View Full Version : The most important thing about the election:
space man
18-04-2012, 01:42 PM
I mean in all its essence, who actually gives a flying quackaroo about a phoney election? Even if it was real, what's one going to do majorly different than the other opposame?
Here's the real deal and what's really important:
From Centrebet:
http://i769.photobucket.com/albums/xx331/Visual123456789/election_lines.png
Who do you like (to win... `cause I don't like any of these fuckers.)?
I think Hillary's good value at such long odds.
Given these are fixed, it would be good to know who win from a conspiratorial view. Do they still go by the "highest royal blood" rule? Or was that out the window when Barrack got elected?
It's interesting that I couldn't find this betting option on other books that I searched, pinnacle had a couple of lines a while ago but not anymore. It would have been interesting to have compared them to pinnacle.
alf hearted
18-04-2012, 01:48 PM
Elections aren't about power, they are about public perceptions of power. A leader only has power at the aquiescence of those who grant that power. If a honest person ever got into such a position they'd be given that much shit to try and clean up that they'd never get a chance to start on the real mess.
totalrecall
18-04-2012, 03:32 PM
Elections aren't about power, they are about public perceptions of power. A leader only has power at the aquiescence of those who grant that power. If a honest person ever got into such a position they'd be given that much shit to try and clean up that they'd never get a chance to start on the real mess.
Lol, that would be like cleaning up a turd.
space man
18-04-2012, 03:38 PM
Alright, so who's your bet?
freedomfox59
19-04-2012, 12:57 AM
If you don't mind me asking, what do those numbers in the chart stand for?
space man
19-04-2012, 01:31 AM
If you don't mind me asking, what do those numbers in the chart stand for?
Price. For every dollar, you get that much back if your bet wins the election.
viper1
19-04-2012, 01:40 AM
Given these are fixed, it would be good to know who win from a conspiratorial view. Do they still go by the "highest royal blood" rule? Or was that out the window when Barrack got elected?
I think they go for the best person at the time.
And my gut tells me it will be Obama again.
But you are right, the betting is the only interesting thing!
And once again, the insiders might already know the winner.
The house always wins :rolleyes: :D
totalrecall
27-04-2012, 06:59 PM
I agree. Obama is being set up to be reelected.
The fake news of the economic recovery etc. Making sure Romney wins the opposame vote is essential for them. He is by far the least popular candiate and by far the weakest in both mind and morality (Mr. flip flop etc.). The msm has made sure to reinforce his crappiness and so has he. This actor has played his role well.
By rigging the the opposame election (less important in the public eyes), they won't need to rig the main election because Obama's opposame will be so shit as to make George W a better contender. :D
Definitely Obama for a second term. Given those odds, I would bet money on it. $100 for $141 back. Not bad.
Ron Paul is placed to keep the angry awakened mob believe in the system. Without legitimacy, governments have a much greater difficulty forcing people to do things they don't want to do. It's a real pain and in the long run nigh on impossible. So their plan of world government won't be implemented without brainwashed sheeple.
They can't have Ron Paul as a presidential candidate as that would be far to dangerous for the government's legitimacy when they rig the vote. RP would get about 65% of the votes and Obama around 35%. They would have to rig the main election and everyone would know it. Instead of boos for George W on the way to the Whitehouse, Obama would be stoned and probably shot by the mob.
Anyway, presidents are just figureheads. They wine and dine other heads of state and sign laws put in front of them by the cabal (and I'm not sure these days that they even have to do that).
There is a chance for a president to yield real power, but if they attempt such nonsense they will get a bullet in the head and replaced by the newer clone. No need for dramatic obvious cabal revealing assassinations such as JFK these days.
I would suggest praying to the tooth fairy to pay off your mortgage, than ask a politician to "save" the world.
hadabusa
27-04-2012, 07:12 PM
there is no economic recovery there was never one.
too many ppl live week to week paycheck and helld break loose if they didnt.
and a few jews and rich families own almost everything.
that is the problem.
and ppl think eonomic monopolies are outlawed.lol.theyre in place firmly.
elections are all bullshit, esp these days.
every consecutive politician throughout history has made matters worse than the previous one, stricter laws etc.
the good hearted proletariate is held down/back by a few.
everyone engaging in politics is a lying filt.
elections wont fix nothing.
space man
30-04-2012, 12:01 PM
I agree. Obama is being set up to be reelected.
The fake news of the economic recovery etc. Making sure Romney wins the opposame vote is essential for them. He is by far the least popular candiate and by far the weakest in both mind and morality (Mr. flip flop etc.). The msm has made sure to reinforce his crappiness and so has he. This actor has played his role well.
By rigging the the opposame election (less important in the public eyes), they won't need to rig the main election because Obama's opposame will be so shit as to make George W a better contender. :D
Definitely Obama for a second term. Given those odds, I would bet money on it. $100 for $141 back. Not bad.
Ron Paul is placed to keep the angry awakened mob believe in the system. Without legitimacy, governments have a much greater difficulty forcing people to do things they don't want to do. It's a real pain and in the long run nigh on impossible. So their plan of world government won't be implemented without brainwashed sheeple.
They can't have Ron Paul as a presidential candidate as that would be far to dangerous for the government's legitimacy when they rig the vote. RP would get about 65% of the votes and Obama around 35%. They would have to rig the main election and everyone would know it. Instead of boos for George W on the way to the Whitehouse, Obama would be stoned and probably shot by the mob.
Anyway, presidents are just figureheads. They wine and dine other heads of state and sign laws put in front of them by the cabal (and I'm not sure these days that they even have to do that).
There is a chance for a president to yield real power, but if they attempt such nonsense they will get a bullet in the head and replaced by the newer clone. No need for dramatic obvious cabal revealing assassinations such as JFK these days.
I would suggest praying to the tooth fairy to pay off your mortgage, than ask a politician to "save" the world.
Pretty much sums it up. I'm apprehensive on taking favourites though.
space man
30-04-2012, 12:26 PM
http://i769.photobucket.com/albums/xx331/Visual123456789/preselection1.png
http://i769.photobucket.com/albums/xx331/Visual123456789/generalelection1.jpg
bagatell
30-04-2012, 12:27 PM
I'll take $10 on Ron Paul. I think he's being set up to be the biggest presidential disappointment of all time.
ben black
30-04-2012, 01:52 PM
I actually have a fiver on Jeb Bush (at 50/1) to be the republican candidate ( taken out 2nd March).
I ufcking hope he isn't tho'....