Catholic Nazi leaders

[Mo0n5tar]

The Catholic Fascist Dictators of the 20th Century
( four of whom were ordained Catholic priests ) :
[compiled by Hugo Borreson, Virgina]
# Austria : Engelbert Dollfuss
# Belgium : Leon Degrelle
# Croatia : Ante Pavelic1
# Bohemia-Moravia : Emil Hacha
# Germany : Adolf Hitler
# Hungary : Miklos Horthy
# Italy : Benito Mussolini 2
# Portugal : Antonio Salazar
# Ruthenia : Fr. Augustin Voloshin
# Slovakia : Fr. Josef Tiso
# Slovakia : Fr. Andrei Hlinka
# Spain : Francisco Franco
# Sudetenland : Konrad Henlein
# Vichy-France : Pierre Laval
# Vichy-France : Henry Petain
# Yugoslavia : Fr. Anton Koroshec

Note 1 on the above : After eliminating the relatively few Jews there, the leaders of Roman Catholic Croatia targeted all the other non-Catholics and they were even more vicious than the Nazis. See Croatian Holocaust (http://CatholicArrogance.Org/CroatianHolocaust.html)

Note 2 on the above : Although Mussolini was an atheist, and not technically a Roman Catholic, he could only govern in the heart of the Roman Catholic Church with the blessing of that church.

Many other Roman Catholic dictators in areas other than Europe, could have been added to the list such as Ngo Diem in Vietnam, Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, the Duvaliers in Haiti, and the long string of Catholic dictators in the many countries of Latin (i.e. Roman Catholic) America. The list above, however, is only about Catholics who headed the Nazi "axis" nations during the World War II era.

The Roman Catholics in Nazi Germany's Leadership

"Many of Nazi Germany's leadership were, like Adolf Hitler, Roman Catholics, people like Heinrich Himmler, Josef Goebbels, Reinhard Heydrich, and Rudolf Hoess, (not to be confused with Hitler's Deputy Fuëhrer and secretary, Rudolf Hess). Hermann Goering, on the other hand, had mixed Catholic-Protestant parentage, while Rudolf Hess, Martin Bormann, Albert Speer, and Adolf Eichmann had Protestant backgrounds. Not one of the top Nazi leaders was raised in a liberal or atheistic family."
Source (http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/paul_23_4.html)

"When Dr, Edoardo Senatro, the correspondent of L'Osservatore Romano in Berlin, asked Pius XII whether he would not protest the extermination of the Jews, the Pope is reported to have answered, "Dear friend, do not forget that millions of Catholics serve in the German armies. Shall I bring them into conflicts of conscience?" The Pope knew that the German Catholics were not prepared to suffer martyrdom for their Church; still less were they willing to incur the wrath of their Nazi rulers for the sake of the Jews whom their own bishops for years, had castigated as a harmful influence in German life." ... The failure of the Pope was a measure of the Church's failure to convert her gospel of brotherly love and human dignity into living reality." (The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany, p 304 )

Adolf Hitler (http://www.catholicarrogance.org/Catholic/Hitlersfaith.html)

Heinrich Himmler ( a Catholic ) was born October 7, 1900, as the son of a secondary school instructor and strict Roman Catholic. . .
"A man often seen as the very personification of evil. Heinrich Himmler was not only head of Hitler's SS police, but was also in charge of the death camps in the East. The account of Himmler's life and his impact on the rise and fall of the Nazi state make a gripping and horrifying story. But more than this, it is a profound moral and intellectual inquiry into the nature of evil in the human character.

Although Adolf Hitler held the ultimate responsibility for the killing of six million Jews, it was Heinrich Himmler who essentially laid the detailed plans for the Holocaust.

Joseph Goebbels (Catholic )
"The pious Catholic parents of Joseph Goebbels raised him and his two brothers in that faith. He spoke of Hitler as "either Christ or St. John." "Hitler, I love you!" he wrote in his diary.
"A Jew is for me an object of disgust. I feel like vomiting when I see one. Christ could not possibly have been a Jew. It is not necessary to prove that scientifically-- it is a fact."
- , in his attempt to win the eternal gratitude of Hitler, (Hitler's Elite, Shocking Profiles of the Reich's Most Notorious Henchmen," Berkley Books, 1990)
"We have a feeling that Germany has been transformed into a great house of God, including all classes, professions and creeds, where the Fuëhrer as our mediator stood before the throne of the Almighty."
- , in a broadcast, 19 April 1936

Franz Von Papen had headed the powerful Catholic "Center Party" and been a close friend of Pope Pius XII from the time that he had been the Papal Nuncio to Germany. Were it not for Papen, President Von Hindenburg might never have been persuaded to make Adolf Hitler Chancellor of Germany. He beame Hitler's first Vice-Chancellor and the Catholic statesman who negotiated the infamous Cordordat of 1933 on behalf of the Nazi government. After the war, the allies spared his life, eventually freed him and he returned to the good graces of the Catholic Church.

Fritz Thyssen, the most important single financial and industrial supporter of Adolf Hitler from 1924 through 1939. He gave up all his properties in Germany in 1939 when his conscience moved him to renounce Hitler and he fled the country. He wrote an article in the Swiss Arbeiterzeitung entitled, "Pius XII, As Nuncio, Brought Hitler to Power." Yet his American banking partners, George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush, who had been helping to finance Hitler's rise to power since 1924 continued to do so for another three years, until the U.S. government closed them down for "supporting the enemy" in 1942.

Rudolf Hoess was one of history's greatest mass murderers, the architect and SS Commandant of the largest killing center ever created, the death camp Auschwitz, whose name has come to symbolize humanity's ultimate descent into evil. Responsible for exterminating 2,5 million people in World War II, he was a mild-mannered, happily married Catholic who enjoyed normal family life with his five children despite his view of the crematoria chimney stacks from his bedroom window.
Rudolf Hoess would testify during the War Crimes Trials after WW2 that at peak efficiency Auschwitz had the capacity to 'get rid of ten thousand people in 24 hours,'

All information extracted from here (http://www.liberalslikechrist.org/Catholic/NaziLeadership.html)
Visit to read more (http://www.liberalslikechrist.org/Catholic/NaziLeadership.html)

[Mo0n5tar]

A great website which has much information on the Catholic Nazi links and great photographic and testimonial evidence linking the two to being a father and son partnership!

SpirituallySmart (http://www.spirituallysmart.com/nazi.html)
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e372/tlthe5th/Axis/image.jpg"Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic Church, died while defending Christianity. It is therefore understandable that words cannot be found to lament over his death, when so many were found to exalt his life. Over his mortal remains stands his victorious moral figure. With the palm of the martyr, God gives Hitler the laurels of Victory". -Spanish dictator (Francisco Franco, Knight of the Order of Christ) published on the 3rd of May 1945, the day of Hitler's death. ("Reforme", 21st of July 1945.)

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e372/tlthe5th/nazi-vatican/15hitlercatholicnuncio2.jpg
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e372/tlthe5th/nazi-vatican/bonhoeffer_hitler.jpg

"The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before [1933], but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit [controlled] Father [Bernhardt] Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For . . . it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it." {10} [Emphasis added] Edmond Paris, 1965 French Historian The Secret History of the Jesuits

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e372/tlthe5th/nazi-vatican/03-28-2008043919AM.jpg
Prelate Ludwig Kaas (23 May 1881 – 15 April 1952) was a Roman Catholic priest, and a prominent German politician during the Weimar Republic.
"The (liberal) Social Democrats fiercely opposed the Enabling act. Hitler needed a 2/3 majority, so the balance lay with Zentrum, the Catholic Center Party. Zentrum leader Monsignor Ludwig Kaas, a close friend and advisor to Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII, addressed the Reichstag. Far from attacking the Enabling act, or disputing Hitler's claim that Nazism was based on Christianity, Kaas called for a 'yes' vote. The Zentrum faction did vote 'yes,' and the act became law.

[Mo0n5tar]

"It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country – the United States of America – are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated MOST of the wars of Europe."
Marquis de LaFayette (1757-1834)

"The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man [i.e., the Black Pope, the Superior General of the Jesuits]. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms [sic] – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses…"
Napolean Bonaparte (1769-1821)

"Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [Thomas J. Campbell]. …Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection." (1987)
J.E.C. Shepherd (Canadian historian)

“The Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] is the enemy of man. The whole human race should unite for its overthrow. …For there is no alternative between its total extirpation, and the absolute corruption and degradation of mankind.”
Robert J. Breckinridge

“The Jesuits…are simply the Romish army for the earthly sovereignty of the world in the future, with the Pontiff of Rome for emperor…that’s their ideal. …It is simple lust of power, of filthy earthly gain, of domination – something like a universal serfdom with them [i.e., the Jesuits] as masters – that’s all they stand for. They don’t even believe in God perhaps.”
Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881; famous Russian novelist)

“The Jesuit Order at last reached the pinnacle of its power and prestige in the early eighteenth century [i.e., the early 1700s]. It had become more influential and more wealthy than any other organization in the world. It held a position in world affairs that no oath-bound group of men has ever held before or since… ‘Nearly all the Kings and Sovereigns of Europe had only Jesuits as directors of their consciences [i.e., as confessor-priests], so that the whole of Europe appeared to be governed by Jesuits only.’” (1927; using a short quote by Jesuit Cordara)
Boyd Barrett (Ex-Jesuit)

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ‘cause of the world’s problems’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rothschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front."
Bill Hughes (The Enemy Unmasked)

“They [i.e., the Jesuits] have so constantly mixed themselves up in court and state intrigues that they must, in justice, be reproached with striving after world dominion. They cost kings their lives, not on the scaffold, but by assassination, and equally hurtful as the society of Illuminati; they were the foremost among the crowd, at all events, who applauded the murder scenes in Paris [during the French Revolution].”
Hector Macpherson

“The organization of the [Roman Catholic] Hierarchy is a complete military despotism, of which the Pope is the ostensible [i.e., apparent; seeming] head; but of which, the Black Pope [Ed. Note: The Superior General of the Jesuits], is the real head. The Black Pope is the head of the order of the Jesuits, and is called a General [i.e., the Superior General]. He not only has command of his own order, but [also] directs and controls the general policy of the [Roman Catholic] Church. He [the Black Pope] is the power behind the throne, and is the real potential head of the Hierarchy. The whole machine is under the strictest rules of military discipline. The whole thought and will of this machine, to plan, propose and execute, is found in its head. There is no independence of thought, or of action, in its subordinate parts. Implicit and unquestioning obedience to the orders of superiors in authority, is the sworn duty of the priesthood of every grade…”
Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris

“Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, as far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the [Roman] Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the [Nazi] Party."
Adolf Hitler

“The SS had been organized by [Heinrich] Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit Order. The rules of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by Ignatius de Loyola [Ed. Note: the founder of the Jesuit Order] constituted a model which [Heinrich] Himmler strove carefully to copy. Absolute obedience was the supreme rule; every order had to be executed without comment.”
Walter Shellenberg ((Chief of the Nazi Sicherheitdienst (SD))

"The Pope is of so great dignity, and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God. and the vicar of God." -Ferraris Ecclesiastical dictionary

"All names which in the Scriptures are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope." - On the Authority of the Councils, book 2, chapter 17


"The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in Heaven and earth." Pope Pius V, quoted in Barclay, Chapter XXVII, p. 218, "Cities Petrus Bertanous".

