View Full Version : Peter and Jordan
hagbard_celine
04-06-2007, 08:21 PM
http://www.itv.com/page.asp?partid=7796
This celebrity couple are definitely a real couple now, but it's odd how they got together on "I'm a Celebrity- Get Me Out of Here!" It has all the signs of being staged. It makes sense; the viewers want something scandalous to happen and the producers wouldn't leave delivering that to chance. Neither Jordan nor Peter Andre are good actors and the scenes on the show of their affection looked very contrived. So did Jordan's then boyfriend when he travelled to Australia to invade the set and "punch peter's lights out".
Jordan's autobiography tells the story of how they fell in love at first sight on the "I'm a Celebrity..." set. Well she's hardly likely to blow the whistle on the TV networks now, is she? remember what happened to the wrestling when it came out that it was staged!
hagbard_celine
05-06-2007, 03:13 AM
Do you remember the previous year that incident with Darren Day. He had a fling with one of the other jungle-mates. I remember Darren's girlfirned being interviewed about it on GMTV and was suspicious. she seemed so unconcerned. This is when it hit me that the whole thing was scripted. It had been agreed and planned beforehand and Darren's girlfriend was in on the plot.
It's not widely known, but there are no laws against this kind of thing. A few years ago a supposed Channel 4 fly-on-the-wall documentary series came out called "Family Confidential". After it had finished it was leaked that the whole thing was a drama, even though it had been advertized as factual and appeared to be one. everyone in it was an actor! Mary Whitehouse hit the hoof and tried to sue Channel 4 but lost. Channel 4 were doing nothing illegal!
I wonder how many more supposedly factual TV programmes are really fake.
emtec
05-06-2007, 11:03 AM
Did day and his girlfriend carry on their relationship after the program? Ever thought she looked unconcerned to save face or even because she wanted shut of him?
As for Jordan and Peter what you fail to mention is this staged relationship for the cameras is still going strong years after the show has ended and they now have a child. It must be costing the producer a fortune i wonder how much they had to pay Jordan alone to let peter get her up the duff.
lumukanda
05-06-2007, 11:10 AM
Do you remember the previous year that incident with Darren Day. He had a fling with one of the other jungle-mates. I remember Darren's girlfirned being interviewed about it on GMTV and was suspicious. she seemed so unconcerned. This is when it hit me that the whole thing was scripted. It had been agreed and planned beforehand and Darren's girlfriend was in on the plot.
It's not widely known, but there are no laws against this kind of thing. A few years ago a supposed Channel 4 fly-on-the-wall documentary series came out called "Family Confidential". After it had finished it was leaked that the whole thing was a drama, even though it had been advertized as factual and appeared to be one. everyone in it was an actor! Mary Whitehouse hit the hoof and tried to sue Channel 4 but lost. Channel 4 were doing nothing illegal!
I wonder how many more supposedly factual TV programmes are really fake.
i think most of these shows are faked, if you look at survivor for example, the shots they use sometimes are seriously set up shots, they'll sometimes do these crane shots where they pan from one group to another, it takes at least 15-20 minutes to build one of those things, to level it, to check that the subjects are lined up properly, they're not going to set it all up only to have the people move and then have to do it again? i don't think so.
hagbard_celine
06-06-2007, 04:32 PM
i think most of these shows are faked, if you look at survivor for example, the shots they use sometimes are seriously set up shots, they'll sometimes do these crane shots where they pan from one group to another, it takes at least 15-20 minutes to build one of those things, to level it, to check that the subjects are lined up properly, they're not going to set it all up only to have the people move and then have to do it again? i don't think so.
I also notice that in supposedly-live debate shows like "Central Weekend" a shot will change to a person in the audience at the moment, or just before, they start speaking spontaneously. How can this be? If it was live then the cameramen would need time to react and focus on the speaker. as well as move the boom mike over so we could hear them properly.
I'm glad people are waking up to this idea. Almost ever time Peter and Jordan are interviewed they address the theories that their whole relationship is just a publicity stunt; and they wouldn't bother with that unless lots of people were saying it. Of course their relationship is real now. They're obviously vvery much in love and I'm pleased for them. All I question is how the relationship began.