Wikipedia Who owns and how it's run.

[eternal_spirit]

James Wales Is The Founder

http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe2.jpg


he 'Wikipedians' or Moderators http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe3.jpg




What Is Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is an internet encyclopedia, that anyone can edit and add information. Wikipedia claims it's articles are based on a totally neutral point of view. It's size is formidable, at 2.5 billion (http://news.yahoo.com/s/bw/20051214/bs_bw/tc20051214441708) views a month.
Once you get below the surface, you find moderators (http://studentorgs.uncc.edu/images/2003%20excellence/Hillel.JPG) that follow an agenda, which clearly takes a Pro-Jewish point of view.





http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe19.jpg Wales
http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe4.jpg
History Of Wikipedia
Larry Sanger (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger), and Jim Wales, founded Wikipedia in Jan. of 2001. It was an offshoot of Nupedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nupedia), an more formal encyclopedia.
Wales is presently in charge. Sanger left in 2002 (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/My_resignation--Larry_Sanger), and is a professor/lecturer at Ohio State.
Names like Jeremy Rosenfeld, Benjamin Kovitz, Seth Cohen, dot the landscape of technical staff.
Moderators openly admit to a pro-Jewish bias.
James Wales History
Wales who was born in Huntsville, Alabama, went to the exclusive Randolph (http://www.randolphschool.net/) prep school, and onto the University of Alabama. Wales graduates, and becomes a Futures Trader (http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipedia_supplement.htm#Chicago%20Futures%20trade rs%20are%2095%%20Jewish) in Chicago. Next he (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Shell) opens Bomis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomis), an 'Adult Content' website, which is followed by Nupedia, which morphs into Wikipedia.
Wales is the darling of the Jewish crowd at Harvard, being a fellow at the Berkman Center (http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/people)for Internet and Society, at the Harvard Law School.
Video of Wales (http://www.nooneslistening.org/mm.php?sl=v3)



http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe18.jpg
Who Is Bomis.Com?
Basically 'Bomis' is an adult site (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Sylvia_Saint_001.jpg), started by Wales, but Wikipedia calls it erotica. Typical picture (http://www.bomis.com/magazine/tshirtpics/aimeeb.jpg) , and a typical site (http://www.clubsilviasaint.net/) (caution - extremely pornographic)



http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe1.jpg
Wikipedia System Of Control
Wikipedians (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiPedians) (Jewish volunteers) will concentrate on a certain subject, and actively moderate any new replies. Once an individual edits an article, his ISP number is recorded, and he is assigned a sayanim (http://judicial-inc.biz/pyschos/Sayanim.htm) that will monitor all his future writings.
Individual contributors are assigned a tracking page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=202.6.138.34), and an open record of all writings. Through out the cycle the contributor this will be monitored by Hillel, ADL, SPLC, type control agents.

[eternal_spirit]

Examples Of Censorship
In 1967, with Lyndon Johnson's blessing (http://judicial-inc.biz/War_Israel_1967.htm), Israel attacked Egypt in a surprise assault. In an attempt to create a 'False Flag' pointing at Egypt, the Zionists attacked the USS Liberty (http://judicial-inc.biz/uss_liberty.htm), killing 44 and wounding 177. The attack failed when three attacking torpedo boats were on their final run, they collided, and their shots missed the ship. The Liberty got an SOS off to the USS Saratoga, and Israel was forced to abort the attack.
Wikipedia's Stance
Their interpretation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident) is the attack was an innocent mistake, the torpedo boats were actually rescue vehicles, which the USS fired on, and innocent Israelis had to defend themselves.
http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe7.jpg
Dr. Fredrick Toben
Dr. Toben is German historian and scholar, that grew up in Australia, and runs the Adelaide Institue (http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/index0.htm). He is noted for his investigation of the 'Jewish Holocaust'. Wikipedia contributors wrote a slanderous page on him, and when he went to refute it (http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipedia_supplement.htm#Fredrick%20Tobens%20comme nts%20that%20were%20deleted), the sayanims deleted all his comments.
Wikipedia's Stance
Toben is a monster, who associates with criminals, and himself was a convict
http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe8.jpg
Theresienstadt
In 1941, Germany gave Jewish artists their own experimental town as prototype refuge, to protect Jews (http://www.judicial-inc.biz/Theirstein_Camp.htm). Subsequently the Jews have altered history, and refer to it as a death camp.
When a 1943 documentary film (http://home.att.net/%7Ewhitesox/Theresienstadt3.wmv) was edited into Wikipedia's Theresienstadt page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theresienstadt_Ghetto), the Hillel (http://www.hillel.org/)Wikipedians immediately deleted, saying it was propaganda and holocaust denial
Wikipedia's Stance
Theresienstadt was Nazi hellhole, where Jews were starved to death, and then sent on to Auschwitz.



http://judicial-inc.biz/wikipe9.jpg
Where Does Wikipedia Get It's Funds?
According to it's founder, James Wales, it lives on grants and small individual contributions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_wikipedia).



What's The Real Story?
From all the available information, it appears Wikipedia was started by a two Jewish kids, one a programmer, and the other an 'Adult Site' operator. It's dynamic success (800,000 pages) stems from 10,000 + individual contributors, which are monitored by core sayanims (http://judicial-inc.biz/pyschos/Sayanim.htm).
Wikipedia's claim: ~ 'We are an internet encyclopedia with a neutral stance' ~ is absurd.
This project is an attempt to control student research on the Internet. Any subject Googled will show Wikipedia as one of the first entries. Type in the word Bolshevik (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks), and the first entry is Wikipedia. Explore their version, and you won't be the slightest mention that the movement was a Jewish instigated bloodbath, that was responsible for 20,000,000 deaths.

[eternal_spirit]

Yet more biased views and control.

[eternal_spirit]

Well some have warned me before about Good ol wiki! And it's finally sunk in to this numb skull of mine.

[damagedbrainn]

You've reached a whole new level of obsessive paranoia and absurdity with this post.

[eternal_spirit]

You've reached a whole new level of obsessive paranoia and absurdity with this post.
..............

You dispute the information as being?

[eternal_spirit]

Plays large drumroll dah dah

[chandrakavi]

Wikipedia is part of the 96% illuminati controlled press.
Everyone will use it anyway because it is there in internet to look up what you want.
But it is good to know it's origin anyway.

[eternal_spirit]

I believe it's true Wiki is run, controlled by Jews who edit what's posted, to put an obvious biased view on what ever they decide they need to. It's blatant propaganda for so many different topics. I'm utterly disgusted, but then again not all that surprised.

[eternal_spirit]

Wikipedia is part of the 96% <<<<illuminati controlled press.
Everyone will use it anyway because it is there in internet to look up what you want.
But it is good to know it's origin anyway.

...........

I'm boycotting Wiki.

[damagedbrainn]

Type in the word Bolshevik (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks), and the first entry is Wikipedia. Explore their version, and you won't be the slightest mention that the movement was a Jewish instigated bloodbath, that was responsible for 20,000,000 deaths.

Here you go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Russia_and_the_Soviet_Union #Jews_and_Bolshevism

Though their version of it probably won't be to your liking since you're allergic to things resembling facts. But it is at least "the slightest mention".

[damagedbrainn]

..............

You dispute the information as being?

As being absurd rubbish.

I mean, all wikipedians are Jews? That's just fuckin' stupid.
Anyone can become a "wikipedian", including you. And the moderators have no way of knowing whether or not those who edit the articles are jewish. Do you have any common sense at all?

[eternal_spirit]

Here you go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Russia_and_the_Soviet_Union #Jews_and_Bolshevism

Though their version of it probably won't be to your liking since you're allergic to things resembling facts. But it is at least "the slightest mention".

..........

That was one of the points of the article I posted ( Bolshevick ) How there is only one mention on Wiki and that's the smallest number, some say up to 60 million at least and some say even more. It's not something we got taught at school or is common knowledge even to a researcher that many Jews where communists. All we heard about was the Hollocaust.

You know like the Germans are still considered pure evil even today over 60 years later. Whilst Wars and atrocities are even carried out as we type by Communists and other war mongers. The Arabs and Muslims in particular are suffering the most. Any wonder after doing some research of past present and predicted future that Zionism plays a big role in this.

[eternal_spirit]

As being absurd rubbish.

I mean, all wikipedians are Jews? That's just fuckin' stupid.
Anyone can become a "wikipedian", including you. And the moderators have no way of knowing whether or not those who edit the articles are jewish. Do you have any common sense at all?

................

Almost the predicted response.( was expecting the infos from a far right neo nazi site) You'll try dispute anything even when the facts are laid out in text lol. Yes you must of miss read? Anyone can edit Wiki, but who's editing the editors? Doesn't take much sense to figure that out.