"...the Pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief of kings, having plenitude of power." Lucius Ferraris, in "Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica", Volume V, article on "Papa, Article II", titled "Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility", #1, 5, 13-15, 18, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition.

-Pope Nicholas I declared that "the appellation of God had been confirmed by Constantine on the Pope, who, being God, cannot be judged by man." - Labb IX Dist.: 96 Can. 7, Satis evidentur, Decret Gratian Primer Para.

"By reason, the Pope is the head, and Kings are but as arms or hands of the same Body; therefore if they do not their duty being careful to preserve the Body, the Head as Lord and Master may cut them off." Multiple Jesuit Contributors, 1685 Warning to England’s King Charles II The Jesuits Catechism

"It is the bounden duty of every Christian to pray against Antichrist. And as to what Antichrist is, no sane man ought to raise a question. If it be not Popery in the Church of Rome, there is nothing in the world that can be called by that name. . . . Popery is contrary to Christ’s gospel and is the Antichrist and we ought to pray against it." ~Charles Haddon Spurgeon, 1873 England’s Prince of Preachers Quoted by Ireland’s Ian Paisley

"To believe in the power of man in the work of regeneration is the great heresy of Rome, and from that error has come the ruin of the Church. Conversion proceeds from the grace of God alone, and the system which ascribes it partly to man and partly to God is worse than Pelagianism" (The Reformation in England (London, 1962), Vol. 1, p. 98)

"Nationalities must be subordinate to religion, and we must learn that we are Catholics first and citizens next. God is above man and the church above the state." --Bishop Gilmore.

"Out of the Roman States there is no country where I am Pope except the United States." --Pope Gregory XVI.

"America is the hope of Rome." --The Pope

[alwayswatching]

"It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country – the United States of America – are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated MOST of the wars of Europe."
Marquis de LaFayette (1757-1834)

"The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man [i.e., the Black Pope, the Superior General of the Jesuits]. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms [sic] – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses…"
Napolean Bonaparte (1769-1821)

"Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [Thomas J. Campbell]. …Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection." (1987)
J.E.C. Shepherd (Canadian historian)

“The Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] is the enemy of man. The whole human race should unite for its overthrow. …For there is no alternative between its total extirpation, and the absolute corruption and degradation of mankind.”
Robert J. Breckinridge

“The Jesuits…are simply the Romish army for the earthly sovereignty of the world in the future, with the Pontiff of Rome for emperor…that’s their ideal. …It is simple lust of power, of filthy earthly gain, of domination – something like a universal serfdom with them [i.e., the Jesuits] as masters – that’s all they stand for. They don’t even believe in God perhaps.”
Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881; famous Russian novelist)

“The Jesuit Order at last reached the pinnacle of its power and prestige in the early eighteenth century [i.e., the early 1700s]. It had become more influential and more wealthy than any other organization in the world. It held a position in world affairs that no oath-bound group of men has ever held before or since… ‘Nearly all the Kings and Sovereigns of Europe had only Jesuits as directors of their consciences [i.e., as confessor-priests], so that the whole of Europe appeared to be governed by Jesuits only.’” (1927; using a short quote by Jesuit Cordara)
Boyd Barrett (Ex-Jesuit)

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ‘cause of the world’s problems’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rothschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front."
Bill Hughes (The Enemy Unmasked)

“They [i.e., the Jesuits] have so constantly mixed themselves up in court and state intrigues that they must, in justice, be reproached with striving after world dominion. They cost kings their lives, not on the scaffold, but by assassination, and equally hurtful as the society of Illuminati; they were the foremost among the crowd, at all events, who applauded the murder scenes in Paris [during the French Revolution].”
Hector Macpherson

“The organization of the [Roman Catholic] Hierarchy is a complete military despotism, of which the Pope is the ostensible [i.e., apparent; seeming] head; but of which, the Black Pope [Ed. Note: The Superior General of the Jesuits], is the real head. The Black Pope is the head of the order of the Jesuits, and is called a General [i.e., the Superior General]. He not only has command of his own order, but [also] directs and controls the general policy of the [Roman Catholic] Church. He [the Black Pope] is the power behind the throne, and is the real potential head of the Hierarchy. The whole machine is under the strictest rules of military discipline. The whole thought and will of this machine, to plan, propose and execute, is found in its head. There is no independence of thought, or of action, in its subordinate parts. Implicit and unquestioning obedience to the orders of superiors in authority, is the sworn duty of the priesthood of every grade…”
Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris

“Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, as far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the [Roman] Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the [Nazi] Party."
Adolf Hitler

“The SS had been organized by [Heinrich] Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit Order. The rules of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by Ignatius de Loyola [Ed. Note: the founder of the Jesuit Order] constituted a model which [Heinrich] Himmler strove carefully to copy. Absolute obedience was the supreme rule; every order had to be executed without comment.”
Walter Shellenberg ((Chief of the Nazi Sicherheitdienst (SD))

"The Pope is of so great dignity, and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God. and the vicar of God." -Ferraris Ecclesiastical dictionary

"All names which in the Scriptures are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope." - On the Authority of the Councils, book 2, chapter 17


"The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in Heaven and earth." Pope Pius V, quoted in Barclay, Chapter XXVII, p. 218, "Cities Petrus Bertanous".

"...the Pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief of kings, having plenitude of power." Lucius Ferraris, in "Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica", Volume V, article on "Papa, Article II", titled "Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility", #1, 5, 13-15, 18, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition.

-Pope Nicholas I declared that "the appellation of God had been confirmed by Constantine on the Pope, who, being God, cannot be judged by man." - Labb IX Dist.: 96 Can. 7, Satis evidentur, Decret Gratian Primer Para.

"By reason, the Pope is the head, and Kings are but as arms or hands of the same Body; therefore if they do not their duty being careful to preserve the Body, the Head as Lord and Master may cut them off." Multiple Jesuit Contributors, 1685 Warning to England’s King Charles II The Jesuits Catechism

"It is the bounden duty of every Christian to pray against Antichrist. And as to what Antichrist is, no sane man ought to raise a question. If it be not Popery in the Church of Rome, there is nothing in the world that can be called by that name. . . . Popery is contrary to Christ’s gospel and is the Antichrist and we ought to pray against it." ~Charles Haddon Spurgeon, 1873 England’s Prince of Preachers Quoted by Ireland’s Ian Paisley

"To believe in the power of man in the work of regeneration is the great heresy of Rome, and from that error has come the ruin of the Church. Conversion proceeds from the grace of God alone, and the system which ascribes it partly to man and partly to God is worse than Pelagianism" (The Reformation in England (London, 1962), Vol. 1, p. 98)

"Nationalities must be subordinate to religion, and we must learn that we are Catholics first and citizens next. God is above man and the church above the state." --Bishop Gilmore.

"Out of the Roman States there is no country where I am Pope except the United States." --Pope Gregory XVI.

"America is the hope of Rome." --The Pope

fascinating ,looks like i got some researching to do.:)

[Mo0n5tar]

Pope John Paul II: Zyklon B Salesman
by TONY BUSHBY
http://www.remnantofgod.org/popedead4.jpg
Bush and Clintons together

In his book 'Behold a Pale Horse,' former US Naval Intelligence Officer William Cooper relates a story associated with the IG Farben Chemical Company.

In the early 1940s, that company employed a Polish chemist and salesman who sold cyanide gas, Zyklon B and Malathion to the Nazis for extermination of groups of people in Auschwitz.

After the war the salesman joined the Catholic church and was ordained a priest.

In 1958 he became Poland's youngest bishop and after Pope John Paul I's mysterious death, the ex-cyanide gas salesman Karol Wojtyla was elected to the papacy as Pope John Paul II in October 1978.

In March 2000, he publicly apologized not for his war effort, but for the wickedness of the Christian religion. The plea for forgiveness also sought to pardon the use of 'violence in the service of truth' an often used fragile and treoubling referenece to the Inquisition.

The apology read by the Pope was the result of four years of work by a panel of 28 theologians and scholars and was by far the most sweeping act by a leader of a major religion.
On few occasions have ecclesiastical authorities ever acknowlegdegd the faults or abuses of which they themselves were guilty. There was concern that the apology was a major theological miscalculation that could undermine the Pope's weakening authority and the unanswered question posed by the international media was --
'In whose name was the Pope asking for forgiveness?' (Excerpted from 'The Crucifixion of Truth' by Tony Bushby)

Bill Cooper may be a good place to start?:
After a 30-day reign his predecessor
was assassinated and our ex-cyanide gas salesman assumed the papacy as
Pope John Paul II.
1990 is the right time with the right leaders: ex-chief of the Soviet
secret police Mikhail Gorbachev, ex-chief of the CIA George Bush, ex-Nazi
cyanide gas salesman Pope John Paul II, all bound by an unholy alliance to
ring in the New World Order.
The Pope has challenged world leaders by claiming that the people of
the world already recognize the absolute authority of Rome because they
observe the Sunday Sabbath that was ordered by the Pope in the Council of
Laodicea (A.D. 364).

The original Ten Commandments given Moses by
God ordered that we should:
Remember the Sabbath day, to
keep it Holy. Six days shalt
thou labor, and do all thy work:
but the seventh day is the
Sabbath of the Lord thy God; in
it thou shalt not do any work,
thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter,
thy man servant, nor thy maid servant,
nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger
that is within thy gates: for in six
days the Lord made heaven and earth,
the sea, and all that in them is,
and rested the seventh day: wherefore
the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and
hallowed it.

The seventh day, the Sabbath as handed to Moses by God, is Saturday
The celebration of Sunday as the Sabbath is verification that the people
recognize the Pope as SUPERIOR TO GOD. The only WHOLE people who
have not recognized the authority of the Pope are the Jewish people, and
that is why the Vatican has not and will not recognize the state of Israel.
The Vatican refuses even to call it Israel.

......

On July 21, 1773, Pope Clement XIV "forever annulled and extin-
guished the Jesuit Order." France, Spain and Portugal had independently
come to realize that the Jesuits were meddling in the affairs of the state and
were therefore enemies of the government. The Pope's action was a res-
ponse to pressure applied by the monarchies. King Joseph of Portugal
signed a decree "by which the Jesuits were denounced as 'traitors, rebels
and enemies to the realm...'" Pope Pius VII in August, 1814, reinstated the
Jesuits to all of their former rights and privileges.

Ex-President John Adams wrote to his successor, Thomas Jefferson: "I
do not like the re-appearance of the Jesuits. If ever there was a body of men
who merited eternal damnation on earth...it is this Society..." Jefferson
replied: "Like you, I disapprove of the restoration of the Jesuits, for it
means a step backwards from light into darkness."

Dr. Ron Brown, independent of and not known by the first,
furnished a copy of the Congressional Record of the House of Representatives
dated February 15,1913, where the same oath is entered as purported to be of
the Knights of Columbus. The Congressman may have been wrong, however,
since the content indicates that this oath may belong either to the Society of
Jesus (otherwise known as the Jesuits) or to the Knights of Malta, which is the
militia of the Pope. I include this oath only as an example that such oaths do
in fact exist and are subversive.

THE OATH
I________________________ , now in the presence of Almighty God,
the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles,
St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints, sacred host of heaven, and to you,
my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the Society of Jesus founded by
St. Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of Paul the III and continued to the
present, do by the womb of the Virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of
Jesus Christ, declare and swear that His Holiness the Pope, is Christ's vice
regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church
throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing
given His Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose
heretical kings, princes, States, Commonwealths, and Governments and
they may be safely destroyed. Therefore to the utmost of my power I will
defend this doctrine and His Holiness's right and custom against all usur-
pers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Luth-
eran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway and
the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and
the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of
America and elsewhere, and all adherents in regard that they may be
usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome.
I do now denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical
king, prince, or State, named Protestant or Liberals, or obedience to any of
their laws, magistrates, or officers.

