a sportsman and tv presenter can have an 'awakening' then anyone can.

Peace and love.

feather
13-02-2007, 03:09 PM
Verichip have now gone veripublic. Their prospectus was submitted on the 9th Feb. to the US Securities and Exchange Commision. In it they say they have FDA approval for the first implantable microchip.

cheers :) that was my point - they have to function in the real world and need investors, which won't like it if they find they're being misled

though after their first day of trading the response was so slow that had to drop the price, i think people are not as willing to embrace this technology as verichip hoped.....yes, *we* know why it's Not A Good Thing, but the folks who dabble in the stock market are also not keen. - that's if i'm reading this right, total layman as far as these things go

http://www.247wallst.com/2007/02/verichip_ipo_br.html

see also

http://www.newswithviews.com/McIntyre/Liz16.htm

as to other points that potential investors are saying " err, hang on a mo" about