[damagedbrainn]

..........

That was one of the points of the article I posted ( Bolshevick ) How there is only one mention on Wiki and that's the smallest number, some say up to 60 million at least and some say even more.

Well I'm sure if it were up to you, the entire site would be devoted to blaming everything from communism to New Coke on The Jew.

It's not something we got taught at school or is common knowledge even to a researcher that many Jews where communists. All we heard about was the Hollocaust.

And that's Wikipedia's fault? In case you're too lazy to check (and it seems that you are), Wikipedia actually goes into far more detail than the typical dumbed-down version of history that most learn from slim school textbooks and television.

You know like the Germans are still considered pure evil even today over 60 years later.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-German_sentiment

Whilst Wars and atrocities are even carried out as we type by Communists and other war mongers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_Communist_party_rule
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_Soviet_Union
etc......

The Arabs and Muslims in particular are suffering the most. Any wonder after doing some research of past present and predicted future that Zionism plays a big role in this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli-Palestinian_conflict#Major_issues_between_the_two_ sides
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Israel#Israel.27s_record:_human_ri ghts_in_the_occupied_territories
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeting_of_civilian_areas_in_the_2006_Lebanon_Wa r
etc....etc......

[damagedbrainn]

................

Almost the predicted response.( was expecting the infos from a far right neo nazi site) You'll try dispute anything even when the facts are laid out in text lol. Yes you must of miss read? Anyone can edit Wiki, but who's editing the editors? Doesn't take much sense to figure that out.

Common sense should tell you that a genuine attempt to control information would not involve allowing just anyone to edit articles at will. If they wanted to control the inforamtion posted on the site, it would be a lot easier to only allow a select few to write the articles, rather than having to monitor literally THOUSANDS of articles around the clock. Also, false information isn't only edited by the moderators, but by the users (even anonymous ones) most of the time. Repeat: ANYONE can edit the articles.

And there's nothing in your "text" which proves that all wikipedians are jews. You saying so isn't "proof", nor is posting a banal picture of a group of people who you probably assume "look jewish". You're not even using the term "wikipedian" correctly.

[eternal_spirit]

Looked at the Bolshevik link not one mention of the Commies being Jews, that proves the point of the first post in this thread.

[Anders Lindman]

I think Wikipedia is great. But it would be horrible if Wikipedia was the only source of information on the web. Wikipedia will probably keep its monopoly, as a web encyclopedia, not as the only source of information.

[eternal_spirit]

Common sense should tell you that a genuine attempt to control information would not involve allowing just anyone to edit articles at will. If they wanted to control the inforamtion posted on the site, it would be a lot easier to only allow a select few to write the articles, rather than having to monitor literally THOUSANDS of articles around the clock. Also, false information isn't only edited by the moderators, but by the users (even anonymous ones) most of the time. Repeat: ANYONE can edit the articles.

And there's nothing in your "text" which proves that all wikipedians are jews. You saying so isn't "proof", nor is posting a banal picture of a group of people who you probably assume "look jewish". You're not even using the term "wikipedian" correctly.

...........

Think what you like, I'm sure most people would read the first posts on this thread and realize the score. It's open to editing by the owners and the people who run the site ( they have much more control over ) The Internet is overloaded with their agents and they have most of the media etc to back them up.

Certainly some common Jewish names on the list.

[eternal_spirit]

From Wiki.......Kolyma ( Gulag camp ) with 4 million exterminated prisoners has by far the highest death toll out of all extermination sites in history (Auschwitz (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auschwitz) only 1.5 milion).

In all, perhaps more than 18 million people passed through the Gulag, with a further millions being deported and exiled (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_transfer_in_the_Soviet_Union#Timeline) to remote areas of the Soviet Union.[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag#_note-7)[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag#_note-8)

Wonder why it's never mentioned that the Communist Jews put people in camps too before and after the WARS.

[de_shit]

Just read the article they have on Icke.

[damagedbrainn]

...........

Think what you like, I'm sure most people would read the first posts on this thread and realize the score. It's open to editing by the owners and the people who run the site ( they have much more control over ) The Internet is overloaded with their agents and they have most of the media etc to back them up.

Certainly some common Jewish names on the list.

1) Anyone can edit the articles, not just the owners. Most edits are done by the users of the site, many of which remain anonymous. You can skip over there right now and do an edit if you'd like. And if you post something inaccurate, it will be spotted by another user (not an owner) who will edit it. See how it works? It's hardly a tyrannical gestapo.

2) Why do you even assume that James Wales and Larry Sanger are jewish in the first place? You provided absolutely no information or evidence as to why you reached that conclusion. Like I said, you saying so isn't proof.

[eternal_spirit]

Just read the article they have on Icke.
.........

The one about him being in with Nazis, yes I've seen what Wiki say about Icke and it reeks of BS.

[damagedbrainn]

Oh, and I also noticed that you failed link to the article on James Wales, though you managed to do so for Larry Sanger.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Wales#Controversy

Kind of odd how the article on him includes such criticisms, despite the fact that it's supposedly so strictly controlled and biased.

And I'll repeat my question one more time, just in case you attempt to dodge it:
Why do you assume that James Wales and Larry Sanger are jewish?

[damagedbrainn]

.........

The one about him being in with Nazis, yes I've seen what Wiki say about Icke and it reeks of BS.

Again:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_icke#Allegations_of_anti-Semitism

....The article presents both sides of the arguement.

Do you ever bother to look into anything before blabbing about it?

[eternal_spirit]

Oh, and I also noticed that you failed link to the article on James Wales, though you managed to do so for Larry Sanger.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Wales#Controversy

Kind of odd how the article on him includes such criticisms, despite the fact that it's supposedly so strictly controlled and biased.

And I'll repeat my question one more time, just in case you attempt to dodge it:
Why do you assume that James Wales and Larry Sanger are jewish?

.............

What's left to debate......You have the attitude of hear no evil see no evil if they are Jews. I on the other hand have read enough to believe otherwise. We'll never convince each other of the opposite.

[damagedbrainn]

.............

What's left to debate......You have the attitude of hear no evil see no evil if they are Jews. I on the other hand have read enough to believe otherwise. We'll never convince each other of the opposite.

Why do you assume that James Wales and Larry Sanger are jewish?

It's a very simple question that SHOULD have a very simple answer, if there even is one. So answer it please.

[damagedbrainn]

And just so you know (because I suspect that this is another case similar to that whole Michael Alquino-Eliphas Levi thing), neither "Wales" nor "Sanger" are Jewish surnames. Look it up.

Edit:

Fuck it, I know you won't look it up, so here:

http://www.searchforancestors.com/surnames/origin/w/wales.php
http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/qx/sanger-family-crest.htm

[thetonic]

Wikipedia is trash... wiki William Cooper... complete slander

[damagedbrainn]

Wikipedia is trash... wiki William Cooper... complete slander

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_William_Cooper

What's slanderous about it?

[orgo knight]

Good post eternal spirit.
Wickedpedia is useful for trivial or general crap.
But completley biased for anything deeper ;)

[orgo knight]

Wikipedia wins...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cumbria/content/images/2005/11/18/biggest_liar_05_sign_470x353.jpg

[megafish33]

eternal spirit is a jewish sayaminismisticthing and works for the illuminati... don't make me, I got proof, and vodka... its true...

[thetonic]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_William_Cooper

What's slanderous about it?

writes that "Cooper told his lurid and outlandish claim as if it were so self-evidently true that sources or supporting data were irrelevant." (Clark, 1998, 162) In many ways

How is that quote necessary in understanding william cooper?


Many ufologists striving for legitimacy ignored Cooper,

bollocks, Cooper always had massive crowds when talking about ufos..


For the most part, he followed many of the claims of John Lear, specifically, that the

More rubbish, Cooper followed no one , and in fact promptly exposed John Lear for the CIA shill he is..

They obviously trying to paint a not so pretty picture of Cooper... Dont trust Wikipedia .. Kapeesh?

[eternal_spirit]

And just so you know (because I suspect that this is another case similar to that whole Michael Alquino-Eliphas Levi thing), neither "Wales" nor "Sanger" are Jewish surnames. Look it up.

Edit:

Fuck it, I know you won't look it up, so here:

http://www.searchforancestors.com/surnames/origin/w/wales.php
http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/qx/sanger-family-crest.htm

.................
Names like Jeremy Rosenfeld, Benjamin Kovitz, Seth Cohen, dot the landscape of technical staff.
Moderators openly admit to a pro-Jewish bias.

Wales according to the links his name originates from the UK, same as Sanger. Jews do marry gentiles too. But it still doesn't disprove his Jewishness, for want of better words.

