Obama: Jesus Would Back Higher Taxes [Archive] - David Icke's Official Forums

arcyclus

03-02-2012, 08:50 AM

mikey mikey

03-02-2012, 11:33 AM

That speech:

"When I talk about making sure insurance companies aren't discriminating against those would are already sick, or making sure that unscrupulous lenders are not taking advantage of the most vulnerable among us. I do so because I genuinely believe that it will make the economy stronger for everybody, but I also do it because I know that far too many neighbors in our country have been hurt and treated unfairly over the last few years. And I believe in God's command to love thy neighbor as thyself."

"When I talk about shared responsibility, it's because I genuinely believe that in a time when many folks are struggling and at a time when we have enormous deficits, it's hard for me to ask seniors on fixed income or young people with student loans or middle class families who can barely pay the bills to shoulder the burden alone. I think to myself, if I'm willing to give something up as somebody who's been extraordinarily blessed and give up some of the tax breaks that I enjoy, I actually think that's going to make economic sense. But for me as a Christian, it also coincides with Jesus' teaching that for 'unto whom much is given, much shall be required.' It mirrors the Islamic belief that those who have been blessed have an obligation to use those blessings to help others or the Jewish doctrine of moderation and consideration for others."

"When I talk about giving every American a fair shot ... it makes economic sense. But part of that belief comes from my faith and the idea that I am my brother's keeper and I am my sister's keeper. As a country, we rise and fall together."

"It is our hope that people of good will can pursue their values and common ground and the common good as best they know how, with respect for each other. And I have to say that sometimes we talk about respect, but we don't act with respect towards each other during the course of these debates"

truthodare

03-02-2012, 11:39 AM

A phony twat talking about a phony economy incorporating phony religion.

Yep, birth certificate or not, that guy's a shoe in at the next election.

fingersync

03-02-2012, 11:57 AM

Great speech...let's see what happens.

mikey mikey

03-02-2012, 12:15 PM

Great speech...let's see what happens.

In one line you have summed up Obama's presidency.:D

mikey mikey

03-02-2012, 12:29 PM

The title of this thread is taken directly from the headline of the article.

The source of the article is called newsmax.com

Here is who founded, runs and who writes for them
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=NewsMax.com

And here is Newsmax's take on Ron Paul

Ron Paul and His Bigots
According to The New York Times, Ron Paul, the libertarian candidate, is “a real Republican contender in Iowa.” He is also the candidate of the white supremacists, Jew haters, and gay bashers

Read more on Newsmax.com: Ron Paul and His Bigots

http://www.newsmax.com/Koch/ron-paul-iowa-gingrich/2011/12/29/id/422442

So who trusts the integrity of this neocon rag?

Maybe just the OP.

Or maybe he doesn't check his sources

bemore

03-02-2012, 12:37 PM

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT-aP9LPPJnN4NUlX9LHoQQbQjpIy9VU1_fw0SHQ0OjiR01FjWBjw

:rolleyes:

fingersync

03-02-2012, 12:41 PM

In one line you have summed up Obama's presidency.:D

:D No we can't..:) At least he bought the troops home from Iraq, and Mitt will now put them in Iran...and around the poor Americans go.. spin spin

Hope I found you well:)

mikey mikey

03-02-2012, 12:43 PM

Hope I found you well:)

You did mate. Likewise I hope everything is good with you and yours.:)

size_of_light

03-02-2012, 12:45 PM

http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/1111/obamateleprompterhelmet.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/833/obamateleprompterhelmet.jpg/)

http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/5/obamalaughing275.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/841/obamalaughing275.jpg/)

fingersync

03-02-2012, 12:53 PM

You did mate. Likewise I hope everything is good with you and yours.:)

Thanks...off to the wateringhole for a few refreshments.

Take care

Later Mikey

chip1

03-02-2012, 03:39 PM

Jesus christ would put him on his knees and make him beg for mercy for not taking true care of the poor...

