Help needed

[gizmocrystal]

Hi i need some help.

I need to provide a list of scientists who dont believe in evolution theory and or who believe in a god.


I am trying to debate over in the digitalspy forum in the thread entitled "What is dawkins problem"

I told them not all scientists believe now they want a list:eek::rolleyes::D

[element]

Google maybe for a list??

This is fun. http://www.icr.org/article/460/

Dawkins is deluded himself. He got an obsession with religion and calls it the root of all evil. Funnily, most wars have not much or nothing to do with it. Look at communism, and look at what influence darwinism had on certain people. Let's not start about abortion, criminals, torturers, rapers.

And the sad thing is that he seems to collect many lost souls. There is quite some atheism fundamentalism going on.

Dawkins is a puppet, to create further chaos and hate towards religions. More hate will be generated towards Islam with this, and we go further on towards the 'Holy' war.

[krakhead]

Google maybe for a list??

This is fun. http://www.icr.org/article/460/

Dawkins is deluded himself. He got an obsession with religion and calls it the root of all evil. Funnily, most wars have not much or nothing to do with it. Look at communism, and look at what influence darwinism had on certain people. Let's not start about abortion, criminals, torturers, rapers.

And the sad thing is that he seems to collect many lost souls. There is quite some atheism fundamentalism going on.

Dawkins is a puppet, to create further chaos and hate towards religions. More hate will be generated towards Islam with this, and we go further on towards the 'Holy' war.

Actually.....

Dawkins has said that the title The Root of All Evil? was not his preferred choice, but that Channel 4 had insisted on it to create controversy.[1] The sole concession from the producers on the title was the addition of the question mark. Dawkins has stated that the notion of anything being the root of all evil is ridiculous

Not defending the guy but credit where credit's due!

[farflame]

http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/sciencefaith.html

Seems to include just about every famous scientist I can think of :)

And if I'm not mistaken, didn't Darwin himself say that his 'theory' was nothing more than that and the wonder of God was far beyond the reach of his theory? Something like that.

[nowheretorun]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4065080646891971315&ei=giuZSMjyOKeuqQKO8qAW&q=gerald+schroeder&hl=en


Dr. Gerald Schroeder sets forth a powerful argument for a Creator of the cosmos that goes beyond Intelligent Design theory to the radical rationality in nature. Dr. Gerald Schroeder holds a dual doctorate in Nuclear Physics and Oceanography from MIT along with high-level research in chemistry and planetary sciences. Dr. Schroeder's argument was so powerful it played a part in influencing the worlds leading atheist, Antony Flew to accept the existence of an infinitely intelligent Creator. This video is a part of the documentary entitled "Has Science Discovered God?" that made world headline news because it shows how Antony Flew changed his mind about atheism on the basis of the message of modern science, a message that testifies to the inherently intelligent infrastructure that underlies the universe

[legendary]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4065080646891971315&ei=giuZSMjyOKeuqQKO8qAW&q=gerald+schroeder&hl=en


Dr. Gerald Schroeder sets forth a powerful argument for a Creator of the cosmos that goes beyond Intelligent Design theory to the radical rationality in nature. Dr. Gerald Schroeder holds a dual doctorate in Nuclear Physics and Oceanography from MIT along with high-level research in chemistry and planetary sciences. Dr. Schroeder's argument was so powerful it played a part in influencing the worlds leading atheist, Antony Flew to accept the existence of an infinitely intelligent Creator. This video is a part of the documentary entitled "Has Science Discovered God?" that made world headline news because it shows how Antony Flew changed his mind about atheism on the basis of the message of modern science, a message that testifies to the inherently intelligent infrastructure that underlies the universe

that argument was put forward years ago. i think it was by William Paley with his analogy of the watch maker. but equally well it could be argued if design was so intelligent and God is perfection or infinitely powerful and knowledgeable, then why can i conceive greater things than he has created. for example, humans only use 10% of our brain, and the appendix has apparently no purpose whatsoever within our body. would an all knowing and all powerful creator have done this purposefully? if so is he worthy of worship, having limited our ability to use our brain and inserting random organs into our body which serve no purpose, but can still kill us if they malfunction

[themime]

Francis S. Collins director of the National Human Genome Research Institute.

[gizmocrystal]

Thanks very much for your help!!:D