PDA

View Full Version : -2TUFF- Exposes all on George Galloway's Talksport


2tuff
17-02-2007, 01:31 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------

2TUFF EXPOSES ALL ON GEORGE GALLOWAY'S TALKSPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------

MP3
Left click the link below. Now select the middle link highlighted.
http://w11.easy-share.com/884603.html


Today folks I managed to get a couple of minutes air time before once again being censored by George Galloway, Respect MP of Great Britain.

Listen to information on AL GORE JR, TRUE COLORS ASSASSINATION TEAM, BILDERBERG, ROYAL INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

Listen to Galloway quickly censor on the RIIA knowledge.

Notice how Galloway basically admits a Coup D E'tat took place in 2000, yet he then claims the people elect the U.S President not the Royal Institute of International Affairs?!?!?! It seems theres a bit of a hypocrisy going on. You can't say the people voted George W. Bush in 2000 when Gore had 500,000 more votes than Bush. Notice Galloway going quiet in spots as I'm a lot more wise than his usual sheeple guests babbling what the Intelligence agency news tells them like tape recorders. Keep listening to Sky News folks spitting out nonsense to fool you. Remember Sky is controlled by Rupert Murdoch whos a Knight of St Gregory the Great, Roman Catholic & Papal Knight of Malta. Thats an example of the crap people listen to

I had much more to give on that show about Al Gore Jr. Maybe next time

Please check out this thread on my last involvement with Galloway:
Galloway the Censorite
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=20978

Thankyou
Craig Oxley
The Unhived Mind Website (http://s13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/)

2tuff
18-02-2007, 01:06 AM
Now on RAPIDSHARE

MP3

File now only 675KB and 1.39 Minutes.

MP3 FORMAT

[Do not use a Download Manager]

midwich cuckoo
18-02-2007, 01:22 AM
And here's me thinking he was the only politician worthy of listening to!. I thought that when he spoke about Iraq and when he outed Ruth Kelly as a member of Opus Dei.

Mind you that Big Brother nonsense was horrific!.

Mr Galloway... kiss my ring you freak. :p

Thanks 2tuff.

2tuff
18-02-2007, 06:23 AM
So he mentioned Ruth being "Work of God" (Opus Dei) then? He's a very devious cretin my friend knowing how to cover some of his tracks. He's not smart enough for me and he knows it. The Email I sent Galloway challenged him, needless to say he didn't take the offer. I gave him many facts and he knows who he's dealing with. I bet he was dreading my call and he will the next one. Beware of all these so called alternatives and people claiming to tell you the truth etc, most are CONTROLLED opposition but really Oppo-same. Look at Alex Jones with all his Catholic buddies. He just loves Hutton Gibson (another phony anti-NWO not) and his son Mel Gibson BOTH Opus Dei. Martin Sheen linked to the Jesuit Order as I exposed a while ago. Its all a covert Catholic game.

burkinalovefaso
18-02-2007, 12:10 PM
Yeah, Cheers to your bravery ! Keep it up ..

warrior
20-07-2007, 11:06 PM
do you still talk to Galloway?

those links have been deleted

synergy777
22-07-2007, 08:07 PM
good one craig, the opposame angle is spot on. i use alex jones quite a lot in my links, has some great news etc. however one must be weary of the fact that if someone is allowed to operate in the open/confrontational manner alex jones does, its because the elite allow it. look at how he interviewed rothschild about climate change. the jesuit angle/catholic church is always hidden, people dare not speakout against the vatican, when we all know its the seat og power in this world of dark forces. they have shaped the mind of the world ever since saul became paul, after his road to damascus epiphany.we all know its the beast/harlot of revelations, one that is trying to heal its wound, before its last act.

warrior
22-07-2007, 10:38 PM
good one craig, the opposame angle is spot on. i use alex jones quite a lot in my links, has some great news etc. however one must be weary of the fact that if someone is allowed to operate in the open/confrontational manner alex jones does, its because the elite allow it. look at how he interviewed rothschild about climate change. the jesuit angle/catholic church is always hidden, people dare not speakout against the vatican, when we all know its the seat og power in this world of dark forces. they have shaped the mind of the world ever since saul became paul, after his road to damascus epiphany.we all know its the beast/harlot of revelations, one that is trying to heal its wound, before its last act.

