View Full Version : Is Paul really dead?
cheeb
02-09-2008, 11:52 PM
First photo - Paul is on the inside, standing the same height as John, Ringo is third out from Paul. Note the gradient of the path and the photo was not taken "straight on."
Second photo - Cannot see anybodies legs, was Paul that much taller than the others judging from your four other snaps? Looks like someone was "stuck" in there. I have referred to doctored stills before, see what I mean. Photo was also not taken straight on but from below. Nowice the other three Beatles are wearing dark suits. Does something not look a bit odd to you??
Third photo - George looks the tallest doesn`t he?, Paul taller than Ringo - But there`s a gradient (just like in the first photo) sloping from the inside of the path.
Fourth photo - Again height difference in minimal compared to vid clips and photos with Faul. Again where are the legs?
Fifth photo - We know Ringo and George are the smallest of the four Beatles, yet here Ringo stands TALLER THAN JOHN on the outside. The Gradient is higher from Ringo on the outside inwards - again we cannot see the feet. Faul is taller here than John even though hes standing "down" from John and Faul practically dwarfs George wearing a massive peaked cap!
Much That I Appreciate You Impressive Website
http://only1rad.proboards62.com/
I Still Think That You Have Got Stuck In A Conspiracy Theory,
That Isnt There...
The Ringo Beind Replaced By Fingo Was Interesting Though....
http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/2521/paulringosl8.jpg
"Dingo" Is A Replacement For Ringo,
But He Is A Foot Taller Than Faul (Paul)
The Lookalike Celebrity Page
http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=deceased&action=display&thread=71
Not Many Of These Lookalikes Actually Look Like Their Celebrity Counterparts
Tom Cruise Is Awful...!!!
http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/8435/sgtpeppersne7.jpg
The Conspiracy
9 November 1966 at 5 am, McCartney, while working on the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album, stormed out of a recording session after an argument with the other Beatles and rode off in his Aston-Martin which he subsequently crashed.
9.11 Interesting Date...
He then crashed into a lamp-post (a car crash sound is heard in "Revolution 9" and "A Day in the Life").
He was pronounced dead on a "Wednesday morning at 5 o'clock as the day begins" ("She's Leaving Home")
Nobody found this out because the news was withheld: "Wednesday morning papers didn't come" ("Lady Madonna").
Image Removed
A funeral procession was held days later, as was supposedly implied on the Abbey Road album cover by the Beatles' clothing. (John Lennon dressed all in white, like a clergyman. Ringo Starr wore a black suit as an undertaker would. Paul McCartney wore a suit without shoes, a common custom for corpses being buried, and walked out of step with the other Beatles. George Harrison's denim outfit resembled that of a gravedigger.)
Adding fuel to the legend is the ending of "Strawberry Fields Forever". Some believed John said "I buried Paul" in a slow deep voice over the final refrain. He later refuted that, stating that he said "cranberry sauce".
Bit Like Queens "One Vision"
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XJvNvBYTsGw
Fried Chicken At The End
Also It's fun to smoke marrijuana,
in "Another One Bites The Dust"
Played Backwards Of Course...
Interesting Beatles Album
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/5011/beatlesuncensoredwebst6.jpg
The White Album
Image Removed
Not The White Album,
But Interesting Themes Going On Here...
Charlie Manson And The White Album..
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/1432/mansonkg2.jpg
Charlie was a Beatles fan. Beatle music played as day-to-day life performed itself out at Spahn Ranch and other places Charlie lived.
Sadie Mae Glutz
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/2776/letter05po2.jpg
Funny How Charlie Has Scrawled HOLE
On This Picture Of Susan Atkins...
They took names from the album (Sexie Sadie aka Susan Atkins) and expressions from lyrics punctuated all of their speech. It was said that Charlie would only quote from the bible or the Beatles.
In the Beatles music, particularly the White Album, he heard "clues" and "messages". Here are some of the suggested interpretations that were allegedly made by the Family from The Beatles works:
Triggers..!!!
Some Songs Off The Album
# I Will: an ode to J.C. or Charlie? Possibly a message to Charlie to record an album . "Sing it loud..." was their message to sing out so that the Beatles could find Charlie, the Messiah.
# Honey Pie: The Beatles' wish for Charlie to come to them "across the Atlantic". They're too "lazy" to look for him themselves. The song's reference to Hollywood suggested to Manson that they knew he was out there somewhere.
# Happiness is a Warm Gun: arm yourself for a race war
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/6092/rise1969uq6.jpg
# Blackbird: a call for Blacks to aRISE and start the Apocalypse. The word "Rise" was written at the home of two of the victims, the LaBiancas.
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5494/deathpigswe1.jpg
# Piggies: the establishment gets a "damn good whacking"... what the blacks were going to do to the whites. The verse about piggies eating bacon with forks and knives could have been acted out, considering that the victims were all stabbed multiple times, and one was found with a fork and knife embedded in his stomach. "Pig" was written at the Tate residence, and "Death to Pigs" was written at the LaBiancas' home.
http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/1355/polanski1kt9.jpg
# Rocky RacCOON: Negroes again!
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/9963/hsfridgejl4.jpg
# Helter Skelter: a British slide or prophecy about Manson emerging from the 'bottomless pit' "Healter Skelter" [sic] was written at the LaBiancas' home.
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/4053/helterskelterdooryt4.jpg
# You Never Give Me Your Money: (ABBEY ROAD): A door was found at the Family's compound with the words "1,2,3,4,5,6,7, ALL GOOD CHILDREN GO TO HEAVEN" (from YNGMYM) printed on it, along with the words "HELTER SKELTER IS COMING DOWN FAST".
# Revolution: Impending disaster (what more do you need...are you out or in?)
# Revolution #9 = Revelation #9 : Revelation #9 is a book in the Bible that deals with prophecy and apocalypse
Revelation Of John Of Patmos
9:8 They had hair like women's hair, and their teeth were like those of lions
9/11 The Day Paul Supposidley Died...
9:11 They have over them as king the angel of the abyss. His name in Hebrew is "Abaddon," but in Greek, he has the name "Apollyon."
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 12:38 AM
Cheeb - just to clarify http://only1rad.proboards62.com/ is truthseeker49`s website, not mine and yes he`s put a lot of work into it.
Come on man - it`s quite obvious Ringo here is walking up steps or standing on something, do you honestly believe he`s that tall - compared to every photo you`ve previously seen of the two together??
cheeb
03-09-2008, 12:50 AM
Cheeb - just to clarify http://only1rad.proboards62.com/ is truthseeker49`s website, not mine and yes he`s put a lot of work into it.
Come on man - it`s quite obvious Ringo here is walking up steps or standing on something, do you honestly believe he`s that tall??
Only If You Honestly Beleive Paul Was Replaced By Faul,
And Ringo Was Replaced By Fingo...!!!!!
http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/2521/paulringosl8.jpg
Can You See Steps There Or Are You Just Making Assumptions???
Fingo Could Be Standing On A Ladder..!!!!!!
Or Faul Could Be In Standing In A Trench..!!!!!
:eek:
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 01:02 AM
Only If You Honestly Beleive Paul Was Replaced By Faul,
And Ringo Was Replaced By Fingo...!!!!!
http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/2521/paulringosl8.jpg
Can You See Steps There Or Are You Just Making Assumptions???
Fingo Could Be Standing On A Ladder..!!!!!!
Or Faul Could Be In Standing In A Trench..!!!!!
:eek:
SEE WHAT IS IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES - that`s all I say to anyone - I don`t see their lower legs/feet DO YOU??
cheeb
03-09-2008, 01:16 AM
SEE WHAT IS IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES - that`s all I say to anyone
http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/2521/paulringosl8.jpg
Infront Of My Eyes I See That Fingo Is Taller Than Faul,
I'm Not Dissin His Website,
I Think It Is Very Well Researched..
I Was A Fan Of Jenny Randalls For Years,
And Her UFO Research Was Spot On..
I Just Think She Based It On The Wrong Assumptions....
Was Yasser Arafat Ringo Starrs Double...
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/5011/yasserringonl7.jpg
Hell Yeah..!!!!
:rolleyes:
faulconandsnowjob
03-09-2008, 03:07 AM
orbandsceptre27: did Paul not play piano?
It's just so obvious that Faul is not Paul. I really don't get why some can't see it.
the seeker
03-09-2008, 07:45 AM
That's ok. The rest of us can't figure out why you do see it.
miss_splitfoot
03-09-2008, 09:14 AM
Yes, JPM lives. (*yawn*) (http://www.tlcgraphic.com/paul.html)
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 10:39 AM
Added to you tube by "iamaphoney" group late last night.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=enok1qDgZP8
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 10:58 AM
http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/2521/paulringosl8.jpg
Infront Of My Eyes I See That Fingo Is Taller Than Faul,
I'm Not Dissin His Website,
I Think It Is Very Well Researched..
I Was A Fan Of Jenny Randalls For Years,
And Her UFO Research Was Spot On..
I Just Think She Based It On The Wrong Assumptions....
Was Yasser Arafat Ringo Starrs Double...
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/5011/yasserringonl7.jpg
Hell Yeah..!!!!
:rolleyes:
Nice one cheeb :D
At least yourself and krakhead are openminded on this material and raise valid points which have to be addressed, instead of carpet-bombing the place with expletives and not doing any relevent research.
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 11:16 AM
Eyes can change colour dependant on lighting - mine do - between green/grey/blue
That`s an important point you raised krakhead -
I`ve also read this before, however, a direct change from grey/blue to brown is at the very least, highly improbable. Quote - "Visually, gray eyes often tend to appear to change between the shades of blue, green and gray. This is said to be influenced by the lighting and the surroundings (such as clothes, make-up, etc.)" Notice it doesn`t mention a change to brown!
Eye color - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We know Paul McCartney had dark-brown/hazel coloured eyes. So to change eye colour completely from dark brown to gray/green eyes (as shown in the video "Fool on the Hill") within the space of a year. Add to this his height increase of four/five inches and change in voice - we`re talking about alot of "coincidences" here!
See 1.04 especially on vid "Fool on the Hill."
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zDJ-015ojec
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 11:33 AM
"Faul has a slightly higher pitched voice than Paul."
It seems a bit "thinner" to me, too.
Yes fcs I`m with you fully on that - Paul had a husky style of singing. I`ve read somewhere that his vocal chords were cutting up from excessive singing around early 65 (about the time of the Help movie - you can hear a slight strain in "The Night Before").
Liam Gallagher of Oasis had a similar problem in the late 90`s (excessive smoking/drinking and basically pushing his voice to the limit too often without sufficent recuperation.)
To me Faul had a better all around voice (with a greater range) esp for hitting the higher notes.
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 11:51 AM
"Cream of the Beatles" is a rare artistic composite of the Beatles. MikeyNL focuses on an important section from the footage relating to the replacement of Paul.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_zAkl2oxsL0
You can see the full film (in two parts) on google video.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=cream+of+the+beatles&emb=0#
orbandsceptre27
03-09-2008, 11:55 AM
[QUOTE=orbandsceptre27;484810]"Cream of the Beatles" is a rare artistic composite of the Beatles. MikeyNL focuses on an important section from the footage relating to the replacement of Paul.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_zAkl2oxsL0
You can see the full film (in two parts) on google video!
Oops it came out twice - apologies!
Yes, JPM lives. (*yawn*) (http://www.tlcgraphic.com/paul.html)
It's ok. I'm just looking for the ones who are interested. And I'm sure there are many. OK, now you can go back to sleep
truthseeker49
03-09-2008, 02:53 PM
Very well put, Anna. I fail to understand why people who obviously are not interested in what happened to Paul insist on posting on these threads. All they do is put us down & insist that he is alive. They don't present any evidence to refute what we are showing/saying. I'm sure the next step is going to be fades that are created to give the illusion that "Paul" from 1967 is the same person as Paul from 1965. :rolleyes:
miss_splitfoot
03-09-2008, 03:42 PM
They don't present any evidence to refute what we are showing/saying.
did you not visit that link I posted?
truthseeker49
03-09-2008, 03:46 PM
Miss Splitfoot, that is their opinion. I have addressed that website on another one of these threads. We have been dealing with people using slander to put us out of business for years. I prefer to just post my comparisons & let people decide for themselves.
faulconandsnowjob
03-09-2008, 04:59 PM
I prefer to just post my comparisons & let people decide for themselves.
Excellent strategy. You can offer the red pill, but they have to swallow it. Those who want to know will do take it. The rest will be lulled back to sleep w/ their little sleeping pill.
faulconandsnowjob
03-09-2008, 05:04 PM
To me Faul had a better all around voice
Oh, Orbandsceptre, you're breaking my heart! I LOVE Paul's voice. It sounds so rich & multi-textured, but maybe I'm just biased :-P I agree that Faul has a good voice, of course, but I prefer Paul's :-)
truthseeker49
03-09-2008, 07:12 PM
Cheeb, I'v seen that before about Ringo & Yassar Arafat. It is quite a resemblance. :D
truthseeker49
06-09-2008, 03:37 PM
I just found three comparisons made by someone on the PID/PWR forums. I wish I could remember who did them, as I feel that the first two comparisons are the best ones that I have ever seen. This is coming from someone who has spent the past 5 years putting together these kinds of comparisons ! ;)
Paul,1963/64 - Faul,1967
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/JPSP3.jpg
Paul,1963/64 - Faul,1967
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/JPSP1.jpg
Faul,1967 - Paul,1965
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/JPSP2.jpg
* NOTE * Please notice the difference between Paul's ears & Faul's ears in all three comparisons.
faulconandsnowjob
06-09-2008, 06:41 PM
Definitely a different look about the 2 men. While my personal preference is Paul (he's hot!), Bill/Faul is also quite handsome :-)
faulconandsnowjob
07-09-2008, 02:04 AM
Which "Ringo"? ;-)
These are excellent comparisons!! Definitely TWO different people!!
faulconandsnowjob
07-09-2008, 03:17 AM
It's like comparing a Paul & oranges :-P
orbandsceptre27
14-09-2008, 10:04 AM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3ej6TrOijeg
faulconandsnowjob
14-09-2008, 05:43 PM
Orb, what's your take on RA 70? I'm starting to think Faul's "Paul" disguise is in the suitcase. Maybe he has some Groucho Marx glasses in there, too
:-P Or maybe the suitcase is a reference to the travel trunk on the last album Paul was on. That could mean Paul has left & gone away...
tyler
14-09-2008, 05:50 PM
macartney has been threatened by some MI5 muslim if he plays the gig in Israel.
What is the dickhead doing playing concerts in this gangster state?
faulconandsnowjob
14-09-2008, 06:13 PM
Tyler, what is up w/ that? Why has Macca been threatened if he plays in Israel?
orbandsceptre27
14-09-2008, 08:50 PM
Orb, what's your take on RA 70? I'm starting to think Faul's "Paul" disguise is in the suitcase. Maybe he has some Groucho Marx glasses in there, too
:-P Or maybe the suitcase is a reference to the travel trunk on the last album Paul was on. That could mean Paul has left & gone away...
Just as long as they don`t find Paul in the suitcase! :p
Hard to say faulcon, it could be more symbolic than anything else - maybe he`s trying to tell us that what`s coming soon will be important!
You can see from the vid he`s carrying the case in either Cern, Switzerland or some site connected with Cern. There is a roadsign with Cern on it and when he walks from the reception (33 33) he passes a van with Cern written on the side. There is also another sign with "chemin des fosses."
The logo for Cern is made up of 6`s. In the occult a sequence of 6`s represents the divine masculine energy while a sequence of 3`s signifies the divine feminine (over the reception door you can see 33 33).
At 2.16 there is a flash photo of what appears to be a sun. Sun symbolism is directly related to the male dominant frequency (6 sequence energy). At around 2.47 there is a flash photo of an inverted cross which symbolises the sun energy out of balance (also used in Satanism).
There is a global shift in consciousness occurring which the powers that be are determined to prevent but (for want of a better phrase) they`re "pissing against the wind", the change is and will happen!
The divine feminine energy (333 frequency) is presently supressed with the divine masculine (666 frequency) dominant. When you put both frequencies together you get 999 "the Christos" or the Christ energy - divine harmony!
I would advise anyone interested in this area to read any of McMenek1 and Lateral V`s threads on this forum. They go into great detail and Mcmenek1 has his own blog!
There is massive occult symbolism all around us and it appears the powers that be are playing out much of their plan in plain sight, yet if people can`t read their symbolism they won`t see whats taking place (I`m no expert myself but I`m seeing it more and more).
So iamaphoney has taken us from The Beatles to nuclear and particle physics, what next ehh....??
Here`s a good vid I recently came across from iamthemagickian-
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3E_ahAkunmg
faulconandsnowjob
14-09-2008, 09:00 PM
Just as long as they don`t find Paul in the suitcase!
Eeewwww! That's dead grotty! :-P
That is very interesting what you said about the new awakening. I have no doubt that LHC (Large Hedron Collider) is very important. I do know a little something about sacred symbolism from what I've read of Michael Tsarion's work. And yes, it is everywhere, but it can be difficult to decipher. At any rate, Paul & PID are indeed much more significant than most people realize...
orbandsceptre27
14-09-2008, 09:21 PM
Humpty Dumpty (999) sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty (999) had a great fall (Faul lol),
All the kings (666) horses
and all the kings men (666),
couldn`t put Humpty (999) together again!
Why not........????
Not until the Queen (333) and all her maidens (333) work in harmony with the king (666) and his men (666)............
only then will we put Humpty (999) back together again!
Oh dear he`s gone off the deep end, lol :D !!!
We`ve been programmed since we were kids - The story of "The Fall of Man" has even been hidden in a nursery rhyme! ;)
faulconandsnowjob
14-09-2008, 09:26 PM
We`ve been programmed since we were kids
Oh, w/o a doubt. Turn off the telly, People!
The story of "The Fall of Man" has even been hidden in a nursery rhyme!
It's everywhere, if you know what you're looking for...
Can you explain the numbers? Is that numerology?
orbandsceptre27
14-09-2008, 10:33 PM
Oh, w/o a doubt. Turn off the telly, People!
It's everywhere, if you know what you're looking for...
Can you explain the numbers? Is that numerology?
Yes faulcon, as well as using numbers in mathematical calculations all numbers have an occult meaning and represent different frequencies. There are no "good" or "bad" numbers!
Problems arise when energy is out of balance. From what I have learned the masculine energy is, at present, the dominant energy throughout humanity. Everything is made up of both energies but the powers that be are continually manipulating and supressing the divine feminine within, cutting our link to "the oneness/higher-self." It`s essentially to control us.
Only when the energies are in balance can spiritual growth occur. There is a massive influx of energy into this solar system, not just the Earth at present.
This isn`t some spiritual jargon - the electromagnetic frequency of the planet was first measured by physicist W.O Schumann and is now commonly known as "The Schumann Resonance." For decades the overall measurement in hertz per second, was 7.8 cycles. Once thought to be a constant, the frequency is rising rapidly (now said to be 11 hertz per second) and it is estimated to rise to 13 hz by 2012.
Schumann resonances - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is highly significant to occultists who equate 13 as the number of unconditional love. IT IS NOT an unfortunate number - see my post this morning - but we`ve been manipulated to regard it as such (Friday 13th, Apollo 13 etc) It is a very powerful and sacred number!
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=502056#post502056
faulconandsnowjob
14-09-2008, 11:05 PM
Problems arise when energy is out of balance. From what I have learned the masculine energy is, at present, the dominant energy throughout humanity. Everything is made up of both energies but the powers that be are continually manipulating and supressing the divine feminine within, cutting our link to "the oneness/higher-self." It`s essentially to control us.
Yes, I've heard/believe this, too. Do you think HAARP is somehow tied to this? I just saw this
Schumann resonances have been used for research and monitoring of the lower ionosphere on Earth and was suggested for exploration of lower ionosphere parameters on celestial bodies.
at Schumann resonances - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Our friends at HAARP have admitted to heating up the ionosphere... Maybe there is a connection?
Only when the energies are in balance can spiritual growth occur. There is a massive influx of energy into this solar system, not just the Earth at present.
Yes, I've noticed :-) Yay!
it is estimated to rise to 13 hz by 2012.
If we get to 2012...
This is highly significant to occultists who equate 13 as the number of unconditional love. IT IS NOT an unfortunate number - see my post this morning - but we`ve been manipulated to regard it as such (Friday 13th, Apollo 13 etc) It is a very powerful and sacred number!
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showt...056#post502056
I think 13 could be very unlucky for some people ;-) Do you think it could maybe be connected to the 13th Zodiac sign, which is Auriga, the Spider?
BTW, that last link didn't work :-(
Orb! I have to tell you what a wonderful post you just made. I know about the Earth's frequency and that it has been rising, like you stated. It's rather exciting! That we are living during this time. I feel like something is on it's way. But, we will have to wait and see what that is.