[eternal_spirit]

Eliphas Levi, a famous Jewish occult practitioner who lived and wrote many books on the occult in the early to mid 1800s.

[damagedbrainn]

.................
Names like Jeremy Rosenfeld, Benjamin Kovitz, Seth Cohen, dot the landscape of technical staff.
Moderators openly admit to a pro-Jewish bias.

Wales according to the links his name originates from the UK, same as Sanger. Jews do marry gentiles too. But it still doesn't disprove his Jewishness, for want of better words.

That doesn't answer the question at all. So everyone is a Jew until they "disprove" that they are not?

I'll ask again: Why did you assume that James Wales and Larry Sanger were jewish in the FIRST PLACE?

Dodging that question is not helping your case at all.

[damagedbrainn]

Eliphas Levi, a famous Jewish occult practitioner who lived and wrote many books on the occult in the early to mid 1800s.


We've already been through this. Eliphas Levi (real name "Alphonse Louis") was a Catholic, born and raised, from France. If you can prove otherwise, then go for it; though I won't be holding my breath.

[eternal_spirit]

We've already been through this. Eliphas Levi (real name "Alphonse Louis") was a Catholic, born and raised, from France. If you can prove otherwise, then go for it; though I won't be holding my breath.
.................
LOL nice try, depends which version you believe, consider to be true. The Kabbalah one of Levi's passions is used in mind control and plays a fair part in Satanism, which is anti christ. Which fits with the Jews blood sacrafice of Christians. Anton the gay, Aquino and the satanic group the sinagogue ( note the spelling) of satan also fit the anti christ description.
Although I wouldn't totally deny that some Christians are satanists too, which would fit the description of Levi if he was indeed a catholic priest.

[eternal_spirit]

Damagedbrainn if you know so much about the occult etc why not start a thread, instead of defending you're glorious Jews?
I've been piecing together information about the Jewish connections to the NWO, occult, masonry.
If that makes you wan't to say anti semitic then I'm doing a bloody good job. :D

[eternal_spirit]

That doesn't answer the question at all. So everyone is a Jew until they "disprove" that they are not?

I'll ask again: Why did you assume that James Wales and Larry Sanger were jewish in the FIRST PLACE?

Dodging that question is not helping your case at all.
................

The start of the thread says enough about who runs/owns Wiki. And I have answered the questions.

[damagedbrainn]

................

The start of the thread says enough about who runs/owns Wiki. And I have answered the questions.

No, you haven't.

At the start of the thread, you simply stated that Wikipedia was founded by two "jews". You gave no proof whatsoever that either James Wales or Larry Sanger are jewish. I, in fact, gave proof that they most likely are not. In other words, you've got jack-shit to backup your statements.

It's fine though because I already know the answer. Just as you assume that Eliphas Levi must've been a JEW because he's a prominent occult figure (despite the complete lack of evidence for this and all evidence to the contrary); James Wales and Larry Sanger must be JEWS because they created something which ended up becoming popular and widely used. That's your only reason for assuming that they're jewish. That's pretty much the gist of your prejudice, shit-for-brains logic.

[damagedbrainn]

Damagedbrainn if you know so much about the occult etc why not start a thread, instead of defending you're glorious Jews?
I've been piecing together information about the Jewish connections to the NWO, occult, masonry.
If that makes you wan't to say anti semitic then I'm doing a bloody good job. :D

At this point, anyone who cannot see that you are highly prejudice, paranoid, and hateful against Jews is a hopeless moron.

[eternal_spirit]

No, you haven't.

At the start of the thread, you simply stated that Wikipedia was founded by two "jews". You gave no proof whatsoever that either James Wales or Larry Sanger are jewish. I, in fact, gave proof that they most likely are not. In other words, you've got jack-shit to backup your statements.

It's fine though because I already know the answer. Just as you assume that Eliphas Levi must've been a JEW because he's a prominent occult figure (despite the complete lack of evidence for this and all evidence to the contrary); James Wales and Larry Sanger must be JEWS because they created something which ended up becoming popular and widely used. That's your only reason for assuming that they're jewish. That's pretty much the gist of your prejudice, shit-for-brains logic.
............

Should we take a vote on this? Who thinks Wiki is run and owned by Jews? Seems to me you have flawed logic too.

You constantly avoid my questions about satanism and the occult like you have in other threads. You're going to deny the Jewish blood sacrafice of christians too? sinogogue of Satan?

You are pro Jew it's obvious to see, what's the deal with this man? What do you hope to achieve? h wait I think I know you are trying to make me out a Neo nazi, just like you always have done. Or try and debunk solid evidence. LOL

[eternal_spirit]

At this point, anyone who cannot see that you are highly prejudice, paranoid, and hateful against Jews is a hopeless moron.

..............

You are just trying to provoke a reaction. How is it paranoid when these things are happening in reality?

[damagedbrainn]

............

Should we take a vote on this?

Oh, by all means, please do. I'd like to see the results of that myself. Just make sure you word it honestly. Don't ask "Do you think that Wikipedia is run by the Illuminati?" or the "Elite" or whatever. Specifically ask everyone if they believe that Wikipedia is run by Jews.

You constantly avoid my questions about satanism and the occult like you have in other threads. You're going to deny the Jewish blood sacrafice of christians too? sinogogue of Satan?

I've avoid it in THIS THREAD because we've argued about that and it went nowhere. I know you enjoy rehashing the same stupid shit over and over again, but I get sick of it eventually.

You are pro Jew it's obvious to see

So if I'm Pro-Jew, would that make you Anti-Jew?

[eternal_spirit]

Oh, by all means, please do. I'd like to see the results of that myself. Just make sure you word it honestly. Don't ask "Do you think that Wikipedia is run by the Illuminati?" or the "Elite" or whatever. Specifically ask everyone if they believe that Wikipedia is run by Jews.



I've avoid it in THIS THREAD because we've argued about that and it went nowhere. I know you enjoy rehashing the same stupid shit over and over again, but I get sick of it eventually.



So if I'm Pro-Jew, would that make you Anti-Jew?

..................

I answer you're questions, yet you don't answer mine. Then you ask me the same questions I've already answered. There is no pleasing you! Not one other person on this thread has denied the Jew connection to Wikipedia, that should tell you all you need to know!

Anyway going off topic with the other stuff. I'd like to see you start a thread on the Occult or something. Or maybe an anti Christian theme. Then I could call you an anti christ. :rolleyes:

[damagedbrainn]

..................

I answer you're questions, yet you don't answer mine. Then you ask me the same questions I've already answered.

You did NOT answer my questions. You attempted to dodge them by reverting back to an older discussion and going off topic.

There is no pleasing you! Not one other person on this thread has denied the Jew connection to Wikipedia, that should tell you all you need to know!

Because most people on this forum are ethnocentric chickenshits. It's not because they necessarily agree with you, they're just willing to tolerate (ie, ignore and overlook) your anti-semitic bullshit because you're not criticising or defaming (condemning) a group that they belong to. (I swear, if anyone posted a thread claiming that all of this is a WHITE conspiracy, this community would flip the fuck out and it would be in the Rant Room post-haste.) They've found that it's easier to ignore hatred and prejudice rather than confront it.

[megafish33]

Wow... logic does prevail... I thought I was the only one who smelled it, but I guess others do as well.

[eternal_spirit]

Because most people on this forum are ethnocentric chickenshits. It's not because they necessarily agree with you, they're just willing to tolerate (ie, ignore and overlook) your anti-semitic bullshit because you're not criticising or defaming (condemning) a group that they belong to. (I swear, if anyone posted a thread claiming that all of this is a WHITE conspiracy, this community would flip the fuck out and it would be in the Rant Room post-haste.) They've found that it's easier to ignore hatred and prejudice rather than confront it.

..............................

There you go again you can't deny that no one else has disputed the Wiki Jew connection. So you've lost the argument and spin the same spiel about anti semitic content. I've been called racist neo nazi by racists on here many times. And you're just the latest addition to the list who can't/won't accept that some Jews are the worst racists on the Planet!

[lizzy]

I say 'VOTE"....Enternal spirit would have mine.

[eternal_spirit]

I say 'VOTE"....Enternal spirit would have mine.
............

LOL the voice of reason.

[damagedbrainn]

..............................

There you go again you can't deny that no one else has disputed the Wiki Jew connection.

And you can't deny that nobody's explicitly agreed with you that Jews run Wikipedia either. I'm sure some do....the usual suspects.....but I doubt that most would; they'll just ignore it and continuing being polite to you, not because it's right, but because it's easy and it's of no consequence to them. Despite all the talk on here about love, tolerance, and "oneness"; most here only care about themselves and their own little group. You could find this out by asking everyone in the form of a poll, as you suggested you were going to.

