View Full Version : What about Islam?
h1s_l0rdsh1p
13-03-2007, 12:25 PM
How come i've never seen Icke or anybody else attack the Qu'Ran?
I mean, attacking an extremist, ok. Or attack one line(passage) out of it, ok.
But how come I don't see anybody trying to denouce the Qu'Ran?
i am all i am
13-03-2007, 02:15 PM
How come i've never seen Icke or anybody else attack the Qu'Ran?
I mean, attacking an extremist, ok. Or attack one line(passage) out of it, ok.
But how come I don't see anybody trying to denouce the Qu'Ran?
G'day H1s L0rdsh1p,
Attacking is pointless, but I do have some information that you may be interested in. Here is a quote that I found in 'The Crucifixion of Truth', by Tony Bushby, page 166.
"Today he is called Mohammed (570-632), but his real name was Lothar Schmalfuss. Ancient Christian writings recorded a remarkable revelation about Mohammed's early religous life and revealed the true reason for the commencement of the Islamic faith. The reference is found in a book called 'Chronica Majora', a summary of world history from biblical Creation to the year of the author's death. It was written by Matthew Paris (d.1259), a pious Christian monk, described by the church 'as an historian who holds the first place among English chroniclers'. From his quaint specimen of Abbey records, the erudite Monk explaines how Mohammed started an 'impious religion':
It is well known that Mohammed was once a cardinal, and became heretic because he faile to be elected pope. Also (later in life) having drunk to excess, he fell by the roadside, and in his condition was killed by swine. And for that reason, his followers abhor pork even unto this day."
Good old Mohammed was in fact a member of the Holy Roman Church prior to starting the Islamic faith. So, the Qu'ran is as fictitous as the Bible is. Lothar Schmalfuss became Mohamed, to start the Islamic religion, because he wasn't elected Pope.
It feels great to not follow any religion.
With LOVE.
___________________________________
WHEN PAIRED OPPOSITES DEFINE YOUR BELIEFS, YOUR BELIEFS WILL IMPRISON YOU.
h1s_l0rdsh1p
13-03-2007, 02:20 PM
G'day H1s L0rdsh1p,
Attacking is pointless, but I do have some information that you may be interested in. Here is a quote that I found in 'The Crucifixion of Truth', by Tony Bushby, page 166.
"Today he is called Mohammed (570-632), but his real name was Lothar Schmalfuss. Ancient Christian writings recorded a remarkable revelation about Mohammed's early religous life and revealed the true reason for the commencement of the Islamic faith. The reference is found in a book called 'Chronica Majora', a summary of world history from biblical Creation to the year of the author's death. It was written by Matthew Paris (d.1259), a pious Christian monk, described by the church 'as an historian who holds the first place among English chroniclers'. From his quaint specimen of Abbey records, the erudite Monk explaines how Mohammed started an 'impious religion':
It is well known that Mohammed was once a cardinal, and became heretic because he faile to be elected pope. Also (later in life) having drunk to excess, he fell by the roadside, and in his condition was killed by swine. And for that reason, his followers abhor pork even unto this day."
Good old Mohammed was in fact a member of the Holy Roman Church prior to starting the Islamic faith. So, the Qu'ran is as fictitous as the Bible is. Lothar Schmalfuss became Mohamed, to start the Islamic religion, because he wasn't elected Pope.
It feels great to not follow any religion.
With LOVE.
___________________________________
WHEN PAIRED OPPOSITES DEFINE YOUR BELIEFS, YOUR BELIEFS WILL IMPRISON YOU.
But the roman church are their enemies, so how do we know that it was not written up to demolish the character of mohammed?
i am all i am
13-03-2007, 02:40 PM
But the roman church are their enemies, so how do we know that it was not written up to demolish the character of mohammed?
This resonates with me. If it doesn't for you, no worries. But if you read 'The Bible Fraud', The Secret in the Bible' and 'The Crucifixion of Truth', by Tony Bushby, you'll see that he takes apart the christian religion, proving it to be a fictitious story, totally made-up to control the population. Still, how do you know anything written isn't bullshit ? My advice is go within, use the inner bullshit radar, then you'll know.