I agree with Faulcon&snowjob about making it to 2012. I don't know about you, but my days are flying by!! And I believe the time speeding up does have to do with the frequency changes.
What you wrote here:
Only when the energies are in balance can spiritual growth occur. There is a massive influx of energy into this solar system, not just the Earth at present.
I didn't know this either:
Problems arise when energy is out of balance. From what I have learned the masculine energy is, at present, the dominant energy throughout humanity. Everything is made up of both energies but the powers that be are continually manipulating and supressing the divine feminine within, cutting our link to "the oneness/higher-self." It`s essentially to control us.
All of this is very interesting. You put a lot of good information in here.
On a "coincidental" note, there seems to be a good bit of interest in Paul Is Dead. I wonder if this could have anything to do with the times we are living in. Probably not. Probably just a coincidence. . . . ;)
Also, I have read somewhere that Earth is not the only planet about to make, what they are calling an "ascension", if you believe in that sort of thing. That other planets in our solar system are about to do the same thing (maybe the entire solar system, Now, I don't remember what the complete statement was) And, now I have no idea where I read that. Interesting though.
faulconandsnowjob
14-09-2008, 11:23 PM
Probably just a coincidence
There's no such thing as "coincidence" ;-)
mariag
15-09-2008, 12:23 AM
When I find myself in Times of trouble MOTHER MARY comes to me .
Speaking words of WISDOM ....let it be
And in My Hour of DARKNESS she is standing RIGHT in FRONT of me .
Speaking words of WISDOM
Let it be...
When all the broken hearted people living in the world of dreams there will be an answer..let it be
Although they will be parted there will be an answer ....Let it Be...
Hey Jude .... Donīt make it bad. Remember to take her into your heart...
Donīt be afraid , you where made to go out ...
The minute you let her under your skin , then you begin to make it better..
Everytime you feel the pain, donīt carry the world upon your shoulder.
Only a fool plays cool...
Lady Madonna ---Children at your feet , wonder how you manage to make ends meet...
Sunday morning creeping like a nun.. see how they run?
Baby at your breast .. wonder how you manage to feed the rest?
Imagine .. there is NO HEAVEN , above us ONLY SKY
HELTER SKELTER DO YOU OR DONīT YOU WANT THE AMERICAN WORLD.
YOU MAY BE A LOVER BUT YOU ARE NO DANCER...
LOOK OUT HELTER SKELTER...
And you people still think that we live under NO SUPERVISION? NO MANIPULATING FORCE OF POWER?
Oh please , why canīt you read behind the lines and understand what the real meaning of all this illusive propaganda realy is about ? I do not mean to be shouting at anyone but I think it is obvious that the Beatles was a force created by the Illuminati, to hypnotize the sheeple .
Paul IS dead there is no question about it as far as I see it and well they through it at our faces literally in all the lyrics and all the videos .
Open your eyes and your mind and then you will see that there is a common thread that runs all the way through the whole theme...
:eek::eek:
supertzar
15-09-2008, 12:30 AM
HELTER SKELTER DO YOU OR DONīT YOU WANT THE AMERICAN WORLD.
Ah ha ha ha! Oh no!!!
faulconandsnowjob
15-09-2008, 12:35 AM
mariag, I agree it's obvious that the Beatles were somehow connected w/ the Illuminati. Personally, I believe the Illuminati-run Tavistock Institute was pushing their drug agenda using "spokespeople" like the Beatles, Stones, etc.
tyler
15-09-2008, 01:22 AM
Tyler, what is up w/ that? Why has Macca been threatened if he plays in Israel?
Israel is an illegal, criminal, ethnic cleansing, gangster fiefdom that should be wiped off the map. The Holy Land of Palestine belongs to the Palestinian people which includes some jews and christians.
Macca playing there gives succor and legitimacy to these child killers.
He is too thick to understand that though.
orbandsceptre27
15-09-2008, 03:41 PM
Orb! I have to tell you what a wonderful post you just made. I know about the Earth's frequency and that it has been rising, like you stated. It's rather exciting! That we are living during this time. I feel like something is on it's way. But, we will have to wait and see what that is.
I agree with Faulcon&snowjob about making it to 2012. I don't know about you, but my days are flying by!! And I believe the time speeding up does have to do with the frequency changes.
What you wrote here:
Only when the energies are in balance can spiritual growth occur. There is a massive influx of energy into this solar system, not just the Earth at present.
I didn't know this either:
Problems arise when energy is out of balance. From what I have learned the masculine energy is, at present, the dominant energy throughout humanity. Everything is made up of both energies but the powers that be are continually manipulating and supressing the divine feminine within, cutting our link to "the oneness/higher-self." It`s essentially to control us.
All of this is very interesting. You put a lot of good information in here.
On a "coincidental" note, there seems to be a good bit of interest in Paul Is Dead. I wonder if this could have anything to do with the times we are living in. Probably not. Probably just a coincidence. . . . ;)
Also, I have read somewhere that Earth is not the only planet about to make, what they are calling an "ascension", if you believe in that sort of thing. That other planets in our solar system are about to do the same thing (maybe the entire solar system, Now, I don't remember what the complete statement was) And, now I have no idea where I read that. Interesting though.
Hi Anna, yes it appears all the planets in the solar system (and maybe further afield) are heating up and as David Icke has said before, it`s not because they`re all driving around in suv`s on Jupiter and Mars! Could it have something to do with that big glowing ball in the sky getting brighter ;)lol?
The Earth`s weather patterns ae changing but it`s becoming more evident that "the elite" are feeding us big fat lies (regarding why) and lining their pockets in the process - environmental taxes for this, that and the other!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DRaeEIN5Sh8
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kb9aA8JL0VI
Hi Anna, yes it appears all the planets in the solar system (and maybe further afield) are heating up and as David Icke has said before, it`s not because they`re all driving around in suv`s on Jupiter and Mars! Could it have something to do with that big glowing ball in the sky getting brighter ;)lol?
The Earth`s weather patterns ae changing but it`s becoming more evident that "the elite" are feeding us big fat lies (regarding why) and lining their pockets in the process - environmental taxes for this, that and the other!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DRaeEIN5Sh8
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kb9aA8JL0VI
Awww! Sanity! at last. . . . ;)
The sun isn't the only thing that's been heating up either because the Paul Is Dead story has been heating up the last 2 years, or longer!
Always enjoy your posts! Orb- :)
orbandsceptre27
15-09-2008, 04:29 PM
When I find myself in Times of trouble MOTHER MARY comes to me .
Speaking words of WISDOM ....let it be
And in My Hour of DARKNESS she is standing RIGHT in FRONT of me .
Speaking words of WISDOM
Let it be...
When all the broken hearted people living in the world of dreams there will be an answer..let it be
Although they will be parted there will be an answer ....Let it Be...
Hey Jude .... Donīt make it bad. Remember to take her into your heart...
Donīt be afraid , you where made to go out ...
The minute you let her under your skin , then you begin to make it better..
Everytime you feel the pain, donīt carry the world upon your shoulder.
Only a fool plays cool...
Lady Madonna ---Children at your feet , wonder how you manage to make ends meet...
Sunday morning creeping like a nun.. see how they run?
Baby at your breast .. wonder how you manage to feed the rest?
Imagine .. there is NO HEAVEN , above us ONLY SKY
HELTER SKELTER DO YOU OR DONīT YOU WANT THE AMERICAN WORLD.
YOU MAY BE A LOVER BUT YOU ARE NO DANCER...
LOOK OUT HELTER SKELTER...
And you people still think that we live under NO SUPERVISION? NO MANIPULATING FORCE OF POWER?
Oh please , why canīt you read behind the lines and understand what the real meaning of all this illusive propaganda realy is about ? I do not mean to be shouting at anyone but I think it is obvious that the Beatles was a force created by the Illuminati, to hypnotize the sheeple .
Paul IS dead there is no question about it as far as I see it and well they through it at our faces literally in all the lyrics and all the videos .
Open your eyes and your mind and then you will see that there is a common thread that runs all the way through the whole theme...
:eek::eek:
Some very good observations mariag and yes if people only thought more about what they`re singing along to!
I`ve posted this vid of Faul McCartney on another thread -
Note the massive Illuminati Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury complete with all-seeing eye at the top; sun symbolic St Georges flags flying over the crowd close to the stage itself; the black and white masonic flashing "checkerboard" behind Faul on stage (also found on the floor of Freemasonic lodges and inside the door of 10 Downing Street!)
Glastonbury is located on one of the biggest energy vortex`s in western Europe (many ley lines intersect in this area) and they just happen to hold a major concert there every year................. hmmm, symbolic perhaps!
"The Hill of Tara" was the main political base of old Gaelic Ireland. The High King of the country used to sit here reigning over the four provinces of Ireland. (There was a king in every province, the strongest of which became High King). The Hill of Tara is set on one of the major ley lines which intersect with Glastonbury - The old ones knew the land and were aware of the energy. ;)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=xSgSkYEHUMA
http://matthew-delooze.blogspot.com/2007/04/answer.html
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31087
http://www.crystalinks.com/grid.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/somerset/content/articles/2005/09/14/earth_energies_in_glastonbury_feature.shtml
The song "Live and Let Die" -
"When you were young and your heart was an open book,
you used to say LIVE AND LET LIVE", (innocence, tolerance and acceptance of what is!)
"But if this ever changing world in which we live in,
makes you GIVE IN and cry......
Say LIVE AND LET DIE" (give in, turn to darkness)
"What does it matter to you when you`ve got a JOB to do,
you`ve got to do it well,
you`ve got to give the OTHER MAN a HAND!" - sexual innuendo!
Old Bill is not so sweet and innocent!
orbandsceptre27
15-09-2008, 04:58 PM
Awww! Sanity! at last. . . . ;)
The sun isn't the only thing that's been heating up either because the Paul Is Dead story has been heating up the last 2 years, or longer!
Always enjoy your posts! Orb- :)
You too Anna, keep up the good work :)
Yes the Beatles were a big "cog in the wheel" regarding the initiation of rock n roll on the masses - much symbolism I believe was played out initially through "the fab four!"
mariag
15-09-2008, 11:42 PM
Some very good observations mariag and yes if people only thought more about what they`re singing along to!
I`ve posted this vid of Faul McCartney on another thread -
Note the massive Illuminati Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury complete with all-seeing eye at the top; sun symbolic St Georges flags flying over the crowd close to the stage itself; the black and white masonic flashing "checkerboard" behind Faul on stage (also found on the floor of Freemasonic lodges and inside the door of 10 Downing Street!)
Glastonbury is located on one of the biggest energy vortex`s in western Europe (many ley lines intersect in this area) and they just happen to hold a major concert there every year................. hmmm, symbolic perhaps!
"The Hill of Tara" was the main political base of old Gaelic Ireland. The High King of the country used to sit here reigning over the four provinces of Ireland. (There was a king in every province, the strongest of which became High King). The Hill of Tara is set on one of the major ley lines which intersect with Glastonbury - The old ones knew the land and were aware of the energy. ;)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=xSgSkYEHUMA
http://matthew-delooze.blogspot.com/2007/04/answer.html
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31087
http://www.crystalinks.com/grid.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/somerset/content/articles/2005/09/14/earth_energies_in_glastonbury_feature.shtml
The song "Live and Let Die" -
"When you were young and your heart was an open book,
you used to say LIVE AND LET LIVE", (innocence, tolerance and acceptance of what is!)
"But if this ever changing world in which we live in,
makes you GIVE IN and cry......
Say LIVE AND LET DIE" (give in, turn to darkness)
"What does it matter to you when you`ve got a JOB to do,
you`ve got to do it well,
you`ve got to give the OTHER MAN a HAND!" - sexual innuendo!
Old Bill is not so sweet and innocent!
:eek:
Act Naturally
Report a Mistake!
They're gonna put me in the movies
They're gonna make a big star out of me
We'll make a film about a man that's sad and lonely
And all I gotta say is act naturally
Well, I'll bet you I'm gonna be a big star
Might win an Oscar you can never tell
The movies gonna make me a big star
'Cause I can play the part so well
Well I hope you come and see me in the movies
Then I know that you will plainly see
The biggest fool that ever hit the big time
And all I gotta do is act naturally
We'll make the scene about a man that's sad and lonely
And beggin down upon his bended knee
I'll play the part but I won't need rehearsal
All I gotta do is act naturally
Well, I'll bet you I'm gonna be a big star
Might win an Oscar you can never tell
The movies gonna make me a big star
'Cause I can play the part so well
Well I hope you come and see me in the movies
Then I know that you will plainly see
The biggest fool that ever hit the big time
And all I gotta do is act naturally
mariag
15-09-2008, 11:45 PM
HEY JUDE
Please note that I am not Anti semetic , I have jewish herritage .
Hey Jude don't make it bad,
Take a sad song and make it better,
Remember, to let her into your heart,
Then you can start to make it better.
Hey Jude don't be afraid,
You were made to go out and get her,
The minute you let her under your skin,
Then you begin to make it better.
And anytime you feel the pain,
Hey Jude refrain,
Don't carry the world upon your shoulders.
For well you know that it's a fool,
Who plays it cool,
By making his world a little colder.
Hey Jude don't let me down,
You have found her now go and get her,
Remember (Hey Jude) to let her into your heart,
Then you can start to make it better.
So let it out and let it in
Hey Jude begin,
You're waiting for someone to perform with.
And don't you know that it's just you.
Hey Jude, you'll do,
The movement you need is on your shoulder.
Hey Jude, don't make it bad,
Take a sad song and make it better,
Remember to let her under your skin,
Then you'll begin to make it all better, better, better, better,
better, better, better, ah!
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na.
Hey Jude, Jude , Jude, Jude, Jude, yeah, yeah!
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na.
Hey Jude.
Another Coomon theme is the obsessions with numbers and figures ..
You know my name, look up the number
You know my name, look up the number
You, you know, you know my name
You, you know, you know my name
(Good evening and welcome to slaggers featuring Denis O'Bell
Come on Ringo, Let's here it for Denis O'Bell, good evening)
You know my name, better look up my number
You know my name, that's right, look up my number
You, you know, you know my name
You, you know, you know my name
mariag
15-09-2008, 11:52 PM
mariag, I agree it's obvious that the Beatles were somehow connected w/ the Illuminati. Personally, I believe the Illuminati-run Tavistock Institute was pushing their drug agenda using "spokespeople" like the Beatles, Stones, etc.
Yellow submarine ----As we live a life of ease,
Everyone of us has all we need,
Sky of blue and sea of green,
In our yellow submarine.
Hey Jude ---the minute you put her under your skin you start to feel better.
Tomorrow Never Knows
Turn off your mind relax and float down-stream,
It is not dying, it is not dying,
Lay down all thought surrender to the void,
It is shining, it is shining.
That you may see the meaning of within,
It is being, it is being,
That love is all and love is evryone,
It is knowing, it is knowing.
That ignorance and haste may mourn the dead,
It is believing, it is believing,
But listen to the color of your dreams,
It is not living, it is not living.
Or play the game "existence" to the end.
Of the beginning, of the beginning.
Of the beginning. Of the beginning.
faulconandsnowjob
15-09-2008, 11:59 PM
You know my name, look up the number > maybe saying do a numerological reading on the names? B/c I would say look up my number if I meant phone number...
Yellow submarine > are you saying it's a pill, maybe?
mariag
16-09-2008, 12:00 AM
Some very good observations mariag and yes if people only thought more about what they`re singing along to!
I`ve posted this vid of Faul McCartney on another thread -
Note the massive Illuminati Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury complete with all-seeing eye at the top; sun symbolic St Georges flags flying over the crowd close to the stage itself; the black and white masonic flashing "checkerboard" behind Faul on stage (also found on the floor of Freemasonic lodges and inside the door of 10 Downing Street!)
Glastonbury is located on one of the biggest energy vortex`s in western Europe (many ley lines intersect in this area) and they just happen to hold a major concert there every year................. hmmm, symbolic perhaps!
"The Hill of Tara" was the main political base of old Gaelic Ireland. The High King of the country used to sit here reigning over the four provinces of Ireland. (There was a king in every province, the strongest of which became High King). The Hill of Tara is set on one of the major ley lines which intersect with Glastonbury - The old ones knew the land and were aware of the energy. ;)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=xSgSkYEHUMA
http://matthew-delooze.blogspot.com/2007/04/answer.html
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31087
http://www.crystalinks.com/grid.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/somerset/content/articles/2005/09/14/earth_energies_in_glastonbury_feature.shtml
The song "Live and Let Die" -
"When you were young and your heart was an open book,
you used to say LIVE AND LET LIVE", (innocence, tolerance and acceptance of what is!)
"But if this ever changing world in which we live in,
makes you GIVE IN and cry......
Say LIVE AND LET DIE" (give in, turn to darkness)
"What does it matter to you when you`ve got a JOB to do,
you`ve got to do it well,
you`ve got to give the OTHER MAN a HAND!" - sexual innuendo!
Old Bill is not so sweet and innocent!
Gives me the shiver right through my bones.
Here we have the fake Paul Mc Cartney sitting on a "throne" of Fire ( symbolic indeed) on a scene in Glastonbury( Avalon ) like the big Merlin himself . And the man is Smiling a grin the moment before he sings LIVE AND LET DIE . All I can say is WOW what a great ritual not that I like the idea but it IS a ritual . I wonder what really happened that day when the concert took part .As it is known that the Illuminati always have great shows and things like this when they perform another great trick on us.
It is sad that people donīt see what I am seeing and many with me . Please wake up
mariag
16-09-2008, 12:02 AM
You know my name, look up the number > maybe saying do a numerological reading on the names? B/c I would say look up my number if I meant phone number...
Yellow submarine > are you saying it's a pill, maybe?
lol no
I am saying that they use numbers in all they do . and this song performed by the Beatles is one example on how the illuminati uses numbers to trick the people .
;)
bicycle
19-09-2008, 04:47 PM
I WAS kind of, you know, playing around in me studio one day when I took a break to have a sandwich. I always think it's a good idea to have a sandwich at lunchtime, whereas some people okay, prefer a bowl of soup, but in those days Linda and myself were like, dead against the eating of soup.
ImageOur thinking behind it was this: we didn't like the slurping or the act of dunking the bread in the soup - it was just one of our, like, things - so let's just leave it at that, shall we? Anyway, as I munched on me parsnip and petit pois sandwich, the Ryder Cup came on the telly, which inspired me to pen this:
Ooo-oooh! There's a man called Nicky Faldo
He don't come from Colorado
Nooooo he don't come from Colorado
Otherwise he wouldn't be playing for Great Britain, Ireland
& Europe
Noo-oo way!
(GUITAR BREAK)
(KEYBOARD FLOURISH)
Ooooh, Nickeeeeeeeeeee
Nickeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Nickeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Faldo!
Then this Sevvy guy holes this like monster putt, okay, so I immediately leapt to me feet and began playing the like, keyboards and sang a song - it goes something like this:
Who-woo-whoahhh! Pour me a bevy
Cos here comes Mr Sevvy
Ooh yeah, he's my favourite Spaniard
Whooooooh! He's way-way better than Franco
Way-hayyy! Yeah, way-way-way better than Franco-oh-woah
Or Mussolini
Yeah, he was a real meany
And an Italy-ee-an-neeny
I was, like so inspired by the moment, okay, that I got an overnight bag together, jumped in me car and drove up to the Belfry to watch the rest of the match. Linda packed me a few sandwiches - dandelion and cress, swede and tomato and of course, her speciality, two different kinds of lettuce. Gear!
Unfortunately the Tupperware box containing all me sarnies accidentally fell out of the car window, and I was forced to stop at a service station and eat a mixed grill, a double cheeseburger and half a dozen Pepperamis.
Okay, so it's the final day of the match, and this dude called Sam Torrance was just about to sink the putt to win it for the home team, when all of a sudden I had this really fab idea, so I started strumming my guitar and walking across the green, singing....
(STRUM- STRUM-STRUM )
Whoah, Sam Torrance
Yaay, whooooahh! Sam Torrance
I don't know you from the Gulf of St Lawrence
Yeahhhh
Oh yeah, but now you're a hero
No longer a zero
A bigger name than De Niro
Or Albert Speer-o
Yeaa
Just as I was getting into the chorus, okay, some big fella started getting really heavy and grabbed me by the scruff of the neck, shouting 'just fuck-off, you annoying c*nt'. I hadn't heard that kind of language since Yoko spilled hot jasmine tea over George Martin's groin at Abbey Road. Nasty business. I wrote a song about it.
drhemp
19-09-2008, 07:11 PM
I loved the Frog Chorus.. all them reps singing in harmony:D
The real Paul McCartney would have never written the Frog Song, he must have been replaced with a double.
orbandsceptre27
19-09-2008, 08:20 PM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kB7FUBlzSkY
rich157
19-09-2008, 09:13 PM
Isn't he a robot, android, thingy ?
I've been watching him. Seems like a big player for the NWO.
I can't say for certain, but it looks like all he does is send messages.