So you've lost the argument and spin the same spiel about anti semitic content.

Whether or not I've lost the argument is a matter of perspective and from my own perspective, it seems I won it rather easily by asking one simple question which you obviously could not answer.

I've been called racist neo nazi by racists on here many times.

And you will be called that many times more because that's what you are.

And you're just the latest addition to the list who can't/won't accept that some Jews are the worst racists on the Planet!

So now it's "some jews"? Sorry, but you've gone too far down this path to start backpedaling now.

[eternal_spirit]

And you will be called that many times more because that's what you are.



So now it's "some jews"? Sorry, but you've gone too far down this path to start backpedaling now.
.............

Going to prove it are you? prove the impossible/none reality, the same as you are trying to disprove the truth in the first posts on this thread?
Like to say that to my two dead grandfathers if they where still alive who fought against the Germans in the war?

[damagedbrainn]

.............

Going to prove it are you? prove the impossible/none reality, the same as you are trying to disprove the truth in the first posts on this thread?
Like to say that to my two dead grandfathers if they where still alive who fought against the Germans in the war?

You're jumping all over the place to avoid providing anything which might resemble a real argument.

Let's get back on track here:

The point of your post rests entirely on your statement that the founders of Wikipedia, James Wales and Larry Sanger, are jewish. Forget Eliphas Levi, or the other members of this forum, or your dead grandfathers, or anything else.

Do you have any proof to back up your statement that James Wales and Larry Sanger are Jewish? What are your reasons for making that assumption?

That is a very important question since it makes up the core of your argument.

And are you going to ask everyone if they agree with your conclusions, or were you just talking shit?

[eternal_spirit]

I've said my bit you are just repeating the same old spiel. I warned you before no more calling me false names. You obviously think you are better than me and think I'm a nazi. Why the fuck should I discuss any further with you?

You going to disprove the Wiki Jewish connection? NO because you can't can you? You'll deny the facts presented in the first posts. Not because your stupid, it's because you enjoy labeling me.

If you feel so strongly about being pro Jew go join one of their forums I'm sure there are many or go debate with someone who is a known proven neo nazi and take it up with them.

[eternal_spirit]

You're jumping all over the place to avoid providing anything which might resemble a real argument.

Let's get back on track here:


And are you going to ask everyone if they agree with your conclusions, or were you just talking shit?
..............

No it's just to prove the point, that if anyone disagreed with the Jew Wiki connection they would have to deny the facts presented, and you're the only one who is denying this connection STILL! It's not for the others to disagree to gain points and keep quiet as you may think. They'd voice an opinion if they wanted too. What have hey got to lose or gain, Fuck all as far as I'm aware.

[damagedbrainn]

I've said my bit you are just repeating the same old spiel. I warned you before no more calling me false names. You obviously think you are better than me and think I'm a nazi. Why the fuck should I discuss any further with you?

You going to disprove the Wiki Jewish connection? NO because you can't can you? You'll deny the facts presented in the first posts. Not because your stupid, it's because you enjoy labeling me.

If you feel so strongly about being pro Jew go join one of their forums I'm sure there are many or go debate with someone who is a known proven neo nazi and take it up with them.

blah blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah

Anyway, what happened to your signature? You know, the one that quoted Nikola Tesla which said "Never trust a jew"? Why did you remove it?

[eternal_spirit]

blah blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah

Anyway, what happened to your signature? You know, the one that quoted Nikola Tesla which said "Never trust a jew"? Why did you remove it?
.................

Because Tesla's work and ideas where stolen from him and he got bad treatment allegedly by some bad Jews. And I removed it because I need to blame someone else other than Jews ( some guilt on my behalf) I had a better one than that if you must know.
I'll tell you anyway.

If you are labeled anti semitic you're getting to close to the truth!

If you're not labeled anti semitic you're either a collaborator or a coward.

oops almost forgot the conclusion some may have after reading such a sig ...but some may call you anti semitic anyway

[carlg1212]

I believe it's true Wiki is run, controlled by Jews who edit what's posted, to put an obvious biased view on what ever they decide they need to. It's blatant propaganda for so many different topics. I'm utterly disgusted, but then again not all that surprised.

It's not Jews, it's SOME Jews.

To use your logic, because the Illuminati is made mostly of men, men are evil (ladies, no comment please).

[damagedbrainn]

.................

Because Tesla's work and ideas where stolen from him and he got bad treatment allegedly by some bad Jews. I had a better one than that if you must know.
I'll tell you anyway.

If you are labeled anti semitic you're getting to close to the truth!

If you're not labeled anti semitic you're either a collaborator or a coward.

I didn't ask you why Nikola Tesla said that. I asked you why you removed it. Christ, you can never answer a straight question can you?

And it's important that you know: You can also become labeled anti-semitic for hating jews, or believing that jews are evil. Or that they worship Satan. Or that they drink the blood of Goyims as a traditional part of being jewish. Are these things labeled "anti-semitic" because they're too "close to the truth"? No. It's because they're proven lies which only someone who is highly prejudice against Jews could be deluded enough to believe.

[eternal_spirit]

.................

Because Tesla's work and ideas where stolen from him and he got bad treatment allegedly by some bad Jews. And I removed it because I need to blame someone else other than Jews ( some guilt on my behalf) I had a better one than that if you must know.
I'll tell you anyway.

If you are labeled anti semitic you're getting to close to the truth!

If you're not labeled anti semitic you're either a collaborator or a coward.

oops almost forgot the conclusion some may have after reading such a sig ...but some may call you anti semitic anyway

...............

I was editing, adding to my post while you where typing yours, so look read again I've answered the question.

[megafish33]

..............

No it's just to prove the point, that if anyone disagreed with the Jew Wiki connection they would have to deny the facts presented, and you're the only one who is denying this connection STILL!

He's questioning the opinions you provided and presented as factual, and maybe your sources. You still haven't provided an answer to his question. The reason may be because you don't have anything to copy and paste from the various antisemitic sources you frequently look toward. I can make a similar post saying 50cent is Jewish, provide my thesis, and say "there, it's facts now." If someone comes along and asks, ok but prove that 50cent is actually a Jew, I can't just say oh well you're twisting the facts in my first post. Get it? Makes no sense es. Nobody is saying they can't be Jews, but for the longest time there has been propaganda claiming that Jews run the world because fellows x, y, and z, are Jews, and those fellows run "everything." Well lo and behold people looked into it and many of these so called Jews weren't Jewish at all, not even by religious conversion, let alone by their family trees.

[eternal_spirit]

And it's important that you know: You can also become labeled anti-semitic for hating jews, or believing that jews are evil. Or that they worship Satan. Or that they drink the blood of Goyims as a traditional part of being jewish. Are these things labeled "anti-semitic" because they're too "close to the truth"? No. It's because they're proven lies which only someone who is highly prejudice against Jews could be deluded enough to believe.

........................

So you don't believe in the blood sacrafice. Guess you're one of those people who don't believe satanists do this either or there is anything wrong with what they do? Read the Babylonian Talmud and see who hates who. It's very antichrist which no one can deny unless they have a pro jew agenda like yourself.

Proven lies only to one like you. Many know and believe it to be true. What makes you think it's all lies?

[eternal_spirit]

megafish and damagedone. You can deny all you like me and others believe that Wiki has a pro Jew agenda.


I've said my bit...see you around suckers.

[megafish33]

Guess you're one of those people who don't believe satanists do this either or there is anything wrong with what they do? Read the Babylonian Talmud and see who hates who.

Proven lies only to one like you.

Es, those scriptures you guys readily quote are fake and don't exist. Go pick up a Talmud at your bookstore.

Read here. (http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/index.html)

Read here as well. (http://talmud.faithweb.com/)

It's an ancient text, written in a language you don't speak, yet you still feel the need to take various "quotes" from those websites and post them here to insight antisemitism. Why? I mean, it's all bullshit to me anyway, because it's religious, but why spew the bullshit further, while at the same time twist things that can actually affect Jewish communities? Why?

See you around suckers? Now you're leaving because you feel you're so-called proofs stand? Whatever, I have to run too...

[eternal_spirit]

Es, those scriptures you guys readily quote are fake and don't exist. Go pick up a Talmud at your bookstore.

Read here. (http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/index.html)

Read here as well. (http://talmud.faithweb.com/)

It's an ancient text, written in a language you don't speak, yet you still feel the need to take various "quotes" from those websites and post them here to insight antisemitism. Why? I mean, it's all bullshit to me anyway, because it's religious, but why spew the bullshit further, while at the same time twist things that can actually affect Jewish communities? Why?