Alex Jones isn't in the spotlight even nearly as much as Craig would suggest. Jones has done ALOT to get himself in the limelight, it didn't happen by itself and it wasn't done for him. Jones did appear on one of the major networks to do about a 5 minute interview some time 2 years ago, the story got alot of publicity, was posted and viewed alot on the various websites, but the tv channel dropped the story the next day and the guy who interviewed Jones was moved from his job. It is mostly through his websites and his own efforts that Jones gets publicity, his movies like Terrorstorm. Jones is very vocal. Some people like Craig will lead you to believe Alex Jones has been appearing on mainstream newsmedia regularly for a long time. Much of it sounds like jealousy.
I am not saying Craig isn't correct in what he suggests about Jones being "one of them", but much of what is said about Jones is crap and is ignoring the fact that the guy has done ALOT of publicity, has internet sites, videos and goes out bullhorning, got into Bohemian Grove etc, etc. Craig will try to compare Jones popularity with Phelps and suggests that because Phelps isn't as widely known as Jones that Jones must be one of them, which is an illogical bs arguement to make. It ignores the fact that Jones has done alot to get himself widely known. You don't see Phelps doing even a fraction as much to get publicity, he isn't outside WTC bullhorning people and making movies that are linked on so many "conspiracy" sites. In fact it is even a total bullshit comparison to make. The only time I have seen Phelps on youtube was doing a documentary, that had alot of interesting details but lets be honest, it was very boringly presented and lacked any kind of energy and definitetly was not made with any kind of effort to get alot of attention. Compare that approach with Jones approach, Jones grabs attention.

Phelps website is very different to Jones also, and will be alot less interesting and is presented very differently to others.

Craig has some very good info on his site, but if he took a very different approach then he would probably get alot more registrations.

Craig has also come onto this website to attack David Icke and to pose the question, why go to Icke when you can go to people like Maxwell and Tsarion, etc. He attacks Icke needlessly as he feels some of Ickes work has been inspired by those and others. At the same time almost all Craigs info is direct copy&paste from Eric Phelps. If Craig can't see the hypocrisy of that then he is very deluded, if to follow Craigs own advice then nobody would g to his site for info on the SMOM, they would go direct to Phelps. And anyone who spends time needlessly attacking people will always come across very badly. Craigs site spends far too much time focusing on labeling people like Jones, Icke, Russo and so on Temporal Coadjutors. When relating to journalists it would be far more useful if he was to focus the mainstream media and highlight their corruption. Craigs apporach isn't doing his credibility any favours.

realdeal
28-09-2008, 09:55 PM
Where the U.S President really takes orders from!
LINK (http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=17861)[/QUOTE]

Yes folks my voice sucks and my accent is terrible but alas thats me and nothing I can do about it. I tried but failed FOR NOW! Yes its that same Gallocrap -2tuff

CAN ANYONE TAKE THIS FOOLISH POLITICAN SERIOUSLY?

HERE HE IS ON BIG BROTHER AN ILLUMINATI WORLD PSY-OP

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m202/anunnaki_2006/Gallowaybigbro2.jpg
Acting as a Cat.

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m202/anunnaki_2006/Gallowaybigbro1.jpg
Acting his age and sexual preference again.

AND HE HAS THE CHEEK TO CLAIM I NEED THE WHITE COATS, THE OLDEST TRICK IN THE BOOK TO CENSOR CONSPIRACY TRUTH!!!!

BEWARE, HE ISN'T ON OUR SIDE JUST HIS OWN!! IF HE WAS THEN HE WOULDN'T BE IN THE POSITION HE IS AND WOULD BE LIKE DAVID KELLY HIT BY BRITISH SIS's GROUP 13.

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m202/anunnaki_2006/georgegal.jpg

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m202/anunnaki_2006/castro.jpg

DOESN'T TELL YOU THAT CASTRO IS A:

4TH VOW JESUIT

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m202/anunnaki_2006/ThePrinceandGrandMastermeetstheCuba.jpg
Castro meets one of the world's most powerful shadow men.
The 78th Grandmaster and Prince of the SMOM Andrew Ninian Bertie

I WONDER WHY?