And he would make him cast the rich to their proper place...

fast eddie

03-02-2012, 05:36 PM

"President Barack Obama linked his economic policies to his Christian faith, saying on Thursday that meeting the nation's challenges requires strong values as much as smart policies.

Obama, making his third appearance as president at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, used his remarks to justify many of his actions, such as his call for the wealthy to pay more in taxes and his health care overhaul. He said they were not only economically sound but also rooted in his Christian values.

Christian values, Christian values!, WTF?

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obama-PrayerBreakfast/2012/02/02/id/428302?s=al&promo_code=E184-1

I guess Jesus would also back the zionist wars against brown skinned people, too. I guess we have to give up our country (the US) and its prosperity to fight a war against Muslims. Praise God!

And that source, Newsmax, is a fear mongering propaganda mill. I get about six articles a day in my inbox from them. It's almost 100% bullshit.

arcyclus

03-02-2012, 11:26 PM

arcyclus

03-02-2012, 11:36 PM

And that source, Newsmax, is a fear mongering propaganda mill. I get about six articles a day in my inbox from them. It's almost 100% bullshit.

Wrong!

Newsmax is a viable news source. It just doesn't doesn't follow the left wing anti-everything mob.

6 articles a day in your mailbox huh? You must spend an awful lot of time on the newsmax website to get 6 a day?

arcyclus

03-02-2012, 11:46 PM

What's unique about Obama is he is galvanizing both the left and the right against him. He is mutually hated from both sides.

bikerdruid

03-02-2012, 11:47 PM

Jesus christ would put him on his knees and make him beg for mercy......

i think you have jesus confused with conan the barbarian.
easy to do, i 'spose...

fast eddie

03-02-2012, 11:49 PM

Wrong!

Newsmax is a viable news source.

Newsmax doesn't bring anything to the table that you can't get from reading the newspapers or watching TV. It's old news.

It just doesn't doesn't follow the left wing anti-everything mob.

I really don't see the left-right paradigm as being that useful anymore. But Newsmax sure does.

Newsmax is for dummies.

6 articles a day in your mailbox huh? You must spend an awful lot of time on the newsmax website to get 6 a day?

I don't know how I got on their mailing list. I do not read most of the articles; I can tell by their titles that they're old news and/or bullshit. Example- half the articles have "Iran" and "nukes" in the title. I do not need to read any more fear mongering propoganda on this topic.

Newsmax is the Washington Post/ Wall Street Journal dumbed down for dummies.

arcyclus

04-02-2012, 12:03 AM

Newsmax is for dummies.

Then moveon.org, has to be for sheep and cattle! :D

fast eddie

04-02-2012, 12:23 AM

Then moveon.org, has to be for sheep and cattle! :D

I have not read "moveon.org." I suppose it's a "left wing" news source.

Thank you for proving my point.

arcyclus

04-02-2012, 12:56 AM

I have not read "moveon.org." I suppose it's a "left wing" news source.

Thank you for proving my point.

.....and you...mine! ;):D

fast eddie

04-02-2012, 12:58 AM

.....and you...mine! ;):D

What's your point? That I'm a "left-winger"?

arcyclus

04-02-2012, 01:49 AM

What's your point? That I'm a "left-winger"?

Fuck, I don't know are you? That's usually the case when when you bash a conservative news site w/o finding anything wrong with the left wing shit.

arcyclus

04-02-2012, 02:10 AM

Or maybe he doesn't check his sources

A link was given for my sources, which is more than you do.

It's understandable you do not approve of the link, most politically correct obama worshippers wouldn't.

fast eddie

04-02-2012, 02:23 AM

Fuck, I don't know are you? That's usually the case when when you bash a conservative news site w/o finding anything wrong with the left wing shit.

Exactly where did I support "left wing shit"?

Just so you understand, I am skeptical of news in general. It's not like I "believe" left wing shit or right wing shit. Shit is shit.

My reaction to many of the Newsmax articles that arrived in my mailbox was that it was superficial and slanted coverage of last week's, or last year's, news. Deal with it.

