freeman, notice of intent etc!!!

[bones]

ive written this as my first draft, if anyone has any ideas on how to improve it im open to suggestions.



22nd June 2008
To: Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, the woman acting as the queen regnant for the United Kingdom and the commonwealth realms
To: Gordon brown acting as the prime minister for England

To: Patricia Scotland the woman acting as attorney general for England and Wales

To: sir Ian Warwick Blair the man acting as chief police commissioner for the metropolitan police

To: Tim Hollis the man acting as chief constable for Humberside police area

To: DVLA

To: Dave Hartnett CB, Acting Chairman of HM revenue & customs





Dear madams and sirs:
I am serving herewith, my notice of understanding and intent and my claim of right for your understanding. You will find the enclosed intact and complete, for now.
Yours truly,


Alan lee redgrift ,
Freeman- on -the -land

NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND RIGHT OF CLAIM

I Alan lee of the redgrift, a flesh and blood living soul hereby make oath and state the following is my truth and my law.

Whereas it is my understanding England and all of her people enjoy the protection of the common law, and whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and
Whereas it is my understanding a freeman- on- the -land is not bound by any statutes created by the government and I alan lee redgrift will not pay any taxes at all as long as I am a freeman -on –the- land, and I will reclaim any taxes associated with, fuel and vat, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in England is a representative one, and
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires a mutual consent, and
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and
Whereas it is my understanding those who have a national insurance number are in fact government employees and are thus bound by statutes created by the government, and it is lawful to abandon my national insurance number.
It is also my understanding people in England have the right to revoke or deny consent and exist free of government control and statutory restraints and,
Whereas a freeman on the land who has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations and limitations and,
Whereas I alan lee redgrift am a freeman- on –the- land and,
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action and,
Whereas as I am a freeman on the land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask for permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation and,
Whereas corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties and,
Whereas it’s my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions and,
Whereas It is my understanding that I have to right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation and I have no obligation to attend.

It’s also my understanding that peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statues and law and those who attempt to enforce statues against a freeman- on- the- land are in fact breaking the law and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have no observed me breach the peace and,
Whereas permanent estoppels by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a freeman on the land under any act is created if this claim is not responded to in a stated fashion and time.

Therefore let it now be known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I,
Alan lee redgrift A freeman -on –the- land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statuary obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter.

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

Furthermore I claim that the courts in England are de-facto and bound by the law and equity act and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

Also I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any act for as herein stated as a freeman on the land I am not subject to any act.

I furthermore have the right to de-register any private conveyance which is my property, and use my private conveyance still without having to pay any taxation or insurance and not need to have permission to travel on a public road, as it’s my right to travel.



Furthermore I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgression by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is (TWO HUNDRED POUNDS PER HOUR) or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and (TWO THOUSEND POUNDS PER HOUR) or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported ,incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process and I also claim a FEE SCHEDULE of (FIVE THOUSEND POUNDS) per day if my private conveyance is towed and in pounded without my express written and notarized consent, also any property seized will be (FIVE THOUSEND POUNDS PER DAY) unless stated in my written and notarized consent.




Furthermore, I claim the right to use a notary public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressor who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de-facto in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principles or agent or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with a lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaim or disputes publicly and in open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claim made within THIRTY (30) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under oath upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in a notary office herein provided no later than (THIRTY) 30 days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or act against myself freeman on the land

[Mo0n5tar]

You showed it to a notary?

I think it's brilliant mate!
Did you get the template off thinkfree?

There are some serious gems of knowledge in there I hope your successful!

[duckingdafta]

there is an irony to me by submitting this VERY WELL WRITTEN letter, it immediately becomes part of the laws and subjects mentioned within it... I suppose the only way around this is to get someone else to submit this information on your behalf...not sure about that either as I am currently tipsy!..lack of thought and need to re-read later...TIC this when I submit my opinion.. I am usually wrong.:D
I would change the word 'Understand' to 'comprehend' as to understand is to agree to Stand Under the law provided and the judgement given, you are submitting yourself as a person who is under standing of the laws and allowance of it's judging.. that's admiral [currency] law, not common law.

[majicdragon]

Whereas It is my understanding that I have to right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation and I have no obligation to attend.



