What will be of miscegenated people?

[daugustus]

Although people who are searching for enlightenment execrate the word racism, we know that the white race has brought up around 95% of our current development level.

Other races, even nowadays, are far behind white countries´overall development.

In Brazil, miscegenated states (22 of 26) are literally financially supported by whiter states like São Paulo and the Southern region with billions of dollars.

In times of enlightenment, do you think that miscegenated people will be able to reach the same development as the white race through education (real education), consciousness expansion, better overall environment and/or others? Or would genes play a determinant role?

I am concerned with this issue because this is the trend not only in Brazil, but which is starting to take place in Europe and US too.

[learner]

Although people who are searching for enlightenment execrate the word racism, we know that the white race has brought up around 95% of our current development level.

Other races, even nowadays, are far behind white countries´overall development.

In Brazil, miscegenated states (22 of 26) are literally financially supported by whiter states like São Paulo and the Southern region with billions of dollars.

In times of enlightenment, do you think that miscegenated people will be able to reach the same development as the white race through education (real education), consciousness expansion, better overall environment and/or others? Or would genes play a determinant role?

I am concerned with this issue because this is the trend not only in Brazil, but which is starting to take place in Europe and US too.

Good day Daugutus,

I can perhaps see your little dilemma which is generally a view by confusion.
Developed nations are called developed by this concept mainly by technology and systematic ideals. I propose to you that 'enlightenment' is in fact opposite to being technologically advanced. Yes we can discover things through advanced science but it is not the same as being spiritually enlightened. It is quite strange really that even the countries we call 3rd world have pockets of ancient knowledge that is but part of the keys to understanding the universe.

I believe that the true knowledge of our surroundings requires everyone on the planet,regardless of their location or status.

:)

[believenothing]

Everybody on the planet is Miscegenated. Europeans and Asians have 1%-4% Neanderthal DNA. Some indigenous South Pacific islanders have a 4%-8% Neanderthal/Denisova genetic admixture. Homo habilis and homo erectus also contributed to the modern human genetic pool.

Our ancestors had migrated to remote parts of the globe and via evolutionary adaption, mutation, survival of the fittest, etc. they became different subspecies who territories eventually crossed. These populations mixed and then the hybrid offspring, if capable of making viable offspring, would introduce these genes to the non-mixed. Since humans are still animals, there was probably sterile hybrids. Some not apparent until a few generations later. There was probably also complications (which likely has something to do with the origin of the word Cesarean section). Only the compatible ones survived and whatever was left of these archaic great apes died off via extermination campaigns which even non-human great apes commit today when expanding territory. Probably catastrophes killed them off too.

The point I'm trying to make is modern man is a hybrid species. Races are a window into are hybrid past, but we are all more genetically same than different. We are all different though but that's not a bad thing. Because of recessive traits, two brothers can be totally different from a behavior standpoint even with similar upbringing.

From a modern standpoint, what people refer to as 'white people' is usually Western Europeans. Western Europe went through a depopulation even as a result of a comet impact around the 5th century. Nordic peoples and the Huns contributed their genes to the Celtic peoples. Arabs contributed their genes to North Africans and North Africans contributed these genes to the Spanish. The most mixed people are those of the Levant as well as Turkey and Greece. Turks, Greeks, and Armenians are ironically more related than not despite their mutual hatred towards one and other.

[valkyrieangel]

Although people who are searching for enlightenment execrate the word racism, we know that the white race has brought up around 95% of our current development level.

Other races, even nowadays, are far behind white countries´overall development.

In Brazil, miscegenated states (22 of 26) are literally financially supported by whiter states like São Paulo and the Southern region with billions of dollars.

In times of enlightenment, do you think that miscegenated people will be able to reach the same development as the white race through education (real education), consciousness expansion, better overall environment and/or others? Or would genes play a determinant role?

I am concerned with this issue because this is the trend not only in Brazil, but which is starting to take place in Europe and US too.

Good question!

I think they can, in their own time - the models exist. The real struggle is against corruption rather than biology.

[daugustus]

Wow, I thoughT the thread was already dead!

Well, according to learner the there is really nothing to fear, which I agree in purely spiritual terms. The only concern I still have is why exactly we keep incarnating (and therefore needing technological advances) in order to evolve. We hear this from most religions and esoteric people, but I don´t quite understand how a physical experience can contribute to a better spiritual living.