If you think you're going to pull me into some kind of left-right showdown, you are wrong.

tenzingnorgay

04-02-2012, 02:46 AM

arcyclus

04-02-2012, 02:57 AM

Exactly where did I support "left wing shit"?

Exactly where did I say you support "left wing shit"? I am the one who was asking.....remember?

johnny botwright

04-02-2012, 03:17 AM

Intresting to see what happens, many feel Obama was groomed and put into power by the illuminati, other front men into key postions, as head of the treasury , cia ect.

involved with the Bilderberg group to, free masons, Jesuits ect.

as for christian values, maybe stated to try and gain the christian vote, will probaly make a few Islamic remarks before the day is done, to corner the muslim vote also. ?

no shortage of people who feel he,s the anti christ. ?

all over the internet ,

i would be very suprised if anyone replaces him, cannot say ive seen anyone eles who i could say, cuts the mustard,

johnny

that one guy

04-02-2012, 03:18 AM

I think Jesus would particularly like Obama's continued efforts to destroy families when any family member is caught growing cannabis.

Isn't this in the New Testament somewhere: "Thou shalt destroy as many familes as thou canst if the familes grow the wrong plants".

Oh you must have received one of those government sponsored Bibles in the mail. Yeah, that quote is from Congress 23:17.

There's something I just don't trust about those new Bibles... I can't put my finger on it.

Obama 1:1 - "In the beginning, God created the health-care bill, and it were good."

Yeah, again... I don't know what it is about these Bibles.

fast eddie

04-02-2012, 03:39 AM

Exactly where did I say you support "left wing shit"? I am the one who was asking.....remember?

Fair enough. I'm used to people trying to tell me what I think. :p

So to make it perfectly clear, I do not support right wing bullshit, and I do not support left wing bullshit. That paradigm is used to control and divide people. I don't play into that.

Hopefully that answers your question.

arcyclus

04-02-2012, 04:26 AM

That paradigm is used to control and divide people. I don't play into that.

Be that as it may,

I have found even the most hardcore libertarians tend to lean to the right or to the left of things in certain areas of life (even though they will never admit to it).

I believe it to be more of human nature and environment more than politics.

mikey mikey

04-02-2012, 12:31 PM

Newsmax is a viable news source.

You still say that after I posted that Newsmax hatchet job on Ron Paul and his supporters?

http://www.newsmax.com/Koch/ron-paul-iowa-gingrich/2011/12/29/id/422442

Ron Paul and His Bigots

Thursday, 29 Dec 2011 07:34 AM
Ron Paul, the libertarian candidate, is “a real Republican contender in Iowa.” He is also the candidate of the white supremacists, Jew haters, and gay bashers.

Twenty years ago, he published a newsletter with articles that bore no bylines that were, according to the Times, “racist, anti-gay, and anti-Israel.” He now says he didn’t write them and he doesn’t know who did.

mightiswrong

04-02-2012, 06:29 PM

"We found this man perverting our nation, FORBIDDING US TO PAY TAXES TO THE EMPEROR."

----Count One against Jesus in his trial before Pilate.

http://jesusontaxes.com/Quotations.html

arcyclus

04-02-2012, 09:36 PM

You still say that after I posted that Newsmax hatchet job on Ron Paul and his supporters?

http://www.newsmax.com/Koch/ron-paul-iowa-gingrich/2011/12/29/id/422442

Yeah, that's right mickey mikey, get used to it. This forum doesn't operate on your whims and wishes. ;) :D

mikey mikey

04-02-2012, 09:57 PM

Yeah, that's right mickey mikey, get used to it. This forum doesn't operate on your whims and wishes. ;) :D

Not saying it does.

Just how can you say "Ron Paul for POTUS" and then support a rag that calls him "racist and bigoted" along with his supporters?

Which it gonna be: Ron Paul or Newsmax?

your call.

look forward to your answer.

don't swerve

otherwise I'll have to ask you again the next time you claim to support Ron Paul.

until you answer;)

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 02:16 AM

look forward to your answer.