I do further declare that the doctrine of the Churches of England and
Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots, and others of the name of Protes- Chapter Three Oath of Initiation of an Unidentified Secret Order • 101
tants or Masons to be damnable, and they themselves to be damned who
will not forsake the same.

I do further declare that I will help assist, and advise all or any of His
Holiness's agents, in any place where I should be, in Switzerland, Ger-
many, Holland, Ireland, or America, or in any other kingdom or territory I
shall come to and do my utmost to extirpate the heretical Protestant or
Masonic doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, legal or
otherwise.

I do further promise and declare that, notwithstanding I am dispensed
with to assume any religion heretical for the propagation of the Mother
Church's interest to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from
time to time, as they intrust me and not divulge, directly or indirectly, by
word, writing, or circumstances whatever but to execute all that should be
proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me by you my Ghostly
father, or any of this sacred order.

I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of
my own or any mental reservation whatsoever, even as a corpse or cadaver
(perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every com-
mand that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope and of
Jesus Christ.

That I will go to any part of the world whithersoever I may be sent, to
the frozen regions north, jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of
Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America without
murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever is
communicated to me.

I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity pre-
sents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly against all her-
etics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do to extirpate them from
the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex, or
condition, and that will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury
alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their
women, and crush their infants' heads against the walls in order to annihi-
late their execrable race. That when the same can not be done openly, I will
secretly use the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the
poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or
author i ty of the persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either
public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agents of
thePope or superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Father of the Society of
Jesus..................

[Mo0n5tar]

Eric Phelps, Nazi IG Farben, Roman Catholic links (http://www.vaticanassassins.org/hitlers_papal.htm)

[Mo0n5tar]

Sherman Skolnick was also a great researcher!

Nazi Popes - Balanced
View Of Popes - Part 2
By Sherman H. Skolnick
www.cloakanddagger.ca
www.skolnicksreport.com
www.rense.com/Datapages/skolnickdatapage.html
4-20-5


ACHTUNG!

If you have frayed nerves or a weak stomach, you should press DELETE now and take your nerve pills. You may or may not well digest what you read here.

A well-informed author on the topic of the Vatican, is reportedly coming out with a well put together book, showing that the late Pope John Paul 2nd worked for the Nazi Gestapo in Poland during World War Two. He rounded up Polish Resistance Fighters and turned them over to the Nazis who had them shot, so the book contends. Some. however, survived.

Questions remain, of course. WHY did the author wait so long to come out with this book? Some belatedly contend that secretive German funds(possibly post-war surviving Nazis?) arranged for and financed the clandestine Conclave that installed Wojtyla as Pope John Paul 2nd. Remember: the Anglo -American Aristocracy financed the rise of Adolf Hitler as a bulwark against the Soviets.

Enforcers for the Vatican are called Jesuits. The head of the Jesuits, although he is NOT a person of color, is nevertheless called the BLACK POPE. Over the centuries, Jesuits, hiding behind royal court types with Jewish names, called hofjuden, sought to control if not topple various European monarchs, most of them Catholics.

So by Royal Order, Jesuits were banished from Spain, France, and a few other places. Hiding behind others, the Jesuits actually went underground, continuing to plot to control Monarchs. In America, the Jesuits have Hollywood hofjuden as a front. Hollywood angers Christians by not showing films about non-Jewish holocausts.

Jesuits also hide behind aristocracy fronts, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, CFR.

In his Inauguration speech in 1841, President William Henry Harrison directly angered the Jesuits. He dared confront the Jesuits and then Pope, by proclaiming:

"We admit of no government BY DIVINE RIGHT, believing that so far as power is concerned, the beneficent Creator has made no distinction among men; that all are on an equality, and that the only legitimate right to govern, is upon the expressed grant of power from the governed."
(Emphasis added.)

Thirty-five days later, for the benefit if not actually aranged by the Jesuits and the British Monarchy, President Harrison was posioned to death.

All told, SEVEN U.S. PRESIDENTS were assassinated from 1841 to 1963, as orchestrated if not actually arranged by the Jesuits and the British Monarchy. four by gunfire, three by poisoning.
[Visit www.skolnicksreport.com and links on Home Page there, to extensive series, "Overthrow of the American Republic".]

Seldom more publicly mentioned, is that over the last two centuries and more, various Jesuits and Popes have labeled the Declaration of Independence as "wickedness", and that Popular Government, provided by the U.S. Constitution with its Bill of Rights is a "satanic instrument".

Are we Americans heading for Nazi doctrines if not actually here already? It is documented beyond dispute, that Prescott S. Bush, Sr., father of George Herbert Walker Bush, and grandfather of George W. Bush, had instrumentally financed the rise of Adolf Hitler.The term Homeland Security is an anglocized version of the abbreviated German term Gestapo.

Adolf Hitler, 1933,, and George W. Bush, 2000, and repeated in 2004, were installed in the highest office of their nation by arbitrary and corrupt powers.

[To understand the role of the corrupted gang of five U.S. Supreme Courrt Justices who installed Bush, December, 2000, in Bush versus Gore, as the occupant and resident of the White House, study the website series, "Coca-Cola, CIA, and the Courts", www.skolnicksreport.com ]

The new Monarch in the Vatican, Joseph Ratzinger, Pope Benedict 16th, was immediately whitewashed by the liars and whores of the oil-soaked, spy-riddled, massive tax-cheating Monopoly Press. They described his past as his father was so Anti-Nazi that he had to move to another town. Actually, Joseph Ratzinger was in the Hitler Youth and his family were apparently pro-Nazi.

Over the many years, Germany repeatedly attacked France. So French Catholics are appalled, if not angered, that Joseph Ratzinger is the first German Pope in over one thousand years.

Before the 1960 Election, John F. Kennedy spoke in Texas to a group of Protestant preachers. He said he is only nominally Catholic and that if elected, he will not bow down for the Vatican. Right there,such a bold statement was JFK's Death Warrant. In 1961, shortly after being Inaugurated, President Kennedy reluctantly went along with a plan left over from the Eisenhower Administration, to attempt to invade Cuba at the Bay of Pigs. The Cuban strongman, Fidel Castro, was and is a Jesuit, hiding behind a left-wing label. Castro never disbanded the Catholic Church in Cuba. Under Vatican Canon Law, a Catholic leader of a nation, like JfK, that attacks another Catholic leader and nation, is subject to a Death Warrant.

What Catholic countries want a pro-Nazi Pope? South America has many such. Included is heavily Catholic Argentina. Toward the end of World War 2, various Nazi war criminals, using Vatican-supplied passports and disguises, escaped down the "Ratlines" to Arentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, and elsewhere in South America. German submarines loaded with Nazi gold also arrived in South America. So the children and grand-children of esaped Nazis, with their fortunes, dominate the Catholic Church throughout South America. Pope John Paul 2nd was viciously against so-called liberation theology of some South American and Central American archbishops.who sought to cater to the "shirtless ones". Such Catholic Church leaders were rooted out, in some instances, assasssinated, apparently on the dictates of Pope John Paul 2nd, ostensibly through his enforcer, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.

Centuries ago, at the behest of the Vatican, was the bloody, horrible "The Inquisition". Does it still exist today? Yes, its existence since 1981 was, like centuries ago, to punish "heretics".Its title is now something like Promoting The Faithful. And who has headed this latter day "Inquisition"? Why, none other than pro-Nazi Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict 16th.

Was it just a coincidence that Joseph Ratzinger was selected as the new Pope, April 19, 2005, a day before Adolf Hitler's birthday?


What is the result of part of the planet going back to rule by Nazis?

More coming. Stay tuned.
-------

Mr. Skolnick's Reports are posted and archived at www.skolnicksreport.com Together with his co-authored The Middle-Finger News, they are posted and archived through
www.rense.com/Datapages/skolnickdatapage.html
also posted and archived through
www.cloakanddagger.ca

Skolnick is co-host with Lenny Bloom on a growing, popular maximum power Internet radio program, FM-quality worldwide, ON-LINE LIVE and ARCHIVED at www.cloakanddagger.ca CHECK SCHEDULE for time it is on.

[Mo0n5tar]

http://liberalslikechrist.org/hitler&nuncio.gif
"The Nazis championed traditional family values: their ideology was conservative, bourgeois, patriarchal, and strongly antifeminist. Discipline and conformity were emphasized, marriage promoted, abortion and homosexuality despised. . .Most religious Germans detested the impiety, secularism, and hedonistic decadence that they associated with such modernist ideas as democracy and free speech. If they feared democracy, they were terrified by Communism, to the point of being willing to accept extreme counter-methods."
[ from http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/paul_23_4.html ]

The extent to which Adolf Hitler was a champion of "traditional values", is illustrated in his own words :

"Parallel to the training of the body a struggle against the poisoning of the soul must begin. Our whole public life today is like a hothouse for sexual ideas and simulations. Just look at the bill of fare served up in our movies, vaudeville and theaters, and you will hardly be able to deny that this is not the right kind of food, particularly for the youth...Theater, art, literature, cinema, press, posters, and window displays must be cleansed of all manifestations of our rotting world and placed in the service of a moral, political, and cultural idea." [Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapter 10]

[kimball13]

The Catholic church had there oppurtunity to turn from the wicked ways and use there resorces for good, they did not and now i will not allow them to continue:cool:They attacked my biological children as well as your's now i am on the attack and declared this in 2002,,,actualy i beagan this mission 22 years or more ago. and getting only $800.00 a mnth for liveing expences and foood it has bena difficult...so vatican and its terrorsts have no place with me send them away!(Vajdra)!!!!!!!enogh for now i am very busy lately;) the banks are easy to deal with:rolleyes:they can trow all the monye they want,,,boy what i could have did with 700 bilion,,,they are so fearful of me that they have kept me impovrished, they sent me promises of finacial security then realized that i may be a force to be reckoned with if i had money,,,boy are they wrong, i have no money or conscripted soldiers, all of my warriors are voletears,,,and some know who my bio father was, he was the best of all soldeirs1977 he was the creator of america's best, look at his picure every day for inspiration, even though some think of him as darth vader;)my love and respect for him as my earthly father is unparrelaeld, and when people meat me that knew him know whos son i am there is no hiding it and i wont, it must be known:cool: when i was at my heavest 175 lbs i looked alot like him, now around 150 lbs i still look alot like he did as well as have alot of the same attributs he carried the sword to here is a clue there is a picture about antelope island, i may be the one in the uper row, im the one with the black dot where my name should be, look closely, i am 15 years older now.......They canot shut me up because they know what my rights are and they dont have a leg to stand on about what i disclose,,,The past is the past we live for the future.:rolleyes:;):cool:

[hw spartan]

Very exellent thread.
I know about these things also, the mainstream people havnt got a clue on the evilness of the vatican.