With LOVE.
_____________________________
WHEN PAIRED OPPOSITES DEFINE YOUR BELIEFS, YOUR BELIEFS WILL IMPRISON YOU.
h1s_l0rdsh1p
13-03-2007, 02:54 PM
This resonates with me. If it doesn't for you, no worries. But if you read 'The Bible Fraud', The Secret in the Bible' and 'The Crucifixion of Truth', by Tony Bushby, you'll see that he takes apart the christian religion, proving it to be a fictitious story, totally made-up to control the population. Still, how do you know anything written isn't bullshit ? My advice is go within, use the inner bullshit radar, then you'll know.
With LOVE.
_____________________________
WHEN PAIRED OPPOSITES DEFINE YOUR BELIEFS, YOUR BELIEFS WILL IMPRISON YOU.
I completely get you man. But I mean, I have read the Qu'Ran, and no I don't believe it, but it is really convincing. I mean, it even states that the universe was created by a "large explotion", something that wasn't said in science until 1910 (The Big Bang)..
Just rather strange in my opinion.
i am all i am
13-03-2007, 03:52 PM
I completely get you man. But I mean, I have read the Qu'Ran, and no I don't believe it, but it is really convincing. I mean, it even states that the universe was created by a "large explotion", something that wasn't said in science until 1910 (The Big Bang)..
Just rather strange in my opinion.
I'm hearing you brother.
In 'The Secret in the Bible', Tony Bushby shows the hidden knowledge that the upper echelon of the church had acces to. Mohammed (Lothar Schmalfuss) had acces to this knowledge and he wrote the Qu'Ran to counter the Christian church and gain followers. So it stands to reason that he may have added a bit of extra knowledge to it for the benefit of him getting as many worshippers as possible.
With LOVE.
h1s_l0rdsh1p
13-03-2007, 04:34 PM
I'm hearing you brother.
In 'The Secret in the Bible', Tony Bushby shows the hidden knowledge that the upper echelon of the church had acces to. Mohammed (Lothar Schmalfuss) had acces to this knowledge and he wrote the Qu'Ran to counter the Christian church and gain followers. So it stands to reason that he may have added a bit of extra knowledge to it for the benefit of him getting as many worshippers as possible.
With LOVE.
Where did they get the higher knowledge then?
i am all i am
13-03-2007, 05:01 PM
Where did they get the higher knowledge then?
It is knowledge of the DNA. The Hebrew alphabet is 22 glyphs of different views of the 'spiral of light' (it looks like a snake standing on its tail). They knew how to access altered states of conciousness to 'talk to God', the DNA within their physicality. Like David Icke did on his ayahuasca trip. So the Bible was actually written by the 'Word of God'.
I don't know if you know this, but the DNA gives of a low level frequency pulse which I believe creates our auric field. The visions that people get on hallucinogens are pictures given by the DNA. While you are in the altered state you can visualise and communicate with your DNA, which is the storehouse of all knowledge. I believe that this is the reason why the church and authorities (illuminati) doesn't want people to have this experience.
With LOVE.
jagalman
14-03-2007, 01:47 PM
G'day H1s L0rdsh1p,
It is well known that Mohammed was once a cardinal, and became heretic because he faile to be elected pope. Also (later in life) having drunk to excess, he fell by the roadside, and in his condition was killed by swine. And for that reason, his followers abhor pork even unto this day."
Good old Mohammed was in fact a member of the Holy Roman Church prior to starting the Islamic faith. So, the Qu'ran is as fictitous as the Bible is. Lothar Schmalfuss became Mohamed, to start the Islamic religion, because he wasn't elected Pope.
I dont know here did you get this story from!!
Mohamad was a Sheep Men he did not knows how to read or write before he received his revelations!! and he was over 50 of his age when he got the first revelation!!