See you around suckers? Now you're leaving because you feel you're so-called proofs stand? Whatever, I have to run too...

............

Save it, I've heard it all before, the Jew trying to protest innocence, it doesn't work on me okay! Just accept that some Jews are the most racist people on the planet, I have no problem with the fact that some English people are racist bad people etc. The Talmud is available in English, I've read enough to know how racist it is.

No I've proved my points the Jew wiki connection for the tenth time lol. I'm just tired of the BS on this thread and don't think there is more to add to it.

[gordonfreeman]

A lot of people are not agreeing with each other. This is bad.

[eternal_spirit]

yet you still feel the need to take various "quotes" from those websites and post them here to insight antisemitism. Why? I mean, it's all bullshit to me anyway, because it's religious, but why spew the bullshit further, while at the same time twist things that can actually affect Jewish communities? Why?

.

.................

Well why don't the Jews lay off the Germans ( some seriously flawed flimsy evidence and exaggerations about the holocaust and anti German propaganda) the communist Jews killed millions more in their death camps ( Gulags ) than anyone else has, before and after the war including many Germans and none communist none Jews....but no apology or compensation from the Jews to those that died in the camps, so I'm sick of the Jews hypocrisy and I'm not alone.

[eternal_spirit]

A lot of people are not agreeing with each other. This is bad.

............

This is a typical discussion lol

[megafish33]

............

Save it, I've heard it all before, the Jew trying to protest innocence, it doesn't work on me okay! Just accept that some Jews are the most racist people on the planet, I have no problem with the fact that some English people are racist bad people etc. The Talmud is available in English, I've read enough to know how racist it is.

No I've proved my points the Jew wiki connection for the tenth time lol. I'm just tired of the BS on this thread and don't think there is more to add to it.

1. Who is the Jew protesting innocence? Me? I'm not protesting anything as I'm a separate person to the Wiki people and the Talmud writers(which you brought up).

2. I never once said that there aren't Jews who are racist, I know this from my own experience but I never felt the need to start thread after thread. I know you'd don't have a problem with English people being racist, in fact you probably don't have a problem with anyone being racist, unless they're Jewish. Why are you telling me to accept racist Jews when you have no problem with English or whomever racists?

3. The Talmud, like the motherfucking Bible, is available in English, yes. The Talmud, like the motherfucking Bible, has also been twisted beyond reason. But the Bible, is referred to by all people. The Talmud is strictly a text of Judaism. See how it was singled out even more? It's amazing what a quick reply I got from you when I posted two fucking links for you to read. No no, god forbid you read anything other than your racist websites, "save it, i've heard it all before,"... :rolleyes: Which Talmud have you read? Read the websites I gave you! It has matching Hebrew and Aramaic... now I don't expect you to find a great Aramaic translator, but there are Hebrew ones.

4. You haven't proved nothing, not a damn thing, in court the Judge would laugh at you and kick you out for wasting his time.

Shalom!

[megafish33]

.................

Well why don't the Jews lay off the Germans ( some seriously flawed flimsy evidence and exaggerations about the holocaust and anti German propaganda) the communist Jews killed millions more in their death camps ( Gulags ) than anyone else has, before and after the war including many Germans and none communist none Jews....but no apology or compensation from the Jews to those that died in the camps, so I'm sick of the Jews hypocrisy and I'm not alone.

Holy fuck! Buddy please! This thread is not about any Germans! Start a new one with proofs of murderous communists, and if you can, proof of their Jewish roots.

[damagedbrainn]

Es, those scriptures you guys readily quote are fake and don't exist. Go pick up a Talmud at your bookstore.

Read here. (http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/index.html)

Read here as well. (http://talmud.faithweb.com/)

It's an ancient text, written in a language you don't speak, yet you still feel the need to take various "quotes" from those websites and post them here to insight antisemitism. Why? I mean, it's all bullshit to me anyway, because it's religious, but why spew the bullshit further, while at the same time twist things that can actually affect Jewish communities? Why?

See you around suckers? Now you're leaving because you feel you're so-called proofs stand? Whatever, I have to run too...

Also here:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm

I believe that's the biggest translation of the Talmud available on the internet.

[eternal_spirit]

What's The Real Story?
From all the available information, it appears Wikipedia was started by a two Jewish kids, one a programmer, and the other an 'Adult Site' operator. It's dynamic success (800,000 pages) stems from 10,000 + individual contributors, which are monitored by core sayanims (http://judicial-inc.biz/pyschos/Sayanim.htm).
Wikipedia's claim: ~ 'We are an internet encyclopedia with a neutral stance' ~ is absurd.
This project is an attempt to control student research on the Internet. Any subject Googled will show Wikipedia as one of the first entries. Type in the word Bolshevik (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks), and the first entry is Wikipedia. Explore their version, and you won't be the slightest mention that the movement was a Jewish instigated bloodbath, that was responsible for 20,000,000 deaths.

..............

Look like I've been saying all along ^^^this is from the first page on this thread happy now!

[damagedbrainn]

What's The Real Story?
From all the available information, it appears Wikipedia was started by a two Jewish kids, one a programmer, and the other an 'Adult Site' operator. It's dynamic success (800,000 pages) stems from 10,000 + individual contributors, which are monitored by core sayanims (http://judicial-inc.biz/pyschos/Sayanim.htm).
Wikipedia's claim: ~ 'We are an internet encyclopedia with a neutral stance' ~ is absurd.
This project is an attempt to control student research on the Internet. Any subject Googled will show Wikipedia as one of the first entries. Type in the word Bolshevik (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks), and the first entry is Wikipedia. Explore their version, and you won't be the slightest mention that the movement was a Jewish instigated bloodbath, that was responsible for 20,000,000 deaths.

..............

Look like I've been saying all along ^^^this is from the first page on this thread happy now!



You're quoting yourself to prove that you're right?

[eternal_spirit]

Also here:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm

I believe that's the biggest translation of the Talmud available on the internet.

............

Lol what a fucking joke the first line on the page reads like this...
A search for Talmud at Google will turn up hundreds of thousands of hits, a depressing number of which are to anti-Semitic sites.

[eternal_spirit]

You're quoting yourself to prove that you're right?
.............

I know I'm right and you are wrong. I wouldn't still be here proving it otherwise.

[eternal_spirit]

try this one

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html

Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud

Where a Jew Should Do Evil
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/images/moed_kattan%2017a.JPG
Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis
Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.
O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.
Jews Have Superior Legal Status
Baba Kamma 37b. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full."
Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean..."
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."
Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile.
Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.
Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.
Insults Against Blessed Mary
Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.
Gloats over Christ Dying Young
A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: "Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?--He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old."

[megafish33]

............

Lol what a fucking joke the first line on the page reads like this...
A search for Talmud at Google will turn up hundreds of thousands of hits, a depressing number of which are to anti-Semitic sites.

Why is it a fucking joke? Because it's true? Your sources are the judicial-inc.biz sites, that's the fucking joke! They don't have proofs themselves, so they're not worthy of being quoted! Same deal with those chinese-swastika websites your buddy quoted a while ago! It's bullshit, yet most people will accept it as fact and never look into it. FFS, get some fresh air.

[eternal_spirit]

............

Lol what a fucking joke the first line on the page reads like this...
A search for Talmud at Google will turn up hundreds of thousands of hits, a depressing number of which are to anti-Semitic sites.
.................

I can't imagine going to a site about the Bible or any other religion and having to read something for the first line such as this....You have found the truest version of the Bible on our site. Lucky for you you didn't google and go to one of those anti Christ sites.

[eternal_spirit]

Why is it a fucking joke? Because it's true? Your sources are the judicial-inc.biz sites, that's the fucking joke! They don't have proofs themselves, so they're not worthy of being quoted! Same deal with those chinese-swastika websites your buddy quoted a while ago! It's bullshit, yet most people will accept it as fact and never look into it. FFS, get some fresh air.

.................

judicial contains much truth, unless you are a Zionist or Jew who always deny any wrong doing like it teaches you to lie to other none jews in you're religous books.

There are many sites spouting unproven info about the Holocaust and so called far right groups. People who prove these lies are sued, jailed......

[megafish33]

try this one

[B]http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html



Revisionist history is antisemitic bullshit and half of those quotes passed around don't even exist or are extremely mistranslated.

Actual translation of alleged racism in Talmud by someone who actually reads and speaks Hebrew (http://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/man.html)

Again (http://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/man2.html)

Various accusations false. (http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/short.html)

Intro to what is said about Christians in Talmud... (http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/jesusi.html)

Obviously eating blood isn't Kosher, but if you're still one of the idiots who believes in the blood libel... (http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/blood.html)

Again, more can be found here. (http://talmud.faithweb.com/)

More responses to the complete garbage being posted by by those who take what is originally a bs story, the Talmud, and use it to insight racism against "racist Jews." Found here. (http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/exp.html)

[eternal_spirit]

Same old spiel anything I post you claim comes from anti semitic sources. Fine, I'm through with this topic. We'll never agree.