Believenothing´s information is something I´ll read more about. If Europeans have reached such a high level of technological development even with some sensitive amount of genes of less evolved races, the issue of miscegenation might come to the percentage of the "best" genes you have rather than just the presence of some "undesired" genes. The problem I still consider is, the more admixture (even below 10%) with berbers/moors/arabs/turks a European country has, the less evolved it seems to be (Portugal, Spain, Greece, etc)

Valkyrieangel´s consideration is something I´ll have to wait to see how much of Brazilian´s inertia is due to manipulation, poverty, culture or genetic influence.

[infinityandlove]

Although people who are searching for enlightenment execrate the word racism, we know that the white race has brought up around 95% of our current development level.

Other races, even nowadays, are far behind white countries´overall development.

In Brazil, miscegenated states (22 of 26) are literally financially supported by whiter states like São Paulo and the Southern region with billions of dollars.

In times of enlightenment, do you think that miscegenated people will be able to reach the same development as the white race through education (real education), consciousness expansion, better overall environment and/or others? Or would genes play a determinant role?

I am concerned with this issue because this is the trend not only in Brazil, but which is starting to take place in Europe and US too.

Good question.
No one is exempt from consciousness expansion. However i still feel, the East, like India and Chinese (buddhism) are champions at awareness. The West is too concerned with technology and medicine and all that.

[fishonwheels]

Hi hi. Wont be caught up on this thread today as i'm still having internet connectivity issues but want address a few points. First how did the op get at the 95% figure and second, sry infinityandlove the east that i know and the onw many western expats might relate to you is as materialistic as any place comes. South east asia just has less materially that about the only difference and frankly i dont think theres any incentive for developed countries all over to help the have not countries because they very obviously benefit from globalized inequalities.

Oh and this isnt directly related but no one's said here that immigration in first world might pertain to population aging, mounting national debt (so they say), and the need for more tax payers? Just a possibility i'm entertaining.

There are two ways for legal immigration into canada for eg. Unless you're seeking asylum you can either open a business or invest a certain amount in an existing one,or, you can appy for the "skilled" category if you have in demand training with what are in demand varying through years.

Well anyways

[vancity eagle]

Wow, I thoughT the thread was already dead!

Well, according to learner the there is really nothing to fear, which I agree in purely spiritual terms. The only concern I still have is why exactly we keep incarnating (and therefore needing technological advances) in order to evolve. We hear this from most religions and esoteric people, but I don´t quite understand how a physical experience can contribute to a better spiritual living.

Believenothing´s information is something I´ll read more about. If Europeans have reached such a high level of technological development even with some sensitive amount of genes of less evolved races, the issue of miscegenation might come to the percentage of the "best" genes you have rather than just the presence of some "undesired" genes. The problem I still consider is, the more admixture (even below 10%) with berbers/moors/arabs/turks a European country has, the less evolved it seems to be (Portugal, Spain, Greece, etc)

Valkyrieangel´s consideration is something I´ll have to wait to see how much of Brazilian´s inertia is due to manipulation, poverty, culture or genetic influence.

your theory has a fatal flaw. What you deem to be "white europeans" or "europeans with minimal mixture" have not always been the most advanced civilizations throughout history. The renaissance of europe came from the areas, where the moors pretty much controlled or had significant influence. In the middle ages, the moors were more advanced than "europeans" so your ideology is flawed.
Also in more ancient times we had the Greeks learning from the Egyptians, so things weren't always as they are today.

[groen]

I like to refer to the case of the celebrity adoption. If angelina jolie's adopted baby from africa goes to the best schools in the west will they have the same potential as the students in his class. If you did an experiment and took a child of a very smart and successful parents and the child of a liberian civil war single mom and brought them up in a controlled environment with excellent teaching and parent child bonding relationship. Would they have equal success rates.

I would say that human individuality is beyond genetics to some extent. There are always exceptions. I have seen very successful people come out of the worst childhood environments and end up successful in work and family and I have seen the most fortunate people not take advantage of their opportunities.

But like physical capabilities, running, jumping etc, thinking (or more specifically logic) i believe is an instinct or capability that has been passed on by genetics.

[daugustus]

You´ve touched a good point. It´s hard to know how much genetics affect our lives and how much the lifestyle we lead affects our genetic pool passed on to the next generations.

That´s why I have been a little on epigenetics lately too.

[johngr]

I like to refer to the case of the celebrity adoption. If angelina jolie's adopted baby from africa goes to the best schools in the west will they have the same potential as the students in his class. If you did an experiment and took a child of a very smart and successful parents and the child of a liberian civil war single mom and brought them up in a controlled environment with excellent teaching and parent child bonding relationship. Would they have equal success rates.