Change "to right" to: "the right"

[Mo0n5tar]

there is an irony to me by submitting this VERY WELL WRITTEN letter, it immediately becomes part of the laws and subjects mentioned within it... I suppose the only way around this is to get someone else to submit this information on your behalf.

Yes i belive this is why you utilise a notary public, they will sign and seal this notice of intent on your behalf which according to Robert Menard will make it legal and law of the land, every time you wish to travel (without a passport now as you are no longer Chattel) you will use the notice of intent method and get it legalised by Notary public then you will have right of law to travel to your destination, if anyone denies you they are acting contrary to the law, genius.

[duckingdafta]

Yes i belive this is why you utilise a notary public, they will sign and seal this notice of intent on your behalf which according to Robert Menard will make it legal and law of the land, every time you wish to travel (without a passport now as you are no longer Chattel) you will use the notice of intent method and get it legalised by Notary public then you will have right of law to travel to your destination, if anyone denies you they are acting contrary to the law, genius.

MANY thanks for that.. kind of clears a lot up for me.:cool:

[truthcommission]

I would interested in how this would apply to a non national living permanently in Australia, given that Australian law is modeled on the English Common Law system.

[bones]

brilliant replys guys thanks alot!!!

i still made a error in spelling "to right" instead of "the right" lol.

the last post was can a non national use the same withing aussy land?

depends on what nationality you are i suppose but im not sure what aussy laws are regarding it. sorry.

i will seek a solicitor to check it all out this week and if he believes its ok ill get info on notorizing it. kinda scary knowing ill be taking on the laws.

any advice would be great!!!

cheers guys...

[duckingdafta]

brilliant replys guys thanks alot!!!

i still made a error in spelling "to right" instead of "the right" lol.

the last post was can a non national use the same withing aussy land?

depends on what nationality you are i suppose but im not sure what aussy laws are regarding it. sorry.

i will seek a solicitor to check it all out this week and if he believes its ok ill get info on notorizing it. kinda scary knowing ill be taking on the laws.

any advice would be great!!!

cheers guys...


No advice.. just best of luck and all I can offer is energy as support.

[danster82]

Keep us updated bones on the sort of replies you get

[seanie]

yeah keep us updated any chance of getting this stickied

[bones]

i have an appointment tomorrow with a solicitor and notary, fingers crossedxxx

190.00 quid an hour its costing me. bloody robbing buggers...

[bones]

went to see a notary today and recieved this response by email.




Dear Mr Redgrift,
You called to see me today for "Notarial Advice". I had not at first
made the connection between your appointment and the unsolicited e mail
of 19.6.08. I have perused your papers and I find that I am, in all the
circumstances, unable to assist notarially. I would not wish to take any
fee from you concerning the matters discussed or our correspondence. I
wish you and yours well.
Yours sincerely,
Paul R Sheridan TD BA Notary Public, Grimsby UK

what you think guys?

do i just find another ?

[danster82]

I wish I understood more, what exactly is a notary and why are they required? and if they are required for certain legal procedures then is it lawful for them to decline to assist you? I mean hes not running a private business he cant pick or chose his clients, its a public office and he has a duty towards you..

The duties and functions of notaries public are described in Brooke's Notary on page 19 in these terms:

"Generally speaking, a notary public [...] may be described as an officer of the law [...] whose public office and duty it is to draw, attest or certify under his official seal deeds and other documents, including wills or other testamentary documents, conveyances of real and personal property and powers of attorney; to authenticate such documents under his signature and official seal in such a manner as to render them acceptable, as proof of the matters attested by him, to the judicial or other public authorities in the country where they are to be used, whether by means of issuing a notarial certificate as to the due execution of such documents or by drawing them in the form of public instruments; to keep a protocol containing originals of all instruments which he makes in the public form and to issue authentic copies of such instruments; to administer oaths and declarations for use in proceedings [...] to note or certify transactions relating to negotiable instruments, and to draw up protests or other formal papers relating to occurrences on the voyages of ships and their navigation as well as the carriage of cargo in ships."

I guess you could either find another notary or ask him why he is unable to assit, that seems a fair question you obviously want to know.

[duckingdafta]

He's scared. IMO.. I read the following on THIS (http://www.nationalnotary.org/news/index.cfm?Text=newsNotary&newsID=78) website
What many Notaries do not realize is that many seemingly harmless actions fall under this category. Any information provided or decisions made on behalf of a signer - even if given inadvertently or at the signer's explicit request - can potentially leave the Notary liable.

also note the illuminati triangle at the top of the page...I think it's the same thing

[Mo0n5tar]

Well alot of Notary publics bulk up there earnings by being practicising lawyers, if this one you saw was a member of The Law Society it would explain his inaction re: undermining the law society and making you a freeman.

