View Full Version : Question re: Kate Middleton
Windsors are very important and powerful bloodline. And Prince William is as illuminati as they come (making corna signs, being part of secret societies, you name it)
Evidence shows that major bloodline families are as obsessed now as they always been through the history with "purity" of their bloodline (probably trying to keep amount of reptilian/annunaki DNA to the maximum).
Is Kate Middleton really a "commoner" as she's portrayed, or is there more to the story? It makes no sense whatsoever that Windsors would ever allow William to marry a real "commoner" and dilute the bloodline.
Anybody has an explanation for this one?
hirschfelder
26-06-2008, 06:54 PM
Good question
I've had a look at her Wiki page and although she comes from a fairly wealthy background, there's nothing really aristocratic about it
It'll be a kick in the nuts for Icke's theories if they get married and have kids
Unless it's all for show
john white
26-06-2008, 07:00 PM
Good question
I've had a look at her Wiki page and although she comes from a fairly wealthy background, there's nothing really aristocratic about it
It'll be a kick in the nuts for Icke's theories if they get married and have kids
Unless it's all for show
Then its a kick in the nuts for Ickes theory. That's theories for you
Assuming of course that there isnt a bit of the "blue blood" swilling around in Kate's DNA and the commoner thing really isnt "for show"
But then Queenie has effectively abolished herself from Jan 1st 2009 anyway, so maybe its game over job done for the Windsor Cabal?
skyline
26-06-2008, 07:20 PM
Windsors are very important and powerful bloodline. And Prince William is as illuminati as they come (making corna signs, being part of secret societies, you name it)
Evidence shows that major bloodline families are as obsessed now as they always been through the history with "purity" of their bloodline (probably trying to keep amount of reptilian/annunaki DNA to the maximum).
Is Kate Middleton really a "commoner" as she's portrayed, or is there more to the story? It makes no sense whatsoever that Windsors would ever allow William to marry a real "commoner" and dilute the bloodline.
Anybody has an explanation for this one?
her 14/Great Grandparent is Sir Thomas Fairfax
Thomas Fairfax, 1st Lord Fairfax of Cameron (1560-2 May 1640), was an English soldier, diplomat and politician.
Fairfax was the eldest son of Sir Thomas Fairfax of Denton and Dorothy Gale. He represented Queen Elizabeth I on several diplomatic missions to King James VI of Scotland and also sat as a Member of Parliament for Lincoln in 1586, for Aldborough in 1588, for Boroughbridge in 1601 and for Yorkshire in 1625. In 1627 he was created Lord Fairfax of Cameron in the Peerage of Scotland. Denton Hall was the main seat of Thomas Fairfax.
Lord Fairfax of Cameron died in May 1640 and was succeeded in the lordship by his son Ferdinando.
There is always a connection nothing is by chance
Look at her background
Middleton was raised in Bucklebury, Berkshire, in the south of England.[1] She went to St Andrew's School, Pangbourne until she was 13 and attended Marlborough College (the same school William's cousin Princess Eugenie of York attends), where she passed eleven GCSEs and three A-level examinations. Like the Prince, Middleton was a student at the University of St Andrews in Fife, Scotland. She graduated in 2005 with a 2:1 degree in History of Art.
empyblessing
26-06-2008, 07:26 PM
Who is Kate Middleton? Pix plox
hirschfelder
26-06-2008, 07:33 PM
Assuming of course that there isnt a bit of the "blue blood" swilling around in Kate's DNA and the commoner thing really isnt "for show"
Seems there might be
I've just had a quick look into Miss Middleton's genealogy and she comes down through the Lupton family bloodline. There are pitmen and labourers in her heritage, but the Luptons are, at least, very well-to-do and may possibly have tentacles into the lower aristocracy
Her great grandad was from ordinary stock and, coincidentally, lived just a few streets from me. He married Olivia Lupton who lived just round the corner from thecosmicmind's Rik Clay!