[eternal_spirit]

I know the score it's the racist Jews who try make out none racists are racist towards Jews. David Icke is a classic example. It will be the same people/groups who tell you to believe anything bad said and written about Jews is a lie. But anything said about the Germans or who ever is on their shit list must be true. If you know who controls the media and creates false scapegoat oppositions by playing agent provacteur then you know the score.

[damagedbrainn]

Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/short.html

If a person is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known, dress in black clothes, cover his head in black, and do what his heart desires so that G-d's name will not be desecrated.

Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.

The proper word is "mock" not "disobeys". What do the Christians say will happen to those who disobey the word of God and the Bible? That they'll be showered with sunshine and lollipops?

Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

http://books.google.com/books?id=WAGK8GiNrQgC&pg=RA1-PA264&lpg=RA1-PA264&dq=sanhedrin+58b&source=web&ots=MDfmKLLtni&sig=b7hdkiLtAB640830lisUWQRD7mk
http://books.google.com/books?id=DcfB3qjRuTMC&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=sanhedrin+58b&source=web&ots=0xdbqhVlJK&sig=9wj67oew_hlWaPe-tbz8t7UtjNA
http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=1445489

if a Gentile observes the Sabbath, he is liable to the death penalty

Whoever strikes the jaw of a FELLOW JEW is as if he struck the jaw of the Shekhinah.

Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.

http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/wages.html
http://www.jtsa.edu/prebuilt/exhib/scrips/01.shtml

"Cuthean" is not a word meaning "Gentile". The Cutheans were residents of Samaria who, though converting to Judaism, retained their previous pagan practices as well, and therefore were accused of "idolatry" by the mainstream Jewish sects. In other words, Cutheans are self-proclaimed Jews who are not accepted by other Jews due to their unorthodox practices.

Baba Kamma 37b. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full."

"Canaanite" is also not a generic term for gentile, but refers to a specific group of people. In Biblical terms, the Canaanites were essentially an Egyptian people who practiced a form of paganism associated with "fertility rites". They weren't Christians. In a historical context (as in, archeological evidence) the Canaanites were most likely just Israelites with a slightly different culture.


Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b).

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/exp.html

Come and listen if he finds a lost article in a place where the majority are Israelites, he must announce [that he found a lost article and return it to its owner]; if the majority are Canaanites he need not announce [that he found a lost article or return it to its previous owner]

Again: "Canaanite" does not mean "gentile."


Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

And again: "Cuthean" does not mean "gentile."

Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."

http://books.google.com/books?id=f17eDnzYfxkC&pg=PA46&lpg=PA46&dq=baba+kamma+37b&source=web&ots=IRKLklhjMD&sig=BFkDxd7wlH_2_goTj-AN22WREFQ#PPA48,M1


Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile.

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:sPXq82kHsOoJ:www.geocities.com/onemansmind/jc/Talmud.html+Baba+Kamma+113a&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=31&gl=us&lr=lang_en
http://books.google.com/books?id=IOqQrPlc9ggC&pg=PA66&lpg=PA66&dq=baba+kamma+113a&source=web&ots=wm_6bwQr7u&sig=y0kccoBItozB3i62NMeb8gIujVc#PPA66,M1

That refers solely to a Jew who has to face a Gentile court which enforces laws beyond the laws of Israel. If the Jew has been determined not to have broken the laws of Israel, then it is considered justified to lie in a Gentile court to avoid being prosecuted under laws which the Jews do not themselves follow. A modern equivalent would be a person from a Western country lying to avoid prosecution in another country with stricter laws. It has nothing to do with how Jews are meant to relate to Gentiles in any other context.


Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.

This passage refers to the children of an Egyptian father and a JEWISH mother. It says nothing about "gentiles". It also says that they are "bastards" because Jewish law prohibited an Egyptian man and a Jewish woman from recieving a Jewish wedding.

Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niddah (wikipeida!)

First of all, "Niddah" does not mean "filth". It's a term referring to menstraution. In traditional Judaism, a woman must perform certain requirements to "purify" herself before she begins to menstrate, and if she fails to do so, she is considered to be in a state of "niddah". So, interpreting what you quoted literally would mean that a gentile girl is in a state of menstraution since birth. Does that make any fuckin' sense? No, it doesn't. The reason a non-jewish woman is considered in a state of "niddah" is because a non-jewish woman, of course, never performs any of the purification rites of Judaism...seeing as how she's not Jewish and all....and therefore remains unclean due to her menstraution. This quote is certainly sexist and mysogynistic, but not racist.

Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.

That's the funniest one. First of all: How can two passages add up to one VERY short sentence? Hmmmm.....
Anyway...This refers to Romans and Greeks and cautions Jews from leaving their cattle unattended near Roman Inns, as they were considered to be havens for prostitution. And it was believed that bestiality was a quite a popular practice in this area (and it most likely was). The passages also warn against leaving a woman unattended for the same reasons.

Insults Against Blessed Mary
Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.

Miriam was a very common name (there are three different Miriams in the New Testament alone), and nowhere in the Bible does it state that Miriam was a hairdresser, nor a descendant of "princes and governors".

[megafish33]

But anything said about the Germans or who ever is on their shit list must be true.

Again, you're trying to change the topic. It was changed once when you opened a can of warms quote those various "talmud" scriptures, despite not proving the Jewish control of something like wiki. Now, again, for the second time you bring up the Germans... nobody accused the Germans. It seems this forum is full of threads on Jews, not Germans! And the majority of these threads are from the same few people who can't get a clue because they're in the mental prison of racism and inequality. Instead of attacking Jews, why not defend Germans? They need to be defended? Apparently they're on some mythical world Zionism and Jewry "shit list" and they're the ones being defamed. Did you know tons of German scientists left Nazi occupied Germany to help the United States? These people are praised! And although dumbass conspiracy theories could easily be made against them, spewing the word Nazi left and right, it's not. Despite the atrocities against the Jews in World War 2, they're still the scapegoat and the problem. You hear about Jewish conspiring, which does exist, but is blown out of proportion, and the word Zionist, which is just a flawed(imho) political movement thrown around like it's the dirtiest word in the English language.

I'm dating a girl can you guess her nationality?

I have no fuckin problem with Germans, and never said I did, but you have a problem with Jews, because of the "facts" you read on the internet.

[damagedbrainn]

.................

I can't imagine going to a site about the Bible or any other religion and having to read something for the first line such as this....You have found the truest version of the Bible on our site. Lucky for you you didn't google and go to one of those anti Christ sites.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/index.htm

[Anders Lindman]

It can be a wise thing to not blindly swallow all the information on Wikipedia. After all, it is some sort of centralized information source. For ordinary information, Wikipedia is excellent, and overall I think it's a very good thing, but yeah, it's probably wise to be a little bit skeptic about it. I will have that in mind the next time I look something up on it.

Another site that could be some form of centralization is Facebook. It is becoming extremely popular. Many, many people, all the way from children to elderly, are joining Facebook at an exponentially growing rate. I'm afraid that the site could foster some kind of hive mind that could be manipulated in a centralized way. I will not touch such sites with a ten foot pole, but maybe I'm just old-fashioned. :D

Other so-called Web 2.0 sites are Digg, YouTube and Flickr among others. These sites I have much less problem with, because they are more transparent and less susceptible to centralized control, but even those can be used for mass manipulation and massive personal information gathering.

[megafish33]

... but even those can be used for mass manipulation and massive personal information gathering.

Yeah I think that's the main reason for most of the social sites. Getting information. Information is a sort of equity in business. If you're selling a store and tell the person buying it that every month six thousand people come and buy three items you're gonna be challenge with a "prove it." You prove it by providing data that is tracked by all the scanned or debited purchases. Online sites can work the same way even if they're not directly selling you anything more than an idea.

[eternal_spirit]

Wow lol you Jews been busy while this goys been away. :D


See the more you lot try and twist and put you're spiel in to the words of the Talmud the more ridiculous it looks and to me it's easier to see the bull. ;)

Heres some more spiel

Examples of this document are available from the following racist and anti-Semitic Web sites: This is what it says about other sites that have the teachings from the Talmud. Below is the claims then the Rabbis or appointed Jews with their response.