McCartney hopes Tel Aviv gig will spread message of peace
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080919/ten-entertainment-britain-israel-music-m-a56114e.html
AFP - 37 minutes ago
LONDON (AFP) - Music legend Sir Paul McCartney said on Friday he hoped his upcoming concert in Israel would spread a message of peace in the region.
In comments posted on his website, the former Beatles star said the concert in Tel Aviv next week -- his first in the country -- could "affect the audience" and added that he believed music could lead to change.
The September 25 gig, part of a series of one-off concerts in places he has never visited before, comes after two previous unsuccessful attempts by McCartney to perform in the Jewish state.
"The world knows about the conflicts that have been in that region and I like to think that if I go to a place it becomes evident that my message is a peaceful one and I hope that the idea will spread," the 66-year-old said.
"It often does happen you know -- you'll go to a place and it can affect the audience.
McCartney [hopes Tel Aviv] gig will spread message of peace
Viva - Spanish for - IT LIVES
Le - French for - THE
Hope - HOPE
Will Spread Message
of = of
gig = GIGANTIC
Peace = WAR
Something about September 25th in there.
Right... it's a WAR MESSAGE.
Because gigantic peace doesn't suit their agenda.
IT LIVES, THE HOPE, WILL SPREAD MESSAGE OF GIGANTIC WAR
McCartney.
25th September ?
orbandsceptre27
19-09-2008, 11:12 PM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kB7FUBlzSkY
Above, posted by iamaphoney on you tube yesterday.
Below, posted by iamaphoney on you tube over an hour ago!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=m0hPto5IEnc
hunger
20-09-2008, 06:00 AM
I WAS kind of, you know, playing around in me studio one day when I took a break to have a sandwich. I always think it's a good idea to have a sandwich at lunchtime, whereas some people okay, prefer a bowl of soup, but in those days Linda and myself were like, dead against the eating of soup.
ImageOur thinking behind it was this: we didn't like the slurping or the act of dunking the bread in the soup - it was just one of our, like, things - so let's just leave it at that, shall we? Anyway, as I munched on me parsnip and petit pois sandwich, the Ryder Cup came on the telly, which inspired me to pen this:
Ooo-oooh! There's a man called Nicky Faldo
He don't come from Colorado
Nooooo he don't come from Colorado
Otherwise he wouldn't be playing for Great Britain, Ireland
& Europe
Noo-oo way!
(GUITAR BREAK)
(KEYBOARD FLOURISH)
Ooooh, Nickeeeeeeeeeee
Nickeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Nickeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Faldo!
Then this Sevvy guy holes this like monster putt, okay, so I immediately leapt to me feet and began playing the like, keyboards and sang a song - it goes something like this:
Who-woo-whoahhh! Pour me a bevy
Cos here comes Mr Sevvy
Ooh yeah, he's my favourite Spaniard
Whooooooh! He's way-way better than Franco
Way-hayyy! Yeah, way-way-way better than Franco-oh-woah
Or Mussolini
Yeah, he was a real meany
And an Italy-ee-an-neeny
I was, like so inspired by the moment, okay, that I got an overnight bag together, jumped in me car and drove up to the Belfry to watch the rest of the match. Linda packed me a few sandwiches - dandelion and cress, swede and tomato and of course, her speciality, two different kinds of lettuce. Gear!
Unfortunately the Tupperware box containing all me sarnies accidentally fell out of the car window, and I was forced to stop at a service station and eat a mixed grill, a double cheeseburger and half a dozen Pepperamis.
Okay, so it's the final day of the match, and this dude called Sam Torrance was just about to sink the putt to win it for the home team, when all of a sudden I had this really fab idea, so I started strumming my guitar and walking across the green, singing....
(STRUM- STRUM-STRUM )
Whoah, Sam Torrance
Yaay, whooooahh! Sam Torrance
I don't know you from the Gulf of St Lawrence
Yeahhhh
Oh yeah, but now you're a hero
No longer a zero
A bigger name than De Niro
Or Albert Speer-o
Yeaa
Just as I was getting into the chorus, okay, some big fella started getting really heavy and grabbed me by the scruff of the neck, shouting 'just fuck-off, you annoying c*nt'. I hadn't heard that kind of language since Yoko spilled hot jasmine tea over George Martin's groin at Abbey Road. Nasty business. I wrote a song about it.
Ha ha, Your best work yet bike!
We were just 4 guys yi kno :cool::cool::cool::eek: (Thats Faul on thee end therrrr & everythink)
truthseeker49
20-09-2008, 06:06 PM
Bicycle, that was GREAT ! You made that up ??? Wow !!!! :D
FAUL,1967http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul_teeth.jpg http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/show-case/james_paul_mccartney_bn.jpgPAUL
THE TEETH ARE OBVIOUSLY DIFFERENT ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE MOUTH.
PAULhttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/splotchfadeharharharhar9xt.gifhttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/faulia.jpgFAUL,1967
Two comparisons made by a member of my forum.
http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi
faulconandsnowjob
21-09-2008, 04:52 AM
Orb: in 32 60 Re - Run, someone says that they came up w/ "number 9" by playing "Paul is dead" backwards, right? I remember reading something like that, I think in "Turn Me On, Dead Man," that some of the cluesters back in '69 had done some "reverse engineering" - saying things like Paul is dead, or whatever, & playing it backwards. They were surprised when they heard some of the stuff they had come up w/ in later songs.
Rich157: you're not the only one to think that Faul's trip to Israel is about war. Maybe a nuke war would make a nice blood sacrifice for the NWO?
orbandsceptre27
21-09-2008, 05:32 AM
Orb: in 32 60 Re - Run, someone says that they came up w/ "number 9" by playing "Paul is dead" backwards, right? I remember reading something like that, I think in "Turn Me On, Dead Man," that some of the cluesters back in '69 had done some "reverse engineering" - saying things like Paul is dead, or whatever, & playing it backwards. They were surprised when they heard some of the stuff they had come up w/ in later songs.
Rich157: you're not the only one to think that Faul's trip to Israel is about war. Maybe a nuke war would make a nice blood sacrifice for the NWO?
Very true Faulcon - there are so many clues relating to backmasking throughout the Beatles music and intentionally put there as you`re well aware of. It was just another way of sending out subliminals as Lennon later admitted in one or two interviews!
What do you make of the new iamaphoney videos........ he`s not giving much away is he? :)
faulconandsnowjob
21-09-2008, 06:11 AM
What do you make of the new iamaphoney videos...
Orb: Well, I personally think that Bill is iaap. I think the suitcase may symbolize Paul or, possibly, PID. I think iaap is trying to warn, or at least call attention to the LHC at CERN, which I believe is run by the Illuminati. The symbols are pretty cryptic, of course, but I think that's what's going on. What do you think?
Orb: Well, I personally think that Bill is iaap. I think the suitcase may symbolize Paul or, possibly, PID. I think iaap is trying to warn, or at least call attention to the LHC at CERN, which I believe is run by the Illuminati. The symbols are pretty cryptic, of course, but I think that's what's going on. What do you think?
THAT'S what I thought too Faulcon, that Bill is IAAP. Surely we aren't the only ones who thought that! And I agree that he is definitely trying his best to warn or inform about LHC at CERN. He has tried to INFORM all the way through the Rotten Apple - Paul Is Dead videos on Youtube. Why are people still refusing to believe that the real Paul is not alive today and that today's Paul is the replacement, a phoney, he gave himself the name, "IAmAPhoney"! He wants the Truth out!!... and not just about real Paul's death and replacement but other Truths as well.
I think anyone keeping up with this thread should view this video
that MikeNL1038 compiled:
paul is dead - nothing is real 262 - YouTube
redman
21-09-2008, 05:12 PM
I think anyone keeping up with this thread should view this video
that MikeNL1038 compiled:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGE1EmvkA_A
Just watched it... what does it mean exactly ?? I watch these pathetic video's and not one has ever made me think anything other that there are some very delusional mother fucks out there with a lot of time on their hands.
Please explain to me whats so fucking great about that video ??
And like I keep on saying on these threads, very easy way to prove without a doubt if Paul was dead and that is indeed another person would be to compare any clip before 1966 with any clip of Paul singing or talking after 1966. And compare voices.
And haypresto, there is your proof.
Still waiting for one of you mongs to come up with the goods. LOL
redman
21-09-2008, 05:18 PM
THAT'S what I thought too Faulcon, that Bill is IAAP. Surely we aren't the only ones who thought that! And I agree that he is definitely trying his best to warn or inform about LHC at CERN. He has tried to INFORM all the way through the Rotten Apple - Paul Is Dead videos on Youtube. Why are people still refusing to believe that the real Paul is not alive today and that today's Paul is the replacement, a phoney, he gave himself the name, "IAmAPhoney"! He wants the Truth out!!... and not just about real Paul's death and replacement but other Truths as well.
May be because those rotten Apple video's on youtube are fucking crap and doesn't produce any credible evidence whats so ever.
Like I say, why does IAmAPhoney go to all the trouble of spending hours of uploading crap video's comparing pictures, when he could quite easily get vocal analysis software and prove that they are two different people.
I'll tell ya why no one has ever come up with that evidence, because that would be very credible evidence and would actually make people take this theory serious.
Comparing ear lobes of a 20 year old with a 60 year old man and saying look at the difference is not credible evidence... LMAO
faulconandsnowjob
21-09-2008, 06:29 PM
Anna, I think Bill is saying "I really, we really, I really love you," & not anything about being dead. That was just what I heard, tho. However, you guys were talking about imagery & symbolism at Glastonbury on another thread. Maybe someone who knows more about it could explain it here...? (I'm looking at you, Orb :)) Anyway, what is apparent in that Glastonbury video, as w/ every post '66 video of "Paul," is that that guy is not Paul. Some people won't be able to tell the difference, but I don't really care about them anymore. I'm way past the point of whether Paul was replaced. I am much more interested now in who did it & why.
howie
21-09-2008, 08:36 PM
This just occurred to me after watching 911 hidden in hollywood.
January 1984
UK Chart No.1 - Paul McCartney - Pipes of Peace (his only solo No.1 hit)
UK Film Chart No.1 - Trading Places
orbandsceptre27
21-09-2008, 10:37 PM
Orb: Well, I personally think that Bill is iaap. I think the suitcase may symbolize Paul or, possibly, PID. I think iaap is trying to warn, or at least call attention to the LHC at CERN, which I believe is run by the Illuminati. The symbols are pretty cryptic, of course, but I think that's what's going on. What do you think?
I think you and Anna could be very close to the truth there Faulcon - It does`nt look like iamaphoney is going to give the game away anytime soon, judging by his last number of posts on you tube.
I believe the Beatles could not "come out" directly with the truth about Paul (or other things surrounding the group in the music industry) as they would have been putting their lives (and the lives of their loved ones) in grave danger. But the old magician himself, Bill, knows an awakening of consciousness is taking place within humanity. The "sheeple" are waking up (............and they`re pissed off - Bill Hicks :D) What better way to begin opening "the can of worms" which is the Beatles (and rock n roll music in general) than by dropping clue after clue on you tube.
If iamaphoney is not Bill he must be an insider of some sort, as his videos are too well put together with information which is over the average Beatles fans head.
orbandsceptre27
21-09-2008, 10:49 PM
This just occurred to me after watching 911 hidden in hollywood.
January 1984
UK Chart No.1 - Paul McCartney - Pipes of Peace (his only solo No.1 hit)
UK Film Chart No.1 - Trading Places
That`s a great spot howie - Coincidence.................. many on this forum are "too long in the tooth" not to see the synchronicity here, well done mate!
orbandsceptre27
21-09-2008, 11:54 PM
I think anyone keeping up with this thread should view this video
that MikeNL1038 compiled:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGE1EmvkA_A
That`s a great vid Anna however I agree with Faulcon that Mikey was stretching it a bit here with the vocals. It also sounds to me like "I really....we really........ I really love you."
Mikey also makes the inference that Bill is iamaphoney - "Bill also likes flashy images........just like iamaphoney."
If you freeze the video around 3.28 you`ll see what it`s like for the crowd viewing the on-stage screens from a distance. The centre screen portrays imagery which seems to morph between a giant (all seeing) eye and what appears like a ufo. Reminds me of something you`d see in Spielbergs "Close Encounters of the Third Kind."
So much of this ufo imagery has been forced on us by the establishment for the last number of years. Speaking of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," here`s an interesting video of the closing ceremony of the 1984 (George Orwells famous book lol - 1984 is a 22/4 Master frequency year) Olympic Games from (The City of Angels) Los Angeles. Looks like something from one of the Nazi Nuremberg Rallies. What oh what are they up to.......?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DCYElo49dJI
Much talk at the moment about 14th Oct. 2008, the supposed first contact with aliens from outer space. They`re going to drive one of their mother ships into our atmosphere, stay visible for three days and then put it in reverse.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=P8c0ppYYT6o
How about the supposed "hijacking" of BBC airwaves in 1977 from an other-worldly being bringing us messages of love?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GJIxos6a-Zc&feature=related
Are we being consciously "softened up" by the elite? Are they preparing for another phase of programming?
faulconandsnowjob
22-09-2008, 12:01 AM
I believe the Beatles could not "come out" directly with the truth about Paul (or other things surrounding the group in the music industry) as they would have been putting their lives (and the lives of their loved ones) in grave danger.
I believe you are right. I think it's possible John was killed b/c they were afraid he might say something about what happened to Paul. I know others (ex, Fenton Bresler) have speculated that TPTB were concerned about John causing problems for the new Reagan agenda, but I personally think it was more tied to PID/PWR.
But the old magician himself, Bill, knows an awakening of consciousness is taking place within humanity. The "sheeple" are waking up (............and they`re pissed off - Bill Hicks :D) What better way to begin opening "the can of worms" which is the Beatles (and rock n roll music in general) than by dropping clue after clue on you tube.
Yes, & TPTB always let the people know what the deal is. It's like an honor code for them. Maybe one reason so many songs & album covers are laden w/ clues - even thru the solo years. They let you know, but they just don't tell you explicitly. They reveal the Truth thru codes & symbols. Well, the Truth isn't really that hard to figure out - all you have to do is compare some photos of Paul & Bill to see Paul was replaced :-P However, the cryptic clues about CERN, etc, are very interesting...
And there's no such thing as "Coincidence" ;-)
That`s a great vid Anna however I agree with Faulcon that Mikey was stretching it a bit here with the vocals. It also sounds to me like "I really....we really........ I really love you."
Mikey also makes the inference that Bill is iamaphoney - "Bill also likes flashy images........just like iamaphoney."
Thanks for your input on that video Orb. I always respect your opinion. You are one of the brighter minds here concerning this topic on Paul McCartney. Not only that, but all the other information you have contributed.
truthseeker49
22-09-2008, 12:38 AM
Howie, that is a great catch ! Orb, they're right. You're a very bright mind on this board. I think that TPTB are behind much of what we're going through right now. I can't see the economy recovering, no matter what the idiot politicians are saying !
If iAAp does reach the masses, the sheeple WILL wake up. It's already beginning to happen ! rejoice !
faulconandsnowjob
22-09-2008, 12:39 AM
0 - Vrillon piratage TV 1977.avi
I think humans did not heed "Vrillon's" warning. Interesting that first contact is supposed to be Oct 14 - 1 week before CERN LHC starts the main phase of experimentation (assuming it still starts on time on Oct 21...)
orbandsceptre27
22-09-2008, 12:40 AM
Thanks for your input on that video Orb. I always respect your opinion. You are one of the brighter minds here concerning this topic on Paul McCartney. Not only that, but all the other information you have contributed.
Thank you for your compliment Anna :) Much of this stuff, as you know, is observational and ties together - it`s a big, big jigsaw though! I heard a wise man say before that if the general public woke up one day to know the truth concerning their leaders - the lies they tell; the knowledge they`ve kept hidden; their apathy for the masses; there would be a massive revolution and all would change. It becomes easy for all of us to see these evils when we really look, and we must also look inside ourselves.
orbandsceptre27
22-09-2008, 12:53 AM
Hi truthseeker and thanks :)
Yep I think alot of people are seeing TPTB are behind so much of what happens in our lives and the politicians are really just expendable pawns as D.I keeps saying. It doesn`t seem to matter who wins the elections, "the agenda" is always played out. If you turn on them, like Kennedy did when he got in, they`ll make an example of you (public execution in his case) to scare others. Fear is the name of their game!
orbandsceptre27
28-09-2008, 09:09 AM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3JwMp-ENcdQ
allure
28-09-2008, 09:28 AM
This thread is an embarrassment!
talulah
28-09-2008, 09:34 AM
has paul mcartney been replaced by a reptile?
orbandsceptre27
28-09-2008, 09:35 AM
This thread is an embarrassment!
No - YOU THINK this thread is an embarrassment. "Global Orgasm Day" and "Snake Baby" are two of your finest allure............. and you`re not embarrassed?
orbandsceptre27
28-09-2008, 09:57 AM
re talulah "Who cares? Wings were shit anyway"..................... I wonder why :rolleyes:
allure
28-09-2008, 10:05 AM
No - YOU THINK this thread is an embarrassment. "Global Orgasm Day" and "Snake Baby" are two of your finest allure............. and you`re not embarrassed?
Why should I be. One was nothing but a 'wow look at this strange lookin baby' and the other was trying to promote an event with the potential to create enough positive magical energy to make positive changes in the world.
Not comparing earlobes of a boy with an old man and talking of word in songs that aren't actually there. Never mind believing someone is dead when all the evidence you could possibly imagine suggests that they are very much alive.
I'll be bumping that "Global Orgasm Day" thread as the 21st of December approaches again.
orbandsceptre27
28-09-2008, 10:08 AM
Why should I be. One was nothing but a 'wow look at this strange lookin baby' and the other was trying to promote an event with the potential to create enough positive magical energy to make positive changes in the world.
Not comparing earlobes of a boy with an old man and talking of word in songs that aren't actually there. Never mind believing someone is dead when all the evidence you could possibly imagine suggests that they are very much alive.
I'll be bumping that "Global Orgasm Day" thread as the 21st of December approaches again.
I rest my case you`re an idiot!
allure
28-09-2008, 11:16 AM
In the future, before resting a case, try presenting one.
allure
28-09-2008, 11:26 AM
orbandsceptre27, you have also seemingly mistaken my 'attack' on this threads subject matter as an attack on you, so you went looking for ammo to attack me with, and I'm the idiot?
And I originally posted that "Global Orgasm Day" in the sub forum about what we can do to make change, a moderator obviously deemed it important enough to move it to the general category.
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 06:11 PM
allure, orbandsceptre is a sharp mind w/ powers of observation that exceed yours, obviously, since you can't tell the difference between Paul & Faul. I think you presented your own case that you're an idiot.
allure
28-09-2008, 07:11 PM
allure, orbandsceptre is a sharp mind w/ powers of observation that exceed yours, obviously, since you can't tell the difference between Paul & Faul. I think you presented your own case that you're an idiot.
Well you would say that. Seeing as Paul McCartney being replaced seems to be the only thing you're interested in and the only reason you're a member of this forum. You're obsessed with a ridiculous fantasy for which there is not one single shread of halfway credible evidence.
I've read this entire thread, initially completely open to being shown evidence that suggests Paul McCartney is dead. There is none.
redman
28-09-2008, 07:15 PM
I see still no evidence of Paul's Voice being totally different from before 66 to after.
You have only had 40 years to come up with this evidence to prove without doubt that it's two different people.
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 07:21 PM
I find it disturbing that some people (allure, redman) can't tell the difference between 2 men who look different, sound different, & act differently. The only thing I can attribute that to is that they've been told for so long that Faul is Paul that they believe it & really can't see the difference (or maybe they just have very poor powers of observation). It's troubling that people's minds can be controlled to such an extent that they can't see what's right in front of them. I guess if someone told them black is white, they'd believe that, too.
I've stayed primarily with this thread because it's important to me and I want this to be in the minds of others. I hope people reading this thread will check out the sights and the great comparisons made in forums and even on Youtube.
There have been manipulations of online photographs of the two Pauls but the Paul Is Dead Miss Him Forum has some really nice comparisons:
http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 07:34 PM
Anna, thanks for that. All one has to do is spend about 15 minutes comparing photos (preferably Paul 1965-66 to Faul 1967) to see they aren't the same person. Well, and overcome the 40+ years of brainwashing that Faul/Bill is Paul.
redman
28-09-2008, 07:59 PM
I find it disturbing that some people (allure, redman) can't tell the difference between 2 men who look different, sound different, & act differently. The only thing I can attribute that to is that they've been told for so long that Faul is Paul that they believe it & really can't see the difference (or maybe they just have very poor powers of observation). It's troubling that people's minds can be controlled to such an extent that they can't see what's right in front of them. I guess if someone told them black is white, they'd believe that, too.