---

BEWARE of FIDEL CASTRO & HUGO CHAVEZ
"ITS KNOWN AS CONTROLLED OPPOSITION"
L I N K (http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=13500)

Yes his Black guest seemed genuinely interested in what I was about to say, you could really sense this. Gallocrap should have let me have my say then people could decide. I guess he felt all his trumping up of Barrack would be shown up for what it was which is FLUFF.

By the way folks guess what George Galloway is?

ROMAN CATHOLIC

Or so he thinks haha, does he submit to TEMPORAL POWER? Will he die for the Pope? Is he from Rome or at least Italy? HES A DREAMING! HES A LIBERAL! HES EXPENDABLE!

OH LOOK WHOS AMONGST THE

GATEKEEPERS

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m202/anunnaki_2006/oxfordprotestDPR_468x343.jpg

IT'S GEORGE GALLOWAY

YET ANOTHER

GATEKEEPER AND SNEAK FOR THE SYSTEM MASQUERADING AS AN OPPOSITION WHEN INFACT HE'S A CENSORING

OPPO-SAME

HYPOCRIT

Protesters delay debate by Holocaust-denier David Irving and BNP leader Nick Griffin at Oxford

Last updated at 01:08am on 27th November 2007
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1770 (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496301&in_page_id=1770)


A group of protesters broke through the security cordon and forced their way into the Oxford Union last night, throwing a planned talk by BNP leader Nick Griffin and controversial historian David Irving into disarray.

After pushing and shoving their way through the doors into the hall at 8.45pm they staged a sit down protest at the debating table.

Scuffles erupted as the protesters tried to get into the building which had been surrounded by tight security ahead of the event.

Earlier, hundreds of noisy protesters surrounded the Oxford Union.

The Oxford Union has been under significant pressure to cancel the freedom of speech event at which the two are guest speakers.

Chanting, waving placards and singing, the crowd that gathered to object to their presence at the debating society was considerably larger than the handful of students inside the Union.

The rally organisers, including Unite Against Fascism and Oxford-based community groups, had hoped at least 1,000 people would turn up in their support. But estimates put the crowd numbers at closer to 500.

Those arriving for the event had to get past heavy security and faced jeers of "shame on you".

The debate was "temporarily postponed" when police moved in to remove the protestors, before it finally started at 10pm, with speakers split into two groups for safety.


It was considered by university authorities to be too dangerous to walk Mr Griffin and Mr Irving across the quadrangle between the main Union building and the debating hall.

Instead Mr Irving spoke alongside broadcaster and author Anne Atkins and Liberal Democrat MP Evan Harris in the debating hall while Mr Griffin was among debaters speaking in the main Union building.

The decision to invite Griffin and Irving, made after a vote among members of the debating society, has outraged equalities watchdog chief Trevor Phillips and prompted a senior Tory MP to resign his life membership of the Union.

Shadow defence minister Julian Lewis said the students should be "ashamed" of themselves.

In a letter to the Union's officers and standing committee, Dr Lewis, MP for New Forest East, said he was resigning his life membership "with great sadness".

In his resignation letter, he said: "Nothing which happens in the debate can possibly offset the boost you are giving to a couple of scoundrels who can put up with anything except being ignored."

The presence of the pair on the list of speakers prompted a series of high profile withdrawals from the platform, including Defence Secretary Des Browne.

Martin McCluskey, president of the Oxford Student Union, said it was "disgraceful" the pair were being given the same platform as past speakers who include Mother Theresa and the Dalai Lama.

Liberal Democrat MP Evan Harris, who is billed to speak at the event, said banning Mr Griffin and Mr Irving would risk turning "bigots into martyrs".

The Oxford Union Debating Society is a separate body from the Oxford University Student's Union and the university. It has said it was important to give people of all views a platform.

Mr Griffin, who was convicted in 1998 for incitement to racial hatred for material denying the Holocaust, has repeatedly insisted the BNP is not a racist group.

Mr Irving has insisted he was not a Holocaust denier - despite spending three years in prison in Austria for the crime.

On Monday, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she "thoroughly deplores" their views.