Since when have you been in favor of Ron Paul? :D :D

Fact is, Newsmax or Ron Paul is not politically correct for you. So you see it's not a question of, "either/or". ;) :D

mikey mikey

05-02-2012, 02:28 AM

Since when have you been in favor of Ron Paul? :D :D

Have you even bothered to check?

So which is it: Ron Paul or Newsmax?

I am having a bet with another poster right now, so make it an honest answer.

We are both waiting.

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 03:03 AM

So which is it: Ron Paul or Newsmax?

You must be having another "senior moment". Your question was answered above.

Here is your favorite news source, newser.com

http://www.newser.com/tag/19723/1/political-correctness.html

mikey mikey

05-02-2012, 03:12 AM

Your question was answered above.

So you see it's not a question of, "either/or".

But it is a question of either/or and you haven't proven otherwise.

Either you value a rag that says Ron Paul is a racist or you reject it.

If not, you clearly can't support Ron Paul.

Now which is it?

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 03:39 AM

So you see it's not a question of, "either/or".

So, which one is it mickey mikey, you going to continue being a faithful follower of, newser.com

or a follower of Ron Paul?

Can't have it both ways, one nulls the other.

I await you answer.

mikey mikey

05-02-2012, 03:44 AM

So, which one is it mickey mikey, you going to continue being a faithful follower of, newser.com

or a follower of Ron Paul?

Can't have it both ways, one nulls the other.

I await you answer.

Never read it and yeah I think Ron Paul says some really good stuff but I don't agree with him on everything. Not being an American, I won't be votin g for him.

So by default I'll go with Paul.

So how about it Arcy.

Ron Paul or Newsmax? Can't really advocate a news source that calls him and his supporters "racist bigot" and still support Ron Paul.

Which one is it going to be?

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 05:02 AM

Never read it and yeah I think Ron Paul says some really good stuff but I don't agree with him on everything.

Oh cut the crap. Most all the things you argue about on this forum can be traced back to newser.com some even word for word.

I am sure newser.comis not the only NWO, politically correct, world socialist, news rag you subscribe to, but it's all from similar sources.

No need to hide in the closet anymore, mickey mikey, it's not like it's crime to be a MSM whore ya know!

mikey mikey

05-02-2012, 05:29 AM

Oh cut the crap. Most all the things you argue about on this forum can be traced back to newser.com some even word for word.

I am sure newser.comis not the only NWO, politically correct, world socialist, news rag you subscribe to, but it's all from similar sources.

No need to hide in the closet anymore, mickey mikey, it's not like it's crime to be a MSM whore ya know!

Never seen the name before. I didn't even click on your link. By all means find one post of mine that uses that source.

Now back to my question: Ron Paul or Newsmax?

Can't really advocate a news source that calls him and his supporters "racist bigot" and still support Ron Paul.

Which one is it going to be?

kitabatake

05-02-2012, 05:42 AM

"President Barack Obama linked his economic policies to his Christian faith, saying on Thursday that meeting the nation's challenges requires strong values as much as smart policies.

Obama, making his third appearance as president at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, used his remarks to justify many of his actions, such as his call for the wealthy to pay more in taxes and his health care overhaul. He said they were not only economically sound but also rooted in his Christian values.

Christian values, Christian values!, WTF?

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obama-PrayerBreakfast/2012/02/02/id/428302?s=al&promo_code=E184-1

Just going to throw this in here: Obama is a christian, or claims to be one for political reasons, yes, this is true. He is claiming that Jesus would back him in his policies. Okay? So this proves that christianity is true how? I do not understand how this proves that christianity is the one true religion and if you do not bow down to jew god you will go to hell... :rolleyes:

mikey mikey

05-02-2012, 05:53 AM

This is what he actually said

"When I talk about making sure insurance companies aren't discriminating against those would are already sick, or making sure that unscrupulous lenders are not taking advantage of the most vulnerable among us. I do so because I genuinely believe that it will make the economy stronger for everybody, but I also do it because I know that far too many neighbors in our country have been hurt and treated unfairly over the last few years. And I believe in God's command to love thy neighbor as thyself."