Anyway, they're not even married yet. If they do marry and have kids we may have to reconsider the importance of genetic to the Royals, given that the future King or Queen's mum is from a relatively lowly background
hirschfelder
26-06-2008, 07:40 PM
her 14/Great Grandparent is Sir Thomas Fairfax
I've just found that
It's through this connection that she's related to Willy Wales, they're 15th cousins, dirty incestuous lizards
There are a number of other branches into the lower aristocracy in her family tree too
jhado
26-06-2008, 09:39 PM
Sorry Girls , girls look away now................
I wouldn't , she's too skinny.
phaid
26-06-2008, 09:57 PM
Who says that they will be reproducing, anyway?
All the Princes have played the field before mating with the true blueblood lizard maiden who will bear the little iguana child.
zilver
17-11-2010, 03:33 PM
Yeah who says that Kate Middleton will really bare his child? If you look at pics... Prince Harry and William dont look like brothers at all... or is it me?
tescos organic
17-11-2010, 03:39 PM
Yeah who says that Kate Middleton will really bare his child? If you look at pics... Prince Harry and William dont look like brothers at all... or is it me?
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=36121
:D
signalnorth
17-11-2010, 05:08 PM
Windsors are very important and powerful bloodline. And Prince William is as illuminati as they come (making corna signs, being part of secret societies, you name it)
Evidence shows that major bloodline families are as obsessed now as they always been through the history with "purity" of their bloodline (probably trying to keep amount of reptilian/annunaki DNA to the maximum).
Is Kate Middleton really a "commoner" as she's portrayed, or is there more to the story? It makes no sense whatsoever that Windsors would ever allow William to marry a real "commoner" and dilute the bloodline.
Anybody has an explanation for this one?
She's a direct descendant of Edward 2nd.
sofa king
17-11-2010, 05:33 PM
Yeah who says that Kate Middleton will really bare his child? If you look at pics... Prince Harry and William dont look like brothers at all... or is it me?
William looks like his mother, Harry looks like his father. So no, they may not be brothers but we can see who gave birth to them.
phildee3
17-11-2010, 05:58 PM
If she's a commoner, will she lose her benefits for refusing to take any work offered her? ;)
Windsors are very important and powerful bloodline. And Prince William is as illuminati as they come (making corna signs, being part of secret societies, you name it)
Evidence shows that major bloodline families are as obsessed now as they always been through the history with "purity" of their bloodline (probably trying to keep amount of reptilian/annunaki DNA to the maximum).
Is Kate Middleton really a "commoner" as she's portrayed, or is there more to the story? It makes no sense whatsoever that Windsors would ever allow William to marry a real "commoner" and dilute the bloodline.
Anybody has an explanation for this one?
She is middle class which by Royal standards is a ''commoner''. Anyways they need a ''commoner'' in every now and then to water down the blue blood they don't want another monster of glamis on there hands do they. Wasn't Diana considered a commoner aswell, maybe history will repeat itself.
perksy
17-11-2010, 07:27 PM
So Kate Middleton and William are 12th cousins! So the illuminati keep the bloodline going as per usual. So icke's theories continue........
phildee3
17-11-2010, 09:56 PM
She is middle class which by Royal standards is a ''commoner''.
Oh, c'mon!!
Even the middle class have to work for a living!
engelsblume
18-11-2010, 10:48 AM
She is middle class which by Royal standards is a ''commoner''. Anyways they need a ''commoner'' in every now and then to water down the blue blood they don't want another monster of glamis on there hands do they. Wasn't Diana considered a commoner aswell, maybe history will repeat itself.
Exactly.
phildee3
18-11-2010, 11:08 AM
She is middle class which by Royal standards is a ''commoner''. Anyways they need a ''commoner'' in every now and then to water down the blue blood
Sharing the same grandparents just 12 generations back is "watering down"?? :eek:
knightofthegrail
18-11-2010, 11:19 AM
She is middle class which by Royal standards is a ''commoner''.
Everyone, even aristocrats, who are not of royal blood are "commoners".