Well I notice something with people like you... You or another Faul Believer posted a video of George supposedly saying " I see Beatle Bill filling his face again " .. So I posted evidence that the footage had been edited and he was indeed saying Beatle Phil, considering he was sat there with Phil Spector who was eating at the time and George was actually looking at him when he said it. LOL
But absolutely no response to the footage from you, and you just went back to comparing photo's that I just do not see the distinct differences that you see except for different hair styles and age and later on it looks like he has had a bit of plastic surgery.
If you are so sure of this theory, then why don't you spend Ģ100 on some software and officially break it to the world that Paul has been replaced by simply comparing the two voices.
And if you are too dumb to do it yourself why don't you look in to doing this, go to a university and ask someone who deals in sound to do the experiment. It would actually take about an hour to do, if that. You could even choose the parts were you think there are big difference in their voices.
Cos I still see no credible evidence... and you would have to be one gullible mother fuck to believe this theory on the evidence you are showing or any of those Faul Sites are displaying.
Now if there was a video of someone showing you them putting two different clips of Paul speaking, and actually showing without a doubt that it's two different voices, then I would take more notice and probably take time to do the experiment myself, but there is fucking no way I am spending cash and wasting my time off the back of a few people who just sit there comparing photos of someone in their early 20's to when they are in their 30's or even later, and then they are surprised that there is slight differences, ie... ear lobes being slightly longer etc... LMAO
Seriously fucking laughable this theory. I remember one of you lot said " well you believe that 911 was a inside job, but you think it would be so hard to replace someone ".
BIG BIG BIG DIFFERENCE... THERE IS COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF EVIDENCE AND EXPERIMENTS BEEN PRODUCED BY SCIENTISTS, DOCTORS, ARMED FORCES, PILOTS, DEMOLITION EXPERTS, FIREMAN, POLICEMEN, PEOPLE ON THE INSIDE, PEOPLE WHO WHERE THERE, AND THERE IS ACTUALLY A MOTIVE AND A REASON WHY 911 WOULD BE DONE.
CAN THE SAME BE SAID ABOUT THIS THEORY WHICH IN COMPARRISON IS A LOT EASIER TO PROVE THAN 911 IS... BY SIMPLY COMPARING THE VOICES, BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE TWO TO HAVE EXACTLY THE SAME VOICE STRUCTURE, SO WHY NO EVIDENCE OF THE VOICES BEING DIFFERENT.
I will tell you why... because then this theory would fall to bits because it's Paul MCcartney's voice, he is not dead and has not been replaced, and I think it's time for you and the few other people who believe this shit to wake the fuck up.
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 08:19 PM
You should check your hearing, redman. On the Imagine video, George says "I see Beatle Bill is making a pig of himself" - not "I see Beatle Bill filling his face again." That doesn't even make sense. Then they change is to "Beatle Ed" in a nudge-nudge, wink-wink sort of way. I guess they weren't too worried about letting it slip. Most people (like you) are too stupid & unobservant to notice that freakin' PAUL MCCARTNEY was replaced!
So, redman, this is what I think. I think you are 1) very afraid to leave your comfort zone & see that Paul was replaced, 2) you have very poor powers of observation, or 3) you have a vested interest in "de-bunking" PID. Well, if you are a disinfo agent or someone trying to de-bunk PID, then you are doing a very poor job of it. I have not seen you present any photos or anything to show that Paul is the same as Faul. In fact, I think the evidence better supports the theory that there were at least 2 Fauls, but I think that theory would probably make your head explode.
smurf
28-09-2008, 08:24 PM
Two different people, eh? I don't think so.
People change both in appearance and personality as they age.
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 08:29 PM
People do not change that much in one year. What some people are proposing is that Paul's eyes, ears, chin, forehead, shape of his head, length of his face, timbre of his voice, composing ability, etc, all changed, yet it's the same person. Yeah, I don't think so.
allure
28-09-2008, 08:32 PM
Paul is NOT dead - more comparisons! - YouTube
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 08:38 PM
Well, except for the eyes, the nose, the chin, the forehead, the mannerisms, the voice, the height, etc, they are exactly the same.
allure
28-09-2008, 08:42 PM
It would appear you didn't watch the video I just posted. Its proves they are the same person, with photographic evidence (which you asked for), photographic evidence that shows their facial bone structures are identical.
The evidence in that video is 1000 times more conclusive than photos attempting to prove PID.
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 08:44 PM
Nope, that video proves nothing. I have looked at tons of pictures of Paul & compared them to Faul/Bill. There is NO WAY they are the same person.
allure
28-09-2008, 08:47 PM
They just happen to have identical facial symmetry and bone structure?
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 08:54 PM
They just happen to have identical facial symmetry and bone structure?
Well, that's the funny thing, b/c that's exactly what they don't have. You can't change the shape of someone's head, or the distance between their eyes. Those are dead give-aways that they aren't the same person.
People do not change that much in one year. What some people are proposing is that Paul's eyes, ears, chin, forehead, shape of his head, length of his face, timbre of his voice, composing ability, etc, all changed, yet it's the same person. Yeah, I don't think so.
Yeah! Not hardly! Those do not change in one year -
allure
28-09-2008, 09:09 PM
I think this gives a good balanced view of the entire thing > http://www.deboogle.com/faul-conspiracy/
faulconandsnowjob
28-09-2008, 09:15 PM
Ok, back to PID 101. Here are some pictures of Paul vs. Faul.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/thumbs2.jpg (Paul)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/mmtstand.jpg (Faul/Bill)
Among other things, Paul's face is not as long as Faul's.
orbandsceptre27
28-09-2008, 09:48 PM
Why should I be. One was nothing but a 'wow look at this strange lookin baby' and the other was trying to promote an event with the potential to create enough positive magical energy to make positive changes in the world.
Not comparing earlobes of a boy with an old man and talking of word in songs that aren't actually there. Never mind believing someone is dead when all the evidence you could possibly imagine suggests that they are very much alive.
I'll be bumping that "Global Orgasm Day" thread as the 21st of December approaches again.
Haha............. well your a bit of a fairy yourself I see! If your own kid was that deformed would you have such a fast tabloid mouth - "snake baby," and as for one of the mods "putting a pin" in your orgasm thread, I take my "bowler hat" off to you! (are you a bowler hatted Belfast chap? ;)) If I was a mod I`d also be keeping it there for the laugh!
I see you`re taking a leaf out of redmans book and charging in with, "the old earlobe" jibe - Jesus go easy there would ya - You might end up surprising yourself and making a half decent point!
The thing is it`s alright for you to start up questionable (that`s being generous) threads and lets all be openminded about "snake baby" and "jibbing off" for world peace - a bit of magick is nice (if you know what you`re doing :rolleyes:) but when it comes to a famous rock n`roller being replaced, no no...... let`s close it up.....terrible stuff to learn the truth you know!
In your earliest comment on this thread you expressed your embarrassment........ some time later since nobody responded, you asked to close down the thread.............. but still nobody bit! Now mr tabloid hack is still all embarrassed! (Attention, attention, attention ehh......!) Grow a pair would you........... - if you`re going to create world peace with your "jibbing" you`re going to need them you soft fawker you! :D
Now that video you posted is made up of "STILLS" and these type of vids have been dealt with before many times. But just like you didn`t take time to view the vid I posted this morning, you won`t take the time and go through the four threads which exist on this forum in relation to the topic at hand!
If you`re all embarrassed and need you`re ego soothed I suggest you take up bridge with a bunch of sensitive old ladies - Who knows............they may even be interested in hearing your tails of the "snake baby" - and how you`re bringing peace to our planet......... "with the cut of your jib!"
shansuke
28-09-2008, 11:14 PM
lol,you got to keep this thread going,ive just sat and read this entire thread and allthow i dont believe it(yet) im getting a good giggle.
honestly thow ive stayed away from any threads about this thoery since the first time i heard about it and althow i cant bring myself to believe it at the moment maybe that will change but i doubt it,althow i would like to see some evidence thats a bit more convincing.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 12:02 AM
I can't imagine anything more convincing than that the 2 (or possibly 3) men don't look alike.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/alittleupset.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul_airport_closeup.jpg Faul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/proper-paula.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/67y_coat.jpg Faul
Does anyone really think these guys are the same? If so, then Paul got a serious (& unfortunate) case of the uglies in late 1966...
I would have thought that people on the David Icke forum would be hip to how TPTB operate. Is it really that hard to imagine that TPTB would replace someone if it suited them?
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:15 AM
I agree Faulcon -
If this is Paul McCartney then I`m Frank Sinatra.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rC4lumYPQD8
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 12:18 AM
Yeah, if that's Paul, then I'm the Easter Bunny. THIS is Paul:
Paul McCartney Interviewed By David Frost - YouTube
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:27 AM
lol,you got to keep this thread going,ive just sat and read this entire thread and allthow i dont believe it(yet) im getting a good giggle.
honestly thow ive stayed away from any threads about this thoery since the first time i heard about it and althow i cant bring myself to believe it at the moment maybe that will change but i doubt it,althow i would like to see some evidence thats a bit more convincing.
Hi shansuke - lol at least you`re open-minded about it, for many it`s a closed shop before they`ve even begun! It may take awhile, but you`ll definately start to see the differences.
Review the old colour vids of Paul singing ("The Night Before" and "Paperback Writer"). Compare these to interviews and vids from 1967 on. Note the green eyes of "Faul" in "Fool on the Hill" and "Hey Jude" (Paul had dark brown eyes - Faul usually wore brown contacts, but not in these two vids). This would be a start!
shansuke
29-09-2008, 12:30 AM
im trying my best to have an open mind about this but im sorry i just cant see it,if thats what you guys really believe then go for it keep up the good work,at least you are trying to proove something that you believe in.but i feel looking at the pictures that im looking for something thats just not ther,ok he looks differant from one photo to the next but as folk have already said everyone changes,im sure we could pick out lots more convincing clones than pual mcCartny.
redman
29-09-2008, 12:30 AM
People do not change that much in one year. What some people are proposing is that Paul's eyes, ears, chin, forehead, shape of his head, length of his face, timbre of his voice, composing ability, etc, all changed, yet it's the same person. Yeah, I don't think so.
Listen, if that was the case and they are two different voices, then this would be the easiest conspiracy theory to prove.
Why has no one come out with proof that they are two different voices ??
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:34 AM
Yeah, if that's Paul, then I'm the Easter Bunny. THIS is Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNYVxqJ83W8
Here`s Paul again (one of his last interviews) - Note the mannerisms (confident demeanour, humour) body language, voice tone (depth) and pitch (accent).
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=f1CidMWUfbw
redman
29-09-2008, 12:35 AM
Hi shansuke - lol at least you`re open-minded about it, for many it`s a closed shop before they`ve even begun! It may take awhile, but you`ll definately start to see the differences.
Review the old colour vids of Paul singing ("The Night Before" and "Paperback Writer"). Compare these to interviews and vids from 1967 on. Note the green eyes of "Faul" in "Fool on the Hill" and "Hey Jude" (Paul had dark brown eyes - Faul usually wore brown contacts, but not in these two vids). This would be a start!
I am fucking open minded about it, I am a Beatles fan and was intrigued and spent a few nights checking the site links that were on this thread.
But there is no evidence except for comparing pics that have not got clear enough differences to make it another person.
And like I keep saying, you say the voices are different, well if thats the case you have more songs and more interviews of Faul to compare with the ones Paul did before 66.
It's quite simple, prove that they are two different voices and I will take this theory a lot more seriously, until then I am going to laugh at it and ridicule it because the evidence provided is as weak as piss.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:37 AM
Here is the present imposter!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zxnCngmi8gg
The differences seem subtle but they are very distinct - the key is the early comparisons!
redman
29-09-2008, 12:41 AM
Here is the present imposter!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zxnCngmi8gg
The differences seem subtle but they are very distinct - the key is the early comparisons!
Wow thats amazing.. he grew a mustache.. must be someone else.. LMAO
Get to fuck... Seriously are you for fucking real ?? :D
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:43 AM
I am fucking open minded about it, I am a Beatles fan and was intrigued and spent a few nights checking the site links that were on this thread.
But there is no evidence except for comparing pics that have not got clear enough differences to make it another person.
And like I keep saying, you say the voices are different, well if thats the case you have more songs and more interviews of Faul to compare with the ones Paul did before 66.
It's quite simple, prove that they are two different voices and I will take this theory a lot more seriously, until then I am going to laugh at it and ridicule it because the evidence provided is as weak as piss.
Like I`ve said many times before redman, I can take you to the water but I can`t make you drink it. I can`t see the differences for you (I wish I could)!
Are you honestly a musician because if you are you should have "the ear" for this - Are you a singer, and can you tune a guitar etc by ear alone? If you can you`ve got a big advantage on most others!
shansuke
29-09-2008, 12:44 AM
the later one just seems like a laid back stoned paul,the voice sounds like he has been smoking the weed a bit more regularly.im gonny check out a few more of the vids.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:45 AM
Wow thats amazing.. he grew a mustache.. must be someone else.. LMAO
Get to fuck... Seriously are you for fucking real ?? :D
You`re joking me/you`re having me on right? - you seriously can`t see/hear the differences between the two - what do you play the fawking spoons??
allure
29-09-2008, 12:46 AM
I taught my self guitar and piano and am quite good at both. But I'm not very proficient at measuring ear lobes! :rolleyes:
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:49 AM
the later one just seems like a laid back stoned paul,the voice sounds like he has been smoking the weed a bit more regularly.im gonny check out a few more of the vids.
That`s what alot have said - but I guarantee if you listen to his voice, you`ll hear the difference in tone yourself. You don`t need any fancy gadgets to "prove to you." That`s only one of the many differences!
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 12:50 AM
I taught my self guitar and piano and am quite good at both. But I'm not very proficient at measuring ear lobes! :rolleyes:
You`re a complete waste of space is what you are!
redman
29-09-2008, 12:57 AM
People do not change that much in one year. What some people are proposing is that Paul's eyes, ears, chin, forehead, shape of his head, length of his face, timbre of his voice, composing ability, etc, all changed, yet it's the same person. Yeah, I don't think so.
This is were you are well off... So you are saying that Paul's composing abililty got worse after 1966... Sorry, but you are wrong. Paul did some of his best work after 66, Sgt peppers, practically wrote most of Abbey Road and Let it be and his musicianship was class on all, were he played bass, guitar and piano.
So actually let the truth be known, Paul actually improved song writing wise and musicianship wise after 1966.
Are you seriously telling me this person that they managed to find in a look a like competition who could pull of his accent to a tee, speak with exactly the same voice to were no one could prove it using voice recognition software ( which is impossible ), Looked exactly like him to were there are video's showing you that their bone structures were exactly the same, play all the instruments that Paul could and actually ended up surpassing Paul MCcartney's musicianship abilitys, the same bloke could go and do interviews, chat shows, perform infront of millions of people and just take it in his stride as if it's fuck all. Then even better you expect me to believe that this replacement took a camera crew into a pub were all his family and friends are and he could remember all their names, speak about the good old times, sit there with his dad, and you think that they were all in on it and if they came out and spoke about it they would be murdered.
HA HA HA HA... What the fuck have you been sniffing. LMFAO. :D:D
redman
29-09-2008, 01:02 AM
That`s what alot have said - but I guarantee if you listen to his voice, you`ll hear the difference in tone yourself. You don`t need any fancy gadgets to "prove to you." That`s only one of the many differences!
Fancy gadgets... LMAO.
Listen, get it through your thick skull, IF THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT VOICES THEN THIS WOULD BE THE EASIEST THEORY TO PROVE AND BEYOND DOUBT THAT IT WAS TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE. Ever wonder why you sat there posting pics of ear lobes as evidence and not one single person has ever come up with the evidence that they are two different voices, ever wondered why ??
I will tell you why, cos this theory is complete horse shit and comparing the voices would indeed tell us that the people speaking are both the same person.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:02 AM
This is were you are well off... So you are saying that Paul's composing abililty got worse after 1966... Sorry, but you are wrong. Paul did some of his best work after 66, Sgt peppers, practically wrote most of Abbey Road and Let it be and his musicianship was class on all, were he played bass, guitar and piano.
So actually let the truth be known, Paul actually improved song writing wise and musicianship wise after 1966.
Are you seriously telling me this person that they managed to find in a look a like competition who could pull of his accent to a tee, speak with exactly the same voice to were no one could prove it using voice recognition software ( which is impossible ), Looked exactly like him to were there are video's showing you that their bone structures were exactly the same, play all the instruments that Paul could and actually ended up surpassing Paul MCcartney's musicianship abilitys, the same bloke could go and do interviews, chat shows, perform infront of millions of people and just take it in his stride as if it's fuck all. Then even better you expect me to believe that this replacement took a camera crew into a pub were all his family and friends are and he could remember all their names, speak about the good old times, sit there with his dad, and you think that they were all in on it and if they came out and spoke about it they would be murdered.
HA HA HA HA... What the fuck have you been sniffing. LMFAO. :D:D
He doesn`t look the same, talk the same, act the same or sound the same - so what are you on - give me some of it will you, what turns a man into a sheep??
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 01:03 AM
Are you honestly a musician because if you are you should have "the ear" for this - Are you a singer, and can you tune a guitar etc by ear alone? If you can you`ve got a big advantage on most others!
Although I wouldn't claim to be a "musician," I did play bass in a coverband, so I got used to really listening to the bass b/c I had to imitate it as closely as possible. Maybe that is why I can hear the difference between the voices, & I'm not the only one:
Dr. Henry M. Truby of the University of Miami used samples from three Beatles songs sung by Paul McCartney ("Yesterday," "Penny Lane," and "Hey Jude") and produced three very different sonagrams. Does that mean that there were three McCartneys? "I'm not prepared to say that this is the final word," Truby told Rolling Stone Magazine, "but it's a beginning."
Reeve, Andru J., Turn Me On, Dead Man: The Complete Story of the Paul McCartney Death Hoax, Ann Arbor: Popular Culture, Ink, 1994: 69.
I find it a little suspicious that the voice in "Lady Madonna" has some major effects on it. Maybe they were trying to hide something...?
But anyway, although I don't claim to be a "musician," I do claim to have an artistic eye. Maybe that's why the photos are all I need to see that they are 2 (maybe 3) different "Pauls." My mother is a professional artist & she spotted the difference in 2 seconds. A trained eye can see the details (distance between eyes, angle of ears, etc), & also the whole. Those guys do not look the same at all.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/TPUDec65001.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul_early.jpg
He doesn`t look the same, talk the same, act the same or sound the same
Yet, according to some of these people, they are the same person. Now THAT is stretching the imagination a bit too far.
And re: composing ability... What redman fails to understand is that Faul sang Paul's songs while he was a Beatle. I doubt Faul wrote anything original while he was a Beatle. Didn't you ever wonder why Faul's solo career has kind of sucked? Not that he hasn't come up w/ a decent tune at times, but there is certainly no sign of the genius responsible for "Yesterday," "For No One," "Eleanor Rigby," etc.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:03 AM
fancy gadgets... Lmao.
Listen, get it through your thick skull, if they are two different voices then this would be the easiest theory to prove and beyond doubt that it was two different people. Ever wonder why you sat there posting pics of ear lobes as evidence and not one single person has ever come up with the evidence that they are two different voices, ever wondered why ??
I will tell you why, cos this theory is complete horse shit and comparing the voices would indeed tell us that the people speaking are both the same person.
I never posted earlobes you stupid spud!
redman
29-09-2008, 01:08 AM
I never posted earlobes you stupid spud!
Well one of you thick fucks did.. one from when he was in his early 20's to one when he was in his early 40's, and said " look they are longer ".
Thick twats... LMAO
shansuke
29-09-2008, 01:08 AM
right i dont know how to post pictures so check this out its a vid of syd barret http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fmA2N0zmfxM&feature=related i think you will know what im getting at,i will go and get another vid of the way he used to look.
redman
29-09-2008, 01:10 AM
Although I wouldn't claim to be a "musician," I did play bass in a coverband, so I got used to really listening to the bass b/c I had to imitate it as closely as possible. Maybe that is why I can hear the difference between the voices, & I'm not the only one:
I find it a little suspicious that the voice in "Lady Madonna" has some major effects on it. Maybe they were trying to hide something...?
But anyway, although I don't claim to be a "musician," I do claim to have an artistic eye. Maybe that's why the photos are all I need to see that they are 2 (maybe 3) different "Pauls." My mother is a professional artist & she spotted the difference in 2 seconds. A trained eye can see the details (distance between eyes, angle of ears, etc), & also the whole. Those guys do not look the same at all.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/TPUDec65001.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul_early.jpg
It's like this evidence here, those two last pics. The last fucking pic is all over the fucking place you can't even make fuck all out and you are posting it as evidence.
What the fuck.. LMAO
shansuke
29-09-2008, 01:10 AM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=COeMSQIsdcE&feature=related is he a clone to.btw im not trying to piss anyone of here im just trying to have a sensible argument.
redman
29-09-2008, 01:12 AM
right i dont know how to post pictures so check this out its a vid of syd barret http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fmA2N0zmfxM&feature=related i think you will know what im getting at,i will go and get another vid of the way he used to look.