"When I talk about shared responsibility, it's because I genuinely believe that in a time when many folks are struggling and at a time when we have enormous deficits, it's hard for me to ask seniors on fixed income or young people with student loans or middle class families who can barely pay the bills to shoulder the burden alone. I think to myself, if I'm willing to give something up as somebody who's been extraordinarily blessed and give up some of the tax breaks that I enjoy, I actually think that's going to make economic sense. But for me as a Christian, it also coincides with Jesus' teaching that for 'unto whom much is given, much shall be required.' It mirrors the Islamic belief that those who have been blessed have an obligation to use those blessings to help others or the Jewish doctrine of moderation and consideration for others."

"When I talk about giving every American a fair shot ... it makes economic sense. But part of that belief comes from my faith and the idea that I am my brother's keeper and I am my sister's keeper. As a country, we rise and fall together."

"It is our hope that people of good will can pursue their values and common ground and the common good as best they know how, with respect for each other. And I have to say that sometimes we talk about respect, but we don't act with respect towards each other during the course of these debates"

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 05:54 AM

Just going to throw this in here: Obama is a christian, or claims to be one for political reasons, yes, this is true. He is claiming that Jesus would back him in his policies. Okay? So this proves that christianity is true how? I do not understand how this proves that christianity is the one true religion and if you do not bow down to jew god you will go to hell... :rolleyes:

Good point.

Obama is a professional politician. He is what the occasion calls for. Christian, Moslim, Jew, Buddhist, it's all the same for him.

mikey mikey

05-02-2012, 06:04 AM

Good point.

Obama is a professional politician. He is what the occasion calls for. Christian, Moslim, Jew, Buddhist, it's all the same for him.

Has he been Hindu, Sikh or Zoroastrian?

What about Taoist, Jainist, or Sufi?

Maybe even Shintoist, Rastafari or Samaritan?

:rolleyes:

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 06:14 AM

Has he been Hindu, Sikh or Zoroastrian?

What about Taoist, Jainist, or Sufi?

Maybe even Shintoist, Rastafari or Samaritan?

:rolleyes:

Possibly!

kitabatake

05-02-2012, 06:24 AM

Has he been Hindu, Sikh or Zoroastrian?

What about Taoist, Jainist, or Sufi?

Maybe even Shintoist, Rastafari or Samaritan?

:rolleyes:

That is not what he is saying really. The point is that Obama wants to appeal to everyone. Most politicians who are smart will do the same thing. Governments, media, hell the global Elite as a whole have a neat little control program for most everyone. Different news media appeals and caters to one group of people. Another channel will cater to yet another group. The same goes for religion. Why can't those who follow these mainstream religions see that they are being conned!? Why? The media does not talk against christianity. It promotes it! Look at Faux News! It promotes christianity! Faux News is owned By Rupert Murdoch, a corrupt, rich, and powerful man. His word is law and his lackeys control what is censored and told on that news network. This corrupt man supports christianity! Why? Because it is a bullshit and it can be used to control people. Keep them ignorant of what is truly going on. The events of today have nothing to do with any religion. Yet the news will want to make you believe that it does.

It is frustrating how no one wants to listen. I am beginning to wonder if humanity will always be this way. I can assure you of one thing: I am never reincarnating on this planet again. I am through with it. I am sure that others agree with me. Whatever contract I signed before I entered this body is irrelevant at this point. This planet is never going to change. Call me deluded, insane, delusional, whatever. I do not care. I know what I know and I am tired of hiding it. I will live out the rest of my life, do my damned best to wake up however few that will actually listen, and I will go back to wherever I really came from. I can grow a lot more spiritually somewhere else. Anywhere else. It is to the point where I feel physically ill with all this spiritual garbage floating around. Let the reptilians have this place. No one wants to listen. No one wants to change. No one wants to open their mind and see that humanity is being controlled by beings that are not human at all. The world Elite worships these non human entities who harvest mankind for their own sustenance. Humans are nothing but a resource to them. The god of christianity is such a being. It feeds from your essence as you worship it.

grots

05-02-2012, 08:22 AM

So we should be able to insure our car after we crash?

mikey mikey

05-02-2012, 04:13 PM

So how about it Arcy.

