Did Ron Paul Win Iwoa Caucaus?

[iaintoff]

there not much chat about it, seems everyone talking about New Hampshire now, whats the craic...

[wake_up_bomb]

Romney narrowly won, Paul finished third, but did fairly well.

[bendoon]

I would say that he did but they fiddled the votes.

[rob_n86]

Ron was winning at 1st. Then I noticed the updates stopped for a while. When updates started again, he was in 3rd. I think he was definatley cheated out of it.

[cathar]

Exit polls said Paul had 30% of the vote....

but I didn't expect the vote count to be honest....

[redman]

What gets me is the sheer amount of Ron Paul voters you see on the net from every walk of life. Ron wins every online vote.

Surely the net reflects the outside world these days with the majority having the internet in the west, I bet Ron Paul fucking walked it. As we all know the voting is rigged in most countries.


Programmer under oath admits computers rig elections - YouTube

[10thlight]

What gets me is the sheer amount of Ron Paul voters you see on the net from every walk of life. Ron wins every online vote.

Surely the net reflects the outside world these days with the majority having the internet in the west, I bet Ron Paul fucking walked it. As we all know the voting is rigged in most countries.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1thcO_olHas

i agree.

[aheroicstand]

What gets me is the sheer amount of Ron Paul voters you see on the net from every walk of life. Ron wins every online vote.

Surely the net reflects the outside world these days with the majority having the internet in the west, I bet Ron Paul fucking walked it. As we all know the voting is rigged in most countries.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1thcO_olHas

Paul does really well with younger voters, but Paul does not get many votes from women or old people, and old people are generally the most internet ignorant. So the old fucks show up to cast their ignorant vote to further screw the younger people.

[redman]

Paul does really well with younger voters, but Paul does not get many votes from women or old people, and old people are generally the most internet ignorant. So the old fucks show up to cast their ignorant vote to further screw the younger people.

I still reckon he still walked it, and it wouldn't surprise me if he got a record number of votes either. The chasm between the picture getting painted on the TV and tabloids and what's actually happening is nothing but fucking scary these days.

[coco]

Diebold

[psystorm]

The great news about Iowa is the Ron Paul has 7 delegates, the same number that Mitt n' Rick have. So all 3 are tied with delegates for the nomination. Popular votes does not get you the nomination, but the delegates do.

[aheroicstand]

I still reckon he still walked it, and it wouldn't surprise me if he got a record number of votes either. The chasm between the picture getting painted on the TV and tabloids and what's actually happening is nothing but fucking scary these days.

It would not surprise me if that was the case. From what I'm hearing it was the rural area's of Iowa that had Paul do poorly, and it was in those area's where Paul did not have people there to watch the vote. In the places where he had people there to watch the vote He did much better and usually was 1st.

Could be election fraud, or it could be the fact that these people don't use the internet and get all their news from the MSM, and have not heard the truth about Paul. Either way it's manipulation of the voting process by the elite.

[aheroicstand]

The great news about Iowa is the Ron Paul has 7 delegates, the same number that Mitt n' Rick have. So all 3 are tied with delegates for the nomination. Popular vote does not get you the nomination, but the delegates do.


Yes this is true. The race will likely come down to Romney vs Paul, and I think Paul has a pretty good shot at beating out Romney for the GOP nomination once it becomes clear to the voters that it's either Paul or Romney. Lot of Republicans will go with the Anti-Romney choice, whoever that is.

[psystorm]

Speaking of voter fraud, this just came up on my front Yahoo page

http://news.yahoo.com/santorum-shrugs-off-report-iowa-vote-errors-043158455.html

Santorum shrugs off report of Iowa vote errors
Associated PressBy MIKE GLOVER | AP – 38 mins ago

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum shrugged off reports late Thursday that the vote count from Iowa's caucuses might be wrong, saying the errors appear not to change the fact that he and Mitt Romney were nearly tied.

Santorum told Fox News that Iowa's Republican Party chairman, Matt Strawn, informed him of two cases in which errors were reported in the count from Tuesday night. Taken together, Santorum said, the changes would almost cancel out each other and that Romney would win by nine votes instead of eight.

"That doesn't really matter to me," he said. "This was a tie."

Strawn said in a statement that party officials would not respond to "every rumor, innuendo or allegation" as it certifies results during a two-week certification process. Romney and Santorum each had just over 30,000 votes out of more than 122,000 votes cast.

Strawn said state party officials had been in contact with GOP officials in Appanoose County but that officials "do not have any reason to believe the final, certified results of Appanoose County will change the outcome of Tuesday's vote."

Des Moines TV station KCCI reported that a Ron Paul backer attending his first precinct caucuses in Appanoose County, in southern Iowa, said the vote from his precinct was inaccurately reported and gave Romney 20 more votes than he actually received.

The Paul supporter, Edward True of Moulton, told The Associated Press that he helped count the ballots cast at his precinct caucuses and that Romney received two votes. True said he was shocked to see the official results on the Republican Party website showed Romney with 22 votes in the precinct.

"I assume somebody made a typographical error," he said in a telephone interview.

True said that when he contacted local Republican officials, "They said they would sort it out in the next couple of weeks, but how many primaries will have happened by that time?"

[largejack]

Speaking of voter fraud, this just came up on my front Yahoo page

http://news.yahoo.com/santorum-shrugs-off-report-iowa-vote-errors-043158455.html

Santorum knows fully well that his role is to ensure Romney is selected. He's not even bothered that he may have been cheated out of victory, as long as he cheated victory out of Ron Paul.