I would say that human individuality is beyond genetics to some extent. There are always exceptions. I have seen very successful people come out of the worst childhood environments and end up successful in work and family and I have seen the most fortunate people not take advantage of their opportunities.

But like physical capabilities, running, jumping etc, thinking (or more specifically logic) i believe is an instinct or capability that has been passed on by genetics.

The Minnesota Trans-racial adoption study tried to do just that. Being brought up in White families did not affect the one-STD difference "G" is mostly genetic, though some environment can affect it positively or negatively.

[saint_frankenstein]

Although people who are searching for enlightenment execrate the word racism, we know that the white race has brought up around 95% of our current development level.

Other races, even nowadays, are far behind white countries´overall development.

In Brazil, miscegenated states (22 of 26) are literally financially supported by whiter states like São Paulo and the Southern region with billions of dollars.

In times of enlightenment, do you think that miscegenated people will be able to reach the same development as the white race through education (real education), consciousness expansion, better overall environment and/or others? Or would genes play a determinant role?

I am concerned with this issue because this is the trend not only in Brazil, but which is starting to take place in Europe and US too.

You need to learn some history in order to understand why non-white people are viewed as doing so poorly compared to white people, historically. Does colonialism, genocide and slavery mean anything to you? After all, it wasn't white people as some sort of unified group who were "better" than everyone else, but a small group of rulers who went around stomping on everyone else, including the fellow "white" people of their own countries/kingdoms.

[protocol]

I'm generally not a believer in any one thing owing to the breathtaking advancement of 'white' nations over the last 500 or so years, be it the favourability of the post ice age european natural environment, dominion over readily available domesticable animals and so on. However, bought to my attention was a short presentation by Niall Ferguson about the revolutionary development of property rights by those like John Locke.

Niall Ferguson: The 6 killer apps of prosperity - YouTube

Of course, this unique process in human history is currently being systematically dismantled by the NWO and future one world corporate-communist oligarchy...we shall descend as quickly as we developed.

[vancity eagle]

I'm generally not a believer in any one thing owing to the breathtaking advancement of 'white' nations over the last 500 or so years, be it the favourability of the post ice age european natural environment, dominion over readily available domesticable animals and so on. However, bought to my attention was a short presentation by Niall Ferguson about the revolutionary development of property rights by those like John Locke.

Niall Ferguson: The 6 killer apps of prosperity - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpnFeyMGUs8)

Of course, this unique process in human history is currently being systematically dismantled by the NWO and future one world corporate-communist oligarchy...we shall descend as quickly as we developed.

human development is a result of one, and one thing only. Interaction with the higher forces ie fallen angels. We are often told of how smart certain scientists were, but the fact of the matter is that they all engaged in kabbalistic worship. The Occult is what brings technology, not a bunch of "smart" people.

Throughout history, whichever civilization was most in tune with the occult forces was the most advanced. It began in Babylon and Egypt, the Greeks learned the occult ways from them and then advanced civilization, same with the Romans. It seems during the "dark ages", the Moors and Arabs along with the Jews of Spain led the way with the occult practises. The Zohar was studied in Spain and the Moors led civilization for nearly 1000 years. Europe again brought the Kabbalistic studies to the forefront, and most of the enlightenment and renaisance thinkers were either Rosicrucians, masons, etc. all practising the black arts. Technology comes from communication with Angels, period. Not because certain races are smarter than others.

[saint_frankenstein]

human development is a result of one, and one thing only. Interaction with the higher forces ie fallen angels. We are often told of how smart certain scientists were, but the fact of the matter is that they all engaged in kabbalistic worship. The Occult is what brings technology, not a bunch of "smart" people.

Throughout history, whichever civilization was most in tune with the occult forces was the most advanced. It began in Babylon and Egypt, the Greeks learned the occult ways from them and then advanced civilization, same with the Romans. It seems during the "dark ages", the Moors and Arabs along with the Jews of Spain led the way with the occult practises. The Zohar was studied in Spain and the Moors led civilization for nearly 1000 years. Europe again brought the Kabbalistic studies to the forefront, and most of the enlightenment and renaisance thinkers were either Rosicrucians, masons, etc. all practising the black arts. Technology comes from communication with Angels, period. Not because certain races are smarter than others.

Then that's an argument in favor of the "Watchers".

[night_gaunt]

Although people who are searching for enlightenment execrate the word racism, we know that the white race has brought up around 95% of our current development level.