Ron Paul or Newsmax? Can't really advocate a news source that calls him and his supporters "racist bigot" and still support Ron Paul.

Which one is it going to be?

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 07:37 PM

So how about it Arcy.

Ron Paul or Newsmax? Can't really advocate a news source that calls him and his supporters "racist bigot" and still support Ron Paul.

Which one is it going to be?

see post #38

arcyclus

05-02-2012, 07:47 PM

So how about it Arcy.

So, which one is it mickey mikey, you going to continue worshiping , political correctness at,newser.com

or a follower of Ron Paul?

Can't have it both ways, one nulls the other.

mikey mikey

06-02-2012, 03:09 AM

So, which one is it mickey mikey, you going to continue worshiping , political correctness at,newser.com

or a follower of Ron Paul?

Can't have it both ways, one nulls the other.

Well as I said earlier, I have never even heard of newser.com and certainly never read it but if you can find ANY posts of mine quoting it you go right ahead and post them here.

So by default, as I said earlier, I will have to say Ron Paul.

Now you

And this is the seventh time I have asked and you have not answered even in post #38. Which is it going to be?

Hang on. Maybe you cannot hear me.

Ron Paul or Newsmax? Can't really advocate a news source that calls him and his supporters "racist bigot" and still support Ron Paul.

Which one is it going to be?

Okay now let us hear your answer

arcyclus

06-02-2012, 04:03 AM

]

Okay now let us hear your answer

Simple Question, which one is it mickey mikey, you going to continue worshiping , political correctness at,newser.com

Or be a Ron Paul advocate? You cannot be politically Correct and be for RP. Which is it?

apollo_gnomon

06-02-2012, 04:06 AM

What, a font fight now?

Chill, guys. It's just the internet.

mikey mikey

06-02-2012, 04:28 AM

Simple Question, which one is it mickey mikey, you going to continue worshiping , political correctness at,newser.com

Or be a Ron Paul advocate? You cannot be politically Correct and be for RP. Which is it?

This the third time I answer this: I have never even heard of newser.com and certainly never read it but if you can find ANY posts of mine quoting it you go right ahead and post them here.

So by default, as I said earlier, I will have to say Ron Paul.

Now you

And this is the eighth time I have asked:

Ron Paul or Newsmax? Can't really advocate a news source that calls him and his supporters "racist bigot" and still support Ron Paul.

Which one is it going to be?

lizzyking

06-02-2012, 04:59 AM

What, a font fight now?

Chill, guys. It's just the internet.

Not it's not. It's also an astralized holographic, ontological interdimensional dementian.

hahahahahahaha!

arcyclus

06-02-2012, 05:00 AM

Ron Paul or Newsmax?

And for the forth time now, it's not an either/or decision.

But it's ok, you aren't bothering me by repeatedly asking the same question, providing it's not bothering you if I give you the same answer? ;) :D

mikey mikey

06-02-2012, 05:44 AM

it's not an either/or decision.

Yeah it is.

How can you be a Ron Paul supporter and then validate a rag that calls Ron Supporters "racist bigots"?

So which is it going to be?

decim

06-02-2012, 01:17 PM

Collective retribution in perpetuity, itz very talmudic....

http://www.tagwar.eu/wp-content/uploads/caterpilarman.jpg

I think Jesus would particularly like Obama's continued efforts to destroy families when any family member is caught growing cannabis.

Isn't this in the New Testament somewhere: "Thou shalt destroy as many familes as thou canst if the familes grow the wrong plants".

mikey mikey

06-02-2012, 01:35 PM

Collective retribution in perpetuity, itz very talmudic....