Have you heard of "The Black Pope"?

or Alberto, ive got a thread called "story of a juiset preist"

by the looks of it you do:)

mmmm will check all links later with some coffee.

renember "the Black Pope" he is there leader
http://www.freesmileys.org/emoticons/emoticon-monster-001.gif (http://www.freesmileys.org)

:)

[Mo0n5tar]

Professor Arthur Noble

Introduction: Focus

The English poet Robert Southey (1774-1843), who wrote a famous biography of Lord Nelson, once gave the following famous satirical description of a Jesuit:

A Jesuit may be shortly described as an empty suit of clothes with another person living in them, who acts for him, thinks for him, decides for him whether he shall be a prince or a beggar, and moves him about wheresoever he pleases; who allows him to exhibit the internal aspect of a man, but leaves him none of the privileges – no liberty, no property, no affections, not even the power to refuse obedience when ordered to commit the most atrocious of crimes; for, the more he outrages his own feelings, the greater his merits. Obedience to the superior is his only idea of virtue, and in all other respects he is a mere image. [Quoted in The Protestant Echo, Vol. XX, 1899, p. 86.]

Unfortunately for humanity, history demonstrates that the Jesuits were no mere image, but a most fearsome and gruesome reality. When the Bill for legalising Jesuitism was set down for its second reading in the House of Commons on June 7, 1899, The Protestant Echo warned the public of the likely consequences by quoting the following words of Rev. Dr. J.A. Wylie, author of the book Jesuitism: Its Rise, Progress and Insidious Workings [London, undated]:

To what country of Europe shall we turn where we are not able to track the Jesuit by his bloody footprints? […] How many assassins they sent to England to murder Elizabeth history attests. […] Nor is it only the palaces of monarchs into which they have crept with their doctrines of murder and assassination; the very sanctuary of their own Popes they have defiled with blood. […] In the Gunpowder Plot we see them deliberately planning to destroy, at one blow, the nobility and gentry of England. To them we owe those civil wars which for so many years drenched with blood the fair provinces of France. They laid the train of that crowning horror, the St. Bartholomew massacre. Philip II and the Jesuits share between them the guilt of the "Invincible Armada" […]. What a harvest of plots, tumults, seditions, revolutions, torturings, poisonings, assassinations, regicides and massacres, has Christendom reaped from the seed sown by the Jesuits! [Ibid.]

An English Roman Catholic wrote the following in 1602 his preface to the Jesuit Catechism:

To receive Jesuits into a Kingdom is to receive a vermin which at length will gnaw out the heart of the State both spiritual and temporal. They work underhand the ruin of the countries where they dwell, and the murder of whatsoever kings and princes it pleaseth them.

The Abbé Marcel de la Roche Arnauld, after physically escaping from eight years in a Jesuit College, wrote:

[…] how can any honest man live among them? Do you wish to excite trouble, to provoke revolution, to produce the total ruin of your country? Call in the Jesuits. [Jesuit Catechism, 1602, Preface.]

Some of the aspects of Jesuitism which I would like to examine in more detail today are foreshadowed in these quotations.

full article (http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=jesuits)

[eternal_spirit]

Who created the Jesuits? the Jews it was a totally Jewish run operation, to try and infiltrate the Catholic church so people would blame the Catholics, when in fact it was Jews hiding behind another religion (this is how they work) Ratzinger the Pope is Jewish.


How many assassins they sent to England to murder Elizabeth history attests. […] Nor is it only the palaces of monarchs into which they have crept with their doctrines of murder and assassination; the very sanctuary of their own Popes they have defiled with blood. […]Catholic monarchs were also murdered by other religions, how else do you think so and so got the throne, by deposing/killing of the Catholic King.

A law was passed over 300 years ago and is still in operation Today bannning any Catholic from becoming king or Queen of England.

In the Gunpowder Plot we see them deliberately planning to destroy, at one blow, the nobility and gentry of England. To them we owe those civil wars which for so many years drenched with


At this time Catholics were being murdered, Priests in particular, by other so called Christians/Parlamentarians/Cromwell's soldiers.

Catholic priest were banned from saying mass. They tried to take the Elite foreign monarchy out. So to blame the civil wars on Catholics is bullshit. War had allready been declared on Catholics before the gun powder plot.

The whole Nazi thing was to defend against the Jewish run Communists and Zionists. Whose side would many Christians choose? Note the dates 1917 Communists were murdering first.


Top (http://www.jewwatch.com/index.htm): Jewish Occupied Governments: (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-folder.html) USSR
http://www.jewwatch.com/gif-ukrainian-dead-crosses.jpgThese Christians are but a few of the 100,000,000 Christian innocents who were exterminated by All Anti-Christian Jewish Red Commissars in Russia under the orders of Trotsky, the Jewish Commissar of Commissars. Yet Spielberg will never Direct a "Schindler's List" Movie for them or their genocide. Why is that? Because Jews did it.
My relatives and my fellow Christians were murdered in the USSR under Jewish Marxism between 1917-1945, and many of the Marxists came to Russia from New York to do this to Christians in 1917 after Jacob Schiff, the Jewish anti-Christian maniac banker who owned The Guaranty National Trust, the largest bank in the United States, financed Lenin and Trotsky $35 million for the Red Revolution and the mass killing of these Christian souls. We must never forget this.

Everything underlined is a link



The Role of the Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Genocidal Killing of 65,000,000 Christians by the Jewish Leaders in the USSR (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-Jewish-Bolshevism-Jewish%20Role.html)
Jewish Bolsheviks & Their Roles Listed in Let My People Go, Empirical Publications, 1976. (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-Jewish-Bolshevism-Bolsheviks.html)
Jews Led Red Revolution - By The Numbers (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-revolution.html)
Jewish Bolsheviks Played Major Role in the USSR, Says www.answer.com (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-jewish-bolsheviks-answer.com.html)
Rabbi Yissocher Frand's Admission of Jewish Communist Connections (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor194710)
Speech in National Geographic Magazine, Dec 1 1906, on Jewish Revolutionary Crimes in Russia (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor16790)
Historical Observations on Red Revolution in USSR as Jewish (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-historians.html)
Winston Churchill's Famous History of Zionists vs. Bolsheviks Carried in Sunday Illustrated Herald on February 8, 1920, page 5 (http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/WSC/WSCwrote1920.html)
Jews & The Red Revolution (http://www4.***************/whitehistory/hwr60.htm)
Jews & the Soviet Government (http://www4.***************/whitehistory/hwr61.htm)
Jews , Their Press, and Others Say Jews Behind Red Revolution (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-moreevidence.html)
First President of Soviet Union, Yakov Sverdlov, a Jew--Article in People's Weekly World (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor22630)
Jews, Communism, and The Job of Killing Off the USSR's Christians (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor19996)
The Vinnitsa Christians Genocide--Committed by the USSR's Jews & Who Controlled the NKVD (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor5760)
Discussion of Jewish Bolshevism as Taking Over Russia in Red Revolution with Names of Jews (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor12931)
Arrested and Enslaved by Jewish Bolsheviks 52 Years Ago, These Christians Still Want to Leave Their Artic Prisons (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor35094)
Jewish Use of Fascist Beating Methods, Torture, and Executions in USSR Prisons (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor179692)
The Jewish Inventions of the Russian Gulags & Their Inhumane Conditions (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor188583)
How Hundreds of Christian [sic. "bourgeousie" Were Lined Up and Shot by the Nazi-Like Jewish Cheka - Red Revolution Materials (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor23296)
Nicholas Utin, a Jew, the First Russian Marist, 1860's to 1870's (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor3061135)
Jewish Founders of the Russian Social-Democratic Movement in 1883 (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor3049198)
Jewish Socialism in 1980-1900 (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor3063205)



History of Jewish Soviet Holocaust of 65,000,000 Indigenous Europeans with Pictures (http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1744)
Ukrainian Famine in the book "Ninth Circle" with pictures published in The Chicago American newspaper during February and March, 1935
Genrik Yagoda, Russian Jewish Christian Killer (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-yagoda.html)
The Prop Masters (http://www.hoffman-info.com/communist.html)
Historical Worksheet on Jewish Influences in the Red Revolution W/USA Banking Connections (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor1218070)
Anti-Semitism USSR Capital Crime by Grateful Communists (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-USSRchristians-antisemitismcrime.html)
Boston Globe Reports 100,000,000 Killed by Communism (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor276580)
Lutheran Synod/Missouri Reports on 95.5 Million Murdered Christians in USSR by Jews (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor9685)
Genocide by High NKVD Jews in Russia Still Hidden--Eric Margolis, Toronto Sun, 12-13-98 (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor2622229)
Pictures of Dying Ukrainians in The Chicago American, February and March 1935 (http://web.archive.org/web/19961217052019/http://www.sabre.org/UFPWWW_Etc/History/ninth.circle/nc.photos.html)
Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-USSRchristians-JAC.html)
Jews Blamed for Lithuanian Genocide (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor49969)
Jewish Assassination of Czar Alexander (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor3049198)
Lazar Kaganovich, Soviet Jewish Commissar and Christian Genocidal Killer (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-kaganovich.html)
Trotsky -- Lev Davidovich Bronstein (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-trotsky.htm)
Reuter's Story on Crucifixions, Scalpings, and Beastial Torture of the Christians in USSR (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor245481)
How the Jews Led USSR Communism (http://web.archive.org/web/19991116054255/http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm/comm_1.html)
"Yiddish Culture, Socialist Politics and the Shaping of Immigrant Jewish Identity in America, 1890-1924," Dissertation by Stanford Ph.D. candidate Anthony Michels (http://web.archive.org/web/19990429064721/http://shamash.org/nfjc/jcn/F95-2.htm)
Netherland Ambassadors Report on Jewish Bolsheviks Published by U.S. State Department (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html#anchor8736)
Post USSR Jewish Control Areas (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-CIS.html)
Email to Jew Watch from USSR Victims (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-victim-email.html)
Commemorating the 65,000,000 Dead with European Holocaust Memorial Week, a European Holocaust Museum, and $20 Trillion in Reparations (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-European-holocaust-week.html)
Stalin's Jews (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-stalins-jews.html)

[eternal_spirit]

First Russian Marxists Were JewishNicholas Utin, a Jew, the First Russian Marxist, 1860's to 1870's.
Instrumental in Creating a Russian Section in the First Communist International.
'In the 1860s and '70s, Jewish activists occupied some of the highest positions in the fledgling Russian revolutionary movement.
The "pioneer of Russian-Jewish revolutionary action" was Nicholas Utin, a baptized Jew who was instrumental in creating a Russian Section in the First International.
Known as the first Russian Marxist, Utin was prominent in the struggle of the International's Marxian wing against the anarchistic tactics of Bakunin. '
-- Philip Mendes, THE NEW LEFT, THE JEWS AND THE VIETNAM WAR, 1965-1972, Lazare Press, North Caulfield, Victoria, Australia, p 10 from material printed originally in Parkin, A.L. The Origins of the Russian-Jewish Labour Movement. F.W.Cheshire Pty Ltd. Melbourne. 1947. p80.

[eternal_spirit]

Hitler's secretary, Martin Bormann, also declared that "National Socialism [Nazism] and Christianity are irreconcilable" and Hitler didn't squawk too much about it. Similarly, Hermann Rauschning, a Hitler associate, said, "One is either a Christian or a German. You can't be both." In addition, Hitler declared Nazism the state religion and the Bible was replaced by Mein Kampf in the schools. You really want confusion? Randy Alley, one of my best WWII history sources, noted that the SS were supposedly forbidden to believe in God--yet the military's belt buckles said "Gott mit uns" ("God is with us")! See photo, below.


