Rod Russell, victim of evil Freemasonry

[ban freekmasons]

http://publish.indymedia.org/en/2008/04/905423.shtml

[keystone]

http://publish.indymedia.org/en/2008/04/905423.shtmlIf his story is true, which needs second source verification to my mind, tell me, oh sweet child of mine, where oh where in this article does it mention freemasonry at all.

Did I hear you say nowhere? Thought so I couldn't find it either. It isn't mentioned either in any of the correspondence offered concerning his complaint. The only conclusion: you made that bit up then. The only persons credibility you damage is your own. Grow up! :D

[ban freekmasons]

If his story is true, which needs second source verification to my mind, tell me, oh sweet child of mine, where oh where in this article does it mention freemasonry at all.

Did I hear you say nowhere? Thought so I couldn't find it either. It isn't mentioned either in any of the correspondence offered concerning his complaint. The only conclusion: you made that bit up then. The only persons credibility you damage is your own. Grow up! :D

Dear Keystone the deranged mason, here is an earlier email from Rod in July 08. I can send you many more emails, but what's the point ? Why try to prove anything to you or any other brainwashed (trained dog) mason behind the curtains? Why don't you contact Rod ? details below.

Dear Joe (2/7/08)

I noticed your comment on the internet. I worked for a company that is highly influential and includes close friendships with some of the world's highest ranking freemasons. My wife and I are both from Glasgow. I have a lot of circumstantial evidence but nothing direct that would connect what is happening to us to masons. Do you have any ideas that might help us?

I am bringing to your attention a real conspiracy theory that involves stalking. A former Group Controller of Grosvenor International my family and I have been threatened and intimidated by MI5 in the UK and CSIS in Canada for 8 years now. This human rights abuse is being covered up by government since they value toadying to the establishment ahead of human rights and rule of law. The story is outlined on the web site below.

Sceptical? Look at the web site and look at the proof of cover up that is attached to my article - letters from Hazel Blears and Manchester Police that conflict with each other and show their lies. Why would the government cover up all this unless they were scared of exposure? Not to mention recorded death threats, property damage and multiple witnesses. The abuse started in Vancouver in 1999. We then fled to the UK where it continued and returned to Calgary where it still continues

I can also be reached through Peter Robertson on 403.608.4665 or 403.231.7418. Peter is Chief Financial Officer of Calgary-based Pembina Pipelines. Since my communications are often interfered with (yes, I can prove this too) I would appreciate confirmation that you have received this.

Roderick Russell
304, 2204 - 1 St SW
Calgary AB T2S 1P4
Canada
(403) 229 - 0864

Story is - HTTP://publish.indymedia.org/en/2008/04/905423.shtml

[keystone]

Dear Keystone the deranged mason,.Why, my dear fella, is it deranged to ask you to justify your accusations. Seems eminently sensible to me.

here is an earlier email from Rod in July 08.Why, thank you.

Dear Joe (2/7/08)

I noticed your comment on the internet. I worked for a company that is highly influential and includes close friendships with some of the world's highest ranking freemasons. My wife and I are both from Glasgow. I have a lot of circumstantial evidence but nothing direct that would connect what is happening to us to masons.

Which sort of proves my point doesn't it. You have sexed up the story in exactly the same way the famous Iraq dossier was sexed up to suit your own agenda. In other words the title of the thread IS A LIE - like I suggested.

I am bringing to your attention a real conspiracy theory that involves stalking...........................

Now I don't discount the possibility of this for one minute - it's your turning it round to make him a victim of freemasonry I object to and believe me I would still object if you chose the Scouts, Salvation Army, the ACP or anyone else as well.

[runciter]

In other words the title of the thread IS A LIE - like I suggested.


to me it seems truthful enough, because i know how these things work.

but i understand your position, you're simply doing your job.

[keystone]

to me it seems truthful enough, because i know how these things work.

but i understand your position, you're simply doing your job.OH please don't patronise me. I'm not doing a job for heavens sake. I don't for one minute think you "know how these things work". I think it's guess work and speculation.

I relly don't understand how you can say it's truthful enough when the supposed victim himself says he hasn't any evidence. I'm saying that the title of the thread is a lie because the Op has previous for it and it amounts to disinfo. I am NOT saying that the alleged stalking is a lie. Can you see that?

[runciter]

the supposed victim himself says he hasn't any evidence.


"I have a lot of circumstantial evidence but nothing direct"

sounds a little different.

[keystone]

"I have a lot of circumstantial evidence but nothing direct"

sounds a little different.No it doesn't. Anyway your missing the point so I'll say it again. The OP has sexed the story up to make it a definitive "It's the evil freemasons" as though it were a proven fact. Saying it is the evil Jesuits has just as much credibility.

[runciter]

Saying it is the evil Jesuits has just as much credibility.


did russell mention the jesuits?

[keystone]

did russell mention the jesuits?See you ARE missing the point. I'm not questioning Russel I'm questioning Stirlings conversion of what Russel said to it's the "evil freemasons". If Stirling had posted "Russel - victim of evil Jesuits" I'd be asking him the same question. Does that make it any clearer?

[runciter]

See you ARE missing the point. I'm not questioning Russel I'm questioning Stirlings conversion of what Russel said to it's the "evil freemasons". If Stirling had posted "Russel - victim of evil Jesuits" I'd be asking him the same question. Does that make it any clearer?

but russell didn't mention the jesuits, he did mention freemasons.

ban freekmasons' conclusion is questionable, but non unfounded.

[keystone]

but russell didn't mention the jesuits, he did mention freemasons.You are right but you'll notice that he mentioned them after he was prompted by Joe to do so which was after BF had made the original post. Please reread my original reply to him.

ban freekmasons' conclusion is questionable, but non unfounded.Yes it is quite unfounded if it's being made up which I suspect and which neatly reflects his normal MO.