As you say this is a public service but as I say some are legal professionals and may have a conflict of interest, find out about the Notary society and how or if they can help you find some answers.

It would take a notary with an interest in constitutional matters and big fat grapefruit bollocks to attach his name to this kind of notice.

As i say research a few differant Notaries and see how some differ and how they differ from lawyers or if they are affiliated to the Law Society.

And remember "fools rush in where angels fear to tread", haste will get us nowhere here we need to be thoroughly aware of what we are doing and confident in our use of English/Legalese.

Peace

[stickwhistler]

I suggest that every Notary in the UK is a solicitor.

A lot of solicitors have taken extra courses on being a Notary.

To be a Notary, you have to have a degree, and have taken 'the course',
and as all solicitors have to have a degree in law, they are 'nearly there'
so to speak.


Why not wait for a while and see what events are about to unfold!

Why not - just for now - use a NUI & COR to the people who NOTICE you first.
Conditionally accept their offer with a NOTICE of Understanding & Intent & Claim Of Right with a time limit of say 10 days.
Send a DEFAULT NOTICE ( if they don't respond in the stated time) with;

"Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein and then successfully defeating these claims in a proper court of law will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act or regulation against My Self Freeman John Thomas for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties."

as the last paragraph.

The above is borrowed, with gratitude, from Robert Arthur: Menard in his published Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right.


John Thomas is a euphemism :p

[bones]

I suggest that every Notary in the UK is a solicitor.

A lot of solicitors have taken extra courses on being a Notary.

To be a Notary, you have to have a degree, and have taken 'the course',
and as all solicitors have to have a degree in law, they are 'nearly there'
so to speak.


Why not wait for a while and see what events are about to unfold!

Why not - just for now - use a NUI & COR to the people who NOTICE you first.
Conditionally accept their offer with a NOTICE of Understanding & Intent & Claim Of Right with a time limit of say 10 days.


Send a DEFAULT NOTICE ( if they don't respond in the stated time) with;

"Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein and then successfully defeating these claims in a proper court of law will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act or regulation against My Self Freeman John Thomas for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties."

as the last paragraph.

The above is borrowed, with gratitude, from Robert Arthur: Menard in his published Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right.


John Thomas is a euphemism :p

im currantly seeking witnesses to my nui and cor, ill kepp you all informed.

also im currantly discharging a parking notice i recieved, ill post the reply notices when i bye a scanner.

[devin]

http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5086

[whitenight639]

I suggest that every Notary in the UK is a solicitor.

A lot of solicitors have taken extra courses on being a Notary.

To be a Notary, you have to have a degree, and have taken 'the course',
and as all solicitors have to have a degree in law, they are 'nearly there'
so to speak.


Why not wait for a while and see what events are about to unfold!

Why not - just for now - use a NUI & COR to the people who NOTICE you first.
Conditionally accept their offer with a NOTICE of Understanding & Intent & Claim Of Right with a time limit of say 10 days.
Send a DEFAULT NOTICE ( if they don't respond in the stated time) with;

"Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein and then successfully defeating these claims in a proper court of law will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act or regulation against My Self Freeman John Thomas for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties."

as the last paragraph.

The above is borrowed, with gratitude, from Robert Arthur: Menard in his published Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right.


John Thomas is a euphemism :p

all notarys have to have passed the bar, there are only a few hundred notarys in the England they are authorised by the arch bishop of canterbury.

see here on rules that a notary governs himself by http://www.facultyoffice.org.uk/Page2.html

[lastmanstanding]

I've just read over this thread and wanted to put my Two cents in.

Firstly.....why would you want to seek a solicitor on this matter?

They, unless he//she has unplugged from the Matrix are still within that framework and will not be on the same wavelength as you.

Secondly....in my notices to the ATO Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Australia, I had not notarised my notice other than with my signature and it had been duly accepted as per his response.

"We acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated 14th January 2005 with regard to the invoice for compensation for the collection of the goods services (GST) and apologise for the delay in responding."

Now, it take be taken that they have accepted the Notice as presented by an Elector, free sovereign being etc, etc as witnessed by their response.