We know?? you think
Are you that ill-informed that you don't know american tribes knew how to perform surgery hundreds of years before europeans? That they understood the complex patterns of planets and stars while white men still thought the earth was the center of the universe?!
There is no dominant race. There is abuse and manipulation.
Every damn culture in this world that wasn't "sparkling white" was fine until the white man destroyed their cultures. Forced religions on them. Raped their women and enslaved their men.
Africa had prosperous kingdoms. Then came the slave trade and colonization. Why do you see children in poverty there now? Because of the white man.
The "white race" has done wonders for itself, sure. Einstein was white, Darwin was white.
But Tecumseh was INDIAN, William Claytor was BLACK, Asians make up the majorities at well-to colleges like Harvard and Yale.
Most ill-informed post of the year award, second place.

[saint_frankenstein]

Most ill-informed post of the year award, second place.

Who came in first? ;)

[night_gaunt]

Who came in first? ;)

Some guy who thought women had nothing to do with the construction of society and should be replaced by robots.
How easily people will absorb mainstream information without learning the background information, like how the success of Watson and Crick was due to Rosalind Franklin, who of course is left out for the most part.

[bikerdruid]

We know?? you think
Are you that ill-informed that you don't know american tribes knew how to perform surgery hundreds of years before europeans? That they understood the complex patterns of planets and stars while white men still thought the earth was the center of the universe?!
There is no dominant race. There is abuse and manipulation.
Every damn culture in this world that wasn't "sparkling white" was fine until the white man destroyed their cultures. Forced religions on them. Raped their women and enslaved their men.
Africa had prosperous kingdoms. Then came the slave trade and colonization. Why do you see children in poverty there now? Because of the white man.
The "white race" has done wonders for itself, sure. Einstein was white, Darwin was white.
But Tecumseh was INDIAN, William Claytor was BLACK, Asians make up the majorities at well-to colleges like Harvard and Yale.
Most ill-informed post of the year award, second place.

agreed.
white-supremest twaddle.

[ritchs]

I don't even know it is even arguable that intelligence is not hereditary.
This is absolute fact. Look to the selective breeding of animals that have resulted in outstanding examples of courage and intelligence as in dog breeds. People refrain from stating this since it is politically incorrect. But sadly all men are not created equal. Both Nature and Nurture play a part, but it has to be there to start with from Nature

But it is not intelligence alone that makes a people great, It is Character.
You can be as smart as Einstein and be a dirtbag of a person.

"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Ghandi

[protocol]

I don't even know it is even arguable that intelligence is not hereditary.
This is absolute fact. Look to the selective breeding of animals that have resulted in outstanding examples of courage and intelligence as in dog breeds. People refrain from stating this since it is politically incorrect. But sadly all men are not created equal. Both Nature and Nurture play a part, but it has to be there to start with from Nature

But it is not intelligence alone that makes a people great, It is Character.
You can be as smart as Einstein and be a dirtbag of a person.

"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Ghandi

The truth is most people support eugenics, they simply say they don't in public. The most obvious example is when people choose sperm donors. They would never ask for the fattest, baldest, dumbest, poorest 'dad' they could find, who has diabetes and cancer. No, they ask for the complete opposite.

[daugustus]

Long time since my last reply. Thanks for all the considerations!

Some people execrate me for being politically incorrect, but I think I have made myself clear that what I really would like to believe is that all races/ethnicities/whatever will be able to live compatibly and peacefully in the near future.

Denying the differences in IQ between Germans and Angolans seems lovely, but it doesn´t help the world improve.

In the last weeks, I came upon these videos, that say, basically, that the Annunaki have locked all humans beings (he considers all a single race) in the current genetic expression, while what some call "junk DNA" is actually the most important part of mankind´s gene pool still to be activated from 2012 on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y87gCU9eqZI

If this is true, I don´t know, but most people on this forum would be familiar with those ideas.

Since I´m tired of ruminating on this subject, I hope to see the manifestation of those things in the next years.

If not, I´ll keep building my country house far from rap listeners and their mating rituals until I can find an appropriate solution to keep living in this physical world in peace.

[daugustus]

The truth is most people support eugenics, they simply say they don't in public. The most obvious example is when people choose sperm donors. They would never ask for the fattest, baldest, dumbest, poorest 'dad' they could find, who has diabetes and cancer. No, they ask for the complete opposite.

So true.