Thats not Syd.... it's Fyd. LMAO
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:12 AM
Redman is this you - crazy Scouser sheep?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fht4iULu0w8
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 01:19 AM
Redman: The last fucking pic is all over the fucking place you can't even make fuck all out and you are posting it as evidence.
It's a picture claiming to represent Paul McCartney, yet it doesn't look like him. What difference does it make if it's "all over the fucking place," as you so eloquently put it (a regular Oscar Wilde* - LMAO).
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/Weirdteeth.jpg
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/pid_on_magazine_p6aaa.jpg
And, anyway, resorting to cursing is just a sign that you are getting desperate. I can understand that. It is a tough position to be in - to have to argue that 2 clearly different men are the same.
* In case you have never heard of Oscar Wilde, he was a famous author (Oscar Wilde - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).
redman
29-09-2008, 01:20 AM
Redman is this you - crazy Scouser sheep!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fht4iULuOw8
The video is no longer there it said.
Anyway, I ain't no sheep, but I ain't falling for any old bull shit. You produce any evidence of any note and I will read, watch it and take it all in. But the evidence you are giving is just so fucking weak it's laughable.
And then the longer I thought about it the more it just came apparent that it's a complete fucking joke. Do you actually read what I type about all the things this replacement would have to be able to do, I mean be a musician to a professional standard, be able to go on TV infront of millions and do a never ending amount of interviews with the most famous people in the world, go and do live gigs infront of thousands at the gig and millions watching worldwide, and then there is the voice part I keep mentioning, it could be proved really easily.
So do you actually think all these things are possible, I mean it's known that people like Sadam Hussein had doubles, but alls they had to do is just stand there and do fuck all, you are expecting me to believe that this replacement managed to write and compose songs on some the best albums of all time.
I mean come on now, read what I am typing.. It's very very very very fucking very unlikely.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:23 AM
Are you sure it`s not there - Are you sure Paul`s still alive?? :D :p
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 01:27 AM
redman, do you even know anything about intelligence agencies or the powers that be, Illuminati, etc? Replacing a rockstar would be a snap for these people. And despite what you keep claiming, the different Pauls do not look alike, sound alike, or look alike, so I guess TPTB didn't do such a good job after all. Certainly not a good enough job to trick everyone forever. As the old maxim goes, you can fool some of the people all of the time, & all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/vercloseup.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/greeneyesStrawberryFields.jpg Faul
Orb's sheep link worked just fine for me:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fht4iULu0w8
redman
29-09-2008, 01:29 AM
Are you sure it`s not there - Are you sure Paul`s still alive?? :D :p
Listen I will leave you to it.
And word of advice, if you really want to prove this theory even to yourself cos I think you are seriously wasting your time believing in shit like this.
Go to a university and see if a sound technician would be interested in doing some tests on both voices to see if they have different sound wave patterns, theory proven right there.
Have fun.
shansuke
29-09-2008, 01:29 AM
im not going to say your wrong orb as its not been prooved that he is paul but redman makes some really good points,i play guitar also and cant imagine having to learn all of someones songs and play ther style identicle,ok im not saying it cant be done but as redman says learning the tunes,the voice,and he would have to know everything about paul to pull it of,it just seems like a big waste of time,if they wanted him removed then why not just take him out.
redman
29-09-2008, 01:31 AM
redman, do you even know anything about intelligence agencies or the powers that be, Illuminati, etc? Replacing a rockstar would be a snap for these people. And despite what you keep claiming, the different Pauls do not look alike, sound alike, or look alike, so I guess TPTB didn't do such a good job after all. Certainly not a good enough job to trick everyone forever. As the old maxim goes, you can fool some of the people all of the time, & all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/vercloseup.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/greeneyesStrawberryFields.jpg Faul
Orb's sheep link worked just fine for me:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fht4iULu0w8
Yeah I do, done a lot of research on them.
I don't see how they could of pulled this one off though, and I don't see why they would even bother to be honest, sorry.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:32 AM
The video is no longer there it said.
Anyway, I ain't no sheep, but I ain't falling for any old bull shit. You produce any evidence of any note and I will read, watch it and take it all in. But the evidence you are giving is just so fucking weak it's laughable.
And then the longer I thought about it the more it just came apparent that it's a complete fucking joke. Do you actually read what I type about all the things this replacement would have to be able to do, I mean be a musician to a professional standard, be able to go on TV infront of millions and do a never ending amount of interviews with the most famous people in the world, go and do live gigs infront of thousands at the gig and millions watching worldwide, and then there is the voice part I keep mentioning, it could be proved really easily.
So do you actually think all these things are possible, I mean it's known that people like Sadam Hussein had doubles, but alls they had to do is just stand there and do fuck all, you are expecting me to believe that this replacement managed to write and compose songs on some the best albums of all time.
I mean come on now, read what I am typing.. It's very very very very fucking very unlikely.
Redman this whole PID scene will never get as far as the courtroom outhouse, but that does`nt mean it`s not true that Paul McCartney was replaced!
This isn`t just about one band member being replaced, there were alot of shady people around the Beatles when they came onto the world stage. The powers that be would never allow Faul`s story see the light of day.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 01:34 AM
if they wanted him removed then why not just take him out.
I'm afraid that's exactly what happened to Paul. TPTB seem to make celebrities. The name becomes like a brand name. The real person will be replaced if they don't "get w/ the program." "Paul McCartney" seems to have had several people playing the part. What happened to Paul just sheds more light on how TPTB operate.
PID almost made it to a courtroom w/ Bettina Krischbin's case.
I don't see how they could of pulled this one off though,
Well, I can. Most people are oblivious & ignorant. It seems like TPTB were more worried about people figuring it out early on - they had Faul wear contacts, ear prostheses, etc. At some point, they decided it wasn't worth the bother b/c people couldn't tell the difference, anyway.
redman
29-09-2008, 01:41 AM
im not going to say your wrong orb as its not been prooved that he is paul but redman makes some really good points,i play guitar also and cant imagine having to learn all of someones songs and play ther style identicle,ok im not saying it cant be done but as redman says learning the tunes,the voice,and he would have to know everything about paul to pull it of,it just seems like a big waste of time,if they wanted him removed then why not just take him out.
It isn't just that though Shansuke, in the space of a couple of days after the accident, Paul who would then be Faul was getting interviewed by all the press, doing chat shows and just fitted into Paul's life without any signs of stress or nerves. And like I say, could pretty much do everything Paul could. So he looked exactly like Paul, could sing like Paul ( which is to a professional standard, especially some of those backing harmonies the Beatles did ). I mean it's just impossible to find a person that could look that much like Paul MCcartney and be able to pull off all the things that Paul could do. Simple as that. And whatever happened to the guy's life who replaced him, I mean someone who looked this much like Paul MCcartney would be probably be world famous before 1966 just because he looked that much like Paul, then if he could actually sing and perform just like him, he would be famous just off the back off that. Or did they make Faul in some Lab somewhere In area 51... LMAO
I mean come on, this theory is fucking stupid. LMAO I truthfully can not believe there are people that actually believe this.
redman
29-09-2008, 01:42 AM
Redman this whole PID scene will never get as far as the courtroom outhouse, but that does`nt mean it`s not true that Paul McCartney was replaced!
This isn`t just about one band member being replaced, there were alot of shady people around the Beatles when they came onto the world stage. The powers that be would never allow Faul`s story see the light of day.
yeah whatever you say... :rolleyes:
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:43 AM
im not going to say your wrong orb as its not been prooved that he is paul but redman makes some really good points,i play guitar also and cant imagine having to learn all of someones songs and play ther style identicle,ok im not saying it cant be done but as redman says learning the tunes,the voice,and he would have to know everything about paul to pull it of,it just seems like a big waste of time,if they wanted him removed then why not just take him out.
It`s all about the money as they say - why end the cash cow which the Beatles became when they could keep the band rolling? Remember at this time nothing like the Beatles had ever happened before........ they truely had a global audience - massive bucks!
They probably did take him out. It seems as though Paul was eliminated, rubbed out (whatever you want to call it). Faulcon knows more about it, as does Anna and Truthseeker who has been into this area for over 5 years!
There was a big break when Paul was replaced - Faul had ample time to learn what he needed to learn, John and Ringo went to make a movie in Spain. The band never toured again as Bill was right handed and it`s said he always played this way unless the cameras were on him (in studio etc). He is also taller than Paul and would have been found out on stage.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:50 AM
It isn't just that though Shansuke, in the space of a couple of days after the accident, Paul who would then be Faul was getting interviewed by all the press, doing chat shows and just fitted into Paul's life without any signs of stress or nerves. And like I say, could pretty much do everything Paul could. So he looked exactly like Paul, could sing like Paul ( which is to a professional standard, especially some of those backing harmonies the Beatles did ). I mean it's just impossible to find a person that could look that much like Paul MCcartney and be able to pull off all the things that Paul could do. Simple as that. And whatever happened to the guy's life who replaced him, I mean someone who looked this much like Paul MCcartney would be probably be world famous before 1966 just because he looked that much like Paul, then if he could actually sing and perform just like him, he would be famous just off the back off that. Or did they make Faul in some Lab somewhere In area 51... LMAO
I mean come on, this theory is fucking stupid. LMAO I truthfully can not believe there are people that actually believe this.
See that`s your major stumbling block redman - you say you are open-minded, yet here you`ve said, "I truthfully can not believe there are people that actually believe this." Fair enough, that`s an honest statement. But you are not, and were not open to the fact that this switch could, and did take place! If you cannot see the possibilty of it arising, you will disregard (filter)much important info, whether your aware of it or not!
redman
29-09-2008, 01:50 AM
It`s all about the money as they say - why end the cash cow which the Beatles became when they could keep the band rolling? Remember at this time nothing like the Beatles had ever happened before........ they truely had a global audience - massive bucks!
They probably did take him out. It seems as though Paul was eliminated, rubbed out (whatever you want to call it). Faulcon knows more about it, as does Anna and Truthseeker who has been into this area for over 5 years!
There was a big break when Paul was replaced - Faul had ample time to learn what he needed to learn, John and Ringo went to make a movie in Spain. The band never toured again as Bill was right handed and it`s said he always played this way unless the cameras were on him (in studio etc). He is also taller than Paul and would have been found out on stage.
Wow, I can't believe how delusional you are. You can't just go and learn how to play the stuff Paul MCcartney was playing in a short space of time mate. It takes years and years to get to that standard. Then you say he played right handed and had to learn to play left handed, that in its self would take fucking years to do... And if you are naturally right handed, you would probably never get to the standard Paul could play. EVER.
Also there wasn't a big break, they started recording Sgt Peppers in late 66.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:54 AM
Wow, I can't believe how delusional you are. You can't just go and learn how to play the stuff Paul MCcartney was playing in a short space of time mate. It takes years and years to get to that standard. Then you say he played right handed and had to learn to play left handed, that in its self would take fucking years to do... And if you are naturally right handed, you would probably never get to the standard Paul could play. EVER.
Also there wasn't a big break, they started recording Sgt Peppers in late 66.
It`s not that I`m delusional, it`s that you`re blind :rolleyes: Did you not stop and think for a minute that maybe......just maybe, Billy was A (drum fawking ROLL) .............. a musician?????? You know, not a bloody pipe-fitter or a "sparks"!
And get you`re facts right there was a long break!
redman
29-09-2008, 01:56 AM
See that`s your major stumbling block redman - you say you are open-minded, yet here you`ve said, "I truthfully can not believe there are people that actually believe this." Fair enough, that`s an honest statement. But you are not, and were not open to the fact that this switch could, and did take place! If you cannot see the possibilty of it arising, you will disregard (filter)much important info, whether your aware of it or not!
Well try and come up with some fucking evidence then... LMAO
I have weighed everything up and it's quite simply impossible what you are saying. I don't think you quite understand that you come across like a compete fucking idiot when you say " Faul had ample time to learn what he needed to learn ", sorry mate but you can't just learn someone's technique of playing, playing instruments is like voices we all have our own voice with it's own trademarks, eg, I can play blackbird on the guitar, but Paul MCcartney or Faul as you would say had a very distinct way of picking that I can not do, so I use my own way of picking.
So when you say " Faul had ample time to learn what he needed to learn ", I can not take you serious anymore because you are not dealing with reality my friend.
Sorry.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 01:59 AM
I'm afraid that's exactly what happened to Paul. TPTB seem to make celebrities. The name becomes like a brand name. The real person will be replaced if they don't "get w/ the program." "Paul McCartney" seems to have had several people playing the part. What happened to Paul just sheds more light on how TPTB operate.
PID almost made it to a courtroom w/ Bettina Krischbin's case.
Well, I can. Most people are oblivious & ignorant. It seems like TPTB were more worried about people figuring it out early on - they had Faul wear contacts, ear prostheses, etc. At some point, they decided it wasn't worth the bother b/c people couldn't tell the difference, anyway.
I concur!
redman
29-09-2008, 02:04 AM
It`s not that I`m delusional it`s, that you`re blind :rolleyes: Did you not stop and think for a minute that maybe......just maybe, Billy was A (drum fawking ROLL) .............. a musician?????? You know, not a bloody pipe-fitter or a "sparks"!
And get you`re facts right there was a long break!
Oh so Faul looked exactly like Paul, could pull off how he spoke and could sing exactly like Paul, and was a professional musician, he was also a great actor and had no problem doing interviews and sat there calm as cucumber getting interviewed by all the worlds media telling stories about how they got together and what life was like before the beatles.
Oh and by the way, if there was a long break, then what month was the accident in 1966, and check out what date they went into the studio to start recording Sgt Peppers which by the way came out on 1/06/67.
And there is also footage of the beatles recording Sgt Peppers, and also the anthologies of the countless takes of them recording the album. And you are trying to tell me thats not Paul MCcartney playing on that album but some bloke that they happened to find in a look a like competition.
HA HA HA HA HA.. Fucking hell, you lot are crazier than a shit house rat to believe this crock. :D
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:04 AM
Well try and come up with some fucking evidence then... LMAO
I have weighed everything up and it's quite simply impossible what you are saying. I don't think you quite understand that you come across like a compete fucking idiot when you say " Faul had ample time to learn what he needed to learn ", sorry mate but you can't just learn someone's technique of playing, playing instruments is like voices we all have our own voice with it's own trademarks, eg, I can play blackbird on the guitar, but Paul MCcartney or Faul as you would say had a very distinct way of picking that I can not do, so I use my own way of picking.
So when you say " Faul had ample time to learn what he needed to learn ", I can not take you serious anymore because you are not dealing with reality my friend.
Sorry.
I`m afraid you`re the one who`s well off here redman, try going away and doing some research.......... any research!
And you`re so cock-sure of yourself - if you knew how foolish you sound when you say you`re "open-minded" .................. you`re fully convinced this could never happen, not to your Liverpool lads, well it did - and there`s four threads here you should seriously start to read...... for a start!
redman
29-09-2008, 02:10 AM
I`m afraid you`re the one who`s well off here redman, try going away and doing some research.......... any research!
And you`re so cock-sure of yourself - if you knew how foolish you sound when you say you`re "open-minded" .................. you`re fully convinced this could never happen, not to your Liverpool lads, well it did - and there`s four threads here you should seriously start to read...... for a start!
I couldn't give a fuck where Paul MCcartney is from, and for your information I don't like the prick, I think he is a right snidy fuck. Lennon on the other hand is the man.
Hey your the one thats sat there claiming someone can learn how to play left handed with in a few month and also learn someone elses techinque down to a tee. Whilst looking exactly like that person and sounding like the person and being able to deal with the pressures of getting thrown into the biggest band in the world and just dealing with it like it was fuck all.
So I ain't cock sure of myself, I just happen to have a great bull shit detector and that's probably why I find myself using this site cos the amount of bull shit thats around.
And this theory my friend is just that, 100% fucking bull squirt. Sooner you realize it the better.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:12 AM
Oh so Faul looked exactly like Paul, could pull off how he spoke and could sing exactly like Paul, and was a professional musician, he was also a great actor and had no problem doing interviews and sat there calm as cucumber getting interviewed by all the worlds media telling stories about how they got together and what life was like before the beatles.
Oh and by the way, if there was a long break, then what month was the accident in 1966, and check out what date they went into the studio to start recording Sgt Peppers which by the way came out on 1/06/67.
And there is also footage of the beatles recording Sgt Peppers, and also the anthologies of the countless takes of them recording the album. And you are trying to tell me thats not Paul MCcartney playing on that album but some bloke that they happened to find in a look a like competition.
HA HA HA HA HA.. Fucking hell, you lot are crazier than a shit house rat to believe this crock. :D
You`re a lying sack of muck and you`re as high as a kite (they don`t come much more emotional than you, do they redman?) Oh when you think you`re onto a good thing your a real fruit! If you view the anthologies you will see FOR DEFINITE the Beatles parted in late 1966.
You go on about the Beatles music like you`re talking about Mozart - do you really play the guitar because you must be fawking lousie?
redman
29-09-2008, 02:15 AM
I`m afraid you`re the one who`s well off here redman, try going away and doing some research.......... any research!
Also I ain't well off in what I said about musicians having their own style of playing, and just so happens that Paul Mccartney's Bass playing had a style that stood out a mile.
So I am dealing in logic, you are dealing in comparing pics that most people can not see any significant changes except for the age.
Then there is the voices, like I keep saying, not one scrap of evidence that says the voices are different and these days it's so fucking easy to be able to prove they are different voices.
So believe me, my argument is looking a lot better than yours.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:17 AM
I couldn't give a fuck where Paul MCcartney is from, and for your information I don't like the prick, I think he is a right snidy fuck. Lennon on the other hand is the man.
Hey your the one thats sat there claiming someone can learn how to play left handed with in a few month and also learn someone elses techinque down to a tee. Whilst looking exactly like that person and sounding like the person and being able to deal with the pressures of getting thrown into the biggest band in the world and just dealing with it like it was fuck all.
So I ain't cock sure of myself, I just happen to have a great bull shit detector and that's probably why I find myself using this site cos the amount of bull shit thats around.
And this theory my friend is just that, 100% fucking bull squirt. Sooner you realize it the better.
You`ve a great-bullshit detector...................ever think of turning it on once in a while and read what`s the level of crap that comes out of your mouth......... imao!
And it`s not that you don`t like Paul McCartney.................. for starters he`s dead, and you THINK you don`t like Billy (but you don`t know him either) so get your facts right would ya....! ;)
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 02:18 AM
The Beatles did immediately announce that they would not tour again in late 1966. A little odd to be so final about it...
It's like redman has never heard of doubles being used before. Maybe there were different "Paul McCartneys" for different things. Maybe the Faul that came directly after Paul didn't work out so well. It's also like redman has never heard of what lengths intell agencies will go to make a convincing double, including plastic surgery. I really can't fathom why he keeps claiming Faul looks exactly like Paul when he clearly doesn't. He also doesn't sing or perform just like Paul. Paul was cool & funny. Faul is kind of awkward & dorky. It's just astonishing that people can't see the difference. I guess they are too afraid to break out of the paradigm they think is reality. Either that or they have no eye for detail.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Western2aaa.jpg
Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/IM15.jpg Faul/Bill
(they don`t come much more emotional than you, do they redman?)
When they get emotional is when you know that they are out of good arguments. You can only keep insisting that 2-3 obviously different people are the same for so long.
redman
29-09-2008, 02:19 AM
You`re a lying sack of muck and you`re as high as a kite (they don`t come much more emotional than you, do they redman?) Oh when you think you`re onto a good thing your a real fruit! If you view the anthologies you will see FOR DEFINITE the Beatles parted in late 1966.
You go on about the Beatles music like you`re talking about Mozart - do you really play the guitar because you must be fawking lousie?
They had a break... you made out it was a big break... well it couldn't of been, because the time scale of when the accident happened which was ??
And Sgt Pepper came out when ?? 1/06/67 Revolver came out 5/08/66, So there is only a year between when Revolver came out and Sgt Pepper was recorded in that year, also in that time Paul had the accident. A year, these days bands take 3 years out to make a fucking album, so like I said there was no BIG BREAK like you claimed.
So there is your fucking answer numb nuts. LMAO
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:19 AM
Also I ain't well off in what I said about musicians having their own style of playing, and just so happens that Paul Mccartney's Bass playing had a style that stood out a mile.
So I am dealing in logic, you are dealing in comparing pics that most people can not see any significant changes except for the age.
Then there is the voices, like I keep saying, not one scrap of evidence that says the voices are different and these days it's so fucking easy to be able to prove they are different voices.
So believe me, my argument is looking a lot better than yours.
And in what way did it stand out from any other top bass player of the day........... since you`re such an expert?
redman
29-09-2008, 02:20 AM
The Beatles did immediately announce that they would not tour again in late 1966. A little odd to be so final about it...