But Ms Smith, an Oxford graduate, said it was up to the debating society to make its own decision about allowing Irving and Griffin to attend the freedom of speech event.

"They have been exposed and discredited time and again by people vastly more qualified than you in arenas hugely more suited to the task than an undergraduate talking-shop, however venerable."

REMEMBER WHEN I WANTED TO SPEAK ABOUT THE JOINING UP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC INSTITUTE AND ANGLICAN CHURCH AS MENTIONED IN THE TIMES? WHAT HAPPENED? GALLOWAY JUST WOULD NOT LET THEM PUT ME THROUGH. BEFORE I HAD NO PROBLEMS WHATSOEVER INFACT THE CALLS WERE PAID FOR BY THEM. WHAT DOES THIS TELL YOU?

Just received in:

Dear George,

You may be interested in yet another justified attack with the thread
below by Craig Oxley on yourself.

http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MI...showtopic=20978 (http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=20978)

Thankyou

You're confusing me with someone who give a ---------!

GALLOCRAP

Galloway shows disrespect to his party

By James Macintyre
Friday, 25 January 2008
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/polit...rty-773869.html (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/galloway-shows-disrespect-to-his-party-773869.html)


George Galloway is to stand on an "Old Labour" ticket for the London Assembly in another attempt to form a new political force after splitting from Respect, the left-wing coalition that he helped to found.

The maverick MP, who fell out with the anti-war coalition after forming the breakaway group "Respect Renewal" and holding an "alternative conference" last November, is to stand for the elections in May as part of an as-yet-unnamed "progressive list".

The MP for Bethnal Green and Bow has been at the centre of a series of internal splits within Respect, which formed in 2004. He has been opposed by sections of the Socialist Worker Party who – along with critics on the right – accuse him of alliances with "radical Islamists".

The divisions go back to the 2005 general election, when Mr Galloway managed against the odds to defeat the Labour MP Oona King, overturning her 10,000-strong majority to win by 823 votes. The campaign was dogged by claims of dirty tricks. Supporters of Ms King – who backed the Iraq invasion – accused Mr Galloway's supporters of anti-Semitism after some groups highlighted the fact that his opponent was part-Jewish.

There was confusion last night as to whether Mr Galloway was officially still a member of Respect. He claimed that he was, according to a report on the BBC website. But John Rees, the general secretary, emphatically denied Mr Galloway was a member. "He effectively left last November when he held a rival conference," Mr Rees said. "If you stand on a slate against Respect you must be a rival organisation."

Mr Galloway could not be contacted last night.

Respect said it was not informed of Mr Galloway's latest breakaway move.

Asked about the attitude of Respect members towards Mr Galloway, Mr Rees cited the MP's appearance in the television programme Celebrity Big Brother and said: "George wasn't very accountable. [He] wasn't really willing to work collectively with people... There were always disagreements."

Mr Galloway – who was thrown out of Labour in 2003 and originally pledged to leave the Commons at the next election – is said to be planning to contest the redrawn seat of Poplar and Limehouse at the next election, challenging the Transport minister, Jim Fitzpatrick.

Mr Galloway is rarely seen at Westminster. He was thrown out of the Commons for 18 days in July last year during a debate over the decision by the Committee for Standards and Privileges to censure him over the use of taxpayer-funded facilities. Continuing his speech to the media outside, he said: "Being lectured by the current House of Commons on the question of funding political campaigns is like being accused of having bad taste by Donald Trump; [or] like being accused of slouching by the Hunchback of Notre Dame."

Let us know what you think at: independent.co.uk/galloway

REMEMBER WHEN GALLOWAY CENSORED ME COMPLETELY FROM SPEAKING ABOUT BARACK OBAMA? REMEMBER WHEN I MANAGED TO SAY HE WAS LINKED TO BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AND THE MAFIA ETC? THEN GALLOWAY MOCKED ME WITH WHITE COATS ONCE HE'D CUT ME OFF? GUESS WHAT? HERES THE VERY GUY I WAS ABOUT TO MENTION! SCREW YOU GALLOCRAP! YOU'RE EXPOSED YOU SELF CENTERED PION OPPO-SAME!! STUDY OBAMAS HOUSE!! ALL THIS HAPPENED TO ME BACK IN FEBRUARY OF 2007. BIT SLOW WEREN'T YOU GALLOCRAP! HAHA

Obama's Political fundraiser arrested

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:47:32
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=4074...ctionid=3510203 (http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=40744§ionid=3510203)


US officials have arrested an indicted real estate developer and political fundraiser who has made contributions to Obama's campaigns.