I believe that the witnessing is not completely necessary but doesn't hurt to do.

One of the key lessons that I have learnt with such matters is to keep records of what is what.

Register all notices as you then have Post as a witness to having sent said notice to said parties.

And if you think about it....when you sign for such instruments such as licenses, contracts etc, some have witnesses while many don't but for some reason, they all fall into law, contract or just agreement with other parties.

As I stated. It is only my cents on the matter, but that is in light that I was
researching on how to structure my notices to the Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Doctors, Teachers and Counselors who are intent on prescribing and medicating the millions of young and not so young minds, around the world.

Starting with Australia, but would be more than happy to share with any others who might be seeking to stopping the madness.

Yours in truth, spirit and justice,

Rob

[whitenight639]

I heard somewhere that a norary is the only person that can overturn judges decisions and are the big guns basically, they come from common law side of things, so there are benifits to having things notarised.

and as for soliciters they are tools that you use, tell them what to sign or interpret for you, the idea is not to use one where ever possible though.

[scottmurray]

Brilliant

[yozhik]

I heard somewhere that a norary is the only person that can overturn judges decisions and are the big guns basically


I have not heard of this.
Could you verify it?
Maybe provide a source?

From what I have read, a judge's decision can only be overturned by a judge in a higher court ... and usually on points of law or on issues of jurisdiction.

Also of interest is that whilst a judge takes an oath to be impartial, he is not bound to be impartial unless his oath is present in the court room.

To ensure impartiality, you must invoke his oath and have it present and on the record. Once his oath has been invoked and put on the record as being present, then he is bound to it and thus provide impartiality. Until this is done, he acts as an officer for the court, which means his primary role is to act on behalf of the court in terms of seeking judgement for the benefit of the court.

[the worm that turned]

Has this thread died or moved elsewhere?

[h2pogo]

" I will not pay any taxes at all as long as I am a freeman -on –the- land, and I will reclaim any taxes associated with, fuel and vat,"

i do like that bit.
how about adding

"and I will reclaim any taxes associated with, fuel and vat in the form of working family tax credits.
and by using my person to sign a self assesment form to reclaim these taxes is in no way consenting to any contract with the government."

i have been looking for a way round claiming tax credits.
i think i just found it
thans bones

[jimmi]

Bones, please don't mistake this for criticism, there are a few spelling mistakes such as license should be spelt licence, I assume that for the purpose that you intend to use the notice that the way it is written is extremely important! and as it is going to bind you to behave in a certain manner then you should be fully aware of the implications of every term contained therein. What I'm getting at is if you spell it 'license' (American spelling) then you might be binding yourself to statutes passed in America , I'm not saying that this is the case but hope you see what I'm trying to say.

Again , your use of the word 'understand', it is my 'comprehension' that you are using the word 'understand' inappropriately! If you are 'understanding' something then you are ... 'standing under' it! ... you are saying that it is above you and therefore has jurisdiction over you, you are inadvertently handing over your sovereignty!

[arten]

22nd June 2008
To: Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, the German Reptile acting as the queen regnant for the corporation of United Kingdom and the commonwealth realms

To: Gordon Brown Scotchman acting as the prime minister for the corporation of England

To: Patricia Scotland the woman acting as attorney general for the corporate enitites of England and Wales

To: sir Ian Warwick Blair the man acting as chief police commissioner for the corporation of the metropolitan police

To: Tim Hollis the man acting as chief constable for the corportaion of Humberside police area

To: DVLA corporation

To: Dave Hartnett CB, Acting Chairman of the corporation of HM revenue & customs


Etc can you all spot the differences I have inserted? I think John Harris really makes the point that everything is a bloddy well corporation and we are slaves to all of them. Apart from that, and your spelling mistakes; I say Brill m8 it warms my cockles to see the Robots Rebellion predicted by the Man and great Visionaray David Icke.

[the worm that turned]

I sent a copy of the NOI and COR in the opening post (with all names etc removed PROMISE) to my solicitor. I also asked if he had heard of the Freeman-on-the-land movement. Here is his reply:

"In short, it's a bag of crap!!! I wouldn't worry too much about it."

???

[arten]

PMSL mate why bother with solicitors they are part of the system they sold out years ago. They are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. If you or any one else is going down the Freeman route then you must be prepared to defend yourself and be your own advocate.