It's like redman has never heard of doubles being used before. Maybe there were different "Paul McCartneys" for different things. Maybe the Faul that came directly after Paul didn't work out so well. It's also like redman has never heard of what lengths intell agencies will go to make a convincing double, including plastic surgery. I really can't fathom why he keeps claiming Faul looks exactly like Paul when he clearly doesn't. He also doesn't sing or perform just like Paul. Paul was cool & funny. Faul is kind of awkward & dorky. It's just astonishing that people can't see the difference. I guess they are too afraid to break out of the paradigm they think is reality. Either that or they have no eye for detail.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Western2aaa.jpg
Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/IM15.jpg Faul/Bill
Wow, the Mullet has won me over. I totally believe it now. No fucking way would Paul be sad enough to grow a fucking mullet... LMAO
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:20 AM
The Beatles did immediately announce that they would not tour again in late 1966. A little odd to be so final about it...
It's like redman has never heard of doubles being used before. Maybe there were different "Paul McCartneys" for different things. Maybe the Faul that came directly after Paul didn't work out so well. It's also like redman has never heard of what lengths intell agencies will go to make a convincing double, including plastic surgery. I really can't fathom why he keeps claiming Faul looks exactly like Paul when he clearly doesn't. He also doesn't sing or perform just like Paul. Paul was cool & funny. Faul is kind of awkward & dorky. It's just astonishing that people can't see the difference. I guess they are too afraid to break out of the paradigm they think is reality. Either that or they have no eye for detail.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Western2aaa.jpg
Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/IM15.jpg Faul/Bill
I agree Faulcon - Did you ever hear of plastic surgery redman?
redman
29-09-2008, 02:24 AM
And in what way did it stand out from any other top base player of the day........... since you`re such an expert?
Try how melodic the bass lines were, the note picking, listen to the construction to the likes of When I am 64, which was wrote when Paul was 16, but Faul must of heard of this song and decided to record it himself. LMAO
Listen if you don't know why Paul was such a great musician then your the one who needs to do your research... the guy was a bass player who actually was a guitarist first and foremost and could of walked in any band as a guitarist, he was the most talented musician out of the beatles.
But this Faul guy was actually better than Paul... LMAO
redman
29-09-2008, 02:26 AM
I agree Faulcon - Did you ever hear of plastic surgery redman?
Plastic surgery for a mullet... cos thats the only difference I can see on those pics.. age and Mullet.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:27 AM
Plastic surgery for a mullet... cos thats the only difference I can see on those pics.. age and Mullet.
Try getting a good pair of glasses for yourself!
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 02:27 AM
Well, redman, we agree on something. Paul was a brilliant genius musician. Faul has never been able to match that.
Paul had the accident
Which accident? Do you mean the one where he broke a tooth, or the one that was staged to cover his murder?
And the mullet, well, Paul had much better taste & style than to wear a mullet, imo, but that was not the reason I posted those pictures. If you look carefully, you will see that the faces do not look the same.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/verynicerightprofile.jpg Paul
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/pid_on_magazine_p4aaa.jpg Faul
And Faul was a good bit older than Paul when he assumed Paul's persona.
redman
29-09-2008, 02:31 AM
The Beatles did immediately announce that they would not tour again in late 1966. A little odd to be so final about it...
It's like redman has never heard of doubles being used before. Maybe there were different "Paul McCartneys" for different things. Maybe the Faul that came directly after Paul didn't work out so well. It's also like redman has never heard of what lengths intell agencies will go to make a convincing double, including plastic surgery. I really can't fathom why he keeps claiming Faul looks exactly like Paul when he clearly doesn't. He also doesn't sing or perform just like Paul. Paul was cool & funny. Faul is kind of awkward & dorky. It's just astonishing that people can't see the difference. I guess they are too afraid to break out of the paradigm they think is reality. Either that or they have no eye for detail.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Western2aaa.jpg
Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/IM15.jpg Faul/Bill
When they get emotional is when you know that they are out of good arguments. You can only keep insisting that 2-3 obviously different people are the same for so long.
Wasn't odd at all, if you actually watch their gigs around that time it was a pointless exercise because they couldn't even hear themselves play never mind the crowd being able to hear them. And that for a band must be pretty fucking depressing situation to be in.
So they said they were going into the studio to concentrate on a new direction for them, which what countless bands have done through history. Drop touring cos it can get a bit repetitive and strenuous and go into the studio for a few years to start creating again... so it's only a bit odd in your mind. If you take their situation into consideration then it totally makes sense, only odd cos you think Paul McCartney died and was replaced.. LMAO
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:32 AM
Try how melodic the bass lines were, the note picking, listen to the construction to the likes of When I am 64, which was wrote when Paul was 16, but Faul must of heard of this song and decided to record it himself. LMAO
Listen if you don't know why Paul was such a great musician then your the one who needs to do your research... the guy was a bass player who actually was a guitarist first and foremost and could of walked in any band as a guitarist, he was the most talented musician out of the beatles.
But this Faul guy was actually better than Paul... LMAO
Redman I can`t believe I`ve wasted all this time here arguing with you when you believe Paul was the most talented musician. George Harrison was a much more accomplished guitarist and again, the bass is a simple instrument to pick up after playing the guitar!
As far as playing the piano goes, Billy`s yer man not Paul....... haha, so go back to fawking sleep would ya.....!
Oh and Ringo played the drums............... you remember Ringo, the guy you thought was "Billy Shears!"
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 02:35 AM
Thought that Billy Shears is Ringo's real name.
Remember this, so what`s your game ehhh.......? Beatles expert my ass!
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 02:38 AM
So they said they were going into the studio to concentrate on a new direction for them, ...
Yes, that what they said. Of course, we know that people never make up cover stories :-P I guess you believe everything you read & hear? Oh, well, you can rationalize it however you want.
Orb, redman can't go back to sleep b/c he's never woken up :-P
Oh, & here are some more photo comparisons.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/serious.jpg Paul
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/IMG_0122aaa.jpg Faul
Yeah, they look *exactly* the same. Whatever.
redman
29-09-2008, 02:38 AM
So Paul McCartney had plastic surgery. And.
Can you see there is still no clear cut evidence. I mean, showing these poxy little pics just doesn't do it for me. Considering what this theory is asking people to believe.
If it was the case that he died and was replaced, I happen to think there would be shit loads of evidence for it. And most definitley someone would of compared the voices and come up without a shadow of doubt that the voices were from totally different people.
So, that leaves me with all the stuff I have put on this thread to consider, and the fact the only evidence is those pics you keep posting and taking bits of lyics and one of you said " Apple corps sounds like A Paul Corpse " when said fast... I mean come on people, do you wonder why I am not jumping on to this theory and taking it seriously when you take a good long look at the evidence.
I seriously think some of you are looking at those pics and actually wanting to see changes, cos like I say there are no really big differences that stand out and say to me, thats two different people.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 02:41 AM
Originally Posted by redman
Thought that Billy Shears is Ringo's real name.
Get out! Redman did not think that Billy Shears was Ringo's real name, did he? Oh, that's embarassing!
Hey, redman, you've made it quite clear that you don't have the ability to see the difference. That's ok. I'm not posting the picture comparisons for your benefit, anyway.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/tryingonshirt.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/paul-8-7-98-4.jpg Faul
there are no really big differences that stand out and say to me, thats two different people.
That's hilarious! If there were "really big differences that stand out" he wouldn't be a very good double, now would he? Hmmm....? Of course, they look similar. That was the point!
redman
29-09-2008, 02:47 AM
Yes, that what they said. Of course, we know that people never make up cover stories :-P I guess you believe everything you read & hear? Oh, well, you can rationalize it however you want.
Orb, redman can't go back to sleep b/c he's never woken up :-P
Listen you are asking me to believe that John Lennon, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr all played along with this.
And whats so strange for a band who played infront of thousands of screaming people and it was documented they were definitley not happy with the fact that they could not hear themselves play never mind the people paying to come and see them been able to hear anything, so it was a bit of circus and all the Beatles had spoke up about this. And for a band that's a nightmare situation to be in because it's just pointless playing the gigs.
So you can look at it as a cover story or whatever you want, I just happen to know that bands make the same decision all the time when they have enough of touring because it does start getting on your tits after months sometimes years of doing the same routine, but the Beatles had a legitimate reason probably that no other band in history have had to endure and that was the crowds were that nuts and screaming their tits off and you have got to remember back then they were only playing with 50 watt amps... that is just surreal to think they actually went on stage playing to 50,000 people and they had 50 watt amps but were coming through some shitty stadium tanoid system.
But you can look at it as a cover story, fill ya boots
redman
29-09-2008, 02:50 AM
Get out! Redman did not think that Billy Shears was Ringo's real name, did he? Oh, that's embarassing!
Hey, redman, you've made it quite clear that you don't have the ability to see the difference. That's ok. I'm not posting the picture comparisons for your benefit, anyway.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/tryingonshirt.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/paul-8-7-98-4.jpg Faul
That's hilarious! If there were "really big differences that stand out" he wouldn't be a very good double, now would he? Hmmm....? Of course, they look similar. That was the point!
Still on that trip... also why is it embarrassing. I said that, but I also said it was a mistake, I meant to say they were referring to Ringo when they said Billy Shears.
Tell ya whats more embarrassing, you thinking that they are referring to some bloke that they got from a look a like competition that happened to replace a dead Paul Mccartney.. Now that is embarrassing.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 02:58 AM
Listen you are asking me to believe that John Lennon, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr all played along with this.
Don't you think Paul's murder would have been a great warning to anyone who dared to step out of line? Yes, the others went along w/ the Paul replacement for whatever reason. I don't think they were happy about it, though.
As far as the Beatles playing live, yes, it must have been dreadful to have all those screaming, adoring fans. It must have really sucked for them :-P
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/pj_serious.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulagain.jpg Faul
And who said they got Faul from a look-a-like contest? I'm sure TPTB have their own "talent."
It is one thing to not notice someone is replaced, but to not see it when it is pointed out to you is quite another story...
redman
29-09-2008, 03:02 AM
Yes, that what they said. Of course, we know that people never make up cover stories :-P I guess you believe everything you read & hear? Oh, well, you can rationalize it however you want.
Orb, redman can't go back to sleep b/c he's never woken up :-P
Oh, & here are some more photo comparisons.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/serious.jpg Paul
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/IMG_0122aaa.jpg Faul
Yeah, they look *exactly* the same. Whatever.
I have seen John Lennon explain exactly why they went into the studio, and it makes total sense.
But no, John Lennon was lying and he was covering up the fact that Paul had died and been replaced by someone they got from a look a like competition.
I think I'm done with trying to make you see sense, cos I just know that it ain't going to happen.
Have fun people. I seriously mean that. I know I come across like a right twat, but thats just the way I speak and type. I don't mean to offend.
Night peeps... :cool:
redman
29-09-2008, 03:03 AM
Don't you think Paul's murder would have been a great warning to anyone who dared to step out of line? Yes, the others went along w/ the Paul replacement for whatever reason. I don't think they were happy about it, though.
As far as the Beatles playing live, yes, it must have been dreadful to have all those screaming, adoring fans. It must have really sucked for them :-P
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/pj_serious.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulagain.jpg Faul
And who said they got Faul from a look-a-like contest? I'm sure TPTB have their own "talent."
It is one thing to not notice someone is replaced, but to not see it when it is pointed out to you is quite another story...
One of you said that.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 03:04 AM
Still on that trip... also why is it embarrassing. I said that, but I also said it was a mistake, I meant to say they were referring to Ringo when they said Billy Shears.
Tell ya whats more embarrassing, you thinking that they are referring to some bloke that they got from a look a like competition that happened to replace a dead Paul Mccartney.. Now that is embarrassing.
I`ll tell you what`s even more embarrassing than that redman - you believing I think he was picked in a lookalike contest and that this whole story is based on the measuring of earlobes!
And worse still, you believing that Billy Shears was Ringos real name............ohhh and you`re still here all this time :o :o :D
redman
29-09-2008, 03:05 AM
Don't you think Paul's murder would have been a great warning to anyone who dared to step out of line? Yes, the others went along w/ the Paul replacement for whatever reason. I don't think they were happy about it, though.
As far as the Beatles playing live, yes, it must have been dreadful to have all those screaming, adoring fans. It must have really sucked for them :-P
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/pj_serious.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulagain.jpg Faul
And who said they got Faul from a look-a-like contest? I'm sure TPTB have their own "talent."
It is one thing to not notice someone is replaced, but to not see it when it is pointed out to you is quite another story...
Well that warning didn't work on Lennon considering what he went on to do after the Beatles.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 03:07 AM
One of you said that.
Oh dear redman............... looks like you`ve dug yourslf another big hole - here..... have another spade, I think allures finished with his :D :p
redman
29-09-2008, 03:11 AM
I`ll tell you what`s even more embarrassing than that redman - you believing I think he was picked in a lookalike contest and that this whole story is based on the measuring of earlobes!
And worse still, you believing that Billy Shears was Ringos real name............ohhh and you`re still here all this time :o :o :D
Hey I fucking read that on one of those shit Faul sites... so don't blame me that this theory is so fucking pathetic. LOL
And like I say, until you come up with more proof then this will have to go down as nigh on the worst conspiracy theory on the net.
I said " I thought Billy Shears was Ringo's real name ", then I said " Oh yeah, my mistake, they were referring to Ringo ".. If you find that embarrassing for me, then that's erm, good for you. :confused:
But believe me I am more embarrassed for you believing this crock of shit. And actually thinking they are referring to the person that replaced the dead Paul Mccartney.... Lets put it that way.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 03:12 AM
But no, John Lennon was lying and he was covering up the fact that Paul had died and been replaced by someone they got from a look a like competition.
Well, except for the lookalike competition, that must have been what happened. Paul was, in fact, replaced. I think John did drop a lot of hints about what happened. I don't think he could just come out & say what happened w/o getting into trouble...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/paultoothyaa.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/pid_on_magazine_p.jpg Faul
Doesn't everyone know that Ringo's real name is Richard Starkey? Who is this redman claiming to be knowledgeable about the Beatles?
redman
29-09-2008, 03:13 AM
Oh dear redman............... looks like you`ve dug yourslf another big hole - here..... have another spade, I think allures finished with his :D :p
Erm.. I seriously have lost you here.
Are you trying to say that this conspiracy does not consist of the replacement of Paul being found at a look a like competition ??
Cos one of the Faul sites says thats what happened.
I will try and find it.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 03:16 AM
one of the Faul sites says thats what happened.
Just b/c one of the Faul sites said that doesn't mean that's what happened.
redman
29-09-2008, 03:18 AM
I`ll tell you what`s even more embarrassing than that redman - you believing I think he was picked in a lookalike contest :o :o :D
http://www.christiewalsh.com/fun/beatles/paulisdead.php
According to the story, Paul was supposedly killed in a car crash. At five AM on a Wednesday morning in November, 1966, he drove his car and took his eyes off the road to look at a meter maid. He didn't see the lights change, and the car crashed. The car burst into flames and crowds of people gathered around the site of the accident. The person inside was badly mangled and hard to identify. He suffered severe head injuries and his teeth were knocked out, so he couldn't be identified by dental records. All they knew was that he was a young man with dark hair.
Shortly after the crash, a Paul McCartney look alike contest was held. The winner was William Campbell, who was chosen to replace Paul. He underwent plastic surgery and filled in for him. Then, they began putting clues into their songs to tell their fans of Paul's death...
This is off the is Paul dead Site. http://www.ispauldead.com/
According to believers, that this is not a Paul is dead hoax,
McCartney was replaced with the winner of a Paul McCartney look-alike
contest. The name of this look-alike has been recorded as William
Shears Campbell, Billy Shears (the name of the fictitious leader of
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band), William Sheppard (based on the
inspiration for the song "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill"), or
some combination of the names.
http://my.opera.com/Hot%20Rod/blog/2008/05/05/paul-mccartney-dead-or-alive
Finding a look-a-like was difficult, but was possible under the guise of an innocent looking 'Paul Look-a-like' competition that was judged by people who were unaware of the overall seriousness of their task. The eventual winner of the competition was a person called William Campbell, and just after he had won reports of his mysterious disappearance began appearing on local news. William Campbell lived in Ontario, Canada and worked for the Ontario Provincial Police. He had disappeared because he was no longer William Campbell - he was Paul McCartney.
http://everything2.com/node/48055
Then, in the winter of 1966, a "Paul look-a-like" contest was held by the Beatles in Canada, and although thousands entered, no winner was ever announced. But there was a winner, William Campbell, a Scot, who was paid an exorbitant amount of money to play Paul. Campbell was never heard from again, and so the story goes that the "stand-in" had been playing Paul since 1966 and that since then the other Beatles had placed various clues onto Beatles records and sleeves, to break the news gently to their fans. The "clues" are of two kinds; those actually recorded on their records and those depicted on the album sleeves.
http://beatlesnumber9.com/dead.html
Paul's stand-in was a man named William Campbell, who had won a Paul McCartney look-alike contest. With a little plastic surgery, William Campbell had taken Paul's place in photos of the group. The surgery had been successful except for a small scar above his lip
redman
29-09-2008, 03:24 AM
.
Just b/c one of the Faul sites said that doesn't mean that's what happened.
Well you ask people to research the fucking thing, so I did and it wasn't just one site, it's many sites that report that this is what happened.
So what your asking me to believe is what your take is on it. And then you try and ridicule me because I repeat something that this fucking god awful Theory has cooked up.
So if you had never heard of this happening, may be your the one who needs to do the fucking research.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 03:26 AM
Hey I fucking read that on one of those shit Faul sites... so don't blame me that this theory is so fucking pathetic. LOL
And like I say, until you come up with more proof then this will have to go down as nigh on the worst conspiracy theory on the net.
I said " I thought Billy Shears was Ringo's real name ", then I said " Oh yeah, my mistake, they were referring to Ringo ".. If you find that embarrassing for me, then that's erm, good for you. :confused:
But believe me I am more embarrassed for you believing this crock of shit. And actually thinking they are referring to the person that replaced the dead Paul Mccartney.... Lets put it that way.
You lie an awful lot redman.................. you made the statement that you thought Billy Shears was Ringos real name on 8/7/2008. You didn`t make another post on this thread until 29/8/2008 - and you never even mentioned YOUR LITTLE MISTAKE - how convenient!
Now you`re quoting garbage from websites and saying how we PIDers all believe it..... as it`s on a PID site - what a load of absolute tosh!
Redman if you ever start up a band can I be in it..... because I think you`re completely full of shit regarding music and what you know (or think you know). You don`t know you`re arse from your elbow when it comes to the Beatles do you.......??
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 03:33 AM
Well you ask people to research the fucking thing, so I did and it wasn't just one site, it's many sites that report that this is what happened.
So what your asking me to believe is what your take is on it. And then you try and ridicule me because I repeat something that this fucking god awful Theory has cooked up.
So if you had never heard of this happening, may be your the one who needs to do the fucking research.
Your level of research is specific to you and you alone, and by the looks of it you don`t know what proper research is - you`ve added NOTHING to this topic only wasted your time, others time and mine too!
If I thought it would do you any good it would be something, but you`re that bloody thick that you`re still spouting the same old rubbish! You have to be right, isn`t that it - that`s so important to you!............ well your wrong, you`re so wrong it isn`t even funny, I actually pity you, I really do man!
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 03:35 AM
There may or may not have been a look-a-like contest, & that may or may not have been where Faul/Bill was found. I rather doubt it. I think TPTB have their own resources. I do think at least one Faul was William Campbell from Ontario.
I also don't believe there was a car crash. I think Paul was murdered & the car crash was staged. It's just one level of disinformation.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/paulringoear.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/paul68.jpg Faul
redman
29-09-2008, 03:35 AM
You lie an awful lot redman.................. you made the statement that you thought Billy Shears was Ringos real name on 8/7/2008. You didn`t make another post on this thread until 29/8/2008 - and you never even mentioned YOUR LITTLE MISTAKE - how convenient!
Now you`re quoting garbage from websites and saying how we PIDers all believe it..... as it`s on a PID site - what a load of absolute tosh!
Redman if you ever start up a band can I be in it..... because I think you`re completely full of shit regarding music and what you know (or think you know). You don`t know you`re arse from your elbow when it comes to the Beatles do you.......??
Why are you getting angry ??
Is it because this theory does consist of the pathetic notion that the replacement was found in a look a like competition and I was right to pick up on it and rip it to peices.
HA HA HA, This theory sucks ass and you can not produce one scrap of evidence to prove me wrong. HA HA.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 03:40 AM
Why are you getting angry ??
Is it because this theory does consist of the pathetic notion that the replacement was found in a look a like competition and I was right to pick up on it and rip it to peices.
HA HA HA, This theory sucks ass and you can not produce one scrap of evidence to prove me wrong. HA HA.
I`m not here to prove a nutter like you wrong - you`ve been found out enough times as it is! What evidence could possibly satisfy you.... ehh? You`re not after evidence - you wouldn`t know good evidence if it jumped up and bit you on the nose!
