How is Iran the Illuminati's target?

[timestop24]

If Iran is a target for regime change, how does it fit the illuminati's plans?

[timestop24]

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17302.htm


Call and make your voice count!

[ho1ogram]

Good one timestop24. I posted it on the campaigns for change section as well, hopefully lot's of people will see it in time. (I live in Aus. so I can't ring 'em.) :)

[timestop24]

It was kind of funny. I just opened up that site after the initial post, and there it was in bold.

[anoninnyc]

If Iran is a target for regime change, how does it fit the illuminati's plans?

1. control of oil
2. elimination of threat to illuminati's plans in iraq
3. or more sinister, to bring on ww3

[docmaturin]

[B]Well here is a thought... A theory of mine. A possibility and something I could see that would be bought hook line in sinker even to the most thought-out professionals/thinkers of western society. Here is my basic overall thought process and you could read further if you want:

1. As far as a war with Iran is concerned, there has been non-emotional number-crunching (monetary cost and cost of "lives") done by those in power.
2. Considering the cost-benefit analysis of Iran being bombed and/or invaded into disarray in order to bring the world closer to ONE government, the war is a "go".
3. The effect will have the Muslim/Islamic world leaders and nations (NOT terror groups but "official" states or gov.'s) have reactions ranging from verbal outrage and absolute anger to just "keeping quiet" but disliking the U.S./U.K. and the "West" even further. STILL it somewhat forces the"Muslim/Islamic World" to play along with Western societies version of world peace/cooperation, etc.
4. Meanwhile, Muslim/islamic culture the world over (whether you are for it or not... women's rights, etc.) continues to dissappear into the "cookie-cuttering" up of the world into music videos, sex, high-tech, materialism-centric society as older people pass away.
4. This removes Iran as a national threat. Key word is NATIONAL, because a "defeat" or some version of destruction of Iran would bring the world (even if only imperceptibly) in line but it would fire up fundamentalists/extremists everywere to include those already living in "open" and "free" Western society.
5. Mix in a few media-fed and frenzied attacks of scales ranging from less than and even bigger than 9/11 over the course of "x" amount of time and the change could be gradual and impercieved until people are fed up or quickly because the "atrocities" are so large scale.
The end result is that the "World" is further ready to comply/unify with being micro-chipped, in order to bring fundamentalists into the open.

UNTIL "BIG-BROTHER" HAS HIS GRIP ON EVERYONE'S PULSE, THEN ANYONE COULD BUY A GUN OR ILLEGAL GOODS FOR THE PURPOSE OF HARMING THE POPULACE OF THE "PEOPLE'S ELECTED" REPRESENTATIVE.

A "Victory in Iran" or some form of turning it upside down like the current Iraq would forward an agenda for one-world government. Forget for a moment who would run Iran, how they would, and in what form (Democracy, etc.) and focus on the fact that if Iran was attacked and changed for better or worse of its own people and whether the Iranians liked the change or would take change "kicking and screaming" like Iraq. Forget that and just know that all the major Muslim/Islamic players vs the U.S. and the "West" would be out of the way. Let me define "major Muslim/Islamic players" being "out of the way" ...

First off Iran is the last of the loudest and most in your face "screw you U.S.!" muslim/Islamic nation going. So if you consider that Libya and Iraq "used to be" that way before bombed, invaded, etc. then they were not necessarily defeated--but they "toned their act down." If Iran was rolled over (even if the initial war/bombing took a few months vice "days" and cost more than the total lives lost in the opening war in Iraq, that is NOTHING in the eyes of the politicians and "leaders." Body counts and costs would be relatively low and for the power hungry elite it is just figures and numbers on a slide show but the results would be a great benifit to their ego and to their forwarding of a "peaceful one-world gov. (on their terms of course.)

Removing Iraq / Iran as a "National" threat would have an effect on the smaller Islamic coutries that were not attacked and would be an in their face example of telling Syria, Egypt, some smaller Asian and African countries, etc. to AT A MINIMUM "play along" or to "stay in their lane" and be on their best behavior. Mind you these are countries... This would bring about more singularity (willing or otherwise) with the Big Boys of the UN, western civ., etc. BUT IT WOULD INCITE MORE FUNDAMENTALISM FROM SMALLER GROUPS AND TICK OFF FUNDAMENTALISTS!!!

This would stir things up for more terror attacks and threats because the fundamentalists would feel like thier ways are going and their backs would be against the wall... that they "lost" or are "losing" both literally and culturally. It would not be a stretch to see more 9/11 scale (or larger or many smaller--or all the above) attacks on the E.U., U.S., and other western influenced allies of the U.S./U.K.

This would be the "last war" to unify the world--to kick fundamentalism in the teeth for good, to "make everyone play along." Their is no way to MAKE something that is grass-roots/underground, etc. stop. "Resistance" and angry terrorists in hiding would flourish forever UNLESS their was a reason to further force people to comply (by our own votes and desires because we will be "SAFER") and big brother will control the masses even further.

In a way, we are like the frogs that are in cool water and don't realise we are being boiled alive until it is too late! Because we are unaware of our surroundings we don't jump out of the bouling cauldron.

-->WELL, IT'S JUST A THOUGHT...

--Randy

[intruder]

I heard an interesting radio broadcast by Michael Collins Piper out of Washington the other night. He revealed some VERY interesting information regarding the Pres. of Iran. He even cited an Israeli writer for some of his information. On a nationwide test (IQ) taken by 150,000 professionals, clerics etc. in Iran, the Pres. scored in as the 156th top score...he's no dummy.
When he was the mayor of Tehran...he worked without pay as he was also teaching at a University in Iran and receiving a salary from there.
Iran must be targeted for Israel and America to achieve greater hegemony in that region.
IMHO

[astral]

It's all in the PNAC document of Sept 2000 about the intended American-Lead globalisation, starting with the Middle-Eastern nations of Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran & Syria.

I think the short-to-long term aim is the re-establishment of Babylon, ruled by the Illuminati, which will be the eventual nerve-centre of the World Government. It helps the immediate expansion plans that there are rich oil reserves in the region to finance the whole thing.

After that, it will be on to the Far East, starting with China.