CLAIM: Translations: The translators of the Talmud sometimes translate the Hebrew word goyim (Gentiles) under any number of terms such as heathen, Cuthean, Egyptian, idolater etc. But these are actually references to Gentiles (all non-Jews). See for example footnote 5 of the Soncino edition Talmud: Cuthean (Samaritan) was here substituted for the original goy... Christians are sometimes referred to by the code word Min or Minim.

It is the standard disinformation practice of the Pharisees to deny the existence of the following Talmudic scriptures and to claim they are the fabrications of "anti-Semites." This disinformation can only obtain cachet among those too lazy to go to the English-language books of the Talmud and look these passages up for themselves. Hebrew University Professor emeritus Israel Shahak in his monumental 1994 work, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion" (London:Pluto Press), has confirmed the malice and racism contained in Talmud.

RESPONSE
Here we have the bizarre claim of the "Christian Identity" movement that the modern day Jews are "Pharisees" and thus not "true" Jews of the Bible... And Professor Shahak is well-known as a self-hating Jew and for his vitriolic attacks against Judaism. He can hardly be cited as an authoritative source on Jewish belief.
David S. Maddison (maddison@connexus.net.au)

CLAIM (15)
Like the courageous Prof. Shahak, we publish the following educational material in the hope of liberating people, both Jewish and non-Jewish, from the superstitions, hate-mongering and barbarities of Talmud. The implementation of Talmudic philosophy has caused untold suffering throughout history and now in occupied Palestine it is used as a justification for the mass murder of Palestinian civilians.

RESPONSE
Professor Shahak is a self-hating Jew who will go to any lengths to discredit his own religion. Unfortunately, his understanding of his own religion is not valid or authentic and he is certainly not a theologian.

Also, rather than causing "untold suffering", the teachings of the Talmud for much of the basis for the legal system and common law in most civilised societies.
David S. Maddison (maddison@connexus.net.au)

Some Teachings of the Talmud Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.

RESPONSE (1)
Interpreting the verse "Much study is weariness of the flesh" (Eccl 12:12), one Rabbi alone understands that anyone who *mocks* (which is worse than disobeying) the Rabbi's statements would be boiled in excrement. HIS UNDERSTANDING IS REJECTED BY THE TALMUD.
Avraham Hampel

RESPONSE (2)
The correct quote is as follows:

"Whoever [rebelliously] breaches the words [legislative enactments] of the Scribes [early legal authorities who had legislative power] is liable for death [at the hands of Heaven]... whoever mocks the words of the Wise is sentenced to [divine] punishment [in the afterlife] by boiling excrement."

The Written Torah bids Jews to follow legislation enacted by the Sanhedrin (council of sages). This legislation was designed to prevent Jews from violating Written Torah laws and to organize life in a manner befitting a holy people. Rebellion against this legislation was naturally seen in an extremely negative light.

As a result it is no wonder that the Talmud expresses itself in the strongest terms against those who systematically and rebelliously violate the rabbinical enactments promulgated by the ancient Sanhedrin. On the other hand one who violates a Written Torah commandment usually does so not as an act of rebellion but because he has succumbed to a momentary sinful impulse.

Phrases such as 'is liable for death' are used to indicate a negative attitude to a certain form of behavior and refer to a penalty imposed by Heaven and not to punishment inflicted by a religious court. In fact such expressions are not usually meant to be taken literally as implying that Heaven will punish someone with early death for his sin. Some commentators note that any unfortunate occurrence such as sickness or poverty may be seen as implementation of a 'death' penalty by Heaven. Also, the judgment of Heaven may be mitigated by factors such as repentance.

Another example of the use of this type of phrase is found at Shabbat 114a where "R. Yochanan said that every scholar who has filth on his cloak is liable for death", and there are many other similar examples. It is important to emphasize that the such statements are in no way meant to suggest implementation of a death penalty by a human court. (In fact the death penalty was so rare in rabbinic times that the Talmud states that "A Sanhedrin that gives a death penalty once in seven years is called 'destructive'; Rabbi Eliezer ben Azaria said [that the reference is to a Sanhedrin which gives a death sentence] once in seventy years." (Makot 7a).)

Similarly the term 'boiling excrement' is another example of the metaphorical style used by the Talmud to express disapproval of negative behavior (I believe that in ancient times animal excrement was used for industrial purposes and the term may not have quite the same connotation it has nowadays).
Michael Gruda (mgruda@netvision.net.il)


( this one takes the biscuit )
Moed Kattan 17a . If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

RESPONSE (1)
It never talks about a "Jew", and it never refers to him being "tempted". It refers to a stage where a person has already been overcome by his evil inclination, and the only question is whether he will sin publicly, or privately in a place where he is not known. The latter is the lesser of the two evils, as at least he does not become a bad example for others to follow. The Gemarrah explained that someone who acted this way died, and could not be buried near the righteous. Obviously it is not recommending it, just attempting damage control. Very wise, IMHO.
Avraham Hampel

RESPONSE (2)
The correct translation should be: "R. Elayi says: 'if a man sees that the evil urges is overcoming him he should go to a place where no one knows him, dress in black, cover himself in black and do what his heart wills and not desecrate the name of Heaven in public".

The commentators on the page immediately point out that the statement means that in the process of leaving his town, entering a strange place, dressing in black and covering himself in black, a person's evil urge will be broken and he will have no desire to do evil; i.e., he may do as his heart wills since his heart will no longer wish to do evil (several commentators note that this interpretation is stated explicitly in a parallel passage of agada in the Talmud Yerushalmi).

Other commentators point out that the statement does not refer to an evil urge to commit a sin but rather the urge to behave improperly, thereby desecrating G-d's name. When a Torah scholar acts in a manner that is not becoming to one who has studied Torah (for example, when he speaks with undue severity) he desecrates G-d's name because he is expected to conform to a higher standard of behavior. According to these commentators this
passage is directed at these scholars; if they feel the urge to act on the level of the common person they should do so where they are not known as Torah scholars and thus avoid the desecration of G-d's name.
Michael Gruda

CLAIM (20)
Jews are Divine Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.

RESPONSE (1)
Nowhere does it say that Jews are divine. In the opinion of one individual Rabbi, Rabbi Hanina, not the Talmud, a non-Jew who hits a Jew is worthy of death by the Hand of G-d - there is no room whatsoever for a Jew to kill him. That is what is written in Sanhedrin 58b. A Jew who hits a Jew, by comparison, is called wicked and excluded from Jewish communal life until he apologises (eg. can't be counted in a Minyan [Mininum size group of 10 men required for communal prayer.]) which is likewise a form of spiritual death. Therefore there is no discrimination.
[Edited RESPONSE.] Avraham Hampel

RESPONSE (2)
Misquote. The text doesn't say that he must be killed but that he's worthy of death -- an idiomatic phrase referring to death by the hand of god (struck by lightning etc.). That's because by hitting a man (made in the image of God) you are marring the image of God. The same is also said of Jews who simply raise their hand against others, by the way.
Usenet message

behrends@student.uni-kl.de (Reimer Behrends)

RESPONSE (3)
The correct translation is: "R. Chanina says 'an idol worshipper who strikes a Jew is liable for death, as it says .... [a proof text from Exodus 2:12] and if one strikes the jaws of a Jew it is as if he has struck the jaws of the Shechina as it says in Proverbs ... [a proof text from Proverbs 20:25 which is based on a play of words]'".

Commentators explain that the phrase 'liable for death' is not a punishment that is carried out by a human court. It may also be noted that in Jewish thought the term 'death' when referring to a 'death penalty' carried out by Heaven may include sickness or poverty, not necessarily untimely death, and in any event punishment may be mitigated by factors such as repentance. See [CLAIM 16] above where this matter is discussed with reference to another passage.

As far as hitting a Jew: Jews bear G-d's name in this world. One who strikes a Jew because of hatred toward the Jewish people is striking at those who brought G-d's word to all mankind. The term "Shechina" refers to the human perception of G-d's presence in this world, and that perception is one that is intimately related to the existence and well-being of the Jewish people.
Michael Gruda

CLAIM (21)
O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a Gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.

RESPONSE (1)
A Jew must certainly pay a Cuthean the wages owed him for work. But because not paying is not the same as stealing, it is not actionable in a Jewish court. That is what is written in Sanhedrin 57a. Worlds apart from sanctioning robbery (and besides, one would expect the non-Jew to be able to make a claim in a non-Jewish court.)
Avraham Hampel

CLAIM (25)
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a Gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.

RESPONSE (1)
The case under consideration was about whether Jews must be compelled to rescue gentiles

[Anders Lindman]

Yeah I think that's the main reason for most of the social sites. Getting information. Information is a sort of equity in business. If you're selling a store and tell the person buying it that every month six thousand people come and buy three items you're gonna be challenge with a "prove it." You prove it by providing data that is tracked by all the scanned or debited purchases. Online sites can work the same way even if they're not directly selling you anything more than an idea.