[the worm that turned]

PMSL mate why bother with solicitors they are part of the system they sold out years ago. They are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. If you or any one else is going down the Freeman route then you must be prepared to defend yourself and be your own advocate.

So do you think it is a knee jerk reaction. Bear in mind that I have known the person for about 15+ years (although more of a colleague than a friend) and I have NEVER asked him anything outside of the "comfort" zone before.

Perhaps he has never heard of it before and is too proud to admit that he knows nothing of the system he works in. Or perhaps it is all a load of crap and will fall apart at the first hurdle!

Other examples include free energy by Lou Britts in Australia, the answer to all our prayers. 10 years on, I'm still being ripped-off by huge corporations that burn coal and oil out of the ground!!!!

Please do not think I am anti this at all, because I am not. I just want to be certain of exactly what we are dealing with here.

[arten]

Mate when I read his reply my first thought was he is being ambiguous. I suspect that most people in the legal profession are going to have a certian amount of Disdain for the FreeMan movement. You have to remember, and I have pointed this out before that Lawyers like Soldiers and Policemen have to swear on oath an allegiance to the Crown.
I bet behind closed doors there are meetings going on all over the place.
Mi5 will be involved and we have seen how they react to anyone or anything that remotely resembles a threat to the Reppies on the throne.
A few years ago I sent an e-mail off to Blair at number 10 castigating him for being a war criminal and a Satanist. I had M15 knock on me door getting stroppy. :eek:

[the worm that turned]

Mate when I read his reply my first thought was he is being ambiguous. I suspect that most people in the legal profession are going to have a certian amount of Disdain for the FreeMan movement. You have to remember, and I have pointed this out before that Lawyers like Soldiers and Policemen have to swear on oath an allegiance to the Crown.
I bet behind closed doors there are meetings going on all over the place.
Mi5 will be involved and we have seen how they react to anyone or anything that remotely resembles a threat to the Reppies on the throne.
A few years ago I sent an e-mail off to Blair at number 10 castigating him for being a war criminal and a Satanist. I had M15 knock on me door getting stroppy. :eek:

So are you working for them now? :D

EDIT - just noticed this was post 33!!! You must be an insider ;)

[arten]

So are you working for them now? :D

EDIT - just noticed this was post 33!!! You must be an insider ;)

LOL nope I am going to declare my Free Man Status once I am fully armed with all I need to know to beat the system.:cool:

[notmarkk]

d (TWO THOUSEND POUNDS PER HOUR) or po

thousand*

[bsmurph83]

I sent a copy of the NOI and COR in the opening post (with all names etc removed PROMISE) to my solicitor. I also asked if he had heard of the Freeman-on-the-land movement. Here is his reply:

"In short, it's a bag of crap!!! I wouldn't worry too much about it."

???

worm, i'd like to see what he says if you ask him if he is prepared to swear on an affidavit under full commercial liability and penalty of perjury! maybe you can find out *grin*

[girlgye]

I suggest that every Notary in the UK is a solicitor.

A lot of solicitors have taken extra courses on being a Notary.

To be a Notary, you have to have a degree, and have taken 'the course',
and as all solicitors have to have a degree in law, they are 'nearly there'
so to speak.


Why not wait for a while and see what events are about to unfold!

Why not - just for now - use a NUI & COR to the people who NOTICE you first.
Conditionally accept their offer with a NOTICE of Understanding & Intent & Claim Of Right with a time limit of say 10 days.
Send a DEFAULT NOTICE ( if they don't respond in the stated time) with;

"Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein and then successfully defeating these claims in a proper court of law will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act or regulation against My Self Freeman John Thomas for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties."

as the last paragraph.

The above is borrowed, with gratitude, from Robert Arthur: Menard in his published Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right.


John Thomas is a euphemism :p

What can I do to become a Notary. I don't need a degree in Law?

[girlgye]

I have not heard of this.
Could you verify it?
Maybe provide a source?

From what I have read, a judge's decision can only be overturned by a judge in a higher court ... and usually on points of law or on issues of jurisdiction.

Also of interest is that whilst a judge takes an oath to be impartial, he is not bound to be impartial unless his oath is present in the court room.

To ensure impartiality, you must invoke his oath and have it present and on the record. Once his oath has been invoked and put on the record as being present, then he is bound to it and thus provide impartiality. Until this is done, he acts as an officer for the court, which means his primary role is to act on behalf of the court in terms of seeking judgement for the benefit of the court.