First, let's look at what he said that seems to put him on the anti-Christian side:
According to a press release from Catholic League President, William A. Donohue (2/4/99): "Hitler was a neo-pagan terrorist whose conscience was not informed by Christianity, but by pseudo-scientific racist philosophies. Hitler hated the Catholic Church, made plans to kill the Pope, authorized the murder of thousands of priests and nuns, and did everything he could to suppress the influence of the Church.



In 1933, Hitler said, 'It is through the peasantry that we shall really be able to destroy Christianity because there is in them a true religion rooted in nature and blood.'" The Catholic League also quoted Hitler, in a 4/23/99 Op-Ed ad in the New York Times, as saying, "Antiquity was better than modern times, because it didn't know Christianity and syphilis." Ouch!





Unfortunately, the press release had no citations attached and the Catholic League did not include any reference to it in the package they sent when I asked about them. The syphilis quote is cited as having come from Hitler's Third Reich: A Documentary History, by Louis Snyder, but they are quoting Patrick Buchanan quoting this book. In other words, they may not have actually checked the source themselves (if they did, why mention Buchanan?). This makes me a bit worried about the validity of both of these (I have not been able to find the book to check on my own). While this doesn't necessarily make them untrue, we have to recognize that there are a lot of bogus Hitler quotes floating around, some allegedly coming directly from Mein Kampf, for example. The problem is that people who have actually read Mein Kampf find that they aren't in there anywhere! I'm not saying these quotes fall into that category, but just a note to be wary of lots of the unsourced "quotes" that are around. (I did my best to check out the various Mein Kampf quotes that I use here, including referencing a friend who actually plowed through the whole thing.)





That said, we can move on to some other relevant info. Jehuda Bauer, Professor of Holocaust Studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, describes the real "god" of Hitler and the Nazis in his article, "The Trauma of the Holocaust: Some Historical Perspectives," by saying: ""They wanted to go back to a pagan world, beautiful, naturalistic, where natural hierarchies based on the supremacy of the strong would be established, because strong equaled good, powerful equaled civilized. The world did have a kind of God, the merciless God of nature, the brutal God of races, the oppressive God of hierarchies." In other words, definitely non-Christian.



Historian Paul Johnson wrote that Hitler hated Christianity with a passion, adding that shortly after assuming power in 1933, Hitler told Hermann Rauschnig that he intended "to stamp out Christianity root and branch."
As Hitler grew in power, he made other anti-Christian statements. For example, he was quoted in Hitler: A Study in Tyranny,


by Allan Bullock, as saying: "I'll make these damned parsons feel the power of the state in a way they would have never believed possible. For the moment, I am just keeping my eye upon them: if I ever have the slightest suspicion that they are getting dangerous, I will shoot the lot of them. This filthy reptile raises its head whenever there is a sign of weakness in the State, and therefore it must be stamped on. We have no sort of use for a fairy story invented by the Jews."

[eternal_spirit]

But in contrast to these quotes, some of Hitler's speeches definitely seem to put him in the Christian camp as a fighter against atheism. For example, he said, on signing the Nazi-Vatican Concordat, April 26, 1933: "Secular schools can never be tolerated because such schools have no religious instruction, and a general moral instruction without religious foundation is built on air; consequently all character training and religion must be derived from faith . . ."
An Associated Press article from the Lansing State Journal, February 23, 1933, is headlined, "Hitler Aims Blow at 'Godless' Move," and talks about how Hitler was campaigning against atheist communists and wanted support from Catholic Nazis. One line in the article specifically says, "Hitler, himself, is a Catholic." (You can see the entire article at http://www.infidels.org/library/his torical/unknown/hitler.html .) In addition, in 1941, Hitler told General Gerhart Engel: "I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so." He never left the church. He was baptized a Roman Catholic as an infant and was a communicant and altar boy in his youth.




In a speech at Koblenz, August 26, 1934, Hitler said: "National Socialism neither opposes the Church nor is it anti-religious, but on the contrary it stands on the ground of a real Christianity . . . For their interests cannot fail to coincide with ours alike in our fight against the symptoms of degeneracy in the world of today, in our fight against a Bolshevist culture, against atheistic movement, against criminality, and in our struggle for a consciousness of a community in our national life . . . These are not anti-Christian, these are Christian principles!"
Related to the above, the "Religion" article in The Oxford Companion to World War II notes that early on in his career, Hitler sponsored something called "practical Christianity," and that "German Christians emerged who claimed to be able to synthesize the best of National Socialism [Nazism] and the best of Christianity. Many Christians seemed to be able to reconcile themselves to at least certain aspects of anti-Semitic legislation. Those who could not . . . often ended up in concentration camps . . . Many anguished Christians serving in the Wehrmacht began to feel a little more comfortable about supporting a war that now included the overthrow of godless communism."


Getting back to quotes, on October 24, 1933, in a speech in Berlin, Hitler said: "We were convinced that the people need and require this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out."
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf: "I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews. I am doing the Lord's work." In 1938, he quoted those same words in a Reichstag speech.
In a speech delivered April 12, 1922, published in "My New Order," and quoted in Freethought Today (April 1990), Hitler said:
My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.
In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison.
Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross.
As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice . . .
And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly, it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people. And when I look on my people I see them work and work and toil and labor, and at the end of the week they have only for their wages wretchedness and misery.
When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people are plundered and exploited.""
I could probably find more speeches in which Hitler claims himself to be a Christian, but I think the point has been made. He said it. Now, what did it mean?
It seems Hitler, like many modern-day politicians, spoke out of both sides of his mouth. And when he didn't, his lackeys did. It may have been political pandering, just like many of our current politicians who invoke God's name to gain support.
Also, it seems probable that Hitler, being the great manipulator, knew that he couldn't fight the Christian churches and their members right off the bat. So he made statements to put the church at ease and may have patronized religion as a way to prevent having to fight the Christian-based church.
In fact, Anton Gil notes in his book, An Honourable Defeat: A History of German Resistance to Hitler, 1933-1945: "For his part, Hitler naturally wanted to bring the church into line with everything else in his scheme of things. He knew he dare not simply eradicate it: that would not have been possible with such an international organisation, and he would have lost many Christian supporters had he tried to. His principal aim was to unify the German Evangelical Church under a pro-Nazi banner, and to come to an accommodation with the Catholics."
In other words, while he was certainly evil, he also usually knew which wars he could win (at least until 1941) and only fought those. He knew he could beat the Polish, French, and British armies and he allegedly counseled the Japanese against attacking the U.S.; he also requested that they open up a front against Russia. He couldn't beat the church in open warfare--so he took control and then attacked them piecemeal while making statements to put them at ease. Think about it--how many other times did Hitler break his word or ignore a treaty? He said whatever would make things easiest, and then ignored it later.


Author Doug Krueger notes that "so many Germans were religious believers that Hitler, if not religious himself, at least had to pretend to be a believer in order to gain support." He adds, "If the [Christian] message won converts, it would seem that most Nazis were probably [Christians] too. After all, would appeal to divine mandate win more theists or atheists to the cause?" He also points out that "Even if Hitler was not a [Christian], he could still have been a theist. Or a deist" (www.infidels.org/library /modern/doug_krueger/copin.html (http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/doug_krueger/copin.html)). Remember that being a non-Christian is not equal to being an atheist.
An interesting side note: Two of my sources, both of whom are well-versed in WWII history, said something to the effect that Hitler acted as if he had a messianic complex and perhaps believed himself to essentially be a god or the messiah. As one put it, you could certainly make the argument that he was a firm believer in God, if by "God" you mean "Adolf Hitler."
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1699/was-hitler-a-christian

[sophia_h]

Hitler's secretary, Martin Bormann, also declared that "National Socialism [Nazism] and Christianity are irreconcilable" and Hitler didn't squawk too much about it. Similarly, Hermann Rauschning, a Hitler associate, said, "One is either a Christian or a German. You can't be both." In addition, Hitler declared Nazism the state religion and the Bible was replaced by Mein Kampf in the schools. You really want confusion? Randy Alley, one of my best WWII history sources, noted that the SS were supposedly forbidden to believe in God--yet the military's belt buckles said "Gott mit uns" ("God is with us")! See photo, below.


First, let's look at what he said that seems to put him on the anti-Christian side:
According to a press release from Catholic League President, William A. Donohue (2/4/99): "Hitler was a neo-pagan terrorist whose conscience was not informed by Christianity, but by pseudo-scientific racist philosophies. Hitler hated the Catholic Church, made plans to kill the Pope, authorized the murder of thousands of priests and nuns, and did everything he could to suppress the influence of the Church.



In 1933, Hitler said, 'It is through the peasantry that we shall really be able to destroy Christianity because there is in them a true religion rooted in nature and blood.'" The Catholic League also quoted Hitler, in a 4/23/99 Op-Ed ad in the New York Times, as saying, "Antiquity was better than modern times, because it didn't know Christianity and syphilis." Ouch!





Unfortunately, the press release had no citations attached and the Catholic League did not include any reference to it in the package they sent when I asked about them. The syphilis quote is cited as having come from Hitler's Third Reich: A Documentary History, by Louis Snyder, but they are quoting Patrick Buchanan quoting this book. In other words, they may not have actually checked the source themselves (if they did, why mention Buchanan?). This makes me a bit worried about the validity of both of these (I have not been able to find the book to check on my own). While this doesn't necessarily make them untrue, we have to recognize that there are a lot of bogus Hitler quotes floating around, some allegedly coming directly from Mein Kampf, for example. The problem is that people who have actually read Mein Kampf find that they aren't in there anywhere! I'm not saying these quotes fall into that category, but just a note to be wary of lots of the unsourced "quotes" that are around. (I did my best to check out the various Mein Kampf quotes that I use here, including referencing a friend who actually plowed through the whole thing.)





That said, we can move on to some other relevant info. Jehuda Bauer, Professor of Holocaust Studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, describes the real "god" of Hitler and the Nazis in his article, "The Trauma of the Holocaust: Some Historical Perspectives," by saying: ""They wanted to go back to a pagan world, beautiful, naturalistic, where natural hierarchies based on the supremacy of the strong would be established, because strong equaled good, powerful equaled civilized. The world did have a kind of God, the merciless God of nature, the brutal God of races, the oppressive God of hierarchies." In other words, definitely non-Christian.



Historian Paul Johnson wrote that Hitler hated Christianity with a passion, adding that shortly after assuming power in 1933, Hitler told Hermann Rauschnig that he intended "to stamp out Christianity root and branch."
As Hitler grew in power, he made other anti-Christian statements. For example, he was quoted in Hitler: A Study in Tyranny,

by Allan Bullock, as saying: "I'll make these damned parsons feel the power of the state in a way they would have never believed possible. For the moment, I am just keeping my eye upon them: if I ever have the slightest suspicion that they are getting dangerous, I will shoot the lot of them. This filthy reptile raises its head whenever there is a sign of weakness in the State, and therefore it must be stamped on. We have no sort of use for a fairy story invented by the Jews."



..


Hitler told Hermann Rauschnig that he intended "to stamp out Christianity root and branch."




Rauschning's Phony 'Conversations With Hitler': An Update

Mark Weber


One of the most widely quoted sources of information about Hitler's personality and secret intentions is the supposed memoir of Hermann Rauschning, the National Socialist President of the Danzig Senate in 1933-1934 who was ousted from the Hitler movement a short time later and then made a new life for himself as a professional anti-Nazi.