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 03:42 AM
Is it because this theory does consist of the pathetic notion that the replacement was found in a look a like competition and I was right to pick up on it and rip it to peices.
Yeah, b/c we know doubles & replacements don't exist. Whatever. And I fail to see how you've ripped this notion to "peices" (sic). All you keep hammering is that Paul wasn't replaced & that this is a stupid theory. I don't see you adding anything, & you certainly haven't presented any evidence.
HA HA HA, This theory sucks ass and you can not produce one scrap of evidence to prove me wrong. HA HA
It is apparent you have no idea what "evidence" is. Photos are evidence, as are signature comparisons, videos, sonagrams, etc. Please, if you don't know what may constitute evidence, please see the Federal Rules of Evidence, or the rules of evidence for your state (if you live in USA).
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/OnlyBeatles/hand_comparison.jpg
What evidence could possibly satisfy you.... ehh?
I think redman needs Faul to wear a sign that he's not Paul :-P
Isn't it funny how people who claim this theory has no merit spend so much time trying to refute it? A little odd...
redman
29-09-2008, 03:47 AM
Tell ya what good evidence would be.
Someone actually recording themselves comparing the voices and actually showing the evidence that they are two different voices.
Because the physical evidence of the photographs is not enough for me to believe and not enough for many other to believe either.
So like I keep on saying, the only way for this theory to be taken serious is for the voices to be compared, which would leave no doubt.
Until then, this theory is complete and utter horse dung on the evidence you two dweebs are producing.
Have a nice life fucko's. :cool:
notthisshitagain
29-09-2008, 03:49 AM
This thread is starting to smell like the Rant Room... :p
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 03:50 AM
Ah, redman, I guess you are out of ideas to debunk us. As I've already posted, there were sonagrams done by a Dr. Truby. He found that there were 3 different "Pauls."
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/sbscomparison28zr.gif
Paul on left, & the 2nd Faul on the right (different from the Sgt Pepper Faul).
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 03:50 AM
Tell ya what good evidence would be.
Someone actually recording themselves comparing the voices and actually showing the evidence that they are two different voices.
Because the physical evidence of the photographs is not enough for me to believe and not enough for many other to believe either.
So like I keep on saying, the only way for this theory to be taken serious is for the voices to be compared, which would leave no doubt.
Until then, this theory is complete and utter horse dung on the evidence you two dweebs are producing.
Have a nice life fucko's. :cool:
The brainless one has spoken.................oooomm!!! :D
Here.............. and take your fawking sheep with you!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fht4iULu0w8
redman
29-09-2008, 03:51 AM
Yeah, b/c we know doubles & replacements don't exist. Whatever. And I fail to see how you've ripped this notion to "peices" (sic). All you keep hammering is that Paul wasn't replaced & that this is a stupid theory. I don't see you adding anything, & you certainly haven't presented any evidence.
It is apparent you have no idea what "evidence" is. Photos are evidence, as are signature comparisons, videos, sonagrams, etc. Please, if you don't know what may constitute evidence, please see the Federal Rules of Evidence, or the rules of evidence for your state (if you live in USA).
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/OnlyBeatles/hand_comparison.jpg
I think redman needs Faul to wear a sign that he's not Paul :-P
Isn't it funny how people who claim this theory has no merit spend so much time trying to refute it? A little odd...
Everything is odd to you. May be It's that I am a secret agent that doesn't want the truth to get out and is trying infiltrate the theory. :eek:
But then again, I might be some douch bored as fuck in work, waiting until 6 olcock so I can get the fuck out of here.
YOU DECIDE.... HA HA HA
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 03:52 AM
You know what is odd to me? That someone on the David Icke forum can't fathom that a rockstar might be replaced.
redman
29-09-2008, 03:56 AM
The brainless one has spoken.................oooomm!!! :D
Here.............. and take your fawking sheep with you!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fht4iULu0w8
Ya see this is the problem with this theory... I bring up serious points and you dismiss them the same way you were trying to dismiss the point I was making about Paul supposedly being found in a look a like competition.
You have nothing to come back with when I am actually speaking seriously.
Was it you that said " well do you believe that 911 was a inside job, so if you can believe that can be possible then replacing someone would be easy ".
Thing is, there is a mountain of evidence produced by credible people that supports that theory.
The only thing this theory has to support it is you two fuck wits posting pics that don't prove shit. LOL
Thats why this theory is a complete and utter joke. And you get angry when I express this because deep down you really want to produce evidence that is credible but can't. Must be frustrating for ya. LMAO
redman
29-09-2008, 03:59 AM
You know what is odd to me? That someone on the David Icke forum can't fathom that a rockstar might be replaced.
Well the fact that I am on the David Icke website should also tell you that I don't fall for bull shit.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 03:59 AM
Everything is odd to you. May be It's that I am a secret agent that doesn't want the truth to get out and is trying infiltrate the theory. :eek:
But then again, I might be some douch bored as fuck in work, waiting until 6 olcock so I can get the fuck out of here.
YOU DECIDE.... HA HA HA
Yeah me too......... only I`m getting off at at 4.15....... I don`t have any evidence of that fact so believe it if you like ;)
redman
29-09-2008, 04:00 AM
I`m not here to prove a nutter like you wrong - you`ve been found out enough times as it is! What evidence could possibly satisfy you.... ehh? You`re not after evidence - you wouldn`t know good evidence if it jumped up and bit you on the nose!
Yeah I am the nutter for not believing that Paul Mccartney died and was replaced on absolutley no credible evidence.
I think you may find that it just may be you thats a bit... nutty. LMAO
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 04:03 AM
"Paul" says he has to pluck up the courage to play w/out a band behind him.
Paul McCartney - Oakland 02-04-2002 Rehearsal - YouTube
It's almost as though he never played "Yesterday" on stage alone - oh, wait, he didn't. That was James Paul McCartney - & he really didn't seem terrified:
yesterday - YouTube
absolutley no credible evidence
Oh, do look up the definition of "evidence," will you? You just make yourself look even more ignorant by going on claiming that we haven't presented "evidence."
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/beauty2.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v145/Kissmekatie/Bill__left_profile.jpg Faul
Well the fact that I am on the David Icke website should also tell you that I don't fall for bull shit.
And yet, you have obviously had the wool pulled over your eyes w/ respect to Paul McCartney.
Great photo comparisons on these last 2 pages of the two DIFFERENT men - one is the real Paul McCartney, the other is his replacement.
Similar looks - SURPRISE!! ....He's SUPPOSED to look very similar to the real deal! He is NOT the real deal. They couldn't make him IDENTICAL but they did as good as they could. The replacement had to be talented and similar in stature (but seems to be a 2 inch difference in height) and have a voice that could be trained to emulate the real Paul. Also, they had to take them out of public view and give a darn good reason for doing so. Oh! change everyone's appearance - hair change, clothes different, oh yeah! mustaches! And I thought the mustaches really helped disguise the differences, but not everything could be hidden - as has been brought in earlier posts.
No need for me to repeat every other thing that's been stated here.
AND, I thought the extreme sadness in George and John after the replacement came on board was so noticeable. It was sadness so deep in some photographs, it was absolutely like they had lost someone very dear and close to them...... and they had.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 04:10 AM
The way the other Beatles interacted w/ Faux Paul was a lot different from how they had interacted w/ Paul. BTW, "Faux Paul" was what John called the new Paul. I always thought that was weird until I figured out PID/PWR.
orbandsceptre27
29-09-2008, 04:10 AM
Ya see this is the problem with this theory... I bring up serious points and you dismiss them the same way you were trying to dismiss the point I was making about Paul supposedly being found in a look a like competition.
You have nothing to come back with when I am actually speaking seriously.
Was it you that said " well do you believe that 911 was a inside job, so if you can believe that can be possible then replacing someone would be easy ".
Thing is, there is a mountain of evidence produced by credible people that supports that theory.
The only thing this theory has to support it is you two fuck wits posting pics that don't prove shit. LOL
Thats why this theory is a complete and utter joke. And you get angry when I express this because deep down you really want to produce evidence that is credible but can't. Must be frustrating for ya. LMAO
Redman
- you`re a liar (as I`ve already shown)
- you know very little about music
- you know very little about the Beatles
- you know very little about the bass guitar
- you`ve brought nothing to this thread only negativity
- you`re a lazy reseacher
Congratulations, you`re still an ass - night night everyone!
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 04:15 AM
Ya see this is the problem with this theory... I bring up serious points and you dismiss them ...
That's a logical fallacy. The problem isn't w/ the theory. You claim the problem is w/ our attitude towards your points, but that has nothing to do w/ the merit of the theory.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v145/Kissmekatie/b003.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v145/Kissmekatie/Faul_right_profile.gif Faul
- you know very little about the Beatles
I think being knowledgeable about the Beatles definitely helps in spotting the difference btw Paul & Faul more quickly.
redman
29-09-2008, 04:32 AM
Redman
- you`re a liar (as I`ve already shown)
- you know very little about music
- you know very little about the Beatles
- you know very little about the bass guitar
- you`ve brought nothing to this thread only negativity
- you`re a lazy reseacher
Congratulations, you`re still an ass - night night everyone!
Right about the one I highlighted, couldn't be further from the truth on the others.
And the fact that I do know about those things winds you up because I have brought up some very good points.
Points that make me think that it would be impossible to pull off what you are trying to say they pulled off.
Sorry but I have tried and I have researched, but the evidence does not hold up on this one. Giz a shout if there are any significant findings or credible evidence that supports the theory, until then I ain't going to believe it, but I am interested.
So PM me if anything comes up.
Later Fucko's. :cool:
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 04:44 AM
I have brought up some very good points.
Oh, yeah, redman? Such as? Oh, please enlighten us as to why this theory is "impossible." I suppose replacing a rockstar is soooo much harder than assassinating heads of state or pulling down the WTC. Whatever.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/profiles.jpg
http://www.stevesbeatles.com/pictures/images/paul/paul_all_you_need_is_love.jpg Effeminate Faul
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/beatq51.jpg Manly Paul
peachped
29-09-2008, 04:52 AM
Effeminate paul and manly paul ha ha ha! :D
He is sat differently because he is sat on different chairs. :D:D
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 04:54 AM
He is sat (sic) differently because he is sat (sic) on different chairs
And because they were different guys w/ different mannerisms.
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/mccartney_large.jpg Paul
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/lovely_group_shot.jpg Faul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/paulnakedtorsopossiblyaltered.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/chains25.jpg Faul (did I say effeminate? :-P)
toty1994
29-09-2008, 11:49 AM
One of the problems with 'pid' is that when you do look into it with an open mind you're confronted by theories that are enourmously muddled and contradictory. Also, if you delve deeper you soon discover that at least some of the pictorial and video evidence has been deliberately manipulated. Iamaphoney is particularly guilty of the latter.
If you peruse the three main forums that are dedicated to researching 'pid' you will find, for instance, that Paul may have been replaced by (to name but some) William Campbell, Bill Shepherd, Phil Ackrill, Denny Laine, Neil Aspinall, Dino Danelli, a Star Trek actor who's name I forget and, most bizzarley of all an old lady called Pearl Witherington!
The whole thing is a bit of a mess. However open your mind is, it is still very hard to take 'pid' seriously once you've spent much time on those forums.
shansuke
29-09-2008, 12:50 PM
heres another replacment for you all. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ANZjwchcY8Q&feature=related lol.
redman
29-09-2008, 05:21 PM
Oh, yeah, redman? Such as? Oh, please enlighten us as to why this theory is "impossible." I suppose replacing a rockstar is soooo much harder than assassinating heads of state or pulling down the WTC. Whatever.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/profiles.jpg
http://www.stevesbeatles.com/pictures/images/paul/paul_all_you_need_is_love.jpg Effeminate Faul
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/beatq51.jpg Manly Paul
The thing is, bringing the WTC down has got copious amounts of credible evidence to back up the claims that there was something very dodgy going on and there is also a big fat motive staring you in the face.
PID on the other hand, has got neither.
So the fact that there is no motive whats so ever, and no evidence to back up your claims. It sort of makes this theory become a bit of a joke.
But if it makes ya happy, then fill ya boots.
If you come up with better evidence I will take this theory a lot more seriously, until then I will have to go with my logic and intuition. Sorry if that upsets you.
redman
29-09-2008, 05:23 PM
One of the problems with 'pid' is that when you do look into it with an open mind you're confronted by theories that are enourmously muddled and contradictory. Also, if you delve deeper you soon discover that at least some of the pictorial and video evidence has been deliberately manipulated. Iamaphoney is particularly guilty of the latter.
If you peruse the three main forums that are dedicated to researching 'pid' you will find, for instance, that Paul may have been replaced by (to name but some) William Campbell, Bill Shepherd, Phil Ackrill, Denny Laine, Neil Aspinall, Dino Danelli, a Star Trek actor who's name I forget and, most bizzarley of all an old lady called Pearl Witherington!
The whole thing is a bit of a mess. However open your mind is, it is still very hard to take 'pid' seriously once you've spent much time on those forums.
Yeah like they found Faul from doing a look a like competition, but then I get ridiculed for stating this but it's actually part of the conspiracy. LMAO
redman
29-09-2008, 05:25 PM
heres another replacment for you all. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ANZjwchcY8Q&feature=related lol.
Sir Falex at his best... LMAO
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 05:29 PM
One of the problems with 'pid' is that when you do look into it with an open mind you're confronted by theories that are enourmously muddled and contradictory.
Yes, of course. There are people who are honestly trying to figure out what happened to Paul, & there are people who are deliberately trying to lead people away from the Truth. There are some pretty outlandish theories out there.
Also, if you delve deeper you soon discover that at least some of the pictorial and video evidence has been deliberately manipulated. Iamaphoney is particularly guilty of the latter.
I agree about the manipulation. It seems TPTB are trying to make Paul & Faul look more alike. I don't agree about IAAP.
If you peruse the three main forums that are dedicated to researching 'pid' you will find, for instance, that Paul may have been replaced by (to name but some) William Campbell, Bill Shepherd, Phil Ackrill, Denny Laine, Neil Aspinall, Dino Danelli, a Star Trek actor who's name I forget and, most bizzarley of all an old lady called Pearl Witherington!
More than one person may have "played" Paul McCartney. I personally think William Campbell is one of the replacements.
The whole thing is a bit of a mess. However open your mind is, it is still very hard to take 'pid' seriously once you've spent much time on those forums.
Well, I don't know why that is. All you have to do is look at pictures to see that PWR. Coming up w/ the correct theory to explain what happened to him is a lot harder than seeing that there are (at least) 2 "Paul McCartneys."
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/backyard.jpg Paul
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/pid_on_magazine_p05aaa.jpg Faul
toty1994
29-09-2008, 06:32 PM
There are people who are honestly trying to figure out what happened to Paul, & there are people who are deliberately trying to lead people away from the Truth. There are some pretty outlandish theories out there.
All you have to do is look at pictures to see that PWR. Coming up w/ the correct theory to explain what happened to him is a lot harder than seeing that there are (at least) 2 "Paul McCartneys."
Ok, so are you saying that all the really outlandish theories are put forward by 'disinfo agents' of some kind? This tag always seems to crop up when discussing the apparently 'crazier' elements of any conspiracy theory. How do you know the people who say Paul was played by an old lady or the Star Trek actor are not as sincere in their beliefs as you?
I can only speak for myself, but after looking at lots of pics and videos I still see only natural and normal explainations for any change in Paul's appearance. I mean, there are photos of me taken only months apart in which I look like two entirely different people so I doubt it's uncommon. As for things like 'Faul' being taller etc, I've seen all that stuff (for me at least) compellingly debunked a few times.
Oh well, that's how I see all this anyway, and I regard myself 'open-minded'.
As a matter of interest, where do you see all this heading?
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 08:34 PM
It's not just photos, but videos, voice, song-writing ability/style, etc. Fair enough if you don't see the difference. Not everyone can, for some reason.
There are some people who have a vested interest in keeping the PIA theory alive. How much is Faul worth? Billions of dollars? There are definitely disinfo agents on the PID scene & on the Icke forum, but I don't claim to know exactly who they are, so I'm not pointing fingers.
Where this is heading... Well, I hope it will lead to justice for Paul (not in a legal sense) & to a greater understanding of how TPTB operate. For some reason, the idea that a rockstar could be replaced is met w/ a lot of resistance - even from saavy conspiracy theorists on the David Icke forum. I guess it's too upsetting to either realize how pervasive TPTB are in our lives or that one has had the wool pulled over one's eyes for so long.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/cheers2.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/press_conf3.jpg Faul
redman
29-09-2008, 09:31 PM
It's not just photos, but videos, voice, song-writing ability/style, etc. Fair enough if you don't see the difference. Not everyone can, for some reason.
There are some people who have a vested interest in keeping the PIA theory alive. How much is Faul worth? Billions of dollars? There are definitely disinfo agents on the PID scene & on the Icke forum, but I don't claim to know exactly who they are, so I'm not pointing fingers.
Where this is heading... Well, I hope it will lead to justice for Paul (not in a legal sense) & to a greater understanding of how TPTB operate. For some reason, the idea that a rockstar could be replaced is met w/ a lot of resistance - even from saavy conspiracy theorists on the David Icke forum. I guess it's too upsetting to either realize how pervasive TPTB are in our lives or that one has had the wool pulled over one's eyes for so long.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/cheers2.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/press_conf3.jpg Faul
Paul's not dead, now jog on.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 09:53 PM
There are plenty of people knowledgeable about PID/PWR who dispute Paul's ultimate fate. It is beyond dispute that he was replaced, however.
And I am having too much fun to "jog on." I will discuss Paul as long as people keep these threads alive. Thanks for your participation. This is great!
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/lilis678/DB1005_BEATLES_6.jpg Paul
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/lilis678/Faulagain-1.jpg Faul
redman
29-09-2008, 09:55 PM
There are plenty of people knowledgeable about PID/PWR who dispute Paul's ultimate fate. It is beyond dispute that he was replaced, however.
And I am having too much fun to "jog on." I will discuss Paul as long as people keep these threads alive.
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/lilis678/DB1005_BEATLES_6.jpg Paul
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/lilis678/Faulagain-1.jpg Faul
Ever thought about doing something more constructive ??
Just a thought.
faulconandsnowjob
29-09-2008, 10:19 PM
Hey, redman, you're the one who keeps posting to a thread about a theory you think has no merit. Maybe you should spend your time on another thread?
Anyway, I'm starting to get curious as to why you can't see the difference. What do you attribute that to? Is it that you don't want it to be true about Paul (who does?), that you believe the mainstream media that Paul is Faul, & can't accept that they might lie to you, or is it that you have no eye for detail? I'm really genuinely curious about that.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Paul2.jpg Paul
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/paulmc1.jpg Faul
redman
29-09-2008, 10:36 PM
This is were you are well off... So you are saying that Paul's composing abililty got worse after 1966... Sorry, but you are wrong. Paul did some of his best work after 66, Sgt peppers, practically wrote most of Abbey Road and Let it be and his musicianship was class on all, were he played bass, guitar and piano.
So actually let the truth be known, Paul actually improved song writing wise and musicianship wise after 1966.
Are you seriously telling me this person that they managed to find in a look a like competition who could pull of his accent to a tee, speak with exactly the same voice to were no one could prove it using voice recognition software ( which is impossible ), Looked exactly like him to were there are video's showing you that their bone structures were exactly the same, play all the instruments that Paul could and actually ended up surpassing Paul MCcartney's musicianship abilitys, the same bloke could go and do interviews, chat shows, perform infront of millions of people and just take it in his stride as if it's fuck all. Then even better you expect me to believe that this replacement took a camera crew into a pub were all his family and friends are and he could remember all their names, speak about the good old times, sit there with his dad, and you think that they were all in on it and if they came out and spoke about it they would be murdered.
HA HA HA HA... What the fuck have you been sniffing. LMFAO. :D:D
Read that Faul freaks and then shut the fuck up for fuck sake.
End of thread. LMAO :D
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 12:04 AM
End of thread.
Yeah, I don't think so. But I like how you try to dictate what other people can post on this forum.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/paul8ak9.jpg Paul
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/pm9kz7xy4.jpg Faul
redman
30-09-2008, 12:09 AM
Yeah, I don't think so. But I like how you try to dictate what other people can post on this forum.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/paul8ak9.jpg Paul
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/pm9kz7xy4.jpg Faul
I'm not trying to dictate shit... It was a joke... ya know HA HA.
Not my problem you spend ya time posting pics of Paul Mccartney and have somewhere along the line lost your sense of humour.
Any road, this theory is the worst conspiracy theory EVER, even worse than the one about the nun with 6 tits found on the moon. LMAO
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 12:17 AM
I'm not trying to dictate shit... It was a joke... ya know HA HA.
Oh, yeah that was hilarious. Have you ever tried stand-up. Give me a break.