[jorates]

True indeed. But I think it is rather biased, since we are always taught to believe either our own race is the desirable one. For instance, in preserved cultures, Arabs are proud of their race, so as Indians, Chinese, and so are others - Europeans get to extreme to believe their people is superior to the neighbour. Or we can be taught the superior race is the dominating one no matter by which means. Colonized American were violently taught to be inferior, but we do not see this belief amongst the simple folks, only amongst those who could benefit in status being the same ethnicity as the rulers.
Every race has its traits.
To be a cold-minded can be a good trait, to be a psychic can be a good trait. Age slowly can be a good trait. To be loving, earthy can be a good trait. We are all Universal Royalty.
The bias is very useful to divide and rule, always has.

[bruceallmighty]

I think the questions more relevent; Is development even a symbol of enlightenment? Or does development aid in the attainment of enlightment over any method where a lack of development in, as you allude to, "not so white races" are involved? And are the "whiter" races any more enlightened per capita than "not so white races?" I also fail to see what miscegenation has to with development or an enlightened consciousness.
Personally I find living in a so called "developed" country with all the various electrical interferences, air pollutants and the toxicity in the food and water to be a severe inhibitor to unfettered consciousness expansion. So much so that people living in developed countries indeed get to a point where they fade out and become so entranced by their techno-state that it takes a huge shift and re-awakening to begin to get back in touch with consciousness. So I feel that an environment directly apposed to the one I just described would be far more conducive to an enlightened conscious state of awareness. One closer to that of the jungles of peru or somewhere similar removed from these so called modern cities or suburbs.
I don't think genes make anyone predisposed to a particular set of unchangeable traits. Rather these traits are imbued (programmed) into the individual by way of the environment which can always be changed via more appropriate programming as deemed acceptable by the individual as consciosness requires to expand.

[deinonychus]

In times of enlightenment, do you think that miscegenated people will be able to reach the same development as the white race through education (real education), consciousness expansion, better overall environment and/or others? No.

[ohzone]

I think the questions more relevent; Is development even a symbol of enlightenment? I also fail to see what miscegenation has to with development or an enlightened consciousness.

****So your big thing is "enlightenment". Do you even know what this means?

So I feel that an environment directly apposed to the one I just described would be far more conducive to an enlightened conscious state of awareness. One closer to that of the jungles of peru or somewhere similar removed from these so called modern cities or suburbs.

**** Are people in the jungles of Peru "enlightened"? How exactly are they "enlightened" and how does it make their lives better than the rest of us?

I don't think genes make anyone predisposed to a particular set of unchangeable traits. Rather these traits are imbued (programmed) into the individual by way of the environment which can always be changed via more appropriate programming as deemed acceptable by the individual as consciosness requires to expand.

****Genes are the basis for ALL mental and physical attributes. Who is doing the "programming you are talking about? So brown eyes can be programmed into an individual? You should send your programmers to Detroit. The same folks living there now an their children are the ones who were making $35 an hour just a few years ago at the auto plants.


Mixed breed people, like mixed breed dogs have lost the special qualities of their ancestors on both sides.

[protocol]

The mixed race will rise to replace whites as the political/government/management/beareaucrat class. They have done in Haiti, and as i understand it are disliked by pure blacks.

The blacks might like Obama now, but in the future, light skinned blacks like him may well be seen as unacceptable vestiges of white hegemony.

[bikerdruid]

Mixed breed people, like mixed breed dogs have lost the special qualities of their ancestors on both sides.

this is pure bollocks.
what a truly elitist attitude.

[bikerdruid]

No.

twaddle.
see above.

[deinonychus]

twaddle.
see above.
How about no - YouTube

[daugustus]

Well, with "development" I mean especially intellectual development, and enlightenment seems the knowledge of truth (truth itself, not facts, that people say are true).

Some people say enlightenment is a raise in consciousness, but anyway it seems intellect is an aid in achieving this.

[saint_frankenstein]

Mixed breed people, like mixed breed dogs have lost the special qualities of their ancestors on both sides.

Bullshit. I'm mixed black and white and I'm my own person. Both sides of my immediate family are crap, really. Why would I have to identify with one or the other? Lots of trashy people in all groups. I put more value in spirit than in flesh. Obsession with ethnicity is materialism.

[khepera2010]

Mixed breed people, like mixed breed dogs have lost the special qualities of their ancestors on both sides.

^^^ absolute horse bollox.

[saint_frankenstein]

^^^ absolute horse bollox.

Hey, khepera2010. *waves*

[khepera2010]

Hey, khepera2010. *waves*

Good morning Frankie :)

[saint_frankenstein]

Good morning Frankie :)

Good night, for me. Lol. How's you day so far?