In the book known in German as Conversations with Hitler (Gespraeche mit Hitler) and first published in the U.S. in 1940 as The Voice of Destruction, Rauschning presents page after page of what are purported to be Hitler's most intimate views and plans for the future, allegedly based on dozens of private conversations between 1932 and 1934. After the war the memoir was introduced as Allied prosecution exhibit USSR-378 at the main Nuremberg "war crimes" trial.



Among the damning quotations attributed to Hitler by Rauschning are these memorable statements:



We must be brutal. We must regain a clear conscience about brutality. Only then can we drive out the tenderness from our people ... Do I propose to exterminate entire nationalities? Yes, it will add up to that ... I naturally have the right to destroy millions of men of inferior races who increase like vermin ... Yes, we are barbarians. We want to be barbarians. It is an honorable title.


Hitler is also supposed to have confided to Rauschning, an almost unknown provincial official, fantastic plans for a German world empire that would include Africa, South America, Mexico and, eventually, the United States.


Many prestigious historians, inculding Leon Poliakov, Gerhard Weinberg, Alan Bullock, Joachim Fest, Nora Levin and Robert Payne, used choice quotations from Rauschning's memoir in their works of history. Poliakov, one of the most prominent Holocaust writers, specifically praised Rauschning for his "exceptional accuracy, while Levin, another widely-read Holocaust historian, called him "one of the most penetrating analysts of the Nazi period."



But not everyone has been so credulous. Swiss historian Wolfgang Haenel spent five years diligently investigating the memoir before announcing his findings in 1983 at a revisionist history conference in West Germany. The renowned Conversations with Hitler, he declared are a total fraud. The book has no value "except as a document of Allied war propaganda."



Haenel was able to conclusively establish that Rausching's claim to have met with Hitler "more than a hundred times is a lie. The two actually met only four times, and never alone. The words attributed to Hitler, he showed, were simply invented or lifted from many different sources, including writings by Juenger and Friedrich Nietzsche. An account of Hitler hearing voices, waking at night with convulsive shrieks and pointing in terror at an empty corner while shouting "There, there, in the corner!" was taken from a short story by French writer Guy de Maupassant.



The phony memoir was designed to incite public opinion in democratic countries, especially in the United States, in favor of war against Germany. The project was the brainchild of the Hungarian-born journalist Emery Reves, who ran an influential anti-German press and propaganda agency in Paris during the 1930s. Haenel has also found evidence that a prominent British journalist named Henry Wickham-Steele helped to produce the memoir. Wickham-Steele was a right-hand man of Sir Robert Vansittart, perhaps the most vehemently anti-German figure in Britain.


A report about Haenel's sensational findings appeared in the Fall 1983 issue of The Journal of Historical Review. More recently, West Germany's most influential weekly periodicals, Die Zeit, and Der Spiegel (7 September 1985), have run lengthy articles about historical hoax. Der Spiegel concluded that Rauschning's Conversations with Hitler "are a falsification, an historical distortion from the first to the last page ... Haenel not only proves the falsification, he also shows how the impressive surrogate was quickly compiled and which ingredients were mixed together."



There are some valuable lessons to be learned from the story of this sordid hoax, which took more than 40 years to finally unmask: It shows that even the most brazen historical fraud can have a tremendous impact if it serves important interests, that it's easier to invent a great historical lie than to expose one and finally, that everyone should be extremely wary of even the "authoritative" portrayals of the emotionally-charged Hitler era.


A footnote: Readers interested in an authentic record of Hitler's personality and private views should look into the fascinating and wide-ranging memoir of Otto Wagener, published in August 1985 by Yale University Press under the title Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant. Wagener was the first Chief of Staff of the SA ("stormtroopers") and Director of the Economic-Political Department of the National Socialist Party. He spent hundreds of hours with Hitler between 1929 and 1932, many of them alone.


http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p499_Weber.html

.

[sophia_h]

`


A Close Examination of Otto Wagener’s Hitler: Hitler—
Memoirs of a Confidant




excerpt:

Interestingly enough, Otto Wagener had no reason to apologize for Hitler, nor to present a “whitewashed” version of Germany’s greatest leader. Not only had Wagener had a “falling out” with Hitler in the year, June 1933 (p. ix) but, more importantly, his wife had claimed that he was nearly executed (p. xiii). Now, this may well have been a fabrication on either Otto or his wife’s behalf, but nevertheless, Wagener was put in jail and allegedly only freed with the help of friends. He had fallen out of favor with Hitler, according to his own account, due to his taking advantage of the ousting of Alfred Hugenberg, prematurely. Hitler was actually going to offer Wagener the post until he found out that Wagener had greedily been pushing for that post before Hitler had decided upon a fitting successor (xii). In light of all this fallout, Wagener nevertheless presents an honest and fair portrayal of Hitler, and it is far from the monster we so often read about in our school books.



Jewry as the Demise of Both Russia and America



According to Wagener (1985) Hitler felt that Germany was especially endangered, due to its geographic proximity to Bolshevist Russia. So, even though he understood that the Red subversion worked within the Comintern, and hence, sought to revolutionize the world, he nevertheless took the position that proximity would eventually endanger German sovereignty (p. 58). In fact, Hitler had informed Wagener that it was not Slavs or Russians that worried him, but rather, Jewish-Bolshevik thinking. He had argued that Communist Slavs would have been excellent potential allies against America’s growing hegemony—Hitler believed that the term democracy had actually been derived from the word daemon, the devil; not demos, the people—but, that Slavs who thought like Jews would undoubtedly serve as Germany’s future enemies (Wag[ener], pp. 167-168). Hitler said, “…I see Jewry’s determination to use Russia as a springboard from which to direct the removal of the existing order in other nations as well! For the organization of the Comintern is purely Jewish” (Wag, p. 167)! In other words, Hitler did not see the Slavs as the enemies in this case, but rather, their Jewish rulers. But, Hitler believed that in order for the Slavs to have allowed Jewry to have overthrown them in the first place meant that they must have had some inherent flaw, or cultural weakness, to begin with. He did not want to ethnically cleanse the Slavs; he wanted to Germanize them. He even wished to see the Ukraine as the breadbasket of a “Greater Europe.” He had told Wagener that he would like to see the fruition of a coalition of nation-states in Europe and the Middle East—the United States of the old world.



Hitler had said of the Russians, during a speech in June, 1941:



You probably all felt that this was a bitter and difficult step for me. The German people have never had hostile feelings toward the peoples of Russia. During the last two decades, however, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have attempted to set not only Germany, but all of Europe, aflame. Germany has never attempted to spread its National Socialist worldview to Russia. Rather, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have constantly attempted to subject us and the other European peoples to their rule. They have attempted this not only intellectually, but above all through military means (“Der Führer an das deutsche Volk 22. Juni 1941,” Bouhler, pp. 51-61).



“In the organized mass of Marxism he has found the weapon which lets him dispense with democracy and in its stead allows him to subjugate and govern the peoples with a dictatorial and brutal fist [Jewish commissars]…Religion is ridiculed, ethics and morality represented as outmoded, until the last props of a nation in its struggle for existence in this world have fallen…The democratic people’s Jew becomes the blood-Jew and tyrant [Lenin/Stalin] over peoples…
The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where he killed or starved about thirty million people with positively fanatical savagery, in part amid inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great people.” [Hitler, pp. 325-26]




Hitler is most certainly telling the truth, as the present-day Jewish Neo-cons in America are guilty of the exact same crime, as were the Jewish-Bolsheviks in Hitler’s day. The Jews try and force other peoples and nations to accept their worldview, but, it simply cannot be done—at least, not without a long, bloody conflict. Then, if these ‘others’ refuse to accept this Jewish worldview, they are instantly labeled as either “madmen who want to dominate the world, and commit genocide against Jews,” or, “terrorists who want to kill Jews and Americans.” But, any discerning mind knows that this is purely speculative and sensationalized nonsense, as their exists not one shred of proof that these ‘others’ are either “world dominating and genocidal madmen” or “terrorists.”
Jewry has the burden of proof, once again; and, once again, they have failed to deliver the evidence. Why Jewry fails to comprehend this is beyond this researcher, but the fact remains, Jewry has always been at the forefront of harmful ideologies. Dr. Kevin MacDonald, God Bless him, has argued this incredibly thoroughly in his trilogy series. He takes the position that Jews have utilized various ideologies, such as Communism and Liberalism, in order to promote and protect their own interests—usually at the immeasurable expense of other groups. According to Dr. MacDonald, it is an “evolutionary group strategy” (see Culture of Critique for full account of Judaism as an evolutionary group strategy). Hitler believed this to be the case, as well.



Indeed, Hitler had told the American-based Chicago Tribune, on 15 February 1931:



The USA has become a state as a result of liberalist ideas and various other factors, through financial monopolies too. But they will never be a nation: they will always be the scene of internal disturbances, ideological, religious, ethnic and religious rivalries. The USA will be overtaken by events (Brockschmidt, 2005).



Hitler believed that all of this was the result of America’s Jewry and, that Germany would share this same chaotic fate if she were to succumb to Jewish-Bolshevist rule.



He also said, “The National Socialist Movement, however, limits its sphere of internal activity to those individuals who belong to one people and it refuses to allow the members of a foreign race to wield an influence over our political, intellectual, or cultural life. And we refuse to accord to the members of a foreign race any predominant position in our national economic system.



In this folk-community, which is based on the bond of blood, and in the results which National Socialism has obtained by making the idea of this community understood among the public, lies the most profound reason for the marvelous success of our Revolution” (Hitler, 1937).



As evidenced in these passages above, Hitler certainly believed that Jews should never be allowed to exact a significant political influence over the Germans in their own nation; and, he clearly believed that America would eventually collapse under the strain, within the socio-political sphere, of Jewish domination.
To act as though Hitler was “evil” for not wishing to allow non-Germans to dictate to Germans in their own country is bizarre, at best. The nation was named Germany after the Germans, and the German people were the only ones Hitler answered to.

To act as though this was wrong is just plain bigoted. Does the modern-day Jewish government in Israel answer to the Jews or the Arabs? Amazingly enough, Palestine was named after the Philistines, or Palestinians, not the Jews—it is not their country, as it rightfully belongs to the Semitic Arabians.

So, Jewry practices, in a nation that does not even rightfully belong to them, exactly what Hitler had practiced in his own nation against Jewish foreigners. Yes, it is a lot to comprehend, but comprehend it you must. Jewish bigotry is truly unprecedented. This is something one must learn through studying the Third Reich, if nothing else.



Hitler Not So Insensitive After All?



Interestingly enough, Hitler had informed Wagener that he did not dismiss people out of disregard for their personal feelings, or for any other ‘personal’ reasons. Hitler said, “I shall not allow the splendid structure of the SA to be broken up or alienated; I shall not endanger it by giving in to the wishes of the Gauleiter! No! I’ll take over the command myself, and the complaints will cease… On the one hand, I don’t want to make Pfeffer my chief of staff after his having already been supreme commander. That would be seen as a camouflaged action or self-deception on my part.” Here, we can clearly see that Hitler was resolving the dilemma simply by talking about it with another person. According to Wagener (1985), this was how Hitler came to resolutions on various matters and issues; he had to talk and think out loud. Oftentimes, he would give a short monologue in support of the ‘either’ and the ‘or,’ and only after he had given each option its due consideration, usually aloud, would he take a position and make a final decision, or order.

