all these tsarion and sitchin knockers...

[dark86]

can i have some clear consice facts explaining why these two ppl are all disinfor please. To just say "oy that tsarion is pony yeahh, rubbish" does not really sway me.





another comment; it is seeming to me that many knowledgable ppl on this board would be better off spending their energies waking up the sheeple as apose to arguing and debating trivial details amongst other awoken ppl. this will solve nothing.

the reason for both of the above is that there are disinfo agents on this board creating confusion and arguements wherever they can. if you are a disinfo agent, i love you x x

[hirschfelder]

can i have some clear consice facts explaining why these two ppl are all disinfor please.

Good luck! At best you'll get the sitchiniswrong.com url

[baron von lotsov]

We have done this so many times that if you still can't find out from this forum then I guess you never will.

[thirdwave]

We have done this so many times that if you still can't find out from this forum then I guess you never will.

what has been done?... sending people likes to a website of someone despoiretly trying to smudge the info while totally ignoring all the other over whelming facts and questions?

there is far more waight to what both these men go into that there is for the bible....

but of course it comes down to what you WANT to see is real or fake.

bottom line...

[fanofenki]

for my money i wouldn't bet on sitchin if the odds were astronomically in his favor. I have heard him and nothing that comes out of this mouth sounds true.

the site sitchiniswrong.com, we should note, DOES NOT question Sitchin's conclusions, ONLY his credentials and the author states this openly. Apparently the guy just doesn't know sumerian the way he says he does and makes some gradeschool mistakes in the translations.

I just have a feeling about sitchin that he is being mislead, or paid. He just doesn't seem right in a very basic sense. I think the alien intervention idea is fine and well supported elsewhere, in fact many elsewhere's. What do we need sitchin's evidence for anyway? Isn't the evidence abundant that there were giants, gods in heveanly chariots, they had super technology. If they didn't come from other worlds then they are our ancenstors who were wiped out. There is eivdence of a 2 million year old nuclear reactor. we've been to higher heights of civilization both in technology and maturity. The Indian scriptues have been proving this since history was written. I just don't understand why we even need to have a Sitchin-based foundational viewpoint. I wouldn't reccomend him.


what has been done?... sending people likes to a website of someone despoiretly trying to smudge the info while totally ignoring all the other over whelming facts and questions?

there is far more waight to what both these men go into that there is for the bible....

but of course it comes down to what you WANT to see is real or fake.

bottom line...

[eternal_spirit]

We have done this so many times that if you still can't find out from this forum then I guess you never will.


Bingo which begs the question who's side are some people on. Waits to be accused of being an agent:rolleyes: by the other side lol.

[cruise4]

Yes. Agents just go round posting 'knocking' articles. You see the same ones, over and over on different forums. They need IGNORING.

"it is seeming to me that many knowledgable ppl on this board would be better off spending their energies waking up the sheeple as apose to arguing and debating trivial details amongst other awoken ppl. this will solve nothing."

You start...

That is classic COINTELPRO. Are YOU an agent??? Do you know what others are doing? What are you doing? Are we not entitled to a bit of light relief inbetween? Your a cheeky bastard is what you are!

[strt]

Found about Tsarion recently. Read atlantis book and heard few interviews.

So far, David Icke, Alex Jones, Jordan Maxwell and Michael Tsarion are pretty reliable sources for my search.

It does not matter what people say about them (and there is a lot of different opinions) as long as their story fits bigger puzzle.

[thirdwave]

for my money i wouldn't bet on sitchin if the odds were astronomically in his favor. I have heard him and nothing that comes out of this mouth sounds true.

the site sitchiniswrong.com, we should note, DOES NOT question Sitchin's conclusions, ONLY his credentials and the author states this openly. Apparently the guy just doesn't know sumerian the way he says he does and makes some gradeschool mistakes in the translations.

I just have a feeling about sitchin that he is being mislead, or paid. He just doesn't seem right in a very basic sense. I think the alien intervention idea is fine and well supported elsewhere, in fact many elsewhere's. What do we need sitchin's evidence for anyway? Isn't the evidence abundant that there were giants, gods in heveanly chariots, they had super technology. If they didn't come from other worlds then they are our ancenstors who were wiped out. There is eivdence of a 2 million year old nuclear reactor. we've been to higher heights of civilization both in technology and maturity. The Indian scriptues have been proving this since history was written. I just don't understand why we even need to have a Sitchin-based foundational viewpoint. I wouldn't reccomend him.

I do agree that he would not be the source I would send people too, although he did discover some very interesting things that are always worth bringing up.