It will be interesting to see where her ancestry does go. Debretts only goes back to the 1800s... She actually looks like the end-game of the glorious revolution and rise of the bankers by being the first Queen to come from Trade rather than Land....
blue2
18-11-2010, 12:21 PM
She looks and sounds lovely all the same,but she doesn't have child bearing hips i thought they are too narrow..lets hope she doesn't have issues carrying but then she is very fit physically...we shall see, just a t atime when the country is supposed to be in poor shape up comes another Royal wedding to pay for...it's actually untrue that we are broke as the Banks within the mile in London are swimming in money...
armoured_amazon
18-11-2010, 12:24 PM
Who says that they will be reproducing, anyway?
All the Princes have played the field before mating with the true blueblood lizard maiden who will bear the little iguana child.
Lmfao
phildee3
18-11-2010, 01:26 PM
Lmfao
Why?
Is it not so?
decode reality
18-11-2010, 01:54 PM
It's pretty insignificant to me, i.e. what their blood is. I mean, she could be Obama's love child; what difference does that actually make to most people's everyday life?
phildee3
18-11-2010, 02:17 PM
It's pretty insignificant to me, i.e. what their blood is. I mean, she could be Obama's love child; what difference does that actually make to most people's everyday life?
Well I thought that this forum was for people who are interested in the bigger picture.
If you're only interested in "people's everyday lives" then turn the TV back on and go back to sleep!
rapunzel
18-11-2010, 02:45 PM
William looks like his mother, Harry looks like his father. So no, they may not be brothers but we can see who gave birth to them.
Harry looks like the Spencers particularly Diana's brother. A number of Spencer family portraits show Spencers with bright red hair so the belief that Harry is not Charles' son because of his hair colour is shown to be ridiculous.
moon monkey
18-11-2010, 03:14 PM
I think she is very attractive indeed. I would let her do a wee wee on me.
shed7628
18-11-2010, 03:19 PM
I think she is very attractive indeed. I would let her do a wee wee on me.
She is a little too perfect maybe?
Where is that stepford wives thread?
moon monkey
18-11-2010, 03:37 PM
I like tall, leggy brunettes so she'll do for me !
fennellal
19-11-2010, 03:33 AM
It does not matter, If as some would say Prince William is the Pinnacle of such a bloodline which has been engineered by Certain arranged marriages, inter breading etc etc throughout the Centurys.
Kate Middleton is nothing more than a Host .
As depicted in many Horror books & movies, Rosemary's Baby springs to mind & the Omen to a degree , also found in Nature along with selective breading patterns, All that is required is a Host when the Perfection has been completed.
In many story's its the common female (Tavern Lady etc who is besieged by Evil or the Towns Mayors' Daughter, It never follows the pattern of another princess etc, simply because marrying into another Royal family would be breading Backwards (In Breading ) as these blood lines have already been used in Williams DNA to date.
All that is Required is a Host when the collection of DNA has been completed.
gisellewilding
20-11-2010, 09:41 AM
Now do we really know who her dad is? Remember the stories of Pindar and Diana? I do not think we are going to be told and I do not think we will see her DNA being mapped out for us. The Windsors are NOT stupid even if they appear quiet. They are disgusting and I have no time for them after what happened to the last incubator. I am sure if she is to marry her genes are suitable but we will not know. Remember up to 10 percent of all children in all marriages do not have the father they think they have. This is a fact.
evie_eve
23-06-2011, 06:58 PM
Good question
I've had a look at her Wiki page and although she comes from a fairly wealthy background, there's nothing really aristocratic about it
It'll be a kick in the nuts for Icke's theories if they get married and have kids
Unless it's all for show
I don't think that Kate marrying Wills and going on to have kids with him debunks Icke's theories at all, because if you recall, Icke never said that Diana was a reptilian, just that she was in the right family circles and had the right heritage, and that the core group of royals (Queen, Charles etc) were reptilian crossbreeds who wanted her to pass on the reptilian genes of Charles to their kids....so if you go on that theory then you don't necessarily have to be a reptilian to marry into the royal family....and in any case they don't mind watering down the genes now and again if it means diverting attention away from the conspiracy theories by saying 'hey look we CAN marry commoners! and if the wife's genes aren't reptilian enough they can always rely on satanist Pindar's sperm to carry on the reptilian gene as in the case of William...'