( wisdom applied . S. )



Oftentimes his Gauleiters and adjutants would mistakenly or deliberately act on his thoughts without first waiting for him to commit his final decision(s) to paper. Bormann deliberately did this quite often, but keep in mind, Bormann probably did not do this out of defiance, necessarily, but may have actually begun to distrust Hitler’s leadership abilities—especially during the latter half of his reign. Bormann more than likely usurped Hitler’s power to help Hitler and the nation, as opposed to hurting them. Also, keep in mind, Hitler did not write. He occasionally jotted notes and doodled, but he never wrote anything down. The alleged Hitler Diaries have already been exposed as fraudulent by David Irving. The only writings we have are his letters and notes, and there are not that many. So, we must take Hitler’s adjutants at their word in this regard. Hitler was the type of thinker who had to think aloud, and he resolved problems in his own mind and developed his train of thought as he spoke. Some people do not think clearly unless they verbalize their thoughts.



Hitler went on to say: “On the other hand, I can’t put Pfeffer into a newly created higher post. That would open the way to the suspicion that I was under his domination, and agitation against him would continue.



“Pfeffer must therefore be sacrificed, without any guilt on his part and contrary to my true opinion. If he is sacrificed on some pretext or other, the mutiny by his opponents will be stilled. The SA will remain completely intact, and I shall take over the leadership and thereby give to the party the guarantee that the SA can never revolt against the political organization.”



“…Wagener, politics is a peculiar business. But without politics one doesn’t get anywhere. So I practice politics even within the movement.”



Wagener objected. “But Herr Hitler! That’s not really right. Look, people cling to you with glowing enthusiasm, with trusting love. They sacrifice themselves and their free time, sometimes even their entire livelihood, to you and to the movement. And you advance them or let them drop—out of political considerations! Here, Wagener clearly does not understand that it is not about individuals, but the German nation. [U]These people were not supposed to be giving their love and lives to Hitler, but to the cause of the German nation.



“But you don’t need to do that; it’s not necessary! You’d said earlier that you’d listened to the insinuations against him and forgotten them. And what did you do about those insinuations? Instead of confronting Pfeffer and me with them, you want to sacrifice Pfeffer, as you say, contrary to you own opinion! Then those intriguers will think that they have won and been successful! And they will have succeeded! You must sacrifice the intriguers and keep Pfeffer! How can you expect in the long run that people will continue to commit their hearts to you if you do not also unconditionally give yours to them?”



Hitler replied, “My heart belongs to the German Volk. To it alone. We all have a single task and duty: to serve our Volk. And the only thing I ask myself is: how can I best serve it? The fate of an individual, even my own [fate], cannot make me so soft as to transgress against the destiny of the Volk. Therefore, I believe I must sacrifice Pfeffer, it will happen solely in the interest of the great cause, in the interest, at bottom, of the Volk” (Wag, p. 29).



Hitler went on to say that he was not sure how to let Pfeffer go, as he did not want to hurt him any more than that which would be inflicted upon his dismissal, but that he [Pfeffer] would need to at least begin to restrain himself to lessen the growing agitation against him. Hitler also remarked that Pfeffer mouthed off his “cutting and sarcastic” opinions with regards to others, even when he was not asked to do so. In light of this escalating clash of personalities within the SA, Hitler informed Wagener that he would indeed keep Pfeffer on board, just not as supreme commander of the SA. He wanted him to join the ranks of his Reichstag deputies. So, Hitler did not just toss his supporters out without due consideration, and he almost always offered them a different position within the party, SA, or SS unless they had done something most regrettable.




The most important thing to grasp from this conversation is Hitler’s honest and open commitment to his country and the German people. Hitler always put the people above individuals, even above himself when necessary, and this is what made him so incredibly popular and well-loved. His sincerity emanated from his person; one need only read the transcripts of his speeches and monologues, comparing them with opportunists and liars like Bush, Roosevelt, Churchill, Lenin, Stalin, or any number of self-serving politicians, to really get the gist of Hitler’s political devotion.

Now, Wagener understood Hitler’s position, but he was repelled by the fact that individuals had to be sacrificed for the common good. But, Hitler’s method is what made him a stellar politician and leader; the fact that he served the country and not money, himself, or particular elites or individuals within the party. Couldn’t we say that Jesus had also sacrificed the concept of the individual in favor of the common good? [U]This is what true socialism is all about; not the Jewish-Bolshevist conception of communal slave labor, mass starvation, enslavement to the state, atheism, secularism, and the leveling-down of the proletariat.

Hitler made it his duty to raise the level of the proletariat. He did not wish to mass murder the bourgeoisie, as he had realized that though they were selfish, pompous, and flawed, they were also a necessary component of the State structure. This is something that Wagener could not quite grasp at the time, as he had felt that Hitler was being insensitive and opportunistic. As Hitler’s record has shown, that just was not the case. Churchill was insensitive and opportunistic.


Furthermore, this conversation also informs us as to Hitler’s actual personal acknowledgment of the fact that he knew that he was sometimes perceived as being opportunistic and insensitive. So, Hitler was aware that these thoughts were churning in the minds of at least a few of his supporters and adjutants. Yet, historians act as though he was so far removed from human normalcy that he could not have possibly understood the thoughts, considerations, and feelings of others. Obviously, that was not the case. He may have seemed insensitive on an individual basis, but to the German people that could not have been more inaccurate. Hitler placed his accountability to his people first.


Lastly, this conversation points up the fact that Hitler did not want his adjutants to put their love and faith in him personally; rather, he wanted them to put themselves, as he had, in the service of the Volk and Fatherland. Hitler never demanded or asked that his subordinates adhere so ardently and fanatically to his person, as this was a phenomenon that had revealed itself over time. Hitler had a way about him that made people love him and want to do whatever he asked them to do.

There was just something magnificent about him, and all of his adjutants and subordinates have described this in their respective memoirs in great detail. But to act as though this was Hitler’s fault is just ridiculous. He could not prevent his followers from living for him as opposed to the nation if that was what they were determined to do. Hitler just tried to harness their commitment; thus, putting them into the service of the German people through their commitment to his person. But, it was never about Hitler. It was about the people. This dovetails nicely with Hitler’s thoughts on the churches and religious authorities whom he believed had always served to the detriment of the people. He also wanted to mend those Christian institutions and priests who had gone astray and had inflicted harm upon the German populace.


Hitler: Economics and Rebirth of the Nation



Wagener (1985) had said, “I think I should begin with the concept of money and capital.” Hitler asked, “Have you studied the subject?” Wagener replied, “Studied may be putting it too strongly. I’ve attended lectures on it and read a number of things. And I gave some lectures on aspects of economic policy. But what I want to present is something which, if it is correct and realizable, will profoundly shake the bases of economic policy.”



“Wagener, there is no way we can avoid such shocks.
That is precisely the most profound secret of the entire revolution we are living through and whose leadership it is our mission to seize; that there has to be overthrow, demolition, destruction by force! The destruction must be meaningful, not senseless, as under [Jewish-Russian] Bolshevism [nothing more than a Jewish bloodbath]. And it can only become meaningful if we have understood the goal, the purpose, the necessity [read: survival].


“Science, economics, and traditional practice—but also the entire concept of law, all the way to universal human rights—all are erected on the individualistic approach of the thousand-year-old past—erected and contrived by men of this ideology. It has colored all the feelings, perceptions, even the ethics and religious beliefs of these people.


“They will not understand our logic; they will condemn our thinking; they will convict our new ethics; and they will shower and persecute us with all the hatred of which an ideology doomed to destruction is capable in order to fight off, to suppress, to strangle an awakening ideology that will overthrow everything that existed previously.

The execution of this great transformation must be left to youth. And if the old should succeed in restraining us and hindering our work, then there is no help for them, then Bolshevism will descend on them—the Bolshevism [read: Jewish-Satanism] that it is our sacred goal to save the world from. With brutal ruthlessness it will crush underfoot and stamp out everything their incompetent egotism attempts to defend. A Sodom and Gomorrah will rise, such as we have already seen in Russia!

Only after decades of suffering will the new come into being and rise from the ruins of that collapsed ideology and world—the new of which we have a presentiment and which it is our hope to see more clearly” (pp. 44-45). [emphasis added]



Hitler went on to exclaim, “I do not want to fight against England, nor do I want to act against England. …Rather, I look to the East for work and bread for the excess millions living in Germany. There is room in the East! There are opportunities in the East! The danger of Bolshevism even requires us to man the front to the East. A Central Europe, a Ukraine, all under German [dominion], solve all the problems of the plight of the peoples of Europe. Who could reject such an idea? What objection could England have to it? Even the Near East is secured by German influence along the coast of the Aegean and the Black Sea” (Wagener, p. 53). Hitler viewed the treaty with Poland as the first step towards the consolidation of Central Europe under a Greater German Reich—the ultimate goal: to save all Europeans from Jewish-Bolshevism and enslavement.



As evidenced by the above passages, Hitler did appear to be very naïve, but, perhaps also a bit haughty with regards to his plans for German expansion; but, keep in mind, his goal was not to plunder and enslave the other Europeans under the German plowshare.
His goal was “to solve all of the problems” created by Jewish-Bolshevism and, ultimately, to “save the world” from it.




Theological-Historical Application



Hitler took it upon himself to assume the responsibility for this pro-human task, and it is no different than Nasrallah’s and Ahmad’s defense of the Palestinian-Arabian peoples suffering and dying daily under the Jewish wrath of Satanism and hatred. Hitler saw Jewish rule for what it really was: murder, suffering, impoverishment, enslavement, death, chaos, internal strife, and hatred. The Jews ruled over the Russians like bestial demons sent by Satan himself. The cruelty, brutality, and oppression under the Jewish yoke of tyranny was relentless and unwavering in its brutality. As many as 45 million [Michael Hoffmann’s figure] perished under Vlad Lenin, and his crony, Josef Stalin—both crypto Jews. Hitler did not wish for this true reign of terror to befall anyone else if he could help it. He was not perfect, and perhaps he let his boys take things too far in the East on too many occasions, but Hitler—the man—meant well.



Brutality, cruelty and racism always rear their ugly heads in times of war [it happened in Vietnam]—when the young and confused minds of boys have been propagandized against the enemy—but, Hitler did the best he could with the people he had. For instance, the Muslim insurgents and freedom fighters do not all exercise the restraint and professionalism exhibited by such organizations as that of Hezbollah but, one cannot judge the entire insurgency, the Muslim world, or even a single Muslim organization based on the brutality of some of its members. That is not only completely childish and immature, but it is dangerous and irrational, as well.
Indicting Hitler for Himmler’s racism and asininity on the front is like indicting George W. Lenin for atrocities ordered by, and committed by, his generals and soldiers. That is ludicrous.



G. W. would only be accountable, and therefore indictable, if he chose to overlook their crimes. Now, he has overlooked the war crimes committed by Satan-rael, during their heinous Lebanon Bloodbath Campaign 2006; thus, he ought to be indicted for that. Rumsfeld chose to “overlook” the fact that Saddam was going to use American-made WMDs against the Iranians and Kurds. Therefore, he is indictable. Hitler, on the other hand, ordered his men not to commit crimes when they came to his attention. David Irving, the historian and master archivist, has turned up countless instances that serve to exonerate Hitler from indictment in this regard.
Hitler was the one who restrained his men; Hitler was upset at the events of Kristallnacht, and he reprimanded Goebbels for what he had done; Hitler was the one who put the brakes on at Dunkirk, allowing some 350,000 of the “Blood Jew” Churchill’s war pawns to flee; lastly, Hitler was the one who actually took the time to look out for the irreverent Jews.