In general, social sites are a very good thing I think. They are a leap into a new level of social interconnectedness. I'm leery about the potential hive mind behaviour they can lock people in to. Someone wrote something like: the collective intelligence of a mob is less than that of any of the individuals making up the mob.

I'm also skeptical about too personal targeted advertisement for example. I'm a great fan of relevant and non-disturbing ads, but I would hate it if some system would try to second-guess my wants and needs all the time. We could even coin the term 'stalking ads' for that kind of obtrusive advertisement.

[megafish33]

In general, social sites are a very good thing I think. They are a leap into a new level of social interconnectedness. I'm leery about the potential hive mind behaviour they can lock people in to. Someone wrote something like: the collective intelligence of a mob is less than any of the individuals making up the mob.

Yeah, they're useful for business IMHO.

I agree with the quote.

[eternal_spirit]

Again, you're trying to change the topic. It was changed once when you opened a can of warms quote those various "talmud" scriptures, despite not proving the Jewish control of something like wiki. Now, again, for the second time you bring up the Germans... nobody accused the Germans. It seems this forum is full of threads on Jews, not Germans! And the majority of these threads are from the same few people who can't get a clue because they're in the mental prison of racism and inequality. Instead of attacking Jews, why not defend Germans? They need to be defended? Apparently they're on some mythical world Zionism and Jewry "shit list" and they're the ones being defamed. Did you know tons of German scientists left Nazi occupied Germany to help the United States? These people are praised! And although dumbass conspiracy theories could easily be made against them, spewing the word Nazi left and right, it's not. Despite the atrocities against the Jews in World War 2, they're still the scapegoat and the problem. You hear about Jewish conspiring, which does exist, but is blown out of proportion, and the word Zionist, which is just a flawed(imho) political movement thrown around like it's the dirtiest word in the English language.

I'm dating a girl can you guess her nationality?

I have no fuckin problem with Germans, and never said I did, but you have a problem with Jews, because of the "facts" you read on the internet.


.................

LOl are you for real you even believe you're own lies and delusions two of a kind you and damgedbrainn the two jewies? sounds like a comedy act! You're first delusion saying I haven't proved the Jew Wiki connection LOL too fucking funny:rolleyes:

I have been defending German's by putting forward an alternative story of the Holocaust, see the Zionst run Government in Germany likes to lock up, sue, ridicule yad de yad dee yah German's for providing damned good evidence that disputes the official stories. You'll find all this info in the Rant Room! The Russian Commie Jews killed more none commie none Jews just in one death camp than the number of Jews in all the German camps put together. Why don't they make movies, preach and teach that????????????????????????????????????

Well you should be thankful for some of the inventions the Nazi's gave the US, they even stole their intelligence. The atom Bomb was mainly invented by Jews (Oppenheimer or whatever) maybe Nazi's worked on it too... not to to forget old Mrs Ron Hubbard the COS Jeez. Yeah yeah shout racist again yawn zzzz.

[eternal_spirit]

LOl my two stalkers are back. I'll have to set Nickatnoon on to you soon, tag team match. ;)

[megafish33]

LOl my two stalkers are back. I'll have to set Nickatnoon on to you soon, tag team match. ;)

Great, so more "proofs" then?

[megafish33]

You're first delusion saying I haven't proved the Jew Wiki connection LOL too fucking funny:rolleyes:


You have not. Your first delusion, but probably not of today.

[eternal_spirit]

You have not. Your first delusion, but probably not of today.

............

I think you need to make yours a double. Off track again, should really of been said in another thread.....we are going round in circles. Anyway I've had enough of arguing. There are other more important subjects.

[megafish33]

Anyway I've had enough of arguing. There are other more important subjects.

I never consider it a "real" argument in an internet forum anyway. Sorry for swearing up and down, I could have probably been for tactful expressing myself. We disagree on a few things, but maybe we agree on a lot more than we think.

[eternal_spirit]

Okay, I'm through with Jew threads, and will not be posting about this anymore. I realize I've been way OTT. Sorry to cause offence.

[albie]

Examples Of Censorship
In 1967, with Lyndon Johnson's blessing, Israel attacked Egypt in a surprise assault. In an attempt to create a 'False Flag' pointing at Egypt, the Zionists attacked the USS Liberty, killing 44 and wounding 177. The attack failed when three attacking torpedo boats were on their final run, they collided, and their shots missed the ship. The Liberty got an SOS off to the USS Saratoga, and Israel was forced to abort the attack.
Wikipedia's Stance
Their interpretation is the attack was an innocent mistake, the torpedo boats were actually rescue vehicles, which the USS fired on, and innocent Israelis had to defend themselves.

That is clearly ok. You prove the Liberty event was a false flag before you accuse anyone.

You cannot prove it. They had every right to change that.

And you will find that both sides of the argument can be found here...on wiki...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident

[carlg1212]

try this one

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html

Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud

Where a Jew Should Do Evil
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/images/moed_kattan%2017a.JPG
Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis
Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.
O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.
Jews Have Superior Legal Status
Baba Kamma 37b. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full."
Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean..."
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."
Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile.
Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.
Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.
Insults Against Blessed Mary
Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.
Gloats over Christ Dying Young
A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: "Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?--He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old."

You may find this hard to believe or imagine, but religion has been infiltrated: started out with good intentions, then the illuminated ones highjacked it.

The Talmud is designed to make enlightened people think ALL religion is evil.

Most religious texts are designed to create ill-will towards each other.

Because of this, it makes me think real, pure spirituality is something the illuminated ones don't want us to know. They try to side track us, and it works everytime.

[eternal_spirit]

You may find this hard to believe or imagine, but religion has been infiltrated: started out with good intentions, then the illuminated ones highjacked it.

The Talmud is designed to make enlightened people think ALL religion is evil.

Most religious texts are designed to create ill-will towards each other.

Because of this, it makes me think real, pure spirituality is something the illuminated ones don't want us to know. They try to side track us, and it works everytime.

.................

Fair point...I don't follow any religion, but do like to show how sick some of it is, as far as I'm concerned it's not the word of God ( not a good god maybe a demon ) The Elite/Brotherhood may have created religion so it's always been corrupt. Unless you consider some good Alien God or something invented it and it was there to benefit man and later became corrupted.

[woghd]

You have no idea what fascism *is* until you've made an enemy out of one of the "neutral" wiki admins...

Archangel

[damagedbrainn]

You have no idea what fascism *is* until you've made an enemy out of one of the "neutral" wiki admins...

Archangel

HA! Is this a reference to how you've tried at least a few times to make an entry for your Starships-RPG, only to have it repeatedly deleted because it's not as well-known as you keep trying to claim? Or is there even more that I'm missing out on?

[lightgiver]

Cheers for the info,i personally try to source info from different sources and treble check any info i come across,and if it reasons with my common sense that usually confirms it,question everything,that's my motto;)

[dreamweaver]

HA! Is this a reference to how you've tried at least a few times to make an entry for your Starships-RPG, only to have it repeatedly deleted because it's not as well-known as you keep trying to claim? Or is there even more that I'm missing out on?

All right, I confess, it was me. I deleted it and covered up my tracks to make it look like someone else did it. I was asked to do it by the same people who bribed all the chip shops in Bob Jones' town.

[cafetimes1991]

http://tcritic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wikipedia.jpg

[ownoiz]

1) Anyone can edit the articles, not just the owners.

1) TRUE...

But how long does the edit or addition stay there when they dont like what you have to say, even if it is true and you back it up with references...Many have been there and done that...the edits dont last long i can tell you.

Most edits are done by the users of the site, many of which remain anonymous..

YEAH? YOU THINK? Heres an example of what the Australian government are doing:

WikiScanner also identifies employees of another department, Defence, as the most prolific Wikipedia contributors in Australia.....

Defence computers were found to have made more than 5000 edits to Wikipedia entries, including to articles on the "9/11 Truth Movement", the Australian Defence Force Academy and even the Vietnam War-era Pentagon Papers.

Read the full article, Government edits Wikipedia (http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/pms-staff-edited-wikipedia/2007/08/23/1187462441687.html?page=fullpage).

This article just skims the surface...IPs that trace back to Australian Government departments constantly edit wikipedia entries on a wide range of matters ranging from foreign policy to politicians profiles. In most cases ONLY edits that trace back to Australian Government IP adresses are left untouched, many other additions and/or edits are deleted promptly.

You can skip over there right now and do an edit if you'd like. And if you post something inaccurate, it will be spotted by another user (not an owner) who will edit it. See how it works? It's hardly a tyrannical gestapo.

See point one. :p
.