Vengeance in Mine sayeth the Lord.

mightiswrong

06-02-2012, 02:35 PM

I think Jesus would particularly like Obama's continued efforts to destroy families when any family member is caught growing cannabis.

Isn't this in the New Testament somewhere: "Thou shalt destroy as many familes as thou canst if the familes grow the wrong plants".

Rubbish.
http://www.equalrights4all.org/religious/bible.htm

(Jesus) "Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man." (Matt. 15:11)

logos880

06-02-2012, 03:39 PM

good speech, but I try not to put faith in the words of politicians. ;)

arcyclus

06-02-2012, 05:40 PM

Yeah it is.

And for the fifth time now, it's not an either/or decision. Newsmax.com has always favored the republican party. Ron Paul is a Republican

But it's ok, you aren't bothering me by repeatedly asking the same question, providing it's not bothering you if I give you the same answer. :D

Fancy that, a left wing, politically correct, toad, who gets his news form newser.com claiming to be for RP?

fast eddie

06-02-2012, 07:49 PM

Fancy that, a left wing, politically correct, toad, who gets his news form newser.com claiming to be for RP?

I hate to break it to you, but a lot of "democrats" support Ron Paul. Furthermore, not every American votes along party lines.

I am a registered Democrat (Irish Catholic so it's kind of compulsory :D ), but I support Paul and I have never voted along party lines.

Most of the people I know, which includes diverse demographics and ethnicities, support Ron Paul. It is only in slanted, yellow journalism (like Newsmax) that a majority oppose him.

Yet despite this, I seriously doubt that he will ever be elected. I'd bet my house that he will not get nominated. This is how the system works in the US. It is a total fallacy that voters get to choose the candidate.

Rank and file Republicans loathe him.

arcyclus

06-02-2012, 08:44 PM

I hate to break it to you, but a lot of "democrats" support Ron Paul. Furthermore, not every American votes along party lines.

I am a registered Democrat (Irish Catholic so it's kind of compulsory :D ), but I support Paul and I have never voted along party lines.

Most of the people I know, which includes diverse demographics and ethnicities, support Ron Paul. It is only in slanted, yellow journalism (like Newsmax) that a majority oppose him.

Yet despite this, I seriously doubt that he will ever be elected. I'd bet my house that he will not get nominated. This is how the system works in the US. It is a total fallacy that voters get to choose the candidate.

Rank and file Republicans loathe him.

Yeah, I know that.

Almost no one votes along party lines all the time.

Like I say, Newsmax (regardless of color)traditionally supports Republicans. Ron Paul is Republician. Sure you are going to have in party skirmishes, that doesn't mean opposition.

mikey mikey

06-02-2012, 10:09 PM

Like I say, Newsmax (regardless of color)traditionally supports Republicans.

Now we are getting close to your reasons fro validating it.;)

Ron Paul is Republician. Sure you are going to have in party skirmishes, that doesn't mean opposition.

Calling somebody a "racist bigot" and his supporters "racist bigots" isn't opposition?

Newsmax did a hatchet job on RP and you say "meh"

*snigger*

Yeah whatever you say.

So do I really need to ask which is it gonna be?

I think we all know by now GOP boy.

;)

Cos not coming to RP's defence at such baseless accusations levelled at hima nd his supporters (many of whom are here on DIF) you have as good as stabbed him in the back.

Well done Judas.

arcyclus

07-02-2012, 12:10 AM

So do I really need to ask which is it gonna be?

Well... No!.... But if you feel you must' go ahead. I've answered 5 times already maybe the 6th time will breach your thickness? :D

mikey mikey

07-02-2012, 02:35 AM

Well... No!.... But if you feel you must' go ahead. I've answered 5 times already maybe the 6th time will breach your thickness? :D

Relax. I think you made your choice not to defend Ron Paul or his supporters perfectly clear in your failure to defend them in the face of Newsmax's accusation. The fact that you validated and justified the outlet more than once while failed to do the same for Paul in the other speaks volumes,

So I won't bring it up again...

...until you claim at any time to support Ron Paul.

Then one further clarification of your new position may be required;)