And yet, they have the mendacity to indict Hitler as the devil’s agent when they have been the “devil’s children” since the beginning. This is ludicrous. Jesus said that the Jews were Satanists all along, and that when they lied, it was as though they were speaking the only truth that they knew. For them, lies are self-evident truths. Bizarre…yes, but quite true. Jews are “deadly nuts.”

Just look at Churchill, Lenin, Mao, Stalin, and Roosevelt—all partakers of Judaism, in one of its blasphemous forms or another. Even Jews admit that Communism is Judaism. Read Deuteronomy some time, and tell me that that is not the Bolshevik mind-set all over again.
Jews have been murderers from the beginning, and Lucifer was not kidding when he told them, “You will have no other gods before me.” They slaughtered Christ because He set Himself up as the true God—the purveyor of God’s Word and will. Jesus had somewhat lamented, “If my followers were of this world [of which I conceive], then they would keep me from being handed over to the Jews. As it is, they are not of this world.” Indeed, Hitler had equated Jewry with Satan and antichrist (Eckart, p. 56).



An individual wrote me about this, and he asked me how God could have been killed. I ask him now: Where was God when the ethnic Ukrainians and Russians were being starved to their deaths and driven into the ground by Jewish reapers? Where was God when the AmerIndians were being murdered, raped and tortured by Europeans and Jews? Where was God when African slaves were being beaten, whipped, and enslaved for greedy, inhuman Americans? Where was God when the Chinese were being systematically slaughtered by their own leader—as many as 70 million—during the numerous proletarian revolutions in China?


I answer you: God has always been there, that “still small voice” inside of you, urging you to do the right thing; urging you to take responsibility; urging you to bring up your fellow man, not tear him down and spit upon him. He has always been there. His people refuse to listen. Hitler listened.




more:
http://hitlerresearch.org/index_files/Page372.html

.

[Mo0n5tar]

In conclusion:

ITTTTSSS DEEE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZZZZZ!

What luck for rulers, that men do not think.

p.s is the poster Eternal spirit a spam bot, I have them on Ignore?

[kimball13]

let me see a cathlic statutue of Paul holding baby jesus with a buddha next to it surrounded by rosary, the late husband of the women with that on her dressor was a merchant seaman who frequently vacationed in i think agentina or veniswala ,,,,,,,,,oh and they were croation,,,,,,,,,,,there was also the 1,000''s of slavs that Rosevelt had secretly shipped durring WW2, good cover for them moving manpower for the Vatican.

That race of children that Hitler spoke of, i am one of them.
the truth is the Nazis wanted to controle a type of people and doing so would make them supermen because after all what do you call supermans boss.

now why am i still alive, a couple of reasons.

one was leverage, maybe they assumed my father was me so i was a barganing chip if neaded.
Now that it is becomeing known that it is i that is to carry the family titles with the full extent of there place, King Arthurs heir.

In reality it is the offspring of King ARthur that scares the crap out of the vatican because they can no longer controle the mane one, they cant destroy arthur because of the reaction in the supernatural and natural realms, and this is why the Church specializes in causing some to seek suicide. That is the only way they can remove one that refuses to bow the there falsehood.

But the the FBI, Marine corps intelligence, Vatican, and skull and bones dont know anything about what was done to me officialy do they.

Ya who took the P2 money, answer in the paragraph before.

Huh a pope that suplied the cyonide at a price becomes pope, and the one that sells the steal creats and american dynasty to replace kennedy,.

BUt maybe that is why Joseph Kennedy died in a remote controle aircraft built by my Grandfather(the catholic one i was raised with), Joseph was the one being groomed for presidency it was only after his death that John was considerd, and John liked barbituates and meth along with women, he had the same addictions as most of the Nazi heirarchy thus putting him on the same level so to speak.

sorry to be so bold but having a Grandfather from both sides has given me a very non-biased veiw, one worked in NM Arizona WW2 the other worked on spiritual and suchbut now that side is manipulated by anther family, after all i am the only male heir and some things only go from Grandfather/FAther to Son and from Grandmother/daughter to Son in these matters. One side was spirituality and management and economy, the other science and wealth. I was kept from my fathers side, but there are my moments with my fathers side that even though brief i am still learning from them and there are things that never nead a physical teaching done, im going to start a new paragraph to emphasise my point.

The ones that raised me was the women on my birth certificate, i never met any of there freinds or realy ever saw where any worked, ive only met family members but from what i understand the family has a very large sum of money and can afford very upscale housing in socal, then a trucking company and such,,,,,,,,,,,,ya i was kept in a box as far as they were concerned and my cousin was i believe the first to die from aids. As far as i know im the only outcaste, even though others have gang tattoos and such. I am also the only family member to stand in the same light as a priest when it comes to the bible so yo would think i would be a bit more welcome, but how can i ask a GRandmother to choose one grandson above the rest of the family, then there are the cousins that have disowned the family for uknown reasons,,,,,that side of the family are from a very well known native american chief, the woman that raised me told storys of an old indidan that would come every christmas and tell storys of Roosevelt and projects they were working on.

Inside scooop ya i got one, so far inside i never realy knew, i had a gut fealing and saw clues but i had to know for sure at all costs because these were women that i called Mom, sister, aunt, and the men well they kept there distance for some reason, maybe because they knew i was less likely to go ballistic on women and children,,,,,,,,,,they knew my pcyce profile before i was born, heck they propbley just took down the info and buried the who i am as well as what i am, and given all this bloodline stuff it makes sense that if they can Control the King then his people would follow suite on a quantum level,,,,,,,,,,,,,im talking quantum spirituality and pscycologie here. Now why woudnt a king such as Arthur have a connection to the people and earth and sun. This king and Christ look to a trinity to you know the only differnce is it is of the FAther, Mother, and Humanity. its only logical for it to be this way, the people seek spiritual guidance from the Son and then the protector (which is a mystery:rolleyes:)so why wouldnt Christ and such have Mankind as part of there trinity because you have to look for guidance in those that you are saving.

So Christ does have an equal, he's bin kept pretty much hidden, this one is his equal the only thing above these is God, i wonder why Two though, one of the Heart and One of the Sword, and now you know why ARthur became a myth/legend only spoken of in poetry and such to hide this part in a political fashion in the arts (Arts).

Just trying to put it as simply as i can and unfortunatly it makes it sound a bit grandiouse but its the parts that are not grandios that are the real meat.

The extra time spent with a child explaining why is priceless in the rewards that child will reap spiritualy as well as yourself because then you will remember what it is to understand as a child, just as christ told the people learn as a childASk Why, why is the sky blue;)

[lala_says_so]

I'm a little over 75% German, and always felt the German side wasn't as religious as the Italian side. (...Thinks of all the crazy Italian religious superstition I know)

However, when you think about it, the Vatican never really had much control over Germany, compared to other European countries. Heck, by the 1930's, the little influence it did have over Germany was sort-of abolished.

& remember folks, if you don't pay tithe, you'll win a free trip, courtesy of the Vatican, to Club Dante's Inferno. It's so hot, you'll incinerate for an eternity! (Catholic School really prepared me for those hard life lessons)

[eternal_spirit]

In conclusion:

ITTTTSSS DEEE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZZZZZ!



p.s is the poster Eternal spirit a spam bot, I have them on Ignore?

fuck off mickeyjaystoned (that was your old name on here?)
Go back to Oxleys pathetic forum and join the other itsssssss all the white gentiles and Catholics fault crew.
And tell the other fool you like to link and quote Eric
John Phelps the racist Zionist Jew to stop dealing in the African Israeli blood diamond biz and to stop mis quoting other authors works and adding his own words trynna pass them off as true!

[Mo0n5tar]

fuck off mickeyjaystoned (that was your old name on here?)
Go back to Oxleys pathetic forum and join the other itsssssss all the white gentiles and Catholics fault crew.
And tell the other fool you like to link and quote Eric
John Phelps the racist Zionist Jew to stop dealing in the African Israeli blood diamond biz and to stop mis quoting other authors works and adding his own words trynna pass them off as true!

Still spammming that bunk spirit Bot?

[eternal_spirit]

Still spammming that bunk spirit Bot?

Bunk lol? The Phelps and OXo comments are true and have been proven.

BTW didn't Master Oxo ban you?

[evster2012]

One need only compare and contrast Catholic depictions of Jesus with Eastern Orthodox icons to see the "white-ification" of Jesus and Mary, as well as the saints. The farther east you get, the darker the skin.

[Mo0n5tar]

One need only compare and contrast Catholic depictions of Jesus with Eastern Orthodox icons to see the "white-ification" of Jesus and Mary, as well as the saints. The farther east you get, the darker the skin.

The most sacred icons of the Catholic Church are the Black Madonna and Christ child, which are found in Europe's most venerated shrines and cathedrals. Each year, hundreds of thousands of European pilgrims ritually humble themselves before the image of Black Mary and her child SO CALLED "Jesus" at Black Madonna sites throughout France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Portugal and other Catholic countries. Many Black Madonna statues have the black paint literally kissed off of their hands and feet. In Poland, the Church encourages believers to pray to the Black Madonna of Czestochowka every morning before rising. It is reported that Pope John Paul follows this ritual. Time Magazine (June 11, 1979) reported on Popelaul II's visit to Czestochowka's holiest shrine, which prominently displays "The Lady" known for centuries as the Black Madonna. At Our Lady of Koden (Poland), there are statues of white saints carrying pictures of Black Madonnas. Pilgrims throughout the ages have visited Black Madonna sites and left inspired, confident, relieved, or healed of their afflictions. Today, there are over 800 documented Black Madonna sites in France alone! Sometimes they are hidden awaken vaults, while the public is shown Madonnas with European features.

In the hard-to-find classic, Anacalypsis, historian Godfrey Higgens writes, "...in all the Romish countries of Europe, in France, Italy, Germany, etc., the God Christ, as well as his mother, are described in their old pictures and statues to be black. The infant God in the arms of his black mother, his eyes and drapery white, is himself perfectly black. If the reader doubt my word, he may go to the cathedral at Moulins -to the famous chapel of the Virgin at Loretto ...the whiteness of the eyes and teeth, and the studied redness of the lips, are very observable... There is scarcely an old church in Italy where some remains of the worship of the BLACK VIRGIN and BLACK CHILD are not to be met with. Very often the black figures have given way to white ones, and in these cases the black ones, as being held sacred, were put into retired places in the churches, but were not destroyed.

The Black Madonnas originally all had Africoid features before most of them were destroyed by iconoclasts. When they were replaced, the artists retained the dark skin color but, not being familiar with real Afrikans, gave European features to the paintings. In cases where originals have survived, you may witness Africoid features on Mary and her child Jesus, such as the Black Madonna of Nuria, Spain - called "the Queen of the Pyrenees." Russia's remarkable legacy of Black Madonnas and other Christian icons of dark skin is evidenced in the book, Russian Icons by Vladimir Ivanov, including the feature story of the Spring 1994 issue of Russian Life magazine, graced with a Black Madonna on its cover.

Here we have a few depiction's of the two prominent Jews. YESHUA/Yahshua, and the women who bore him.
http://www.uploadhouse.com/fileuploads/903/9031955f91f90e9b7ca41038d999ec0a03f84b.jpg

http://www.authenticjews.com/


You know on Pope Benedict's coat of Arms he actually has a black Madonna/Moorish looking woman?

[dlb2007]

The New world order is protestant or the result of protestant heresay, its natural conclusion, the old world order is the catholic church. The Church wants to stop the new world order