Sent you a message.

[khepera2010]

Good night, for me. Lol. How's you day so far?

Sent you a message.

Yeah saw and answered the message, cheers :).

[manicshamanic]

Sad really, the amount of racisism I see, even by senior members, I thought this was a forum for the open minded.. but whatever, we're all here to express ourselves...
My view is that enlightenment has absolutely nothing to do with the "development" status of their environment. Infact I'd think less is more when is comes to spiritual and conscious enlightenment. We see them as miscegenated, impoverished and lacking education. Maybe they're blessed. I doubt there's any ego, materialism or sense of self importance getting in the way of enlightenment.
Just a thought, who knows really

[thommo]

Good day Daugutus,

I can perhaps see your little dilemma which is generally a view by confusion.
Developed nations are called developed by this concept mainly by technology and systematic ideals. I propose to you that 'enlightenment' is in fact opposite to being technologically advanced. Yes we can discover things through advanced science but it is not the same as being spiritually enlightened. It is quite strange really that even the countries we call 3rd world have pockets of ancient knowledge that is but part of the keys to understanding the universe.

I believe that the true knowledge of our surroundings requires everyone on the planet,regardless of their location or status.

:)

Really good post! +1

The technological advances that are being talked about in the OP are going a long way to destroying this world. When spiritual enlightenment and technology converge, the human race will stop devolving and will start to evolve again. The main roadblocks here are fear and greed which ultimately lead to hate. As long as we operate a monetary system that will not change as the technological advances that will help the spiritual enlightenment won't be released to the masses, just to those that can afford it.

The Celestine Prophecy by James Redfield puts it very well. If you've not read it have a look :)

[unelected bureaucrat]

"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Ghandi

I thought that quote was animals not weakest members. Or that might've been Einstein.

I think white people are more successful overall because historical environmental challenges required more thought than just hunting and gathering etc.

[daugustus]

Well, one thing is for sure...if genes could not be "reprogrammed", there would be no evolution.

Perhaps we can´t see gene evolution clearly these times because we have been living times of supression and prevalence of the masculine principle.

Who knows what will happen when children of any race are grown listening to good music, with love and affection, and being induced to think and question everything?

My daughter listens to classical music everyday and the 528Hz frequency sometimes, and her development is outstanding.

I have seen "mixed" people around here being successful in most areas, although they are clearly mostly white in genes.

My own observation and reflection have led me to believe that miscegenated people (in São Paulo, always mostly white) that seem not to evolve intellectually are not actually short of "neurons", but stuck in emotional problems that block their development.

If experience shows that those gene-based emotional problems can be overcome, then I can be confident of building a beautiful civilization in the next decades.

[bendoon]

Only a black man would dare to tell the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cea3MaQ-ZEg&feature=player_embedded#!

[foonclown]

Although people who are searching for enlightenment execrate the word racism, we know that the white race has brought up around 95% of our current development level.

Other races, even nowadays, are far behind white countries´overall development.

In Brazil, miscegenated states (22 of 26) are literally financially supported by whiter states like São Paulo and the Southern region with billions of dollars.

In times of enlightenment, do you think that miscegenated people will be able to reach the same development as the white race through education (real education), consciousness expansion, better overall environment and/or others? Or would genes play a determinant role?

I am concerned with this issue because this is the trend not only in Brazil, but which is starting to take place in Europe and US too.


What do you mean by development levels? People dying of hunger and cold in the UK. The great development levels of greed from the 1% . Slaves to the banks and big business. False flag attacks, illegal wars etc:) Surpressed health cures,technology ,alternative energy etc

[saint_frankenstein]

Well, one thing is for sure...if genes could not be "reprogrammed", there would be no evolution.

Perhaps we can´t see gene evolution clearly these times because we have been living times of supression and prevalence of the masculine principle.

Who knows what will happen when children of any race are grown listening to good music, with love and affection, and being induced to think and question everything?

My daughter listens to classical music everyday and the 528Hz frequency sometimes, and her development is outstanding.

I have seen "mixed" people around here being successful in most areas, although they are clearly mostly white in genes.

My own observation and reflection have led me to believe that miscegenated people (in São Paulo, always mostly white) that seem not to evolve intellectually are not actually short of "neurons", but stuck in emotional problems that block their development.

If experience shows that those gene-based emotional problems can be overcome, then I can be confident of building a beautiful civilization in the next decades.

Have you ever stopped to think about why these "non-white" nations are not at the same developmental level as the West?

Here's a hint: It's not because they're not "white".