His contributions now have subjected the Democratic White House hopeful to criticism from his chief rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The US Attorney's office and FBI Agent Tom Simon confirmed Monday real estate developer and fast food magnate Antoin "Tony" Rezko's arrest at his home in a suburb of Chicago, but would not discuss the reasoning behind the government's bail revocation motion.

Rezko, who according to MSNBC has pleaded not guilty to charges of fraud, attempted extortion and money laundering, was taken into custody after his $2 million (euro1.36 million) bail was revoked.

Obama has since sought to distance himself from Rezko, even as Clinton invoked Rezko's name and his "slum lord business" during a recent debate.

Rezko had long been a fundraiser for Obama who has been accused of no wrongdoing involving Rezko or anyone else.

BY THE WAY GEORGE SEEING AS YOUR A ROMAN CATHOLIC WHAT YOU DOING IN THIS PROTESTANT NATION OF ENGLAND? GET OUT AND LIVE IN THE CATHOLIC HOVELS OF DIRT, MUCK, POVERTY AND SCUM! WE DON'T WANT YOU IN THIS COUNTRY, BLOODY GET TO SCOTLAND AT LEAST!

Galloway: Killing Blair “Morally Justified”
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MI...showtopic=10074 (http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=10074)

Interesting how he can get away with saying such a thing.

realdeal
28-09-2008, 09:57 PM
Bolsheviks were controlled by Jesuits! -Craig

British MP George Galloway Cuts off Caller for Telling the Truth about Jewish NeoCons

Wednesday, September 24, 2008
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/20...y-cuts-off.html (http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/09/british-mp-george-galloway-cuts-off.html)

See Video:

British MP George Galloway Cuts off Caller for Telling the Truth about Jewish Neocons - YouTube

What Galloway did to me on his program was just completely uncalled for because he called me a racist for telling the truth about the Jewish nature of Neoconservatism. He had no right to cut me off and call me a racist when what I said was accurate about the neoconservative movement being a Jewish movement. Send link to others: ************/GallowayCutsOff

Stephen J. Sniegoski is the author of the The Transparent Cabal

"Miliband is merely following in the tradition of former British foreign secretaries who have supported Israel, turned a blind eye to its brutality and surrounded themselves with Arab tyrants who now do not even speak against Israel, let alone dream of reversing its illegal occupation. After all, as a former British foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, designed the scheme to establish the Israeli entity on the land of Palestine, who better then the current British foreign secretary to defend its brutality?" - Niliband defends Israeli brutality

"Most neocons share unwavering support for Israel ... The original neocons were a small group of mostly Jewish liberal intellectuals" - Neocon 101, Some basic questions answered - The Christian Science Monitor

"The fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives--people like Joe Lieberman and the crowd over at Commentary--plumped for this war, and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties: using U.S. military power, U.S. lives and money, to make the world safe for Israel. And then there is the question--made manifest by the no-bid contracts offered U.S. oil companies by the Iraqis--of two oil executives, Bush and Cheney, securing a new source of business for their Texas buddies." - Joe Klein June 24, 2008

"There is a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who unsuccessfully tried to get Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Saddam Hussein in the 1990s, and then successfully helped provide the intellectual rationale for George Bush to do it in 2003. Their motivations involve a confused conflation of what they think are Israel's best interests with those of the United States. They are now leading the charge for war with Iran"

"I am not willing to grant these ideologues the anonymity they seek ... I believe there are a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who are pushing for war with Iran because they believe it is in America's long-term interests and because they believe Israel's existence is at stake. They are wrong and recent history tells us they are dangerous. They are also bullies and I'm not going to be intimidated by them." -When Extremists Attack by Joe Klein

Joe Klein is TIME's political columnist and author of six books, most recently Politics Lost.