Not my problem you spend ya time posting pics of Paul Mccartney and have somewhere along the line lost your sense of humour.
Ok, Kettle, b/c you're not spending "ya" (sic) posting on a PM thread. At least I am posting something that adds to the discussion. You have not added anything constructive or useful that has added anything but curse words, as far as I can tell.
Any road, this theory is the worst conspiracy theory EVER, even worse than the one about the nun with 6 tits found on the moon. LMAO
I think you are just having problems refuting it & are getting frustrated. Oh, & here are some more picture comparisons. I got tons of them.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/JPSP1.jpg Paul on left, Faul on right
redman
30-09-2008, 12:22 AM
Oh, yeah that was hilarious. Have you ever tried stand-up. Give me a break.
Ok, Kettle, b/c you're not spending "ya" (sic) posting on a PM thread. At least I am posting something that adds to the discussion. You have not added anything constructive or useful that has added anything but curse words, as far as I can tell.
I think you are just having problems refuting it & are getting frustrated. Oh, & here are some more picture comparisons. I got tons of them.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/JPSP1.jpg Paul on left, Faul on right
I like posting on this thead, it's funny. A bit like the whole theory really. Just funny, not to be taken seriously. Just a bit of harmless fun.
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 12:27 AM
Oh, now the thread is "funny." Well, I guess we have a different take on what is "funny." I don't think it's funny at all that a person was murdered & replaced. I think it was horrible. It was wrong what happened to Paul, & it's wrong that the public has been lied to about it for so long.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Beatle_Paul_cover.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/67y_coat.jpg Faul
redman
30-09-2008, 12:32 AM
Oh, now the thread is "funny." Well, I guess we have a different take on what is "funny." I don't think it's funny at all that a person was murdered & replaced. I think it was horrible. It was wrong what happened to Paul, & it's wrong that the public has been lied to about it for so long.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Beatle_Paul_cover.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/67y_coat.jpg Faul
So what evidence really makes you think that this happened. I mean what is the best evidence that you have seen ??
Serious question, no fucking about.
Show us a piece of evidence that makes you think without a doubt that he was murdered and replaced.
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 01:44 AM
The evidence shows that Paul was replaced. All the photos, signature comparisons, vocal comparisons, etc, establish that. It was enough for me to compare some photos & watch some videos. It was pretty devastating, but it's the Truth, & I'd rather know the Truth, even if it's tough, than to live in blissful ignorance.
As far as Paul being murdered goes, I have come to that conclusion based on what I know about TPTB, the Tavistock Institute, intell agencies, etc. IMO, the scenario that Paul was killed by TPTB best explains why the other Beatles (& Faul) denied PID/PWR, yet took great pains to reveal it in hidden codes & messages in their songs & album covers. It explains why friends & family went along, why the media has continually promoted Faul as being Paul, why photos & videos have been manipulated, etc.
Some things that I found particularly compelling were
PID sites
http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/
http://homepages.tesco.net/harbfamily/opd/other.html
Bettina Krischbin alleged that "Paul" had sent a double to give blood when her mother commenced a paternity suit against him.
http://invanddis.proboards29.com/index.cgi?board=TAR&action=display&thread=4958
Dr. Henry M. Truby of the University of Miami used samples from three Beatles songs sung by Paul McCartney ("Yesterday," "Penny Lane," and "Hey Jude") and produced three very different sonagrams. Does that mean that there were three McCartneys? "I'm not prepared to say that this is the final word," Truby told Rolling Stone Magazine, "but it's a beginning." (Reeve, Andru J., Turn Me On, Dead Man: The Complete Story of the Paul McCartney Death Hoax, Ann Arbor: Popular Culture, Ink, 1994: 69)
Signature comparisons:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/paul/mccartney2.html
http://members.cruzio.com/~bbarrow/fab4.html
Video comparisons:
Paul McCartney Interviewed By David Frost - YouTube (Paul)
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. (Faul)
And of course, photo comparisons:
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/250038082-4.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/pid_on_magazine_p2.jpg Faul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/paul_faul.jpg
And info about Tavistock Institute:
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/beatles_mind_control.htm
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock03.htm
redman
30-09-2008, 02:13 AM
The evidence shows that Paul was replaced. All the photos, signature comparisons, vocal comparisons, etc, establish that. It was enough for me to compare some photos & watch some videos. It was pretty devastating, but it's the Truth, & I'd rather know the Truth, even if it's tough, than to live in blissful ignorance.
As far as Paul being murdered goes, I have come to that conclusion based on what I know about TPTB, the Tavistock Institute, intell agencies, etc. IMO, the scenario that Paul was killed by TPTB best explains why the other Beatles (& Faul) denied PID/PWR, yet took great pains to reveal it in hidden codes & messages in their songs & album covers. It explains why friends & family went along, why the media has continually promoted Faul as being Paul, why photos & videos have been manipulated, etc.
Some things that I found particularly compelling were
PID sites
http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/
http://homepages.tesco.net/harbfamily/opd/other.html
Bettina Krischbin alleged that "Paul" had sent a double to give blood when her mother commenced a paternity suit against him.
http://invanddis.proboards29.com/index.cgi?board=TAR&action=display&thread=4958
Dr. Henry M. Truby of the University of Miami used samples from three Beatles songs sung by Paul McCartney ("Yesterday," "Penny Lane," and "Hey Jude") and produced three very different sonagrams. Does that mean that there were three McCartneys? "I'm not prepared to say that this is the final word," Truby told Rolling Stone Magazine, "but it's a beginning." (Reeve, Andru J., Turn Me On, Dead Man: The Complete Story of the Paul McCartney Death Hoax, Ann Arbor: Popular Culture, Ink, 1994: 69)
Signature comparisons:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/paul/mccartney2.html
http://members.cruzio.com/~bbarrow/fab4.html
Video comparisons:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNYVxqJ83W8 (Paul)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC4lumYPQD8 (Faul)
And of course, photo comparisons:
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/250038082-4.jpg Paul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/pid_on_magazine_p2.jpg Faul
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/paul_faul.jpg
And info about Tavistock Institute:
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/beatles_mind_control.htm
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock03.htm
I have checked most of them out, and I am still left with the feeling that there is not enough credible evidence.
I am curious about that part I have highlighted, because like I keep saying it would be very easy, especially with todays tech to find out if they were two voices that belonged to two different people.
But even that what I highlighted is rather here or there... It's just what it is. No proof that it actually took place, no proof of the actual tests done or even if that was published in rolling stone.
Need to see more.
redman
30-09-2008, 02:36 AM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9TiRb8rfpH0&feature=related
You are talking about Paul's accent changing, so how do you explain Ringo's voice. LMAO
Also you expect me to believe that Ringo is sat there knowing that the guy next to him is not Paul Mccartney. LMAO
If Ringo met any of you lot who believe this shit he would laugh his tits off.
Do you honestly, I mean honestly believe that Ringo Starr, John Lennon, and George Harrison all knew and kept it a secret along with everybody else who knew Paul Mccartney who happened to be one of the most famous men on the planet ??
LMFAO.
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 02:46 AM
I think most people are stumped with WHY this could have happened in the first place - why would someone want to replace a rock n`roll star? A President/Prime Minister, a General is one thing, but why "a lowly pop singer"! You`ve given as good an explanation as I`ve read anywhere Faulcon when you mentioned the drugs element! Drugs equates to control!
The Beatles were a revolution in popular music and Paul McCartney (as a Beatle) had more influence in his position as a pop singer than almost any who came before him. The powers that be have been controlling every institution on this planet from religion to politics, to economics! Why should it be any different with the "liberating" (and at the time new) cult of rock n`roll. Controlling rock n`roll and what it represented ment control of the youth! The Beatles were the linear model for all bands, as they were the most successful at the time - they were the blueprint.
If you think the lab created lsd, cocaine, heroin etc is freeing/liberating then take a visit to any of your local drug rehabilitation clinics. Mindless zombies are what these drugs lead to. Initially they can produce altered states of consciousness, but with a big price. The 60`s was a time of major spiritual awakening - Unfortunately with these mind altering addictive drugs, crap gurus and false idols (rock n roll stars who promoted this ridiculous lifestyle) the awakening was funnelled into the wrong channels. CIA influenced "New Agers" such as Timothy Leary (who was like a moth around the Beatles) influenced the culture which is now responsible for the "cool" drugs epidemic that has so brutally affected most affluent western cities.
If Paul McCartney refused the lsd, cocaine (or refused to push whatever agenda was in front of him) then he was a thorn in the side of TPTB. I also believe he was "rubbed out." I don`t believe it was an accident - If it was an accident there would be no problem replacing Paul with another talented musician, fans would grieve and that would be that.
So why a replacement? With a replacement there is no body, no inquest, no indepentent researchers to snoop about - nothing. No body - no problem! By putting out false rumours of a car accident, further "false goose chases" ensue!
Examine the old colour vids and pics of Paul McCartney if you want to see that he was a completely different individual from the man who claims to be him today.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dCQtP4AjVg8
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 02:50 AM
Dr. Henry M. Truby of the University of Miami used samples from three Beatles songs sung by Paul McCartney ("Yesterday," "Penny Lane," and "Hey Jude") and produced three very different sonagrams. Does that mean that there were three McCartneys? "I'm not prepared to say that this is the final word," Truby told Rolling Stone Magazine, "but it's a beginning."
Here is the cite. You can check it out yourself:
Reeve, Andru J., Turn Me On, Dead Man: The Complete Story of the Paul McCartney Death Hoax, Ann Arbor: Popular Culture, Ink, 1994: 69.
Anyway, about Ringo, George, & John, yeah, I think the fact that Paul was murdered would definitely be incentive for them to keep their mouths shut. How do you know John's murder wasn't linked to PID/PWR? Maybe TPTB were afraid he might spill the beans...? Good grief, redman, it's like you've never heard of some of the terrible things TPTB have done. Do you really think replacing a rockstar is beyond their scope? Come on.
http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee248/AleForNoOne/65-67-68-69_pauls.jpg Paul on right. Who knows who the other guys are?
http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee248/AleForNoOne/0665whitaker.jpg Paul
http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee248/AleForNoOne/0268madonna.jpg Faul
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/k561.jpg Paul
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/DR1004_Paul_McCARTNEY_6.jpg Faul
If you think the lab created lsd
Well, of course we know the CIA at least was trying to use LSD in mind-control experiments.
Orb, you make an excellent point about the replacement. It's very tough to prove a murder occurred w/out a body. And anyway, most people didn't even notice a change. Some on the ball people noticed something was amiss back in 1969, but when TPTB trotted out someone claiming to be Paul in LIFE magazine, most were satisfied. Anyway, I think the accident is just one level of disinfo. It's for people who figure out something happened to Paul, but who don't dig deeper to find out more. I suspect TPTB are hoping most people will stop at the accident & be satisfied w/ that. You can see references to a car crash in the "Free as a Bird" video.
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
I don't care what Redman, Yellowman or Purpleman says, something this BIG is going to be covered up and manipulated to keep the public from finding out the truth, AND this IS big. That's why it's important - it is very deep and includes other entertainers who have been replaced. What happened to those people I don't know, but I'm guessing they aren't here any longer, just like the Real Paul. There are also disinformation agents on any conspiracy cover ups. Anyone into David Icke already know this!
It is not in me to lie about something this important. This is a subject that needs to be in the forefront so people will begin to see what has happened and what is happening. We just need to pay a little more attention to what's going on around us. Wake Up! Open our eyes!
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 03:07 AM
Anna, I agree. It is big what happened to Paul b/c it exposes this whole new angle on how TPTB operate. If they can do it to Paul, they can do it to pretty much anybody.
Oh, another opportunity for photo comparisons. I love this :-)
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Paul296-1.jpg Paul (wow - he was stunning)
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/FPaul_Jane-1.jpg Faul
Orb, your post #455 "hits the nail on the head"!
You have laid it all out exactly as I have believed it to be for a long time!
It isn't pretty and it IS SAD. We know what the CIA is capable of doing and what they really do. That's why something this size can be covered up. These are big people and they think the power of the regular guy is nothing. Well, I think the power of the regular guy is what will stop these people. When enough of us Wake Up then change can happen!! And I think more and more people are opening up to this idea AND waking up.
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 03:16 AM
An important video Faulcon - FREEZE IT AT 2.22 (numerology wise an important sequence 222) What`s that in the reflection of the rear window of the van (just leading up to the car crash)? Is that a badly cut up human face (in an innocent little pop video) - It is indeed!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0D196-oXw2k
See in slow mo -
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Syc4Mqjrf_0&feature=related
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 03:36 AM
numerology wise an important sequence 222
How so? I don't know that much about numerology, but I think it's fascinating. I know TPTB know lots about it, so I wouldn't be surprised one bit if they put that image of what looks to be a pretty messed up Paul there on purpose.
What do you make of this image? It was posted on TKIN earlier...
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/6037/paulisdeadframe6sik6.jpg
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 03:40 AM
Orb, your post #455 "hits the nail on the head"!
You have laid it all out exactly as I have believed it to be for a long time!
It isn't pretty and it IS SAD. We know what the CIA is capable of doing and what they really do. That's why something this size can be covered up. These are big people and they think the power of the regular guy is nothing. Well, I think the power of the regular guy is what will stop these people. When enough of us Wake Up then change can happen!! And I think more and more people are opening up to this idea AND waking up.
Thanks Anna, it may or may not have happened like that but it`s important, like you said, for people to realise who were sitting on the Beatles coat-tails!
If you rebelled, you were silenced - Look at Martin L. King, the Kennedys (public execution - fear is the name of their game, you rebel against us this is what you`ll get!) Of course Paul was a pop star, no need for the public example of execution, just replace him with a "doppleganger."
Ironically rock n`roll is projected as being revolution against the establishment imao....... Of course that`s just a portrayal as such, a projection, false hope - (Timothy Leary "turn on, tune in, drop out"). If you were not in the rock n`roll click, you just were`nt "cool man" (and all that). So much of what we`re shown to be true is really there just to keep us asleep - prevent us asking the real questions!
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 03:49 AM
Anna, I agree. It is big what happened to Paul b/c it exposes this whole new angle on how TPTB operate. If they can do it to Paul, they can do it to pretty much anybody.
Oh, another opportunity for photo comparisons. I love this :-)
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Paul296-1.jpg Paul (wow - he was stunning)
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/FPaul_Jane-1.jpg
You`ve so many great picture comparisons Faulcon, but this one in particular - Look at the difference in the jawline of both men. Faul had a longer face as can be clearly seen here!
There`s Jane Asher - she has never spoken publically or written memoirs of her time with Paul, and she was engaged to be married to him. She did a couple of photo ops with Faul to "keep up appearances" (went to India with the Beatles) and then "publically broke up." Again, she has never spoken of her time with Paul.
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 04:01 AM
Yes, & Faul's face is so much narrower.
Some photo comparisons of Jane w/ Paul:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/jane_with_paul.jpg
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/paul_jane.jpg
Jane w/ Faul (Bill):
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/MoreFaulandJaneyaaa.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/jane_with_faul.jpg
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 04:13 AM
How so? I don't know that much about numerology, but I think it's fascinating. I know TPTB know lots about it, so I wouldn't be surprised one bit if they put that image of what looks to be a pretty messed up Paul there on purpose.
What do you make of this image? It was posted on TKIN earlier...
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/6037/paulisdeadframe6sik6.jpg
An interesting image to say the least Faulcon from a rare Beatles film called "Cream of the Beatles." Notice the flash photo after 4 seconds -glass with a bullet hole through it! It`s only a flash but it`s there. Why, if it was only an innocent car "accident," would we be shown this frame (bullet holes)?
Why, in such an innocent film of the Beatles, are we shown such graphic images? Why (in a film only 20 mins in length) are there these gastly images (when the rest of the film is light-hearted and jovial)? What could be the importance.......... I wonder. Why are there reportedly over a hundred clues in album covers and songs about the death of Paul McCartney.........? "to sell albums" imao.....! Along with all the physical evidence.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_zAkl2oxsL0&feature=related
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 04:26 AM
Yes, & Faul's face is so much narrower.
Some photo comparisons of Jane w/ Paul:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/jane_with_paul.jpg
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/paul_jane.jpg
Jane w/ Faul (Bill):
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/MoreFaulandJaneyaaa.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/jane_with_faul.jpg
Look at the relative difference in height between Jane Asher and Paul McCartney in the first and second pictures ............... and then compare the height disparity of the bottom two photos (Faul and Jane) {and she has her knees slightly bent in the last picture}..........Hello!
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 04:48 AM
Jane *must* have been wearing 5-inch heels in the first 2 pictures. That's the only *logical* explanation. :-P LMAO!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_zAkl2oxsL0&feature=related
That video is really good. Is that the raw "Lady Madonna" before all the effects were added to the voice? Yeah, it sounds nothing like Paul.
It is indeed odd how the Beatles went from being fun-loving & cheerful to somber, morose, serious, & very spiritual in one year. Could it be that maybe a tragedy befell them...?
Any idea what this might mean? According to youknowmyname231, it does not mean that Faul came on the scene in 1966. It might just be a distraction. I don't know.
Insider
FIREMAN = 66
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 05:15 AM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9TiRb8rfpH0&feature=related
You are talking about Paul's accent changing, so how do you explain Ringo's voice. LMAO
Also you expect me to believe that Ringo is sat there knowing that the guy next to him is not Paul Mccartney. LMAO
If Ringo met any of you lot who believe this shit he would laugh his tits off.
Do you honestly, I mean honestly believe that Ringo Starr, John Lennon, and George Harrison all knew and kept it a secret along with everybody else who knew Paul Mccartney who happened to be one of the most famous men on the planet ??
LMFAO.
Believe me redman, he`d break his bollox laughing at you.
You don`t see any innuendo in this interview - Ringo can`t stand him!
- Larry King - "You couldn`t drum with him on that hah....?"
- Ringo - "I couldn`t drum with him on that cause he was in another country!" Wink wink......
1.12 Larry King - "You would have used him though," Faul replies "Oh yeah, I`d use him........... all the time!" Nod nod.......
- The best piece though ........ (Watch Fauls expression here :D) Larry King asked Ringo how life was treating him ....... Ringo - "Life is great........ the wife is great...........the wife is gorgeous AND SHES GREAT!"
- Larry King - "and Paul how are you adjusting to.............." (the wife was suing him). "I`m ok Larry, thank you for asking" - Look at Ringo, he`s about to have a fit! :D
- 2.08 Faul`s infamous - "and with friends like these, who needs life?"
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TUUpXxHXSzI
The younger imposter - (present day Faul)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zxnCngmi8gg
("see any mistakes we`ve made......straighten them out.....haha!")
The original Paul McCartney (interview and vid - "The Night Before")
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?vf1CidMWUfbw
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NTb3uifuKDc
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 05:25 AM
re : Interview and vid (with Paul)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=f1CidMWUfbw
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=aNMhPQoEbJE&feature=related
faulconandsnowjob
30-09-2008, 05:34 AM
From that Larry King interview w/ Faul & Ringo:
Faul says, "With friends like these, who needs life?" He made no attempt to correct himself, so it seems that he said it deliberately.
Faul is wearing tennis shoes w/ a suit. Totally not Paul's style.
Ringo seems a little irritated by Faul's song. Hurry up & get that sh*t over with! At least, that's how I read his body language.
Ringo - "I couldn`t drum with him on that cause he was in another country!"
B/c w/ all of his houses in different countries, I guess Ringo maxed out his credit card & couldn't afford to travel to where Faul was recording? LMAO!
Orb, that link, http://uk.youtube.com/watch?vf1CidMWUfbw, doesn't seem to be working...
orbandsceptre27
30-09-2008, 05:50 AM
From that Larry King interview w/ Faul & Ringo:
Faul says, "With friends like these, who needs life?" He made no attempt to correct himself, so it seems that he said it deliberately.
Faul is wearing tennis shoes w/ a suit. Totally not Paul's style.
Ringo seems a little irritated by Faul's song. Hurry up & get that sh*t over with! At least, that's how I read his body language.
Ringo - "I couldn`t drum with him on that cause he was in another country!"
B/c w/ all of his houses in different countries, I guess Ringo maxed out his credit card & couldn't afford to travel to where Faul was recording? LMAO!
Orb, that link, http://uk.youtube.com/watch?vf1CidMWUfbw, doesn't seem to be working...
Faulcon I placed it underneath with the vid "You`ve got to Hide Your Love Away." I`ve put it up before and it shows a completely different individual to "the Faul guy."
Many have said how they remembered Paul as a jovial happy-go-lucky type early on with the Beatles, but almost overnight he turned into a charmless (also talentless) man and also became quite grumpy. We now know that this is a totally different man. How can there be such drastic changes vocally, appearance wise, mannerisms, in his relationship with the band, character wise? It doesn`t happen of course. Paul Newman remained the same jovial, charismatic man all his life - Yes people can go through changes, but not so many in such a short space of time!