[the nine]

Santorum knows fully well that his role is to ensure Romney is selected. He's not even bothered that he may have been cheated out of victory, as long as he cheated victory out of Ron Paul.

We need to speak to sheople as much as possible whilst these elections are happening, we have a chance to educate them in truth not conspiracy which may frighten them..

Highlight the corruption and the power the banks have through usury, and how printing this fake money has allowed these people to buy the media..

They can see the game in action, let them connect the dots.. It is a genuine opportunity for us to speak and show soap addicts the nature of reality without speaking of 911 7/7 which is terrifying to these people..

They may realise the the whole system requires people to make a stand, to be prepared to wash the mould and cut away the rot..

[motleyhoo]

Santorum knows fully well that his role is to ensure Romney is selected. He's not even bothered that he may have been cheated out of victory, as long as he cheated victory out of Ron Paul.

This is likely quite true. I'm sure the RNC knows full well that Santorum is such an extremist that he would not stand a chance against Obama in the general election. He is there to steal votes from RP and that's all he is there for. The RNC is controlled by big money interests and bankers just like the rest of the political system is, and these people want Romney because he is a clone of Bush and Obama. In other words he will be a puppet just like Obama is. Even if he beat Obama it would not matter to the PTB.

.

[largejack]

I still reckon he still walked it, and it wouldn't surprise me if he got a record number of votes either. The chasm between the picture getting painted on the TV and tabloids and what's actually happening is nothing but fucking scary these days.

I used to follow politics a lot in my naive and I can honestly say polls normally reflect the outcome; the outcome of this flew in the face of the polls.

[largejack]

This is likely quite true. I'm sure the RNC knows full well that Santorum is such an extremist that he would not stand a chance against Obama in the general election. He is there to steal votes from RP and that's all he is there for. The RNC is controlled by big money interests and bankers just like the rest of the political system is, and these people want Romney because he is a clone of Bush and Obama. In other words he will be a puppet just like Obama is. Even if he beat Obama it would not matter to the PTB.

.

Yeah and they had to choose some one with a 'I want to punch that silly smile off your face' type to do it for them didn't they? :D

[crisitunity]

Yeah he sure did.

[motleyhoo]

Yes this is true. The race will likely come down to Romney vs Paul, and I think Paul has a pretty good shot at beating out Romney for the GOP nomination once it becomes clear to the voters that it's either Paul or Romney. Lot of Republicans will go with the Anti-Romney choice, whoever that is.

I don't know. There's one thing about Republican voters (democrats too), they will fall over themselves to kiss the feet of any candidate that tells them what they want to hear even if it's all lies. The closer it gets to election day the shorter their memories of anything Romney said previously will become. At that point all Romney has to do is tell them what they want to hear, and unlike RP he is quite capable of spewing out the lies.

Remember, Bush should have been sitting in jail on multiple felony stock fraud charges and these people voted for him twice. They're also the same people who said Obama was not experienced or qualified enough to be President, and yet they twice voted into office a man who single handedly bankrupted 4 different companies he was put in charge of. The voting public are not the sharpest lot.

.

[largejack]

Iowa fraud now admitted but doesn't affect Ron Paul apparently? :rolleyes: The fact that the establishment couldn't care less whether Santorum or Romney win, but fraud admitted??? Hmmmm

[energi]

I still reckon he still walked it, and it wouldn't surprise me if he got a record number of votes either. The chasm between the picture getting painted on the TV and tabloids and what's actually happening is nothing but fucking scary these days.

word

[motleyhoo]

There was a guy on coast to coast last week who has been studying the voting system for years. He had a huge list of voting irregularities that occurred in Iowa, including whole precincts of votes being lost in districts that Ron Paul polled well in. Then there was a researcher on there who dropped the bomb that the two major voting machine companies are now not even owned by US companies.

.

[antiarchonist]

There was a guy on coast to coast last week who has been studying the voting system for years. He had a huge list of voting irregularities that occurred in Iowa, including whole precincts of votes being lost in districts that Ron Paul polled well in. Then there was a researcher on there who dropped the bomb that the two major voting machine companies are now not even owned by US companies.

.

They were owned by America's best bud and number one ally. The nation state with the most moral army in the world. Just like the cancerous cluster tumor causing TSA machines, compliments of patriot act co-writer Michael Chertoff (American Hero!)

The delegate results in Iowa are still unknown, but lets wait a few weeks and see how Dr. Paul does in the Caucasus states. Delegate-wise, I have a feeling he will come out on top when March roles around. Gingrich and Santorum will have to call it quits. If I'm wrong I'm wrong, but if Paul doesn't get any votes the whole month, something smells funny. And Ron Paul's voting base does not want to vote for Obama or other GOP candidates so nobody can expect them to automatically roll over.

[flickflack]

there not much chat about it, seems everyone talking about New Hampshire now, whats the craic...

Rick Santorum turned out to be the winner, as well as in Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado. As far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul hasn't won anything in this race.

[watson]

there not much chat about it, seems everyone talking about New Hampshire now, whats the craic...

There's talk going on about it now, in a few different camps

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByJAC-sfXwumZzI2bVlON2VTMnFyYVZZSnpDYnNyQQ/edit?pli=1