So this is why they get riled then? This is why they threaten to call in security and have you arrested? When they do this what do you suggest?

[sherrieandblakk]

He's scared. IMO.. I read the following on THIS (http://www.nationalnotary.org/news/index.cfm?Text=newsNotary&newsID=78) website


also note the illuminati triangle at the top of the page...I think it's the same thing

They can be scared and apparently there is a clause that forces them also
to do the things you ask as they are held by it.

Check more with Rob Menard.

[deem]

I hope it works, keep us posted on your journey to freedom.:D

[dolores1]

I got my Notice of intent and claim noterised on the 9th. August. It cost me £30.00 and took less that 10 minutes.

[wakeupworld]

This is great news.

[vienna]

went to see a notary today and recieved this response by email.




Dear Mr Redgrift,
You called to see me today for "Notarial Advice". I had not at first
made the connection between your appointment and the unsolicited e mail
of 19.6.08. I have perused your papers and I find that I am, in all the
circumstances, unable to assist notarially. I would not wish to take any
fee from you concerning the matters discussed or our correspondence. I
wish you and yours well.
Yours sincerely,
Paul R Sheridan TD BA Notary Public, Grimsby UK

what you think guys?

do i just find another ?

john harris mentioned in his latest lecture a notary or solicitor is unnecessary all you need are 3 o witne your claim - im seeing if there's further info in the forums and tempate section

[the worm that turned]

brilliant replys guys thanks alot!!!

i still made a error in spelling "to right" instead of "the right" lol.

the last post was can a non national use the same withing aussy land?

depends on what nationality you are i suppose but im not sure what aussy laws are regarding it. sorry.

i will seek a solicitor to check it all out this week and if he believes its ok ill get info on notorizing it. kinda scary knowing ill be taking on the laws.

any advice would be great!!!

cheers guys...

I don't think you are taking on the laws, you are just learning them and using them to your advantage. :)

Good luck and keep us posted

[owltui]

In Australia under the Bills if Exchange Act 1905 Section 100 it states
"Protest when notary not accessible
Where a dishonoured bill or note is authorized or required to be protested, any householder or substantial resident of the place where the bill is dishonoured may, in the presence of two witnesses, give a certificate, signed by them, attesting the dishonour of the bill, and the certificate shall in all respects operate as if it were a formal protest of the Bill."

I have used a householder and two witnesses successfully on numerous occasions including my NOUICOR.

Notary Publics in Australia are all members of the Law Society and have sworn an oath to that society, so are not going to help any of us to be free sovereigns now are they? I dare say the same is true in many other places.

[tien an]

I got my Notice of intent and claim noterised on the 9th. August. It cost me £30.00 and took less that 10 minutes.

If I'd had my NOUI & CoR notarised, I think I would remember the date...

This link is to another thread in which you maintain that you've had your documents notarised.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1208794&postcount=86

Given that everyone I've seen attempting to do this in the UK has been unsuccessful, I'd really like to know who notarised them.

Here's where you didn't answer my question the last time...

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1219051&postcount=103

Perhaps it's different, in Northern Ireland?

tian an.

[vienna]

nice bit of detective work that man ;)

is dolores1 = Shayler ?

the John Harris method is certainly cheaper (basically achieving it by the fact they don't contest your claims - 'estoppal by aquiesence'- there are downloadable templates at TPUC.org if anyone wants to use this method) and it 'feels' right too, especially to anyone loathe to giving their money to solicitors

[dolores1]

If I'd had my NOUI & CoR notarised, I think I would remember the date...

This link is to another thread in which you maintain that you've had your documents notarised.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1208794&postcount=86

Given that everyone I've seen attempting to do this in the UK has been unsuccessful, I'd really like to know who notarised them.

Here's where you didn't answer my question the last time...

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1219051&postcount=103

Perhaps it's different, in Northern Ireland?

tian an.

You are right I left of the 1, I had a flood in my office and the mess is my
only excuse.

The Notary was Michael Flannagen, Falls Road. Belfast. If you send me your email I will attach a notarised copy.

[tien an]

How about that...only one notary public listed in Belfast (notarysociety.org)...and his name isn't Flanagen, Flanagan...or even Flanigin.


I smell porky-pies.


tian an.

EDIT: "If you send me your email I will attach a notarised copy." Yeah right: rock on.

[dolores1]

How about that...only one notary public listed in Belfast (notarysociety.org)...and his name isn't Flanagen, Flanagan...or even Flanigin.


I smell porky-pies.


tian an.

EDIT: "If you send me your email I will attach a notarised copy." Yeah right: rock on.

I do NOT lie, I made you an offer in good faith to send you a copy. I am on a different computer from my main one at present. I have a LAN.

I smell porky-pies?

How infantile!

[dolores1]

How about that...only one notary public listed in Belfast (notarysociety.org)...and his name isn't Flanagen, Flanagan...or even Flanigin.


I smell porky-pies.


tian an.

EDIT: "If you send me your email I will attach a notarised copy." Yeah right: rock on.


I feel very angry at your non response to my first offer. I offer a copy of it to anyone who would like to see it, but I will send it through a moderator.

I have been unable to watch all the recent posts because of a close family death. My sister.

[dolores1]

nice bit of detective work that man ;)

is dolores1 = Shayler ?

the John Harris method is certainly cheaper (basically achieving it by the fact they don't contest your claims - 'estoppal by aquiesence'- there are downloadable templates at TPUC.org if anyone wants to use this method) and it 'feels' right too, especially to anyone loathe to giving their money to solicitors

?

[tien an]

I feel very angry at your non response to my first offer. I offer a copy of it to anyone who would like to see it, but I will send it through a moderator.

I have been unable to watch all the recent posts because of a close family death. My sister.

dolores1, there is no need to feel angry: I am simply very interested in the subject of having a notarial seal affixed to my NOUI & COR.
It seems, so far, that this is impossible in the UK.
I'm not hounding you, I just want to get my NOUI & COR sealed by a Notary.
My freedom, and that of my family depends on it and to say I'm passionate about the issue would be an understatement.

Your revelation (20th August) that you had achieved this awoke my curiosity and I (as well as The Worm That Turned) asked you for the name of the Notary.

Later (31st August), I asked you to confirm whether it was the 9th or 19th that you'd had a Notary seal your documents.

You replied that it was indeed the 19th and that you were distracted (and made an error in typing) because you had a mess due to a flood.

Then, on 1st September, you posted that it was a notary named Flanagen on the Falls Road in Belfast.

You offered to send me a copy if I would divulge my email address!

Now you're angry that I didn't take up your offer.
(You're angry over my refusal to share my identity with you?)

You say that you're on a different computer than your own at the time of posting. You have a LAN.
Whilst I appreciate that you might not have access to a scanner or even the documents in question if you're on a different computer...what does having a LAN have to do with the price of eggs?

Was my 'porky pies' comment infantile?
Perhaps.
It was side-stepping the issue of calling you a liar outright.

I offer you my heartfelt condolences for the death of your sister, but I'm afraid that using her demise as an excuse (for an excuse) of not being able to read posts on this subject is also questionable:
A quick look at your posting record shows that between the 20th August and today, you have posted every day except the 31st August and 4th September.

I'll leave you alone now; I have no wish to be accused of harassment.

I might suggest, though, that you google 'imageshack' or 'photobucket', both sites where you can upload images and provide a link to them here on the forum...completely anonymously.

Heavenly Peace,
tian an.

[dolores1]

You are right I left of the 1, I had a flood in my office and the mess is my
only excuse.

The Notary was Michael Flannagen, Falls Road. Belfast. If you send me your email I will attach a notarised copy.

Tel: 02890233309 M. Flannagan - Notary Public

[tien an]

Tel: 02890233309 M. Flannagan - Notary Public

Right...can you explain to me just how this proves that you have had your NOUI & COR sealed by this solicitor?

(I can't see on his website that he's a Notary Public, and he's not listed as such on the Notary Society's website).

What am I supposed to do?
Call him and ask?

What do you think will happen?
He'll tell me he's not at liberty to divulge that information to me...and rightly so.

You must take me for a complete idiot...I could do the same by giving you the name and telephone number of any solicitor in the UK...

I've since found out that a Notary in NI is something quite different from those in the rest of the UK.
(Some information that will be useful in the future).

I'm not interested in your bogus claims any more: I have other, more pressing engagements.


'Bye.

tian an.

[takawa]

I got my Notice of intent and claim noterised on the 9th. August. It cost me £30.00 and took less that 10 minutes.

Where did you get it notarized? I am been denied all the time.